AzTrials
AzTrials

Weight LossNCT05529758

Virtual Third-Wave Intervention for Internalized Weight Bias Combined With a Weight Loss Program

A study testing Internalized Weight Bias Intervention in people with Weight Loss and Weight Prejudice, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current study aims to test a third-wave based IWB intervention paired with a standard BWLP delivered through video conferencing software. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Weight Loss, Weight Prejudice
What is being tested?
Internalized Weight Bias Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Aug 2022to 15 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Interested in weight loss
  • 18 or older
  • BMI of 25 kg/m2 or greater
  • Higher-than-average levels of IWB
  • Access to internet, along with a web camera and sound, and be able to use video conferencing software and attend weekly online groups, and access to a reliable scale to weigh themselves weekly

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with current use of medication prescribed for weight loss (such as orlistat, sibutramine, or rimonabant)
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • East Carolina University

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27858

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Third-Wave Intervention for Internalized Weight Bias Combined With a Weight Loss Program Using Video Conferencing Software

The current study aims to test a third-wave based IWB intervention paired with a standard BWLP delivered through video conferencing software.

Read the detailed description

Internalized weight bias (IWB), has been shown to impact mental (e.g., depression and anxiety) and physical health (e.g., cardiometabolic functioning), as well as weight loss and weight loss associated behaviors (e.g., interference with exercise and healthy eating). These associated behaviors especially pose a risk for weight regain and disruption of healthy weight loss. Therefore, given the association between IWB and weight loss associated behaviors, as well as the psychological and health risks associated with IWB, it is clear that IWB interventions are also needed independently and in conjunction with behavioral weight loss programs (BWLPs). Interventions using third-wave strategies (such as acceptance commitment therapy; ACT) have begun to show promise in reducing IWB, but have not yet looked at this therapy in conjunction with a BWLP. Finally, there has also been a growing interest in and need for telehealth-based programs and interventions. The COVID19 pandemic demonstrated a clear need for efficacious telehealth programs, and a further benefit is that these programs may reach populations with limited access to resources (i.e., rural populations). Thus, the current study aims to examine a third-wave based IWB intervention paired with a standard BWLP delivered through video conferencing software.

Being tested
Internalized Weight Bias Intervention
Keywords
Behavioral Weight Loss Program
Medical subject headings
Weight Loss, Weight Prejudice

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Internalized Weight Bias InterventionBehavioural

    ACT-based programs and self-compassion have shown promise throughout research for lowering IWB (Berman et al., 2016; Levin et al., 2018; Lillis et al., 2009; Palmeira, Cunha, \& Pinto-Gouveia, 2017; Palmeira, Pinto-Gouveia, \& Cunha, 2017; Forbes et al., 2020). Therefore, using techniques from prior ACT- and self-compassion based programs, a weight bias reduction intervention will be administered. Session topics will include psychoeducation and coping for weight bias and internal weight bias, and these topics will be viewed through a self-compassionate and ACT-based lens (for example, participants may defuse from internal critical thoughts rather than challenge them). Sessions will also cover acceptance, cognitive defusion, mindfulness, committed action, and the dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) DEARMAN skill.

Study groups in NCT05529758
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention GroupExperimentalReceives internalized weight bias intervention along with standard behavioral weight loss program
Receives: Behavioral: Internalized Weight Bias Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weight Change

    Weight Change

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  2. Weight Bias Internalization Scale

    Internalized Weight Bias, which is internalizing weight bias towards oneself, is scored on a scale of 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias internalization.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  3. Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire

    Internalized Weight Bias, which is internalizing weight bias towards oneself, is summed on a scale of 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater weight bias internalization. Includes two subscales of Self-Devaluation (WSSQ-SD) and Fear of Enacted Stigma (WSSQ-FNE), each summed on scale of 6-30.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  4. Revised Morgenstern Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ-M)

    The Revised Morgenstern Physical Activity Questionnaire assesses Physical Activity through 11 items, asking participants specifically about light, moderate, or rigorous exercise, recreational activities, home, volunteer, or work activities, and chores.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  5. Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III)

    The Diet History Questionnaire III assesses Eating Behavior, including various food items/groups (with 124 food items) and frequency and portion of each food item or group.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  6. Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 (TFEQ-18)

    The Three Factor Eating Questionnaire-R18 is an 18-item measure designed to examine eating behavior through three subscales: cognitive restraint, uncontrolled eating and emotional eating using a 4-point Likert scale, using "definitely true" to "definitely false". Higher scores indicate more disordered eating.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Self-Compassion Scale

    The Self-Compassion Scale is a 12-item scale that uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). The scale has six subscales; the first three represent crucial/core components of self-compassion: self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness, and the remaining three serve as counters to these core components, with self-judgement, isolation, and overidentification (becoming wrapped up in negative emotions). The three core components are added together, along with reverse-scored counter components, to create an overall score in which higher scores indicate higher self-compassion.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  2. Brief Stigmatizing Situations Inventory

    The Brief Stigmatizing Situations Inventory is a 10-item scale used to measure experiences of weight stigma, including items such as "Overhearing other people making rude remarks about you in public," on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 9 (daily), and higher scores indicating more situations encountered.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  3. Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items (DASS-21)

    The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale assess depression, stress, anxiety, with score cut off's for...

    • depression: normal: 0-9, mild: 10-12, moderate:13-20, severe: 21-27, and extremely severe: 28-42.
    • anxiety: normal: 0-6, mild: 7-9, moderate: 10-14, severe:15-19, and extremely severe: 20-42.
    • stress: normal: 0-10, mild:11-18, moderate:19-26, severe: 27-34, and extremely severe: 35-42.

    Higher scores equate higher depression, anxiety, and stress.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  4. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

    Self-Esteem will be measured utilizing the 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). The RSES uses a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), which higher scores indicating higher self-esteem.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  5. The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Second Edition (AAQ-II)

    The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire is a 7-item questionnaire that uses a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). Higher scores indicate less psychological flexibility and higher experiential avoidance.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  6. Satisfaction with Therapist and Therapy Scale

    The Satisfaction with Therapist and Therapy Scale assesses satisfaction with therapy and therapist using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Questions regarding treatment will be adapted for the telehealth, BWLP situation (i.e., "I am satisfied with the quality of the therapy I received" will be adapted to "I am satisfied with the quality of the telehealth weight loss treatment I received"). Similarly, questions about the therapist will be changed to "weight loss coach."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  7. Ruminative Response Scale - Short Form

    The Ruminative Response Scale - Short Form includes nine items with two subscales; brooding and reflection. The form utilizes a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always") for various aspects of rumination. Higher scores indicate more rumination.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  8. Universal Measure of Bias (UMB-FAT)

    The Universal Measure of Bias (UMB-FAT) is a 20-item scale that assesses attitudes towards fat, using a 7-point scale with "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." It includes four subscales: negative judgment (dislike towards individuals with overweight or obesity), distance (comfort with individuals with overweight or obesity in social situations), equal rights (assessing the belief that individuals with overweight or obesity deserve legal protection against discrimination) and attraction (the extent to which the participant finds individuals with overweight or obesity to be attractive). Higher scores indicating greater weight bias by the participant.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

  9. The Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale

    The Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale - DSM 5 Version is 22-item a questionnaire designed to assess symptoms of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder per DSM-5 criteria. The questions vary in terms of format, using 6-point Likert ratings from "Not at all" to "Extremely," dichotomous items and asking about frequency of diagnostically relevant behavior over a set period of time (i.e., days per week for over X amount of months)

    Measured: Baseline to Week 10

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2022
  2. Study start15 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion15 May 2023
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05529758
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-001438
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
19 Aug 2022
Last updated
5 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Participant data will be kept confidential.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Internalized Weight Bias Intervention in people with Weight Loss and Weight Prejudice, run by East Carolina University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weight Change (time frame: Baseline to Week 10). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in