AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory DiseaseNCT05546073

Advanced Point-of-care Technology During In-home Assessment Among Older Adults

A study testing Advanced point-of-care technology in people with Acute Respiratory Disease and Acute Illness, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Due to ageing-related physiological changes, diagnosing older adults is challenging. Delayed disease recognition lead to adverse health outcomes and increased hospitalisation, which is why there is a need to develop new procedures for timely diagnosis and treatment of older adults. Point-of-care technology, e.g. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Disease, Acute Illness
What is being tested?
Advanced point-of-care technology
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
632 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
14 Oct 2022to 18 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • referred to the ACHCS in Kolding Municipality for in-home assessment
  • dyspnoea
  • cough
  • fever
  • fall
  • functional decline defined as either subjective (not able to perform normal daily activities as usual) or objective functional decline (increased need of home care)

Who cannot join

  • moderate to severe cognitive impairment
  • antibiotic treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Siri Smedemark

    Kolding, Region Syddanmark, 6000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Advanced Use of Point-of-care Technology Versus Usual Care During In-home-assessment by Acute Community Nurses in Older Adults for Reducing Acute Hospital Admissions

Due to ageing-related physiological changes, diagnosing older adults is challenging. Delayed disease recognition lead to adverse health outcomes and increased hospitalisation, which is why there is a need to develop new procedures for timely diagnosis and treatment of older adults. Point-of-care technology, e.g. focused lung ultrasound scan and bedside analysis of blood samples (leucocytes with differential count, electrolytes and creatinine) carried out in the patients' home may support clinical decision-making, and potentially reduce acute hospital admissions.

The trial's overall aim is to investigate whether increased point-of-care technology, i.e. focused lung ultrasound scan and bedside blood analysis, used as in-home diagnostics in older adults with acute respiratory symptoms, can qualify the general practitioner's clinical decision-making for early treatment initiation and eventually reduce acute hospital admission.

Read the detailed description

The trial is conducted in Kolding municipality in Denmark. Participants eligible for this study are people aged 65 years or older, referred to the Acute Community Health Care Service (ACHCS) in Kolding municipality for an in-home assessment.

Data collection:

In the control group, the Acute Community Nurses (ANC) will carry out usual care that involves a clinical inspection, measurements of vital signs (respiratory rate(breaths/min), saturation (%), blood pressure (mmHg), heart rate (beats/min), body temperature (celsius), and Glasgow Coma Scale), and point-of-care tests (POCT) for C-reactive protein (CRP) and haemoglobin.

In the intervention group, the ACN will carry out extended POCT besides usual care. Extended POCT covers a focused lung ultrasound scan (FLUS) and biochemical blood analyses. FLUS examination follows a standardized protocol (21). Biochemical analyses include sodium, potassium, creatinine, urea, and leucocytes with differential count.

In both control and intervention groups the ACN communicates the examination results to the participants' primary care physician (PCP) by telephone as well as an electronic written documentation. The findings will support the PCP in the clinical decision-making. The communication to the PCP is part of the usual care and is carried out in both groups.

Training of ACNs:

Prior to the study initiation, all ACNs are trained in FLUS examination, technical procedure of POCT biochemical blood-analysis, as well as in research methods with specific focus on study procedures to increase their adherence to and respect for to the randomization procedure and protocol.

Point-of-care technology used in the study:

FLUS is carried out using Lumify® C5-2 Curved Array Transducer (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA), with a bandwidth of 5-2 megahertz (MHz) and scan depth up to 30 cm.

POCT on blood samples for creatinine and electrolytes are carried out using venous blood samples (collected in lithium/heparin vacutainers) and analysed immediately on the POCT instrument i-STAT® (Abbott, Inc., NJ, U.S.A.) using CHEM8 cassette.

POCT blood analysis for leucocyte differential count is carried out using venous blood samples (collected in EDTA-vacutainers) and analysed immediately on the POCT instrument HemoCue® WBF DIFF System (HemoCue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) with dedicated micro-cuvettes.

POCT blood-analysis for CRP is carried out using blood samples obtained by finger-prick and analysed on the POCT instrument QuickRead go® (Orion Diagnostica, Oy).

Data-sources:

To assess co-morbidity, disabilities, utilization of primary care and health care services, death, and medical history external data sources will be applied for permission to access.

The Danish Health Data Authority is responsible for the national health registers containing data related to the health of the entire Danish population and services of the healthcare system. A unique personal identification number for all people living in Denmark makes it possible to link data across national health registers.

The Danish Health Data Authority will be applied to get access to the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Register of Causes of Death, The Danish National Prescription Registry, and the Danish National Health Service Register. The registers contain information about diseases, treatments, deaths, and health care utilization, and are needed to access information on comorbidity, time of death, medical history, treatment initiations or changes, and number of consultations at PCPs.

The Electronic Municipal Care Records (EOJ - Elektronisk Omsorgsjournal) registers the amount of home care the participants receive, and will be obtained at day 0 and at day 30 to investigate possible changes as a proxy of changes in functional level.

The hospital Electronic Patient Journal (EPJ) will be accessed by the primary investigator to register admissions, reason for admission and any complications during admission. The EPJ will be accessed at day 30 after the acute visit to register admissions, reasons for admission, length of admission, treatment during admission, functional decline during admission, and discharge diagnosis.

Data monitoring:

During the study, several checkpoints will be established to ensure adherence to protocol. Number of kits used will be noted every month to ensure no extra kits for POCT on biochemistry on blood samples are used as a violation to protocol. Time and date logging on each POCT device will be carried out each month to ensure adherence to protocol.

Sample size:

A clinically significant reduction of acute hospital admission is set to a 10% reduction. However, it is unknown how many patients are acutely admitted after the first visit of ACNs. Preliminary results from a pilot-study of the intervention (not yet published) showed that 21% of included participants were acutely admitted. We then assume to reduce hospital admissions by 10%, and to detect a reduction from 31% to 21% at a significance level 0.05 with a power of 80, a total of 602 participants are required (301 in each arm). Allowing for a 5 % drop out after randomisation, 316 in each arm are required (a total of 632 participants).

Being tested
Advanced point-of-care technology
Keywords
acute illness, older adults, acute home care, pre-hospital care, point-of-care technology, geriatric, acute community nurse, focused lung ultrasound scan, FLUS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Advanced point-of-care technologyOther

    The intervention consists of:

    • focused lung ultrasound scan(FLUS)
    • venous blood samples for leucocytes with 5-part differential count, creatinin, sodium, potassium, urea
Study groups in NCT05546073
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control - Usual CareNo interventionParticipants in the control-arm will undergo usual care. This covers clinical inspection, vital parameters (respiratory rate(breaths/min), saturation (%), blood pressure (mmHg), heart rate (beats/min), body temperature (celsius), and Glasgow Coma Scale) , and point-of-care blood-test for CRP and haemoglobin
Intervention - Advanced point-of-care technologyExperimentalParticipants in the intervention-arm will undergo usual care as well as advanced point-of-care technology.
Receives: Other: Advanced point-of-care technology

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Admission ≤ 30-days

    Proportion of Admissions during 30 days follow-up

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Mortality ≤ 30-days

    Proportion of diseased participants in the intervention group and control group after inclusion during 30 days follow-up

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Acute admissions at day 0

    Proportion of acute admissions on visit day (day 0)

    Measured: Day 0

  3. Length of hospital admission

    Number of days admitted to acute-care hospital, long-term acute-care hospital or in an emergency department.

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Hospital-free days ≤ 30-days

    Number of days alive that is spend outside of an acute-care hospital, long-term acute-care hospital or in an emergency department, including days spent wholly or in part under "observation" status

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Complications during hospital admission

    Number of complications registered in the electronic patient journal during admission including delirium and fall

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Treatment initiations or changes at day 0

    Number of treatment initiation or changed at day 0 including antibiotics, diuretics, inhalation medication, prednisolone, iv fluids, iv antibiotics

    Measured: Day 0

  7. Treatment initiation or changes ≤ 30-day

    Number of treatment initiation or changed during 30 days follow-up including antibiotics, diuretics, inhalation medication, prednisolone, iv fluids, iv antibiotics

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Functional level

    Measured by proxy assessment of functional level:

    • Change in amount of home care during 30 days follow-up
    • number of change of dwelling

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Re-referrals to the Acute Community Health Care Service

    Number of re-referrals to the ACHCS

    Measured: 30 days

  10. Contact to the PCP ≤ 30-days

    Number of contact to the PCP during 30 days follow-up

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2022
  2. Study start14 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion18 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion18 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
632 participants referred to the acute community health care service for in-home assessment due to acute disease will be enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive usual care or advanced point-of-care technology
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
632 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05546073
Sponsor's protocol ID
S-20220050
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
14 Sep 2022
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Smedemark SA, Jarbol DE, Laursen CB, Lauridsen JT, Rosenvinge FS, Andersen-Ranberg K. Extended use of point-of-care technology by acute community nurses during in-home assessment of older adults with potential acute respiratory conditions: a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2026 Mar;7(3):100830. doi: 10.1016/j.lanhl.2026.100830. Epub 2026 Apr 9.

    PubMed 41969012
  • Smedemark SA, Laursen CB, Jarbol DE, Rosenvinge FS, Andersen-Ranberg K. Extended use of point-of-care technology versus usual care for in-home assessment by acute community nurses in older adults with signs of potential acute respiratory disease: an open-label randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04774-z.

    PubMed 38365595

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Advanced point-of-care technology in people with Acute Respiratory Disease and Acute Illness, run by University of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Admission ≤ 30-days (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05546073, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in