Pregnancy ComplicationsNCT05537480
Correlation of CGM Metrics With OGTT and Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With or Without a High Risk for GDM
A study testing Continuous glucose monitoring device in people with Pregnancy Complications and Diabetes Mellitus, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
the aim of the study is to obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT and to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pregnancy Complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemic Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Continuous glucose monitoring device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 280 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 14 Jan 2022to 1 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant women at high risk for GDM based on GCT results
- Pregnant women at low risk for GDM based on GCT results.
- Had an ultrasound earlier before 12 weeks to confirm gestational age
- Singleton pregnancy
Who cannot join
- Pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes diagnosed during enrollment
- Concomitant disease or condition that may compromise patient safety or the ability to complete study tasks including and not limited to, severe mental illness, a diagnosed or suspected eating disorder or any uncontrolled long-term medical condition at the investigator's discretion
- Known (or suspected) allergy to medical grade adhesives
- Use of hydroxyurea (a known interferent of CGM)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Souraski MC
Tel Aviv, 64239
Liran Hirsh, prof, 97236925633, liranh@tlvmc.gov.il
yariv yogev, prof, 97236977660, yarivy@tlvmc.gov.il
About this study
the aim of the study is to obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT and to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches).
Read the detailed description
Study Objectives
Primary Objective:
- Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches) Secondary Objectives:
- Compare GDM diagnosis using the 1-step and 2-step OGTT
- Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT while comparing reproducibility of the 1-step and 2-step methods
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained concomitant with OGTT correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Determine how dysglycemia evolves over the third trimester in women with or without diagnosed GDM
- Compare hyperglycemia determined with CGM to hyperglycemia determined by SMBG in participants diagnosed with GDM
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women correlate best with the need for pharmacologic management of GDM Study Devices Dexcom G6 Pro CGM systems blinded to participants. Sample Size Observational. Not powered. The total sample size is up to 280 participants. the invastigators anticipate enrollment of 280 participants with up to 50 low risk participants and 230 high risk participants. Risk assessment is based on the glucose challenge test results. This should result in 50-80 participants with GDM out of the 230 high risk participants, and allow for 25% dropout for observation throughout the third trimester in the subset of participants Patient Population Pregnant women undergoing screening for GDM Inclusion Criteria To enroll subjects across the glycemic spectrum.
- Pregnant women at high risk for GDM based on GCT results
- Pregnant women at low risk for GDM based on GCT results.
- Had an ultrasound earlier before 12 weeks to confirm gestational age
- Singleton pregnancy Exclusion Criteria • Pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes diagnosed during enrollment
- Concomitant disease or condition that may compromise patient safety or the ability to complete study tasks including and not limited to, severe mental illness, a diagnosed or suspected eating disorder or any uncontrolled long-term medical condition at the investigator's discretion
- Known (or suspected) allergy to medical grade adhesives
- Use of hydroxyurea (a known interferent of CGM) Study Overview Enrollment will occur at 24-28 weeks of gestation after the GCT. After enrollment, two blinded G6 Pro CGM systems will be placed for a 10-day wear period at the arm. Up to 50 women that passed the GCT (glucose <140 mg/dl) will be enrolled. The other approximately 230 women to be enrolled will have hyperglycemia (≥140 mg/dl) on the GCT. All participants will return 2-7days later for either an OGTT and complete corresponding blood draws (including CBC and HbA1C) and fingerstick samples with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) meter at the fasting and 2-hr timepoints of each OGTT. In order to maintain standartization , Subjects will use freestyle lite glucometerto measure SMBG. be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to begin with either the 75-g OGTT or the 100-g OGTT. The data from the initial OGTT will be blinded to the participants unless significant hyperglycemia is detected (75 g HAPO defined: >105 FPG, >200 2hr-PG and 100g defined: >105 FPG, >240 1hr-PG, >200 2hr-PG, >180 3hr-PG). A second OGTT using the alternate glucose content will be performed 3-6 days later and the data will be blinded to participants and the clinicians. This will allow comparison of the diagnostic tests. A subset of 40 participants will be randomized during the initial randomization (10 from the low risk group and 30 from high risk group) will receive the same glucose content in the second OGTT to determine reproducibility of the OGTT. In other words, 20 participants with an initial 75-g OGTT will receive the 75-g dose again at the second OGTT, and 20 participants with an initial 100-g OGTT will receive the 100-g dose again at their second OGTT.
Following the second OGTT the results of the 100-g OGTT will be unblinded (if it was the initial OGTT performed and will be used for diagnostic and management purposes). For those participants that had repeated 75-g OGTT, the results of the initial blinded OGTT will be used for diagnostic and management purposes (after the second OGTT is performed).
Due to the second OGTT, there will be a ~3-day delay in the diagnosys of GDM. This delay has minimal/non-significat ifluence on pregnancy outcome.
The CGM data will be blinded to the patient and clinician and will only be used for research purposes.
Following the OGTT, all 280 participants will have a new CGM placed and participants will be instructed on inserting a CGM system. They will wear a blinded CGM system for 10 days, approximately every other 10-day period through the third trimester until delivery. After each wear session, devices will be sent back to the clinical staff. Medications used to manage GDM and maternal and neonatal outcome data will be collected.
Study Visits Visit 1/Screening \& Enrollment (day 0): Participants will complete the informed consent process and complete screening to ensure participant meets inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening includes GCT with risk assessment based on threshold of 140 mg/dl. Randomization to the different OGTT groups and to the reprodusibility OGTT will be performed. Two CGM systems will be inserted with display blinded.
Patients will be asked to fill a 24-48 hours diet log prior to the first OGTT, thogh it will no be mandatory for the study.
Visit 2/OGTT 1 (day 2 to 7): Study staff will confirm the CGM systems are collecting data. If not, replacement systems will be inserted. Participants will complete either the 75-g or 100-g OGTT and the corresponding blood draws (including CBC and HbA1C). In addition (if possible), fingerstick samples should be obtained with self-monitoed blood glucose (SMBG) at the fasting and 2-hr timepoints of each OGTT. Results will not be provided to the participant but will be reviewed by study staff to confirm there is no overt hyperglycemia requiring unblinding and management of GDM or overt diabetes.
Visit 3/OGTT 2 (day 4 to 10): Study staff will confirm both CGM systems are collecting data. For the subgroup of participants enrolled in the OGTT comparison study (n≤240), participants will complete an OGTT that is the alternate glucose dose provided at Visit 2/OGTT 1, and complete corresponding blood draws and fingersticks per protocol. For the subgroup of participants enrolled in the reproducibility study (n≤40), participants will complete an OGTT that is the same glucose dose provided at Visit 2/OGTT 1.
Visits 2 and 3 will be performed within 2 weeks, and at least 48 hours between them. The third visit will be attempted to be completed prior to 28+6 weeks.
Visit 4/ unblinding OGTT (Day 10): Data from the 100-g OGTT will be unblinded and used for diagnosis by Carpenter \& Coustan criteria and management. For participants that had both OGTT using 75-g glucose loads, the initial OGTT will be used for GDM diagnostic purposes using the IADPSG criteria.
In case a participant will complete only one OGTT, due to either technical issues or to personal choice/refussal after completing the first OGTT, she will still remain in the studty. The test that was performed will be unblined and will be used for diagnosis as mentioned above.
Following the OGTT, the CGM sensors will be removed and a new CGM sensor will be deployed by all the participants (whether or not they have GDM) and an additional 3-4 sensors and transmitters will be provided for deployment at home at approximately 3 week intervals. This will allow multiple 10 day wear periods to collect blinded glucose data followed by a 10/11 day breaks off of CGM during the third trimester (objectives 5,7, and 8). The breaks from wearing CGM may help study retention. The CGM data will be blinded to participants and their management will otherwise be usual care for patients with or without GDM. After each wear session, participants will mail back the CGM transmitters to the study staff to download the CGM data. The transmitter should be returned withing 10 days after it is removed.
Optional phone visits: (approximately every 3 weeks): For all participants enrolled through the third trimester, the clinical research team may remind the participant to insert a new CGM and may remotely help participants with deployment issues or other CGM issues. After the wear session, participants may mail back CGM system to study staff so that transmitter is received within 2 weeks for removal.
Data collected • Complete CGM information, (including insertion time/place), GCT, OGTT,(including time/place of measurements taken and brand of blood-glucose meter) HbA1c results.
- Maternal information including: age, height, pre-pregnancy weight, gestational weight gain, mode of conception, number of pregnancies, number of prior deliveries, ethnicity, chronic diseases, smoking habits.
- Pregnancy and delivery information: diagnosis of GDM (including use of insulin or oral agents), length of pregnancy, mode of delivery (and indication for intervention), pregnancy complication, delivery compication (3rd/4th lacerations), shoulder dystocia, LGA, PPH, blood products transfusion.
- Fetal outcome indluding: Gender, weight, apgar score, neonatal hypoglycemia , time in NICU, umbilical cord pH.
Analyses • Correlate basic CGM metrics at week 24-28 with GDM diagnosis by the 75 and 100-g OGTT approaches
- Descriptive statistics of CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT in participants diagnosed with GDM compared to those without GDM
- Compare CGM metrics in participants that need pharmacotherapy to those that don't
- Compare diagnosis by each of the OGTT approaches
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT with maternal and fetal outcomes in women with and without diagnosed GDM (ex: Sung J, et al. AM J Perinatol 2015; 32:461-468)
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester with maternal and fetal outcomes in women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT with CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester
- Compare reproducibility of the diagnostic for the 75 and 100-g OGTT
- Compare dysglycemia determined by CGM compares with dysglycemia determined by SMBG in women diagnosed with GDM
- Compare diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of 1-step vs. 2-step and diagnostic CGM vs. 2-step.
- Being tested
- Continuous glucose monitoring device
- Medical subject headings
- Pregnancy Complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous glucose monitoring deviceDevice
Also called CGM, DEXCOM PRO G6
Continuous glucose monitoring device will be worn by participants during several periods.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Normal GCT | Other | Women with GCT <140mg/dl Receives: Device: Continuous glucose monitoring device |
| Abnormal GCT | Other | Women with GCT >=140mg/dl Receives: Device: Continuous glucose monitoring device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches)
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Compare GDM diagnosis using the 1-step and 2-step OGTT
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT while comparing reproducibility of the 1-step and 2-step methods
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained concomitant with OGTT correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Determine how dysglycemia evolves over the third trimester in women with or without diagnosed GDM
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Compare hyperglycemia determined with CGM to hyperglycemia determined by SMBG in participants diagnosed with GDM
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women correlate best with the need for pharmacologic management of GDM
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2022
- Study start14 Jan 2022
- Primary completion1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pregnancy ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eli Sprecher, MD, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
- Investigators
- Liran Hirsh, prof, Principal investigator, Tel Aviv Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537480
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0620-20TLV
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Correlation of CGM Metrics With OGTT and Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women With or Without a High Risk for GDM
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537480
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0620-20TLV
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 280 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterOther government
- Collaborators
- DexCom, Inc.
- Study start
- 14 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
the aim of the study is to obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT and to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches).
Detailed description
Study Objectives
Primary Objective:
- Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches) Secondary Objectives:
- Compare GDM diagnosis using the 1-step and 2-step OGTT
- Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT while comparing reproducibility of the 1-step and 2-step methods
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained concomitant with OGTT correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Determine how dysglycemia evolves over the third trimester in women with or without diagnosed GDM
- Compare hyperglycemia determined with CGM to hyperglycemia determined by SMBG in participants diagnosed with GDM
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women correlate best with the need for pharmacologic management of GDM Study Devices Dexcom G6 Pro CGM systems blinded to participants. Sample Size Observational. Not powered. The total sample size is up to 280 participants. the invastigators anticipate enrollment of 280 participants with up to 50 low risk participants and 230 high risk participants. Risk assessment is based on the glucose challenge test results. This should result in 50-80 participants with GDM out of the 230 high risk participants, and allow for 25% dropout for observation throughout the third trimester in the subset of participants Patient Population Pregnant women undergoing screening for GDM Inclusion Criteria To enroll subjects across the glycemic spectrum.
- Pregnant women at high risk for GDM based on GCT results
- Pregnant women at low risk for GDM based on GCT results.
- Had an ultrasound earlier before 12 weeks to confirm gestational age
- Singleton pregnancy Exclusion Criteria • Pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes diagnosed during enrollment
- Concomitant disease or condition that may compromise patient safety or the ability to complete study tasks including and not limited to, severe mental illness, a diagnosed or suspected eating disorder or any uncontrolled long-term medical condition at the investigator's discretion
- Known (or suspected) allergy to medical grade adhesives
- Use of hydroxyurea (a known interferent of CGM) Study Overview Enrollment will occur at 24-28 weeks of gestation after the GCT. After enrollment, two blinded G6 Pro CGM systems will be placed for a 10-day wear period at the arm. Up to 50 women that passed the GCT (glucose <140 mg/dl) will be enrolled. The other approximately 230 women to be enrolled will have hyperglycemia (≥140 mg/dl) on the GCT. All participants will return 2-7days later for either an OGTT and complete corresponding blood draws (including CBC and HbA1C) and fingerstick samples with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) meter at the fasting and 2-hr timepoints of each OGTT. In order to maintain standartization , Subjects will use freestyle lite glucometerto measure SMBG. be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to begin with either the 75-g OGTT or the 100-g OGTT. The data from the initial OGTT will be blinded to the participants unless significant hyperglycemia is detected (75 g HAPO defined: >105 FPG, >200 2hr-PG and 100g defined: >105 FPG, >240 1hr-PG, >200 2hr-PG, >180 3hr-PG). A second OGTT using the alternate glucose content will be performed 3-6 days later and the data will be blinded to participants and the clinicians. This will allow comparison of the diagnostic tests. A subset of 40 participants will be randomized during the initial randomization (10 from the low risk group and 30 from high risk group) will receive the same glucose content in the second OGTT to determine reproducibility of the OGTT. In other words, 20 participants with an initial 75-g OGTT will receive the 75-g dose again at the second OGTT, and 20 participants with an initial 100-g OGTT will receive the 100-g dose again at their second OGTT.
Following the second OGTT the results of the 100-g OGTT will be unblinded (if it was the initial OGTT performed and will be used for diagnostic and management purposes). For those participants that had repeated 75-g OGTT, the results of the initial blinded OGTT will be used for diagnostic and management purposes (after the second OGTT is performed).
Due to the second OGTT, there will be a ~3-day delay in the diagnosys of GDM. This delay has minimal/non-significat ifluence on pregnancy outcome.
The CGM data will be blinded to the patient and clinician and will only be used for research purposes.
Following the OGTT, all 280 participants will have a new CGM placed and participants will be instructed on inserting a CGM system. They will wear a blinded CGM system for 10 days, approximately every other 10-day period through the third trimester until delivery. After each wear session, devices will be sent back to the clinical staff. Medications used to manage GDM and maternal and neonatal outcome data will be collected.
Study Visits Visit 1/Screening \& Enrollment (day 0): Participants will complete the informed consent process and complete screening to ensure participant meets inclusion and exclusion criteria. Screening includes GCT with risk assessment based on threshold of 140 mg/dl. Randomization to the different OGTT groups and to the reprodusibility OGTT will be performed. Two CGM systems will be inserted with display blinded.
Patients will be asked to fill a 24-48 hours diet log prior to the first OGTT, thogh it will no be mandatory for the study.
Visit 2/OGTT 1 (day 2 to 7): Study staff will confirm the CGM systems are collecting data. If not, replacement systems will be inserted. Participants will complete either the 75-g or 100-g OGTT and the corresponding blood draws (including CBC and HbA1C). In addition (if possible), fingerstick samples should be obtained with self-monitoed blood glucose (SMBG) at the fasting and 2-hr timepoints of each OGTT. Results will not be provided to the participant but will be reviewed by study staff to confirm there is no overt hyperglycemia requiring unblinding and management of GDM or overt diabetes.
Visit 3/OGTT 2 (day 4 to 10): Study staff will confirm both CGM systems are collecting data. For the subgroup of participants enrolled in the OGTT comparison study (n≤240), participants will complete an OGTT that is the alternate glucose dose provided at Visit 2/OGTT 1, and complete corresponding blood draws and fingersticks per protocol. For the subgroup of participants enrolled in the reproducibility study (n≤40), participants will complete an OGTT that is the same glucose dose provided at Visit 2/OGTT 1.
Visits 2 and 3 will be performed within 2 weeks, and at least 48 hours between them. The third visit will be attempted to be completed prior to 28+6 weeks.
Visit 4/ unblinding OGTT (Day 10): Data from the 100-g OGTT will be unblinded and used for diagnosis by Carpenter \& Coustan criteria and management. For participants that had both OGTT using 75-g glucose loads, the initial OGTT will be used for GDM diagnostic purposes using the IADPSG criteria.
In case a participant will complete only one OGTT, due to either technical issues or to personal choice/refussal after completing the first OGTT, she will still remain in the studty. The test that was performed will be unblined and will be used for diagnosis as mentioned above.
Following the OGTT, the CGM sensors will be removed and a new CGM sensor will be deployed by all the participants (whether or not they have GDM) and an additional 3-4 sensors and transmitters will be provided for deployment at home at approximately 3 week intervals. This will allow multiple 10 day wear periods to collect blinded glucose data followed by a 10/11 day breaks off of CGM during the third trimester (objectives 5,7, and 8). The breaks from wearing CGM may help study retention. The CGM data will be blinded to participants and their management will otherwise be usual care for patients with or without GDM. After each wear session, participants will mail back the CGM transmitters to the study staff to download the CGM data. The transmitter should be returned withing 10 days after it is removed.
Optional phone visits: (approximately every 3 weeks): For all participants enrolled through the third trimester, the clinical research team may remind the participant to insert a new CGM and may remotely help participants with deployment issues or other CGM issues. After the wear session, participants may mail back CGM system to study staff so that transmitter is received within 2 weeks for removal.
Data collected • Complete CGM information, (including insertion time/place), GCT, OGTT,(including time/place of measurements taken and brand of blood-glucose meter) HbA1c results.
- Maternal information including: age, height, pre-pregnancy weight, gestational weight gain, mode of conception, number of pregnancies, number of prior deliveries, ethnicity, chronic diseases, smoking habits.
- Pregnancy and delivery information: diagnosis of GDM (including use of insulin or oral agents), length of pregnancy, mode of delivery (and indication for intervention), pregnancy complication, delivery compication (3rd/4th lacerations), shoulder dystocia, LGA, PPH, blood products transfusion.
- Fetal outcome indluding: Gender, weight, apgar score, neonatal hypoglycemia , time in NICU, umbilical cord pH.
Analyses • Correlate basic CGM metrics at week 24-28 with GDM diagnosis by the 75 and 100-g OGTT approaches
- Descriptive statistics of CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT in participants diagnosed with GDM compared to those without GDM
- Compare CGM metrics in participants that need pharmacotherapy to those that don't
- Compare diagnosis by each of the OGTT approaches
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT with maternal and fetal outcomes in women with and without diagnosed GDM (ex: Sung J, et al. AM J Perinatol 2015; 32:461-468)
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester with maternal and fetal outcomes in women with and without diagnosed GDM
- Correlate CGM metrics obtained at the time of the OGTT with CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester
- Compare reproducibility of the diagnostic for the 75 and 100-g OGTT
- Compare dysglycemia determined by CGM compares with dysglycemia determined by SMBG in women diagnosed with GDM
- Compare diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) of 1-step vs. 2-step and diagnostic CGM vs. 2-step.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Normal GCT | Other | Device: Continuous glucose monitoring deviceWomen with GCT <140mg/dl |
| Abnormal GCT | Other | Device: Continuous glucose monitoring deviceWomen with GCT >=140mg/dl |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant women at high risk for GDM based on GCT results
- Pregnant women at low risk for GDM based on GCT results.
- Had an ultrasound earlier before 12 weeks to confirm gestational age
- Singleton pregnancy
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregestational diabetes or overt diabetes diagnosed during enrollment
- Concomitant disease or condition that may compromise patient safety or the ability to complete study tasks including and not limited to, severe mental illness, a diagnosed or suspected eating disorder or any uncontrolled long-term medical condition at the investigator's discretion
- Known (or suspected) allergy to medical grade adhesives
- Use of hydroxyurea (a known interferent of CGM)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous glucose monitoring deviceAlso: CGM, DEXCOM PRO G6Continuous glucose monitoring device will be worn by participants during several periods. | Device | Abnormal GCT, Normal GCT |
Primary outcome
Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches)
Time frame: 2 years
blood level will be measured of CGM versus self monitoring blood glucose
7 secondary outcomes
Compare GDM diagnosis using the 1-step and 2-step OGTT
Time frame: 2 years
Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT while comparing reproducibility of the 1-step and 2-step methods
Time frame: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained concomitant with OGTT correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
Time frame: 2 years
Determine how dysglycemia evolves over the third trimester in women with or without diagnosed GDM
Time frame: 2 years
Compare hyperglycemia determined with CGM to hyperglycemia determined by SMBG in participants diagnosed with GDM
Time frame: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained during the third trimester correlate best with maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with and without diagnosed GDM
Time frame: 2 years
Determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women correlate best with the need for pharmacologic management of GDM
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pregnancy Complications
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Liran Hirsh, prof principal investigator
Tel Aviv Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous glucose monitoring device in people with Pregnancy Complications and Diabetes Mellitus, run by Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Obtain CGM data concomitant with OGTT to determine what CGM metrics obtained in pregnant women with and without a high risk of GDM correlate best with the diagnostic OGTT (obtained via the 2-step and 1-step approaches) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2022.