RetrognathismPhase 2/3NCT05536596
Pharmacological Treatment on the Recovery of Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
A Phase 2/3 study testing Orthognathic Surgery, Melatonin 10 MG Oral Tablet and Hydroxycobalamin in people with Retrognathism and Prognathism, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya.
Trial summary
The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible is one of the most used surgical techniques to achieve a harmonious jaw relation in the context of orthognathic surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Retrognathism, Prognathism, Orthognathic Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Orthognathic Surgery, Melatonin 10 MG Oral Tablet and Hydroxycobalamin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2022to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- patients who:
- do not have sufficient information in their clinical records
- cannot be contacted
- do not attend their check-ups (for at least 24 postoperative months in cases with DNS)
- have refused consent to the use of their information for purposes of research.
- already undergoing Orthognathic Surgery
- with systemic conditions prone to alter recovery patterns or serious systemic diseases (decompensated metabolic disorders; neoplasms; osteodysplasias; neuropathies).
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Pharmacological Treatment on the Recovery of Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: a Randomized, Double-blind Trial
The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible is one of the most used surgical techniques to achieve a harmonious jaw relation in the context of orthognathic surgery. Nevertheless, one of its main complications is neurosensory damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, which can cause severe impact in the quality of life on patients who suffer from it permanently. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to provide rigorous scientific evidence of the pharmacological effect of 1) Melatonin, 2) combination uridine triphosphate (UTP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and hydroxycobalamin (UTP/CMP/hydroxycobalamin) and 3) hydroxycobalamin regarding neurosensory disturbances incidence and persistence after BSSO.
Read the detailed description
The study will be done according to the international standards of the Helsinki convention for medical research and approved by the scientific ethics committee of Universidad de los Andes Clinic.
All subjects will give their signed consent to participate of this clinical research.
This clinical randomized trial will be double-blinded as both the patient and the surgeon will not know the treatment used until the experiment is over. The randomization will be done using "random.org" software to assign participants into 4 groups. Groups A, B and C will receive the medication, whereas the Group P will receive a placebo.
- Being tested
- Orthognathic Surgery, Melatonin 10 MG Oral Tablet, Hydroxycobalamin, Centrum
- Keywords
- Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy, Neurosensory Disturbances
- Medical subject headings
- Retrognathia, Prognathism, Sensation Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Orthognathic SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
Prognathism/Retrognathism correction through surgical procedures
Melatonin 10 MG Oral TabletDrug
Group B will receive the pharmacology treatment with 10 mg Melatonin. One capsule orally at night for 60 days.
HydroxycobalaminDrug
Group C will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (vitamin B12). One capsule daily for 60 days.
CentrumDrug
Also called Citoneurone [Cytidine + Hydroxocobalamin, + Uridine]
Groups A will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1.5 mg uridine triphosphate, 2.5 mg cytidine monophosphate and 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (Citoneuron). One capsule orally three times a day for 60 days as suggested by the manufacturer for patients with trauma - compressive peripheral neural disorders.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Citoneurone | Experimental | Groups A will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1.5 mg uridine triphosphate, 2.5 mg cytidine monophosphate and 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (Citoneurone). One capsule orally three times a day for 60 days as suggested by the manufacturer for patients with trauma - compressive peripheral neural disorders. Receives: Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery; Drug: Centrum |
| Melatonin | Experimental | Group B will receive the pharmacology treatment with 10 mg Melatonin. One capsule orally at night for 60 days. Receives: Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery; Drug: Melatonin 10 MG Oral Tablet |
| Hydroxycobalamin | Experimental | Group C will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (vitamin B12). One capsule daily for 60 days. Receives: Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery; Drug: Hydroxycobalamin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | The controls will receive 1 capsule placebo containing 5 mg starch to be taken once daily. Receives: Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: pre-operative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 1 day postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 3 day postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 2 weeks postoperative.
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 1 month postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 2 month postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 6 month postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 12 month postoperative
Neurosensory Activity
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Measured: 18 month postoperative
Secondary outcomes (2)
Subjective Test
Subjective testing using a questionnaire and visual analogue scale. 0 = normal sensation, 10= more severe sensory deficit.
Measured: pre-operative, at day 1 and 3, at week 2, and at month 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 after surgery.
Objetive Test
The Semmes-Weinstein (SW) test of sensitivity to touch/pressure will be used.
Measured: pre-operative, at day 1 and 3, at week 2, and at month 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 after surgery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2022
- Study start30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RetrognathismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The participants will be assigned into 4 groups. Groups A, B and C will receive the medication (Melatonin, Hydroxycobalamin and combination UTP/CMP/hydroxycobalamin), whereas the Group P will receive placebo.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad de los Andes, Chile
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pedro Sole Ventura, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
- Investigators
- Pedro Sole, DMD, OMFS, Principal investigator, Universidad de los Andes, Chile
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05536596
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PISV01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be available due to anonymity and ethical considerations.
Publications
Alolayan AB, Leung YY. Resolution of neurosensory deficit after mandibular orthognathic surgery: A prospective longitudinal study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
PubMed 28318920Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H, Vahatalo K, Tammisalo T, Virtanen A. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Feb;31(1):33-9. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0157.
PubMed 11936397da Costa Senior O, Gemels B, Van der Cruyssen F, Agbaje JO, De Temmerman G, Shaheen E, Lambrichts I, Politis C. Long-term neurosensory disturbances after modified sagittal split osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;58(8):986-991. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
PubMed 32631751Seddon HJ. A Classification of Nerve Injuries. Br Med J. 1942 Aug 29;2(4260):237-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4260.237. No abstract available.
PubMed 20784403Schlund M, Grall P, Ferri J, Nicot R. Effect of modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;60(8):1086-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
PubMed 35606209Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Nov;58(11):1234-9; discussion 1239-40. doi: 10.1053/joms.2000.16621.
PubMed 11078134Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A, Habu M, Kito S, Kodama M, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Seta Y, Tominaga K, Sakoda S, Morimoto Y. Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;49(7):552-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PubMed 21071118van Merkesteyn JP, Zweers A, Corputty JE. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Jun-Jul;35(4-5):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
PubMed 17681774Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A. Neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.009.
PubMed 17719387Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;33(6):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.11.005.
PubMed 15308252
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pharmacological Treatment on the Recovery of Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: a Randomized, Double-blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05536596
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PISV01
- Keywords
- Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy, Neurosensory Disturbances
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad de los Andes, Chile
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible is one of the most used surgical techniques to achieve a harmonious jaw relation in the context of orthognathic surgery. Nevertheless, one of its main complications is neurosensory damage to the inferior alveolar nerve, which can cause severe impact in the quality of life on patients who suffer from it permanently. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to provide rigorous scientific evidence of the pharmacological effect of 1) Melatonin, 2) combination uridine triphosphate (UTP), cytidine monophosphate (CMP), and hydroxycobalamin (UTP/CMP/hydroxycobalamin) and 3) hydroxycobalamin regarding neurosensory disturbances incidence and persistence after BSSO.
Detailed description
The study will be done according to the international standards of the Helsinki convention for medical research and approved by the scientific ethics committee of Universidad de los Andes Clinic.
All subjects will give their signed consent to participate of this clinical research.
This clinical randomized trial will be double-blinded as both the patient and the surgeon will not know the treatment used until the experiment is over. The randomization will be done using "random.org" software to assign participants into 4 groups. Groups A, B and C will receive the medication, whereas the Group P will receive a placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 4
- Model description
- The participants will be assigned into 4 groups. Groups A, B and C will receive the medication (Melatonin, Hydroxycobalamin and combination UTP/CMP/hydroxycobalamin), whereas the Group P will receive placebo.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Citoneurone | Experimental | Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery, Drug: CentrumGroups A will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1.5 mg uridine triphosphate, 2.5 mg cytidine monophosphate and 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (Citoneurone). One capsule orally three times a day for 60 days as suggested by the manufacturer for patients with trauma - compressive peripheral neural disorders. |
| Melatonin | Experimental | Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery, Drug: Melatonin 10 MG Oral TabletGroup B will receive the pharmacology treatment with 10 mg Melatonin. One capsule orally at night for 60 days. |
| Hydroxycobalamin | Experimental | Procedure: Orthognathic Surgery, Drug: HydroxycobalaminGroup C will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (vitamin B12). One capsule daily for 60 days. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Orthognathic SurgeryThe controls will receive 1 capsule placebo containing 5 mg starch to be taken once daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- do not have sufficient information in their clinical records
- cannot be contacted
- do not attend their check-ups (for at least 24 postoperative months in cases with DNS)
- have refused consent to the use of their information for purposes of research.
- already undergoing Orthognathic Surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Orthognathic SurgeryAlso: Bilateral Sagittal Split OsteotomyPrognathism/Retrognathism correction through surgical procedures | Procedure or surgery | Citoneurone, Hydroxycobalamin, Melatonin, Placebo |
| Melatonin 10 MG Oral TabletGroup B will receive the pharmacology treatment with 10 mg Melatonin. One capsule orally at night for 60 days. | Drug | Melatonin |
| HydroxycobalaminGroup C will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (vitamin B12). One capsule daily for 60 days. | Drug | Hydroxycobalamin |
| CentrumAlso: Citoneurone [Cytidine + Hydroxocobalamin, + Uridine]Groups A will receive the pharmacology treatment with 1.5 mg uridine triphosphate, 2.5 mg cytidine monophosphate and 1 mg hydroxycobalamin (Citoneuron). One capsule orally three times a day for 60 days as suggested by the manufacturer for patients with trauma - compressive peripheral neural disorders. | Drug | Citoneurone |
Primary outcome
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: pre-operative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 1 day postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 3 day postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 2 weeks postoperative.
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 1 month postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 2 month postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 6 month postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 12 month postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
Neurosensory Activity
Time frame: 18 month postoperative
Presence or absense of symptoms and signs such as hypoesthesia, pain, anesthesia, numbness, among others
2 secondary outcomes
Subjective Test
Time frame: pre-operative, at day 1 and 3, at week 2, and at month 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 after surgery.
Objetive Test
Time frame: pre-operative, at day 1 and 3, at week 2, and at month 1, 2, 6, 12 and 18 after surgery.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28318920Alolayan AB, Leung YY. Resolution of neurosensory deficit after mandibular orthognathic surgery: A prospective longitudinal study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May;45(5):755-761. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 11936397Teerijoki-Oksa T, Jaaskelainen SK, Forssell K, Forssell H, Vahatalo K, Tammisalo T, Virtanen A. Risk factors of nerve injury during mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Feb;31(1):33-9. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0157.
- Background: PubMed 32631751da Costa Senior O, Gemels B, Van der Cruyssen F, Agbaje JO, De Temmerman G, Shaheen E, Lambrichts I, Politis C. Long-term neurosensory disturbances after modified sagittal split osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;58(8):986-991. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
- Background: PubMed 20784403Seddon HJ. A Classification of Nerve Injuries. Br Med J. 1942 Aug 29;2(4260):237-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4260.237. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 35606209Schlund M, Grall P, Ferri J, Nicot R. Effect of modified bilateral sagittal split osteotomy on inferior alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Oct;60(8):1086-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 11078134Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen K. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Nov;58(11):1234-9; discussion 1239-40. doi: 10.1053/joms.2000.16621.
- Background: PubMed 21071118Yoshioka I, Tanaka T, Khanal A, Habu M, Kito S, Kodama M, Oda M, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Seta Y, Tominaga K, Sakoda S, Morimoto Y. Correlation of mandibular bone quality with neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;49(7):552-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 17681774van Merkesteyn JP, Zweers A, Corputty JE. Neurosensory disturbances one year after bilateral sagittal split mandibular ramus osteotomy performed with separators. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Jun-Jul;35(4-5):222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2007.04.006. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
- Background: PubMed 17719387Colella G, Cannavale R, Vicidomini A, Lanza A. Neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1707-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.009.
- Background: PubMed 15308252Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Neurosensory deficits after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible--influence of soft tissue handling medial to the ascending ramus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;33(6):543-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.11.005.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be available due to anonymity and ethical considerations.
Related trials for Retrognathism
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Craniofacial Anomalies and Developmental Growth Variants
Prognathism, Retrognathism
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Mandibular Overjet in Children With Maxillary Retrognathism
Maxillary Retrognathism, Children
Recruiting
Using Chin Bone Rings for Sinus Lifting and Dental Implants in One Surgery
Maxillary Deficiency, Bone Resorption
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Comparative Evaluation of Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Box and Mini-Wing Genioplasty Techniques
Class II Malocclusion, Dentofacial Deformities
Recruiting
Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite.
Posterior Crossbite, Maxilla; Hypoplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pedro Sole, DMD, OMFS principal investigator
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Orthognathic Surgery, Melatonin 10 MG Oral Tablet and Hydroxycobalamin in people with Retrognathism and Prognathism, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pedro Sole, DMD, OMFS (+56 9 9235 2728, psole@uic.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neurosensory Activity (time frame: pre-operative). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05536596, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2022.