Systemic Lupus ErythematosusNCT05539001
Screening Biomarkers for Severe Lupus Based on Multi-omics Studies
An observational study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and treatment of the disease, we performed RNA sequencing and ATAC(Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin) chromatin open sequencing in lupus patients in the early stage. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- How many people
- 152 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to 30 Jun 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Inpatients in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University School of Medicine were recruited
Inclusion Criteria:All of the following criteria must be met at the same time
- Meet at least 4 of the 11 systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) classification criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1997;
- The age range is 18-60 years;
- Sign the informed consent and be willing to provide blood samples
Exclusion Criteria:Any meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded.
- Have other autoimmune diseases other than SLE: including dermatomyositis/polymyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc., but not including secondary Sjogren's syndrome symptomatic patients.
- Those with organ failure; or those with an estimated survival period of less than 4 weeks;
- Combined with various infections (at least one blood or secretion culture result is positive, or at least one second-generation sequencing detects the pathogen sequence and conforms to clinical manifestations, or is clinically judged by a physician as infection);
- Combined pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing
xuebing Feng, director, 18805195759, zjj18805195759@163.com
About this study
In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and treatment of the disease, we performed RNA sequencing and ATAC(Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin) chromatin open sequencing in lupus patients in the early stage. By comparing with normal controls, other rheumatic immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis), and before and after treatment, dozens of disease-causing genes independently associated with the disease were identified. Based on the previous omics results, this project will analyze its changes in different outcomes of lupus patients, and use machine learning methods to establish an optimal severe prediction model, so as to build an early diagnosis system based on novel biomarkers and reduce all-cause mortality in patients with treatment failure rate. It is expected to produce good social and economic benefits.
Read the detailed description
The results of the previous study found that the gene expression value in the active stage of lupus disease was more than 1.5 times higher on average than in the inactive stage. PASS(Power Analysis and Sample Size) 15.0 software was used for analysis, and the sample size was calculated by t-test between groups. Two-sided α=0.05 test level was used, and the statistical power was 80% (β=0.2). According to the 3-fold difference in sample size between the groups, a total of 60 samples were needed. According to the 20% dropout rate, the total number of cases is 76. In the second stage, the validation set was allocated in a ratio of 1:1, the statistical power was 90% (β=0.1), and other conditions remained unchanged. An additional 76 lupus patients were recruited for model validation. The patients were visited in the 0th, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months, and the error within 7 days was allowed for each time. The contents include the medical history, blood routine testing, urine routine testing, vital organ function testing, and BLIAG(British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index)evaluation. If any patients died, the time and cause of death were recorded.
The effect evaluation index mainly include the following four aspects: (1) Epidemiological questionnaire: face-to-face inquiries by uniformly trained health professionals, mainly including the socio-demographic information of the research subjects (including gender, date of birth, marital status, education level, occupation, income level, height and weight, etc.), environmental exposure factors (including smoking, alcohol and other drug use, etc.), medical history (hypertension, diabetes, liver and kidney and other important organ diseases) and historical medical information. (2) Clinical features: the clinical manifestations (buccal erythema, skin erythema, rash, oral ulcer, arthritis, digestive, nervous and blood system involvement) of the patients were observed and examined face to face by clinicians in the department of rheumatology. (3) Test items: including general blood routine examination, urine routine (urine protein, urine protein-creatinine ratio, etc.), biochemical indexes (total bilirubin, creatinine, C-reactive protein, etc.) detection, immune routine (complement and immune globulin, etc.) and echocardiography, chest CT and other data. (4) Gene expression detection: According to the previous multi-omics research, screen out the gene sets that are different from normal people and have significant changes before and after treatment (see the research basis for details). The patients' RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA(complementary deoxyribonucleic acid), and the expression levels of related genes at different periods were detected by PCR(Polymerase Chain Reaction) array technology.
The electronic medical record report form is used uniformly for data management. In the early stage, we have established the Jiangsu Provincial Lupus Research Database Entry System to store the data of this study. The data entry and modification shall be completed by the researcher, the data shall be traceable and consistent with the original documents. Any observation and inspection results in the trial should be timely, correct, complete, clear, standardized and true. The data administrator (a member of the team statistics) is responsible for reviewing and managing the entered data. For questions about the data, the data administrator will send corresponding questions to the researcher, and the researcher will respond to the questions sent by the data administrator in time. The data administrator can question again when necessary. All subjects' information will be kept strictly confidential. Research data are also confidential.
SAS(STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM)9.4 and R software were used to process and analyze the data. The cleaning of the dataset mainly includes: a) For covariates with missing values in the dataset, excluding covariates with missing values greater than 30% and using bagging trees to fill in missing values; b) Two variables with a high degree of correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.9), excluding variables with more missing values; c) Excluding variables whose variance is 0 or close to 0, the rough calculation principle is that the frequency of the unique value is too small relative to the whole (10% in this study), and the ratio of the most frequent value to the frequency of the sub-multiple value is greater than 20; d) Box-Cox transformation was performed for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Different algorithms in machine learning are used to select features and construct models, and the prediction ability of different models is compared to obtain the optimal model. In addition to the classical logistic regression method, we also used some common methods to deal with high-dimensional data, such as linear discriminant analysis considering the linear relationship between covariates and outcomes, partial least squares regression, multiple adaptive regression spline method and elasticity network (EN). Considering that many clinical features and outcomes in clinical medicine show nonlinear correlation, we also use k-Nearest neighbors, Adaptive Boosting, support vector machine, random forest and neural network method to build a predictive model. The variance inflation factor is used to judge the collinearity problem. Different indicators are used to reflect the predictive ability of the model from multiple perspectives, and the C statistic is calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of the built model. The comprehensive judgment improvement index is used to judge the improvement of the model after the introduction of new variables. And the decision curve is drawn to find a model that predicts the largest net benefit.
Before the start of the trial, the trial staff explained the informed consent form to each participant participating in the trial in an easy-to-understand manner, and obtained the written informed consent form of the participant voluntarily participating in the trial. It is guaranteed that participants can refuse to participate in this trial or withdraw from this trial at any time during the progress of the trial, and the rights and interests of subjects will not be affected in any way.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| systemic lupus erythematosus group | Based on hospitalization and follow-up data, the enrolled patients were divided into severe group and mild group by BILAG score independently by specialized researchers. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The severity of lupus
Using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) to judge severe lupus
Measured: 12 months after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2022
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- xuebing Feng, director, Study director, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05539001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-LCYJ-MS-04
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Feng X, Pan W, Liu L, Wu M, Ding F, Hu H, Ding X, Wei H, Zou Y, Qian X, Wang M, Wu J, Tao J, Tan J, Da Z, Zhang M, Li J, Sun L; Jiangsu Lupus Collaborative Group. Prognosis for Hospitalized Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China: 5-Year Update of the Jiangsu Cohort. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168619. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 28030595Li Z, Wu X, Leo PJ, De Guzman E, Akkoc N, Breban M, Macfarlane GJ, Mahmoudi M, Marzo-Ortega H, Anderson LK, Wheeler L, Chou CT, Harrison AA, Stebbings S, Jones GT, Bang SY, Wang G, Jamshidi A, Farhadi E, Song J, Lin L, Li M, Wei JC, Martin NG, Wright MJ, Lee M, Wang Y, Zhan J, Zhang JS, Wang X, Jin ZB, Weisman MH, Gensler LS, Ward MM, Rahbar MH, Diekman L, Kim TH, Reveille JD, Wordsworth BP, Xu H, Brown MA; TCRI AS Group. Polygenic Risk Scores have high diagnostic capacity in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Sep;80(9):1168-1174. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219446. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PubMed 34161253Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis JN, Cervera R, Doria A, Gordon C, Govoni M, Houssiau F, Jayne D, Kouloumas M, Kuhn A, Larsen JL, Lerstrom K, Moroni G, Mosca M, Schneider M, Smolen JS, Svenungsson E, Tesar V, Tincani A, Troldborg A, van Vollenhoven R, Wenzel J, Bertsias G, Boumpas DT. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
PubMed 30926722Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, Griffiths B, Khamashta M, Maddison P, McHugh N, Snaith M, Teh LS, Yee CS, Zoma A, Gordon C. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):902-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh624. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
PubMed 15814577Feng X, Zou Y, Pan W, Wang X, Wu M, Zhang M, Tao J, Zhang Y, Tan K, Li J, Chen Z, Ding X, Qian X, Da Z, Wang M, Sun L. Prognostic indicators of hospitalized patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a large retrospective multicenter study in China. J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1289-95. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101088. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
PubMed 21459949Li K, Mo W, Wu L, Wu X, Luo C, Xiao X, Jia X, Yang H, Fei Y, Chen H, Zhang F, Li Y, Zhao L, Zhang X. Novel autoantibodies identified in ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):739-747. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218460. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PubMed 33452006Zhu Y, Tang X, Xu Y, Wu S, Liu W, Geng L, Ma X, Tsao BP, Feng X, Sun L. RNASE2 Mediates Age-Associated B Cell Expansion Through Monocyte Derived IL-10 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 21;13:752189. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.752189. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35265065Chen W, Li W, Zhang Z, Tang X, Wu S, Yao G, Li K, Wang D, Xu Y, Feng R, Duan X, Fan X, Lu L, Chen W, Li C, Sun L. Lipocalin-2 Exacerbates Lupus Nephritis by Promoting Th1 Cell Differentiation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Oct;31(10):2263-2277. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019090937. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
PubMed 32646856
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Screening Biomarkers for Severe Lupus Based on Multi-omics Studies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05539001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-LCYJ-MS-04
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In order to achieve accurate diagnosis and treatment of the disease, we performed RNA sequencing and ATAC(Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin) chromatin open sequencing in lupus patients in the early stage. By comparing with normal controls, other rheumatic immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis), and before and after treatment, dozens of disease-causing genes independently associated with the disease were identified. Based on the previous omics results, this project will analyze its changes in different outcomes of lupus patients, and use machine learning methods to establish an optimal severe prediction model, so as to build an early diagnosis system based on novel biomarkers and reduce all-cause mortality in patients with treatment failure rate. It is expected to produce good social and economic benefits.
Detailed description
The results of the previous study found that the gene expression value in the active stage of lupus disease was more than 1.5 times higher on average than in the inactive stage. PASS(Power Analysis and Sample Size) 15.0 software was used for analysis, and the sample size was calculated by t-test between groups. Two-sided α=0.05 test level was used, and the statistical power was 80% (β=0.2). According to the 3-fold difference in sample size between the groups, a total of 60 samples were needed. According to the 20% dropout rate, the total number of cases is 76. In the second stage, the validation set was allocated in a ratio of 1:1, the statistical power was 90% (β=0.1), and other conditions remained unchanged. An additional 76 lupus patients were recruited for model validation. The patients were visited in the 0th, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th months, and the error within 7 days was allowed for each time. The contents include the medical history, blood routine testing, urine routine testing, vital organ function testing, and BLIAG(British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index)evaluation. If any patients died, the time and cause of death were recorded.
The effect evaluation index mainly include the following four aspects: (1) Epidemiological questionnaire: face-to-face inquiries by uniformly trained health professionals, mainly including the socio-demographic information of the research subjects (including gender, date of birth, marital status, education level, occupation, income level, height and weight, etc.), environmental exposure factors (including smoking, alcohol and other drug use, etc.), medical history (hypertension, diabetes, liver and kidney and other important organ diseases) and historical medical information. (2) Clinical features: the clinical manifestations (buccal erythema, skin erythema, rash, oral ulcer, arthritis, digestive, nervous and blood system involvement) of the patients were observed and examined face to face by clinicians in the department of rheumatology. (3) Test items: including general blood routine examination, urine routine (urine protein, urine protein-creatinine ratio, etc.), biochemical indexes (total bilirubin, creatinine, C-reactive protein, etc.) detection, immune routine (complement and immune globulin, etc.) and echocardiography, chest CT and other data. (4) Gene expression detection: According to the previous multi-omics research, screen out the gene sets that are different from normal people and have significant changes before and after treatment (see the research basis for details). The patients' RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA(complementary deoxyribonucleic acid), and the expression levels of related genes at different periods were detected by PCR(Polymerase Chain Reaction) array technology.
The electronic medical record report form is used uniformly for data management. In the early stage, we have established the Jiangsu Provincial Lupus Research Database Entry System to store the data of this study. The data entry and modification shall be completed by the researcher, the data shall be traceable and consistent with the original documents. Any observation and inspection results in the trial should be timely, correct, complete, clear, standardized and true. The data administrator (a member of the team statistics) is responsible for reviewing and managing the entered data. For questions about the data, the data administrator will send corresponding questions to the researcher, and the researcher will respond to the questions sent by the data administrator in time. The data administrator can question again when necessary. All subjects' information will be kept strictly confidential. Research data are also confidential.
SAS(STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SYSTEM)9.4 and R software were used to process and analyze the data. The cleaning of the dataset mainly includes: a) For covariates with missing values in the dataset, excluding covariates with missing values greater than 30% and using bagging trees to fill in missing values; b) Two variables with a high degree of correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.9), excluding variables with more missing values; c) Excluding variables whose variance is 0 or close to 0, the rough calculation principle is that the frequency of the unique value is too small relative to the whole (10% in this study), and the ratio of the most frequent value to the frequency of the sub-multiple value is greater than 20; d) Box-Cox transformation was performed for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Different algorithms in machine learning are used to select features and construct models, and the prediction ability of different models is compared to obtain the optimal model. In addition to the classical logistic regression method, we also used some common methods to deal with high-dimensional data, such as linear discriminant analysis considering the linear relationship between covariates and outcomes, partial least squares regression, multiple adaptive regression spline method and elasticity network (EN). Considering that many clinical features and outcomes in clinical medicine show nonlinear correlation, we also use k-Nearest neighbors, Adaptive Boosting, support vector machine, random forest and neural network method to build a predictive model. The variance inflation factor is used to judge the collinearity problem. Different indicators are used to reflect the predictive ability of the model from multiple perspectives, and the C statistic is calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of the built model. The comprehensive judgment improvement index is used to judge the improvement of the model after the introduction of new variables. And the decision curve is drawn to find a model that predicts the largest net benefit.
Before the start of the trial, the trial staff explained the informed consent form to each participant participating in the trial in an easy-to-understand manner, and obtained the written informed consent form of the participant voluntarily participating in the trial. It is guaranteed that participants can refuse to participate in this trial or withdraw from this trial at any time during the progress of the trial, and the rights and interests of subjects will not be affected in any way.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| systemic lupus erythematosus group | – | –Based on hospitalization and follow-up data, the enrolled patients were divided into severe group and mild group by BILAG score independently by specialized researchers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Inpatients in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University School of Medicine were recruited
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The severity of lupus
Time frame: 12 months after enrollment
Using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) to judge severe lupus
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28030595Feng X, Pan W, Liu L, Wu M, Ding F, Hu H, Ding X, Wei H, Zou Y, Qian X, Wang M, Wu J, Tao J, Tan J, Da Z, Zhang M, Li J, Sun L; Jiangsu Lupus Collaborative Group. Prognosis for Hospitalized Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in China: 5-Year Update of the Jiangsu Cohort. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168619. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 34161253Li Z, Wu X, Leo PJ, De Guzman E, Akkoc N, Breban M, Macfarlane GJ, Mahmoudi M, Marzo-Ortega H, Anderson LK, Wheeler L, Chou CT, Harrison AA, Stebbings S, Jones GT, Bang SY, Wang G, Jamshidi A, Farhadi E, Song J, Lin L, Li M, Wei JC, Martin NG, Wright MJ, Lee M, Wang Y, Zhan J, Zhang JS, Wang X, Jin ZB, Weisman MH, Gensler LS, Ward MM, Rahbar MH, Diekman L, Kim TH, Reveille JD, Wordsworth BP, Xu H, Brown MA; TCRI AS Group. Polygenic Risk Scores have high diagnostic capacity in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Sep;80(9):1168-1174. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219446. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 30926722Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A, Aringer M, Bajema I, Boletis JN, Cervera R, Doria A, Gordon C, Govoni M, Houssiau F, Jayne D, Kouloumas M, Kuhn A, Larsen JL, Lerstrom K, Moroni G, Mosca M, Schneider M, Smolen JS, Svenungsson E, Tesar V, Tincani A, Troldborg A, van Vollenhoven R, Wenzel J, Bertsias G, Boumpas DT. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
- Background: PubMed 15814577Isenberg DA, Rahman A, Allen E, Farewell V, Akil M, Bruce IN, D'Cruz D, Griffiths B, Khamashta M, Maddison P, McHugh N, Snaith M, Teh LS, Yee CS, Zoma A, Gordon C. BILAG 2004. Development and initial validation of an updated version of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group's disease activity index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jul;44(7):902-6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh624. Epub 2005 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 21459949Feng X, Zou Y, Pan W, Wang X, Wu M, Zhang M, Tao J, Zhang Y, Tan K, Li J, Chen Z, Ding X, Qian X, Da Z, Wang M, Sun L. Prognostic indicators of hospitalized patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a large retrospective multicenter study in China. J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1289-95. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101088. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 33452006Li K, Mo W, Wu L, Wu X, Luo C, Xiao X, Jia X, Yang H, Fei Y, Chen H, Zhang F, Li Y, Zhao L, Zhang X. Novel autoantibodies identified in ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):739-747. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218460. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 35265065Zhu Y, Tang X, Xu Y, Wu S, Liu W, Geng L, Ma X, Tsao BP, Feng X, Sun L. RNASE2 Mediates Age-Associated B Cell Expansion Through Monocyte Derived IL-10 in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 21;13:752189. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.752189. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 32646856Chen W, Li W, Zhang Z, Tang X, Wu S, Yao G, Li K, Wang D, Xu Y, Feng R, Duan X, Fan X, Lu L, Chen W, Li C, Sun L. Lipocalin-2 Exacerbates Lupus Nephritis by Promoting Th1 Cell Differentiation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Oct;31(10):2263-2277. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019090937. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Nipocalimab in Adults With Moderate to Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Obinutuzumab in Adolescents With Active Class III or IV Lupus Nephritis and the Safety and PK of Obinutuzumab in Pediatric Participants
Lupus Nephritis
Recruiting
Effect of Anifrolumab on Arterial Inflammation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Study
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Atherosclerosis Generalized
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
xuebing Feng, director study director
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact xuebing Feng, director (18805195759, zjj18805195759@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The severity of lupus (time frame: 12 months after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05539001, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2023.