Elbow Injuries and DisordersNCT05537636
Physical Therapy on Non-structural Medial Elbow Pain
A study testing Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapy in people with Elbow Injuries and Disorders and Neuritis, Ulnar, run by Timothy Uhl at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is investigating the effect of using a regional interdependence approach of managing non-structural elbow pain with physical therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Elbow Injuries and Disorders, Neuritis, Ulnar, Neuritis, Brachial
- What is being tested?
- Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2022to 30 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient presents with elbow pain that is not exacerbated with resisted wrist flexion, extension, supination, or pronation.
- The patient presents with elbow pain that is not exacerbated with passive wrist flexion or extension.
- The patient presents with three of the four positive cervical radicular signs
- Patient presents with peripheral paresthesia
Who cannot join
- The patient reports a surgical history involving the elbow.
- The patient has an MRI that is positive for structural deficits within the upper extremity.
- The patient self-reports a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or other neurological systemic diseases such as Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular accident, multiple sclerosis, or similar conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Regional Interdepence Physical Therapy Approach on Non-structural Medial Elbow Pain
This study is investigating the effect of using a regional interdependence approach of managing non-structural elbow pain with physical therapy.
Read the detailed description
Potential patients will be referred for physical therapy with elbow nerve pain arising from a non-structural lesion. We believe by addressing spine and trunk posture and mobility we can relieve elbow pain associated with a nerve compression with physical therapy.
Patients will be put on a staged exercise program to regain spinal mobility and strengthen proximal core musculature and scapular musculature. Manual therapy to facilitate mobility will be incorporated. Patients will undergo standard physical therapy by an unblinded therapist until resolution of symptoms.
- Conditions
- Elbow Injuries and Disorders, Neuritis, Ulnar, Neuritis, Brachial, Neuritis; Nerve Root, Neuritis Median Nerve
- Being tested
- Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapy
- Keywords
- Regional Interdependence, Posture, Neural Tension, Physical Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Elbow Injuries, Disease, Ulnar Neuropathies, Brachial Plexus Neuritis, Neuritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapyOther
A licensed Physical Therapist will provide manual therapy to help restore spinal and scapular mobility. In association with this patients will be prescribed home exercises using a phased approach.
Phase 1 to gain mobility of the spine and scapular motor control Phase 2 to gain shoulder mobility to strengthen scapular and spine musculature Phase 3 shoulder strengthening with long lever arms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Interdepence Intervention for the upper quarter | Experimental | Physical therapist will perform interventions to the entire uppper extremity and spine to treat elbow pain. Physical therapy intervention will include manual therapy and soft-tissue massage to the shoulder, cervical, and thoracic spine. Participants will be prescribed specific exercises using a phased approach. Receives: Other: Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Cervical Range of Motion in extension
Inclinometer measurement of cervical extension
Measured: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Change in Focus On Therapeutic Outcome (FOTO) Patient Outcme Score
Patient self-report of perceived level of function. Scores range from 0 = low function, to 100=high function.
Measured: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Change in Lower Trapezius scapular muscle strength
Objectively measure with hand held dynamometer for scapular retraction
Measured: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in Elbow Flexion Range of Motion in Ulnar Nerve Tension position
Goniometric measure using a standard plastic goniometer with patient plased In nerve tension position that bias tension on ulnar nerve. The standard upper limb tension test position described by Magee' Orthopaedic Physical Assessment 7th edition. The angle of elbow flexion that reproduces symptoms will be recorded. Values will range from 0-150 degrees with a higher numbers indicating less symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Change in Elbow Extension Range of Motion in Median Nerve Tension positoin
Goniometric measure using a standard plastic goniometer with patient plased In nerve tension position that bias tension on median nerve. The standard upper limb tension test position described by Magee' Orthopaedic Physical Assessment 7th edition. The angle of elbow extension that reproduces symptoms will be recorded. Values will range from 0-150 degrees with a lower numbers indicating less symptoms.
Measured: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2022
- Study start1 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Aug 2023
- Study completion30 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Elbow Injuries and DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Cohort longitudinal
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Timothy Uhl
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bluegrass Orthopedics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Timothy Uhl, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Tim L Uhl, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537636
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 60696
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2022
- Last updated
- 22 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sueki DG, Cleland JA, Wainner RS. A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):90-102. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000027.
PubMed 24421619Wickstrom BM, Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Non-surgical relief of cervical radiculopathy through reduction of forward head posture and restoration of cervical lordosis: a case report. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1472-1474. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1472. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
PubMed 28878485Day JM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, McCallum M, Foister R, Uhl TL. Outcomes following the conservative management of patients with non-radicular peripheral neuropathic pain. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):192-9; quiz 200. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
PubMed 24685569Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
PubMed 12544957Nee RJ, Jull GA, Vicenzino B, Coppieters MW. The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 May;42(5):413-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3988. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
PubMed 22402638
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Regional Interdepence Physical Therapy Approach on Non-structural Medial Elbow Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05537636
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 60696
- Conditions
- Elbow Injuries and Disorders, Neuritis, Ulnar, Neuritis, Brachial, Neuritis; Nerve Root, Neuritis Median Nerve
- Keywords
- Regional Interdependence, Posture, Neural Tension, Physical Therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Timothy UhlUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bluegrass Orthopedics
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is investigating the effect of using a regional interdependence approach of managing non-structural elbow pain with physical therapy.
Detailed description
Potential patients will be referred for physical therapy with elbow nerve pain arising from a non-structural lesion. We believe by addressing spine and trunk posture and mobility we can relieve elbow pain associated with a nerve compression with physical therapy.
Patients will be put on a staged exercise program to regain spinal mobility and strengthen proximal core musculature and scapular musculature. Manual therapy to facilitate mobility will be incorporated. Patients will undergo standard physical therapy by an unblinded therapist until resolution of symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Cohort longitudinal
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Interdepence Intervention for the upper quarter | Experimental | Other: Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapyPhysical therapist will perform interventions to the entire uppper extremity and spine to treat elbow pain. Physical therapy intervention will include manual therapy and soft-tissue massage to the shoulder, cervical, and thoracic spine. Participants will be prescribed specific exercises using a phased approach. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The patient presents with elbow pain that is not exacerbated with resisted wrist flexion, extension, supination, or pronation.
- The patient presents with elbow pain that is not exacerbated with passive wrist flexion or extension.
- The patient presents with three of the four positive cervical radicular signs
- Patient presents with peripheral paresthesia
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient reports a surgical history involving the elbow.
- The patient has an MRI that is positive for structural deficits within the upper extremity.
- The patient self-reports a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis or other neurological systemic diseases such as Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular accident, multiple sclerosis, or similar conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapyA licensed Physical Therapist will provide manual therapy to help restore spinal and scapular mobility. In association with this patients will be prescribed home exercises using a phased approach. Phase 1 to gain mobility of the spine and scapular motor control Phase 2 to gain shoulder mobility to strengthen scapular and spine musculature Phase 3 shoulder strengthening with long lever arms. | Other | Regional Interdepence Intervention for the upper quarter |
Primary outcome
Change in Cervical Range of Motion in extension
Time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Inclinometer measurement of cervical extension
Change in Focus On Therapeutic Outcome (FOTO) Patient Outcme Score
Time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Patient self-report of perceived level of function. Scores range from 0 = low function, to 100=high function.
Change in Lower Trapezius scapular muscle strength
Time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Objectively measure with hand held dynamometer for scapular retraction
2 secondary outcomes
Change in Elbow Flexion Range of Motion in Ulnar Nerve Tension position
Time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Change in Elbow Extension Range of Motion in Median Nerve Tension positoin
Time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Nov 2023.
- Results publication: PubMed 24421619Sueki DG, Cleland JA, Wainner RS. A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):90-102. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000027.
- Results publication: PubMed 28878485Wickstrom BM, Oakley PA, Harrison DE. Non-surgical relief of cervical radiculopathy through reduction of forward head posture and restoration of cervical lordosis: a case report. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1472-1474. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1472. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
- Results publication: PubMed 24685569Day JM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, McCallum M, Foister R, Uhl TL. Outcomes following the conservative management of patients with non-radicular peripheral neuropathic pain. J Hand Ther. 2014 Jul-Sep;27(3):192-9; quiz 200. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 12544957Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 1;28(1):52-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00014.
- Results publication: PubMed 22402638Nee RJ, Jull GA, Vicenzino B, Coppieters MW. The validity of upper-limb neurodynamic tests for detecting peripheral neuropathic pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 May;42(5):413-24. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3988. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Elbow Injuries and Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
A Comparison of the Effects of Combining ESWT With Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Functional Arm Scale for Throwers (FAST) in Throwing Athletes
Shoulder Injuries and Disorders, Elbow Injuries and Disorders
Recruiting
Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Posterior Cutaneous Nerve of the Forearm Epicondylar Branch Block on Pain and Function in Lateral Epicondylitis (PCNF-BrEpi)
Lateral Epicondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Shockwave for Elbow and Wrist Spasticity in People With Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Spasticity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tim L Uhl, PhD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rehabiltiation using exercise and manual therapy in people with Elbow Injuries and Disorders and Neuritis, Ulnar, run by Timothy Uhl at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Cervical Range of Motion in extension (time frame: Baseline and every 5th visit up to discharge which is estimated to be 3 months on average). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05537636, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2023.