Coronary DiseaseASSISTNCT05529459
Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With DES Eluting in Patients With CAD
A study testing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in people with Coronary Disease, run by Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D. at 17 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography-guided anatomic complete revascularization and fractional flow reserve-guided physiologic complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,400 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 13 Mar 2023to 31 Jul 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men or women between the ages of 19and older
- Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI Significant lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Who cannot join
- Coronary lesions resulting in the expected inability to perform FFR (ex, severe tortuosity or extreme angulation of the vessels)
- Chronic total occlusion
- Failed PCI of severe stenotic (diameter stenosis > 90%) or ACS culprit lesions
- Previous PCI within 6 months before the index procedure
- Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
- Cardiogenic shock or hemodynamic instability
Show all 15Show fewer
- Left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%)
- Life expectancy < 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes
- Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure
- A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer
- Patient's pregnant or breast-feeding or child-bearing potential.
- A known intolerance to antiplatelet agents (aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor)
- Hypersensitivity or contraindication to DES material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
17 sites in 1 country
South Korea17 sites, 17 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
Anyang
Kyoung-Ha Park, MD
Yoon Seok Koh, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si
Ha-Wook Park, MD
Ha-Wook Park, MD
- Recruiting
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan
Tae-Hyun Yang, MD
Min Ku Chon, MD
- Recruiting
Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital
Changwon
Jae Seok Bae, MD, baefach@naver.com
Jae Seok Bae, MD
- Recruiting
Chungbuk National University Hospital
Cheongju-si
Sang Min Kim, MD
Sang Min Kim, MD
- Recruiting
Daegu Veterans Hospital
Daegu
Jeong Hwan Cho, MD
Jeong Hwan Cho, MD
- Recruiting
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
Daegu
Hyuck Jun Yoon, MD
Hyuck Jun Yoon, MD
- Recruiting
Gangneung Asan Hospital
Gangneung
Hanbit Park, MD
Hanbit Park, MD
- Recruiting
Wonkwang University Hospital
Iksan
Jae Young Cho, MD
Jae Young Cho, MD
- Recruiting
Kwangju Christian Hospital
Kwangju
Seung Uk Lee, MD
Seung Uk Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital
Pusan
Tae Hyun Yang, MD, yangthmd@naver.com
Tae Hyun Yang, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Bundang CHA Hospital
Seongnam
Se Hun Kang, MD
Se Hun Kang, MD
- Recruiting
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
Seung-Whan Lee, MD, seungwlee@amc.seoul.kr
Seung-Whan Lee, MD
- Recruiting
Korea University Anam Hospital
Seoul
Hyungjun Joo, MD
Hyungjun Joo, MD
- Recruiting
Veterans Hospital Service Medical Center
Seoul
Chang-Hoon Lee, MD, changhoon.lee121@gmail.com
Chang-Hoon Lee, MD
- Not yet recruiting
The Catholic University of Korea, ST. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon
Sung-Ho Her, MD
Sung-Ho Her, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan
mingu chon, MD
mingu chon, MD
About this study
Official title: ASSIST Trial Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With Drug Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
This study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography-guided anatomic complete revascularization and fractional flow reserve-guided physiologic complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter center, open-label, randomized trial to compare QCA-guided versus FFR-guided CR strategies in patients with significant CAD who are undergoing PCI with DES. Patients with symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia are eligible for enrollment if there have stenotic lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50%-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation, and CR is expected to be achievable by PCI. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in the session 4. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either QCA-guided CR or FFR-guided CR group. In the QCA-guided CR group, PCI will be performed if there are lesions with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by QCA during the index procedure (and, if necessary, planned staged procedure). In the FFR-guided CR group, FFR is measured for the target coronary lesions, and then PCI will be performed for the lesions with FFR ≤0.80. Post-PCI FFR measurement is strongly recommended. However, additional procedures are not recommended based on post-PCI FFR value because there is no consensus of the optimal cut-off value to define physiologic CR. In both QCA-guided and FFR-guided PCI groups, imaging guidance during PCI is left at the discretion of the operator. However, routine high pressure post-dilation with noncompliant balloons is recommended to achieve optimal stent expansion with minimal residual stenosis (diameter stenosis < 10% on visual estimation). Patients will be followed clinically at 1, 6, 12 months, and then upto 5 years after the index procedure
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous Coronary InterventionProcedure or surgery
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| quantitative coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention | Experimental | Successful revascularization of all coronary artery lesions or segments ≥2.25 mm* in diameter with ≥50% diameter stenosis by QCA regardless of their functional significance Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
| fractional flow reserve-guided PCI | Active comparator | Successful revascularization of all coronary artery lesions or segments ≥2.25 mm in diameter with evidence of ischemia or hemodynamic significance by FFR ≤ 0.80 regardless of their anatomic severity† Receives: Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants with death
Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death
Measured: 12month
Number of Participants with MI
Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.
Measured: 12month
Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization
Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.
Measured: 12month
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants with death
Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death
Measured: 5years
Number of Participants with MI
Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.
Measured: 5years
Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization
Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.
Measured: 5years
Number of Participants with bleeding
Major or minor bleeding according to definitions from TIMI
Measured: 5years
Number of Participants with rehospitalization
Rehospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome or repeat PCI
Measured: 5years
Self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale by EQ5D
EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group and provides a simple and general questionnaire for use in clinical assessments
Measured: 5years
cost-effectiveness
Procedure-related cost during index procedure
Measured: 5years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2022
- Study start13 Mar 2023
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 2,400 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biotronik Korea Co., Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Seung-Whan Lee, Investigator, Principal investigator, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05529459
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-1298
- Acronym
- ASSIST
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ASSIST Trial Anatomic Versus Physiologic Guidance for Complete Revascularization With Drug Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05529459
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASSIST / 2022-1298
- Conditions
- Coronary Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,400 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Biotronik Korea Co., Ltd
- Study start
- 13 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to compare clinical outcomes between quantitative coronary angiography-guided anatomic complete revascularization and fractional flow reserve-guided physiologic complete revascularization in patients with significant coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multicenter center, open-label, randomized trial to compare QCA-guided versus FFR-guided CR strategies in patients with significant CAD who are undergoing PCI with DES. Patients with symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia are eligible for enrollment if there have stenotic lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50%-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation, and CR is expected to be achievable by PCI. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in the session 4. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either QCA-guided CR or FFR-guided CR group. In the QCA-guided CR group, PCI will be performed if there are lesions with diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by QCA during the index procedure (and, if necessary, planned staged procedure). In the FFR-guided CR group, FFR is measured for the target coronary lesions, and then PCI will be performed for the lesions with FFR ≤0.80. Post-PCI FFR measurement is strongly recommended. However, additional procedures are not recommended based on post-PCI FFR value because there is no consensus of the optimal cut-off value to define physiologic CR. In both QCA-guided and FFR-guided PCI groups, imaging guidance during PCI is left at the discretion of the operator. However, routine high pressure post-dilation with noncompliant balloons is recommended to achieve optimal stent expansion with minimal residual stenosis (diameter stenosis < 10% on visual estimation). Patients will be followed clinically at 1, 6, 12 months, and then upto 5 years after the index procedure
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| quantitative coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention | Experimental | Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary InterventionSuccessful revascularization of all coronary artery lesions or segments ≥2.25 mm* in diameter with ≥50% diameter stenosis by QCA regardless of their functional significance |
| fractional flow reserve-guided PCI | Active comparator | Procedure: Percutaneous Coronary InterventionSuccessful revascularization of all coronary artery lesions or segments ≥2.25 mm in diameter with evidence of ischemia or hemodynamic significance by FFR ≤ 0.80 regardless of their anatomic severity† |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Men or women between the ages of 19and older
- Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI Significant lesions with a diameter stenosis of 50-90% in major epicardial coronary arteries ≥ 2.25 mm in diameter by visual estimation.
- The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Coronary lesions resulting in the expected inability to perform FFR (ex, severe tortuosity or extreme angulation of the vessels)
- Chronic total occlusion
- Failed PCI of severe stenotic (diameter stenosis > 90%) or ACS culprit lesions
- Previous PCI within 6 months before the index procedure
- Previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPercutaneous Coronary Intervention | Procedure or surgery | fractional flow reserve-guided PCI, quantitative coronary angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants with death
Time frame: 12month
Major adverse cardiac events are defined as all-cause death
Number of Participants with MI
Time frame: 12month
Non-fatal myocardial infarction includes both spontaneous MI and periprocedural MI.
Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization
Time frame: 12month
Unplanned repeat revascularization is defined as revascularization of any diseased coronary arteries ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter by QCA due to recurred angina with at least one of the following: (1) positive non-invasive test, (2) positive invasive physiologic test, or (3) presence of diameter stenosis ≥50% by QCA.
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants with death
Time frame: 5years
Number of Participants with MI
Time frame: 5years
Number of Participants with unplanned repeat revascularization
Time frame: 5years
Number of Participants with bleeding
Time frame: 5years
Number of Participants with rehospitalization
Time frame: 5years
Self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale by EQ5D
Time frame: 5years
cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 5years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jan 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Disease
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
BOdygUardian MOnitoriNg for ReCurrencE of AF
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2/3 Study of Participants With Recurrent Pericarditis Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of KPL-387
Pericarditis, Pericarditis Acute
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Seung-Whan Lee, Investigator principal investigator
Asan Medical Center
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in people with Coronary Disease, run by Seung-Whan Lee, M.D., Ph.D. at 17 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jiwon Baek, RN (82230107267, cvcrc22@amc.seoul.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants with death (time frame: 12month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2025.