AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine DiseasesNCT05533710

Comparison Between Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

A study testing erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Diseases
What is being tested?
erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
28 Aug 2021to Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II.
  • Female sex.
  • Age between 40 to 60 years old.
  • Scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy surgeries.

Who cannot join

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Patients who received long-acting opioids preoperatively.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders and coagulopathy.
  • Infection at the injection site.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Patients with significant cognitive dysfunction.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with diabetic neuropathy.
  • Patients with uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes.
  • Patients with advanced cardiac, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease.
  • Patients with viral hepatitis or HIV.
  • Surgeries which have been complicated or prolonged (more than 150 mins).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Ain Shams University

    Cairo, 11591

    israa ihab, MSc, 01005461696 ext. +2, israa_ihab@med.asu.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Between Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae block versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.

Being tested
erector spinae plane block, transversus abdominis plane block
Keywords
ESPB, TAP
Medical subject headings
Uterine Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • erector spinae plane blockProcedure or surgery

    Patients will receive ESB. In the lateral decubitus, after skin sterilization, ESP block will be performed at the level of T9

  • transversus abdominis plane blockProcedure or surgery

    patients will receive TAP block in supine position after skin sterilization, TAP block will be performed between internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles

Study groups in NCT05533710
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A : erector spinae block.Experimentalpatients will receive bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae block.
Receives: Procedure: erector spinae plane block
Group B : transversus abdominis plane block.Experimentalpatients will receive bilateral ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane block.
Receives: Procedure: transversus abdominis plane block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total morphine consumption

    Compare postoperative pain intensity using the total amount of morphine consumption in the first 24 hours after the operation, and the time for first call rescue analgesia

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  2. Visual Analog Scale Score

    Compare postoperative pain intensity using VAS score in the first 24 hours after the operation.The VAS score is a 10-cm line labeled with "worst pain imaginable" on the right border, and "no pain" on the left border (ranging from 0 by indicating no pain to 10 indicating extreme pain).

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  3. The time for first call rescue analgesia

    the time for first call rescue analgesia

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Patient satisfaction

    Measure patient satisfaction by asking the patient if he is satisfied or not "yes or no"

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  2. Recognize the adverse effects

    Recognize the adverse effects

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2022
  2. Study start28 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completionJun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05533710
Sponsor's protocol ID
ainshamsU FAMSU
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
3 Sep 2022
Last updated
9 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block in people with Uterine Diseases, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact israa ihab, MSc (01005461696 ext. +2, israa_ihab@med.asu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total morphine consumption (time frame: 24 hours postoperative). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in