AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaPhase 4BURANNCT05552508

BURAN: Benralizumab on Airway Dynamics in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Using Functional Respiratory Imaging

A Phase 4 study testing Benralizumab in people with Asthma, run by AstraZeneca at 25 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the effects of benralizumab on airway dynamics in severe eosinophilic asthma in terms of quantitative computed tomography (CT)-derived measurements of pulmonary structure and function using the Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI) platform. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
Benralizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
25 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
11 Oct 2022to 19 Jul 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants who are diagnosed with asthma with documented reversibility post-bronchodilator or salbutamol either historical or at Visit 0 (V0).
  • Participants who have documented treatment with ICS and LABA for ≥ 3 months prior to V0 with or without oral corticosteroids and additional asthma controllers.
  • Participants who have documented peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥ 300 cells/μL at V0, or if Oral Corticosteroids (OCS)-dependent, a documented peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥ 150 cells/μL at V0.
  • Participants who have had a minimum of 2 exacerbations in the last 12 months prior to V0.
  • Participants who have pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ≤ 70% at Visit 0 (V0).
  • Participants who have pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 80% of predicted at V0.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Participants who can perform acceptable and repeatable spirometry.
  • Participants who can withhold asthma maintenance medication for at least 12 hours prior to V0, 1 and 4 where spirometry and/or Computed Tomography (CT) scan procedures will be performed except for once-a-day dosage where 24 hours will be required.
  • Female participants who have a negative pregnancy test prior to administration of the investigational product (IP) and high-resolution CT scan and must agree to use a highly effective method of birth control from randomization throughout the study duration and within 12 weeks after last dose of IP.

Who cannot join

  • Participants who are unstable or who experienced an exacerbation/infection in the 6 weeks before V0.
  • Participants with acute upper or lower airway infection in the 6 weeks before V0.
  • Participants diagnosed with clinically important pulmonary disease other than asthma, or participants who have ever been diagnosed with pulmonary or systemic disease, other than asthma that are associated with elevated peripheral eosinophil count.
  • Receipt of any biologic products for asthma within 4 months or 5 half-lives prior to V0 whichever is longer.
  • History or current use of chronic (i.e., > 4 weeks) immunosuppressive medication.
  • History of lung volume reduction surgery, lung resection, thermal bronchoplasty at any time before visit 0 (V0) or on active phase of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Participants with current malignancy or history of malignancy.
  • History of other clinically significant disease or abnormality.
  • Participants with positive Hepatitis B, C or HIV.
  • Participants with:
  • Positive COVID-19 test at V0, COVID-19 disease within 6 weeks before V0 or History of severe COVID-19 disease at any time, defined by the need for Intensive Care Unit stay or Mechanical Ventilation (invasive or non-invasive).

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 7 countries.

25 sites in 7 countries

United States10 sites
  • Research Site

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • Research Site

    DuBois, Pennsylvania, 15801

  • Research Site

    Greenwood, Indiana, 46143

  • Research Site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

  • Research Site

    Loxahatchee Groves, Florida, 33470

  • Research Site

    Plantation, Florida, 33324

  • Research Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Research Site

    Tyler, Texas, 75708

  • Research Site

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

  • Research Site

    Webster, Texas, 77598

Other trials in United States

Spain6 sites
  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08006

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 08017

  • Research Site

    Barcelona, 8003

  • Research Site

    Madrid, 28007

  • Research Site

    Santander, 39008

  • Research Site

    Villarreal (Castellón), 12540

Other trials in Spain

Australia2 sites
  • Research Site

    Clayton, 3168

  • Research Site

    Toorak Gardens, 5065

Other trials in Australia

Belgium2 sites
  • Research Site

    Liège, 4000

  • Research Site

    Namur, 5101

Other trials in Belgium

Portugal2 sites
  • Research Site

    Lisbon, 1649-035

  • Research Site

    Porto, 4100-180

Other trials in Portugal

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Research Site

    Bradford, BND9 6RJ

  • Research Site

    Nottingham, NG5 1PB

Other trials in United Kingdom

France1 site
  • Research Site

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: BURAN: Effects of Benralizumab on Airway Dynamics in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Using Functional Respiratory Imaging Parameters

This study will assess the effects of benralizumab on airway dynamics in severe eosinophilic asthma in terms of quantitative computed tomography (CT)-derived measurements of pulmonary structure and function using the Functional Respiratory Imaging (FRI) platform.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase IV, interventional single group, open-label, uncontrolled, prospective, multicenter clinical trial.

This study will be conducted in male and female participants ≥18 years old with established severe eosinophilic asthma as defined by European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical guidelines inadequately controlled by treatment with Inhaled Corticosteroids-Long-acting β2 agonists (ICS-LABA) with or without oral corticosteroids (OCS) or other asthma controller medications.

Each participant will participate in the study for a minimum of 15 weeks and up to 23 weeks.

This study will comprise of:

Screening visit (V0) Visit 1 (V1; week 0; within 1 to 21 days of screening) Visit 2 (V2; week 4 ± 5 days) Visit 3 (V3; week 8 ± 5 days) Visit 4 (V4; week 13 ± 5 days) Follow-up (2 weeks [± 7 days] after V4) - Phone call follow-up. Participants will be discharged from the study after the phone call follow-up is completed.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
Benralizumab
Keywords
BURAN, Inhaled Corticosteroids, Long-acting β2 agonists, Benralizumab, Eosinophilic Asthma
Medical subject headings
Asthma, Pulmonary Eosinophilia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BenralizumabCombination product

    Also called Fasenra

    Participants will receive benralizumab subcutaneously.

Study groups in NCT05552508
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BenralizumabExperimentalParticipants will receive 3 doses of benralizumab having a strength of 30 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks (Week 0, Week 4, and Week 8).
Receives: Combination Product: Benralizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume at TLC

    Change from baseline in airway dynamics after 13 weeks following treatment with benralizumab, using total mucus volume (specific airway volume) at total lung capacity (TLC) measurements from untrimmed airways was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

Secondary outcomes (36)
  1. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Plugs Score at TLC

    Change from baseline in untrimmed total mucus plugs score at TLC was assessed. Mucus plugs was scored with a scoring system similar to that by Dunican et al. with the Severe Asthma Research Program (SARP) based on bronchopulmonary segmental anatomy. The mucus score was calculated by counting the number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of the airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug[s] present) or 0 (mucus plug[s] absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  2. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Air Trapping at FRC

    Change from baseline in untrimmed total air trapping at FRC was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  3. Change From Baseline in Trimmed Distal Airway Wall Volume at TLC

    Change from baseline in trimmed distal airway wall volume at TLC was assessed. Change from baseline in airway dynamics at Week 13 following treatment with benralizumab as measured by secondary FRI endpoints, irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  4. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at TLC

    Change from baseline in untrimmed distal airway volume at TLC was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  5. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC)

    Change from baseline in untrimmed distal airway volume at FRC was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  6. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at TLC

    Change from baseline in untrimmed total lung volume at TLC was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  7. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at FRC

    Change from baseline in untrimmed total lung volume at FRC was assessed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  8. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume Measured at TLC and Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (Pre-BD FEV1)

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  9. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Mucus Plugs Score at TLC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  10. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Air Trapping at FRC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations. Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  11. Correlation Between Trimmed Distal Airway Wall Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  12. Correlation Between Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  13. Correlation Between Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at FRC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  14. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  15. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at FRC and Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  16. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume Measured at TLC and Pre-bronchodilator Forced Vital Capacity (Pre-BD FVC)

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  17. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Mucus Plugs Score at TLC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  18. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Air Trapping at FRC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  19. Correlation Between Trimmed Distal Airway Wall Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  20. Correlation Between Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  21. Correlation Between Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume at FRC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  22. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at TLC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  23. Correlation Between Untrimmed Total Lung Volume at FRC and Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements, cross sectionally (at week 0) and irrespective of participants characteristics was assessed. Positive correlations were identified by values greater than 0, and negative correlations were identified by values less than 0. Statistical significance is indicated when the lower limit of the 95% CI for the correlation is greater than 0 for positive correlations or less than 0 for negative correlations.

    Here, "Number" in measure type is indicating data of Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

    Measured: At Baseline (Week 0)

  24. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume Measured at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  25. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Plugs Score at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    Relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1). Mucus plugs was scored with a scoring system similar to that by Dunican et al. with SARP based on bronchopulmonary segmental anatomy. Mucus score was calculated by counting number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug present) or 0 (mucus plug absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores = worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  26. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Air Trapping at FRC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  27. Change From Baseline in Trimmed Distal Airway Wall Volume at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  28. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  29. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Lung Volume With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FEV1

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FEV1).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  30. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume Measured at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  31. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Plugs Score at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    Relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC). Mucus plugs was scored with a scoring system similar to that by Dunican et al. with SARP based on bronchopulmonary segmental anatomy. Mucus score was calculated by counting number of bronchopulmonary segments which contained 1 or more mucus plug, up to a maximum score of 18 corresponding to the 18 bronchopulmonary segments present in most people. In this system, a mucus plug is defined as a complete occlusion of airway visible at TLC. Each bronchopulmonary segment is given a score of 1 (mucus plug present) or 0 (mucus plug absent). The segment scores of each lobe are summed to generate a total mucus score for both lungs, yielding a mucus score ranging from 0-18. Higher scores = worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  32. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Air Trapping at FRC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at Week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  33. Change From Baseline in Trimmed Distal Airway Wall Volume at TLC With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  34. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Distal Airway Volume With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  35. Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Lung Volume With and Without Adjustment for Pre-BD FVC

    The relationship between changes from baseline (week 0) in airway dynamics and conventional lung function measurements at week 13, after accounting for baseline measurements of conventional lung function was assessed with and without adjustment for conventional lung function measures (pre-BD FVC).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 13

  36. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    The safety and tolerability of benralizumab was assessed.

    Measured: From screening (Day -21) to follow-up (up to 1.9 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Sep 2022
  2. Study start11 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion19 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion19 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05552508
Sponsor's protocol ID
D3250R00107
Other IDs
2022-000152-11
Acronym
BURAN
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
27 Apr 2022
Last updated
25 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure. Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.

Publications

  • Carstens DD, De Backer W, Rhodes K, Muchmore P, Lavon BR, Chung SYE, Fogel R, Trudo F, Panettieri R Jr. Impact of benralizumab on airway structure/function in severe eosinophilic asthma. Respir Res. 2026 Jul 15. doi: 10.1186/s12931-026-03742-y. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42458446
  • Genofre E, Carstens D, DeBacker W, Muchmore P, Panettieri RA Jr, Rhodes K, Shih VH, Trudo F. The effects of benralizumab on airway geometry and dynamics in severe eosinophilic asthma: a single-arm study design exploring a functional respiratory imaging approach. Respir Res. 2023 May 3;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02415-4.

    PubMed 37131265

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Benralizumab in people with Asthma, run by AstraZeneca at 25 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in United States, Spain, Australia, Belgium, Portugal and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Untrimmed Total Mucus Volume at TLC (time frame: Baseline and Week 13). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05552508, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in