AzTrials
AzTrials

Fractures BoneNCT05528432

ANKLE TRAUMA Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Compared to Standard Radiography in the Detection of Fractures

An observational study of Fractures Bone, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre at 1 site in Belgium.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound performed by a lay experimenter compared to standard radiographic imaging (or standard x-ray) in the detection of fractures in patients with closed acute ankle trauma and positive Ottawa ankle rules Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Fractures Bone
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 30 Sep 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Any adult patient presenting to the emergency services of the CHU Saint Pierre

Who may be able to join

  • Any adult patient with acute ankle trauma
  • + one or more criteria of the Ottawa ankle rules :
  • Inability to walk 4 steps immediately after the trauma or in the emergency room,
  • pain at the level of the internal or external malleolus (the distal 6 cm) or the base of the 5th metatarsal bone.

Who cannot join

  • Any patient under the age of 18 years
  • Any patient unable to sign the informed consent
  • Skin lesions contraindicating sonography (e.g. open fracture wound, … )
  • An unstable patient whose inclusion in the study would delay vital treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Laeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin contact

0493481204 ext. 0032

laeticia.frezals@gmail.com

Alain PA Plumacker, Médecin contact

alain.plumacker@stpierre-bru.be

Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
  • FREZALS Laeticia Vaiana

    Brussels, 1000

    Laeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin, 02493481204 ext. 0032, laeticia.frezals@gmail.com

    Alain PA Plumacker, Médecin, alain.plumacker@stpierre-bru.be

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound performed by a lay experimenter compared to standard radiographic imaging (or standard x-ray) in the detection of fractures in patients with closed acute ankle trauma and positive Ottawa ankle rules

Read the detailed description

Selection of patients is according to the criteria detailed below. If the patient is deemed eligible for the study, he will be asked to read and sign the informed consent. Besides standard history taking, physical examination and radiographic imaging, a standardized ultrasound examination of the ankle joint will be performed by a lay experimenter.

Care will be provided by the attending physician and, according to "standard of care", treatment decisions will be based on history taking, physical examination and conventional ankle x-ray series. Sonographic results will not be used for this purpose. All ankle x-ray series will be reviewed by a senior resident radiologist.

Conditions
Fractures Bone
Keywords
Fracture ankle, Fracture foot, Frature metatarsus, Ultrasound, X-ray
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone, Ankle Fractures

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Negative predictive value

    Negative predictive value of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures

    Measured: at inclusion

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Sensitivity

    of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures

    Measured: at inclusion

  2. Specificity

    of ultrasound compared to standard radiography in the detection of long bone fractures

    Measured: at inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Sep 2022
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05528432
Sponsor's protocol ID
CE-21-02-21
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
30 Aug 2022
Last updated
8 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Bozkurt O, Ersel M, Karbek Akarca F, Yalcinli S, Midik S, Kucuk L. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in determining the reduction success of distal radius fractures. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 10;18(3):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.04.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.

    PubMed 30191190
  • Frezals LV, Delafontaine A, Scoubeau H, Sontou R, Moorthamers S, Plumacker A, Plumacker A. Diagnostic value of FAST ankle ultrasound compared to standard radiography for fracture detection in the emergency department by non-radiologist physicians: a monocentric prospective diagnostic cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Feb 14;51(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02772-3.

    PubMed 39953135

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Fractures Bone, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laeticia Vaiana FL Frezals, Médecin (0493481204 ext. 0032, laeticia.frezals@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Negative predictive value (time frame: at inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05528432, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in