AzTrials
AzTrials

TendinopathyNCT05549817

Synchronous and Asynchronous Telerehabilitation Methods in Patients With Shoulder Tendinopathy

A study testing Synchronous Exercise Program and Asynchronous Exercise Program in people with Tendinopathy and Shoulder Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted to compare the effects of synchronous and asynchronous telerehabilitation programs on pain, disability, and quality of life parameters in patients with shoulder tendinopathy in the Marmara University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Tendinopathy, Shoulder Pain
What is being tested?
Synchronous Exercise Program and Asynchronous Exercise Program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Jun 2022to 25 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants between the ages of 18-65,
  • Who had access to the internet and smartphone,
  • Had the ability to conduct video calls included in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Participants were excluded if they had COVID-19,
  • Had surgery in the last 6 months,
  • Had neurological and psychological disorders,
  • Received physiotherapy treatment.
  • Had surgery in the last 6 months,
  • Had a condition that prevented them from exercising.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Eren Timurtaş, Ph.D. contact

+905384855543

selcukhalit@gmail.com

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of Health Sciences

    Istanbul, Maltepe, 1464185881

    EREN TİMURTAS, Pt, MSc, +905356670080, erentimurtas@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted to compare the effects of synchronous and asynchronous telerehabilitation programs on pain, disability, and quality of life parameters in patients with shoulder tendinopathy in the Marmara University Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department.

Being tested
Synchronous Exercise Program, Asynchronous Exercise Program
Medical subject headings
Tendinopathy, Shoulder Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Synchronous Exercise ProgramOther

    The exercise program consisted of exercises by recommended guidelines for shoulder tendinopathy patients which includes various strengthening, stretching, and proprioceptive exercises with progression.

  • Asynchronous Exercise ProgramOther

    The exercise program consisted of exercises by recommended guidelines for shoulder tendinopathy patients which includes various strengthening, stretching, and proprioceptive exercises with progression.

Study groups in NCT05549817
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Synchronous Telerehabilitation GroupExperimentalThe exercise program was applied to groups that include three participants of the synchronous group 3 days per week by video conference method on an online platform (Zoom) with the supervision of a physiotherapist. The time of the group session was organized according to the availability of participants in that group and the physiotherapist using shared calendar availability (Doodle). The physiotherapist sent a reminder to participants one hour prior to each session including the video conference meeting link. Each exercise session lasted approximately 40 minutes. For 8 weeks, a total of 24 exercise sessions were performed. The physiotherapist demonstrated the exercises as needed, supervised the group by giving real-time feedback, and progressed the exercise program according to the needs of each group.
Receives: Other: Synchronous Exercise Program
Asynchronous Telerehabilitation GroupActive comparatorThe exercise program was prescribed and followed up 3 days per week via the mobile application (FizyoTr). A notification was sent to participants' phones via mobile application prior to each session and attendance to the exercise program was recorded. For 8 weeks, a total of 24 exercise sessions were performed. The physiotherapist progressed the exercise program according to the assessment at 4 weeks and the needs of each participant.
Receives: Other: Asynchronous Exercise Program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain intensity was measured with a 0-10 cm scale. Participants were asked to rate their pain as "0: no pain and 10: excruciating pain" on the 0-10 cm scale (10). The pain reported by the patients was recorded in centimeters.

    Measured: The pain was measured at baseline.

  2. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain intensity was measured with a 0-10 cm scale. Participants were asked to rate their pain as "0: no pain and 10: excruciating pain" on the 0-10 cm scale (10). The pain reported by the patients was recorded in centimeters.

    Measured: The pain was measured at mid-treatment in the 4th week.

  3. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain intensity was measured with a 0-10 cm scale. Participants were asked to rate their pain as "0: no pain and 10: excruciating pain" on the 0-10 cm scale (10). The pain reported by the patients was recorded in centimeters.

    Measured: The pain was measured at the end of treatment in the 8th week.

  4. Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Pain intensity was measured with a 0-10 cm scale. Participants were asked to rate their pain as "0: no pain and 10: excruciating pain" on the 0-10 cm scale (10). The pain reported by the patients was recorded in centimeters.

    Measured: The pain was measured at long-term follow-up assessment in the 16th week.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The DASH survey was published in 1994 by the American Academy of Orthopedic Developed by Surgeons (AAOS), in upper extremity injuries. It is a questionnaire that evaluates function and disability. The survey consists of 30 questions. The first 21 questions about the difficulty of the patient during activities of daily living, 5 questions about symptoms (pain, activity-related pain, tingling, stiffness, weakness), social function, work, sleep, and patient self-esteem in each of the remaining 4 questions. A total score of 0-100 is obtained. High scores indicate severe disability (0 points: no disability, 100 points: maximum disability). Turkish validity and reliability study of the survey was conducted.

    Measured: The disability was measured at baseline.

  2. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The DASH survey was published in 1994 by the American Academy of Orthopedic Developed by Surgeons (AAOS), in upper extremity injuries. It is a questionnaire that evaluates function and disability. The survey consists of 30 questions. The first 21 questions about the difficulty of the patient during activities of daily living, 5 questions about symptoms (pain, activity-related pain, tingling, stiffness, weakness), social function, work, sleep, and patient self-esteem in each of the remaining 4 questions. A total score of 0-100 is obtained. High scores indicate severe disability (0 points: no disability, 100 points: maximum disability). Turkish validity and reliability study of the survey was conducted.

    Measured: The disability was measured at mid-treatment in the 4th week.

  3. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The DASH survey was published in 1994 by the American Academy of Orthopedic Developed by Surgeons (AAOS), in upper extremity injuries. It is a questionnaire that evaluates function and disability. The survey consists of 30 questions. The first 21 questions about the difficulty of the patient during activities of daily living, 5 questions about symptoms (pain, activity-related pain, tingling, stiffness, weakness), social function, work, sleep, and patient self-esteem in each of the remaining 4 questions. A total score of 0-100 is obtained. High scores indicate severe disability (0 points: no disability, 100 points: maximum disability). Turkish validity and reliability study of the survey was conducted.

    Measured: The disability was measured at the end of treatment in the 8th week.

  4. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)

    The DASH survey was published in 1994 by the American Academy of Orthopedic Developed by Surgeons (AAOS), in upper extremity injuries. It is a questionnaire that evaluates function and disability. The survey consists of 30 questions. The first 21 questions about the difficulty of the patient during activities of daily living, 5 questions about symptoms (pain, activity-related pain, tingling, stiffness, weakness), social function, work, sleep, and patient self-esteem in each of the remaining 4 questions. A total score of 0-100 is obtained. High scores indicate severe disability (0 points: no disability, 100 points: maximum disability). Turkish validity and reliability study of the survey was conducted.

    Measured: The disability was measured at long-term follow-up assessment in the 16th week.

  5. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    The quality of life was assessed using SF-36, which consists of 36 items. The Sf-36 has a total of 8 subscales including physical functioning, limitation due to physical problems (physical role), limitation due to emotional problems (emotional role), vitality, bodily pain, mental health, general health, and social functioning. The Turkish version of the SF-36 has been shown to have validity and reliability.

    Measured: The quality of life was measured at baseline.

  6. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    The quality of life was assessed using SF-36, which consists of 36 items. The Sf-36 has a total of 8 subscales including physical functioning, limitation due to physical problems (physical role), limitation due to emotional problems (emotional role), vitality, bodily pain, mental health, general health, and social functioning. The Turkish version of the SF-36 has been shown to have validity and reliability.

    Measured: The quality of life was measured at mid-treatment in the 4th week.

  7. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    The quality of life was assessed using SF-36, which consists of 36 items. The Sf-36 has a total of 8 subscales including physical functioning, limitation due to physical problems (physical role), limitation due to emotional problems (emotional role), vitality, bodily pain, mental health, general health, and social functioning. The Turkish version of the SF-36 has been shown to have validity and reliability.

    Measured: The quality of life was measured at the end of treatment in the 8th week.

  8. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    The quality of life was assessed using SF-36, which consists of 36 items. The Sf-36 has a total of 8 subscales including physical functioning, limitation due to physical problems (physical role), limitation due to emotional problems (emotional role), vitality, bodily pain, mental health, general health, and social functioning. The Turkish version of the SF-36 has been shown to have validity and reliability.

    Measured: The quality of life was measured at long-term follow-up assessment in the 16th week.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2022
  2. Study start1 Jun 2022
  3. Primary completion10 Nov 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion25 Nov 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05549817
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022/67
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
7 Sep 2022
Last updated
22 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Synchronous Exercise Program and Asynchronous Exercise Program in people with Tendinopathy and Shoulder Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eren Timurtaş, Ph.D. (+905384855543, selcukhalit@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: The pain was measured at baseline.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in