Alopecia AreataPhase 2NCT05556265
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib in Participants With Alopecia Areata
A Phase 2 study testing Deucravacitinib in people with Alopecia Areata, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deucravacitinib versus placebo at Week 24 and safety and tolerability of deucravacitinib versus placebo in adults with alopecia areata. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alopecia Areata
- What is being tested?
- Deucravacitinib
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 28 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 8 Nov 2022to 16 May 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Documented clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) for at least 6 months.
- Current episode of scalp hair loss (at screening) must meet the following criteria: duration at least 6 months; duration of current hair loss episode of AA affecting ≥ 50% of the scalp not exceeding 8 years; scalp hair loss has been stable (no significant spontaneous regrowth [> 10%] over the last 6 months)
- SALT score ≥ 50 at Screening and Day 1. Participant with complete scalp hair loss (SALT score of 100) with or without body hair involvement can be included.
Who cannot join
- Participant with diffuse-type AA or other forms of hair loss, including traction alopecia, lichen planopilaris, central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, frontal fibrosing alopecia, etc.
- Other active skin diseases affecting the scalp that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with accurate assessment of SALT score.
- Extensive tattooing of the scalp that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the accurate assessment of SALT score.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.
Trial locations and contacts
28 sites in 6 countries.
28 sites in 6 countries
United States12 sites
Local Institution - 0012
Austin, Texas, 78759
Local Institution - 0019
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516-4061
Local Institution - 0023
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038-1137
Local Institution - 0013
Houston, Texas, 77004-8098
Local Institution - 0036
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Local Institution - 0024
New York, New York, 10029-6501
Local Institution - 0032
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3403
Local Institution - 0011
Portland, Oregon, 97201-5134
Local Institution - 0014
San Antonio, Texas, 78213-2250
Local Institution - 0016
Santa Monica, California, 90404-2120
Local Institution - 0017
South Jordan, Utah, 84095
Local Institution - 0018
Tampa, Florida, 33624-2038
Canada6 sites
Local Institution - 0021
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2
Local Institution - 0034
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 2V1
Local Institution - 0009
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2
Local Institution - 0027
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4X7
Local Institution - 0010
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 9M7
Local Institution - 0015
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4
Japan4 sites
Local Institution - 0031
Hamamatsu, 431-3192
Local Institution - 0028
Kōtoku, 136-0075
Local Institution - 0030
Mitaka-Shi, 181-8611
Local Institution - 0029
Shinjuku-Ku, 160-0023
Australia2 sites
Local Institution - 0005
Carlton, Victoria, 3053
Local Institution - 0003
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
France2 sites
Local Institution - 0033
Nice, 06200
Local Institution - 0020
Paris, 75010
Poland2 sites
Local Institution - 0025
Warsaw, 02-962
Local Institution - 0026
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-566
About this study
Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) in Participants With Alopecia Areata
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deucravacitinib versus placebo at Week 24 and safety and tolerability of deucravacitinib versus placebo in adults with alopecia areata.
- Conditions
- Alopecia Areata
- Being tested
- Deucravacitinib, Placebo
- Keywords
- Deucravacitinib, IM011134, BMS-986165
- Medical subject headings
- Alopecia Areata
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DeucravacitinibDrug
Also called BMS-986165
Specified dose on specified days
PlaceboOther
Placebo was administered.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Deucravacitinib Dose 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Deucravacitinib; Other: Placebo |
| Deucravacitinib Dose 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Deucravacitinib; Other: Placebo |
| Placebo, followed by Deucravacitinib Dose 1 or Dose 2. | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Deucravacitinib; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool Score at Week 24 in Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period
The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score is a quantitative rating scale for measuring the severity of alopecia areata based on the amount of terminal hair loss in each of the 4 quadrants of the scalp: back region, top region, left and right regions of the scalp. To calculate a SALT score, the degree of scalp hair loss, as a percentage of each scalp region affected, is determined. Each region is multiplied by it's respective weighting factor (percentage surface area of the scalp in that area; back region [24%], top region [40%], left region [18%] and, right region [18%]), in order to achieve a subtotal for each region. The SALT score is the sum of the scalp hair loss in each area (sum of the subtotals). The score ranges from 0 to 100, the higher score reflects high severity of alopecia areata.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events in Placebo-Controlled Period
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization. Adverse event of interest included herpes zoster, malignancy, opportunistic infection or tuberculosis infection.
Measured: From first dose (Day 1) and up to 30 days after last dose for all participants (up to approximately 28 weeks)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events in Active Treatment Period
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization. Adverse event of interest included Herpes zoster, malignancy, opportunities infection or tuberculosis infection.
Measured: From first dose (Day 1) of Week 25 and up to 30 days after last dose for all participants (up to approximately 28 weeks)
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Change From Baseline to Grade 3/Grade 4 in Laboratory Test Results as Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 in Placebo-Controlled Period
Blood samples were collected for assessment of laboratory test results. All abnormalities were graded as per CTCAE v5.0 on a scale from 1 to 4, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Measured: From first dose (Day 1) through Week 24
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Change From Baseline to Grade 3/Grade 4 in Laboratory Test Results as Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 in in Active Treatment Period
Blood samples were collected for assessment of laboratory test results. All abnormalities are graded as per CTCAE v5.0 on a scale from 1 to 4, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Measured: From Week 25 to Week 52
Number of Participants With Marked Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Placebo-Controlled Period
A 12-lead ECG was performed after the participant remained supine for at least 5 minutes prior to the ECG. The ECG results read by the principal study investigator or a qualified and delegated designee as per local requirements
Measured: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
Number of Participants With Marked Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Active Treatment Period
A 12-lead ECG should be performed after the participant has remained supine for at least 5 minutes prior to the ECG. The ECG results will be read by the principal study investigator or a qualified and delegated designee as per local requirements
Measured: Week 25 to Week 52
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Marked Vital Signs in Placebo-Controlled Period
Vital signs such as systolic blood pressures (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate were assessed. The evaluation of the marked abnormality criteria is based on participants highest change from baseline in the period. Blood pressure and heart rate were to be measured after the participant has been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.
Measured: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Marked Vital Signs in Active Treatment Period
Vital signs such as systolic blood pressures (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate were assessed. The evaluation of the marked abnormality criteria is based on participants highest change from baseline in the period. Blood pressure and heart rate were to be measured after the participant had been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.
Measured: Week 25 to Week 52
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Targeted Physical Examination Parameters in Placebo-Controlled Period
Participants were assessed for abnormalities in targeted physical parameters.
Measured: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Targeted Physical Examination Parameters in Active Treatment Parameters
Participants were assessed for abnormalities in targeted physical parameters.
Measured: Week 25 to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 50% Reduction in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score (SALT50 Response) From Baseline at Week 24
The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score is a quantitative rating scale for measuring the severity of alopecia areata based on the amount of terminal hair loss in each of the 4 quadrants of the scalp; back region, top region, left and right regions of the scalp. To calculate a SALT score, the degree of scalp hair loss, as a percentage of each scalp region affected, is determined. Each region is multiplied by its respective weighting factor (percentage surface area of the scalp in that area; Back region [24%], Left Region [18%], Right Region [18%], Top Region [40%]), in order to achieve a subtotal for each region. The SALT score is the sum of the scalp hair loss in each area (sum of the subtotals). The score ranges from 0 to 100, the higher score reflects high severity of alopecia areata. SALT50 response indicates at least a 50% improvement from baseline in the SALT score at a particular time point, indicating 50% hair regrowth.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score ≤20 at Week 24
The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score is a quantitative rating scale for measuring the severity of alopecia areata based on the amount of terminal hair loss in each of the 4 quadrants of the scalp; back region, top region, left and right regions of the scalp. To calculate a SALT score, the degree of scalp hair loss, as a percentage of each scalp region affected, is determined. Each region is multiplied by its respective weighting factor (percentage surface area of the scalp in that area; Back region [24%], Left Region [18%], Right Region [18%], Top Region [40%]), in order to achieve a subtotal for each region. The SALT score is the sum of the scalp hair loss in each area (sum of the subtotals). The score ranges from 0 to 100, the higher score reflects high severity of alopecia areata. percentage of participants achieving an absolute SALT score ≤ 20, indicates ≤ 20% scalp hair loss.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24 With at Least a 2-Point Change From Baseline
The AA-IGA utilizes a 5-points scale, in which the investigator assesses scalp hair loss based on the SALT assessment. The AA-IGA measures alopecia areata severity at a single point in time(without taking into account the baseline disease condition).The participant's scalp hair loss, as it look at the time of evaluation is scored as none (0) (0% scalp hair loss), limited (1) (1%-20% scalp hair loss), moderate (2) (21%-49% scalp hair loss), severe (3) (50%-94% scalp hair loss), or very severe (4)(95%-100 % scalp hair loss).
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2022
- Study start8 Nov 2022
- Primary completion6 Jan 2024
- Study completion16 May 2024
Why it stopped: Business objectives have changed
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Alopecia AreataStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bristol-Myers SquibbThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Bristol-Myers Squibb, Study director, Bristol-Myers Squibb
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05556265
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IM011-134
- Other IDs
- U1111-1246-1767, 2020-000113-33
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 31 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: BMS will provide access to individual anonymized participant data upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria. Additional information regarding Bristol Myers Squibb's data sharing policy and process can be found at: https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinical-trials-and-research/disclosurecommitment.html
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Deucravacitinib (BMS-986165) in Participants With Alopecia Areata
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05556265
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IM011-134
- Conditions
- Alopecia Areata
- Keywords
- Deucravacitinib, IM011134, BMS-986165
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Business objectives have changed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bristol-Myers SquibbIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 8 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 6 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 28 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deucravacitinib versus placebo at Week 24 and safety and tolerability of deucravacitinib versus placebo in adults with alopecia areata.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Deucravacitinib Dose 1 | Experimental | Drug: Deucravacitinib, Other: Placebo |
| Deucravacitinib Dose 2 | Experimental | Drug: Deucravacitinib, Other: Placebo |
| Placebo, followed by Deucravacitinib Dose 1 or Dose 2. | Placebo comparator | Drug: Deucravacitinib, Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Documented clinical diagnosis of alopecia areata (AA) for at least 6 months.
- Current episode of scalp hair loss (at screening) must meet the following criteria: duration at least 6 months; duration of current hair loss episode of AA affecting ≥ 50% of the scalp not exceeding 8 years; scalp hair loss has been stable (no significant spontaneous regrowth [> 10%] over the last 6 months)
- SALT score ≥ 50 at Screening and Day 1. Participant with complete scalp hair loss (SALT score of 100) with or without body hair involvement can be included.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participant with diffuse-type AA or other forms of hair loss, including traction alopecia, lichen planopilaris, central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, frontal fibrosing alopecia, etc.
- Other active skin diseases affecting the scalp that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with accurate assessment of SALT score.
- Extensive tattooing of the scalp that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the accurate assessment of SALT score.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DeucravacitinibAlso: BMS-986165Specified dose on specified days | Drug | Deucravacitinib Dose 1, Deucravacitinib Dose 2, Placebo, followed by Deucravacitinib Dose 1 or Dose 2. |
| PlaceboPlacebo was administered. | Other | Deucravacitinib Dose 1, Deucravacitinib Dose 2, Placebo, followed by Deucravacitinib Dose 1 or Dose 2. |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool Score at Week 24 in Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score is a quantitative rating scale for measuring the severity of alopecia areata based on the amount of terminal hair loss in each of the 4 quadrants of the scalp: back region, top region, left and right regions of the scalp. To calculate a SALT score, the degree of scalp hair loss, as a percentage of each scalp region affected, is determined. Each region is multiplied by it's respective weighting factor (percentage surface area of the scalp in that area; back region [24%], top region [40%], left region [18%] and, right region [18%]), in order to achieve a subtotal for each region. The SALT score is the sum of the scalp hair loss in each area (sum of the subtotals). The score ranges from 0 to 100, the higher score reflects high severity of alopecia areata.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events in Placebo-Controlled Period
Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) and up to 30 days after last dose for all participants (up to approximately 28 weeks)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization. Adverse event of interest included herpes zoster, malignancy, opportunistic infection or tuberculosis infection.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events in Active Treatment Period
Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) of Week 25 and up to 30 days after last dose for all participants (up to approximately 28 weeks)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization. Adverse event of interest included Herpes zoster, malignancy, opportunities infection or tuberculosis infection.
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Change From Baseline to Grade 3/Grade 4 in Laboratory Test Results as Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 in Placebo-Controlled Period
Time frame: From first dose (Day 1) through Week 24
Blood samples were collected for assessment of laboratory test results. All abnormalities were graded as per CTCAE v5.0 on a scale from 1 to 4, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade Change From Baseline to Grade 3/Grade 4 in Laboratory Test Results as Per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 in in Active Treatment Period
Time frame: From Week 25 to Week 52
Blood samples were collected for assessment of laboratory test results. All abnormalities are graded as per CTCAE v5.0 on a scale from 1 to 4, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Number of Participants With Marked Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Placebo-Controlled Period
Time frame: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
A 12-lead ECG was performed after the participant remained supine for at least 5 minutes prior to the ECG. The ECG results read by the principal study investigator or a qualified and delegated designee as per local requirements
Number of Participants With Marked Electrocardiogram Abnormalities in Active Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 25 to Week 52
A 12-lead ECG should be performed after the participant has remained supine for at least 5 minutes prior to the ECG. The ECG results will be read by the principal study investigator or a qualified and delegated designee as per local requirements
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Marked Vital Signs in Placebo-Controlled Period
Time frame: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
Vital signs such as systolic blood pressures (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate were assessed. The evaluation of the marked abnormality criteria is based on participants highest change from baseline in the period. Blood pressure and heart rate were to be measured after the participant has been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Marked Vital Signs in Active Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 25 to Week 52
Vital signs such as systolic blood pressures (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate were assessed. The evaluation of the marked abnormality criteria is based on participants highest change from baseline in the period. Blood pressure and heart rate were to be measured after the participant had been resting quietly for at least 5 minutes.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Targeted Physical Examination Parameters in Placebo-Controlled Period
Time frame: First dose (Day 1) to Week 24
Participants were assessed for abnormalities in targeted physical parameters.
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Targeted Physical Examination Parameters in Active Treatment Parameters
Time frame: Week 25 to Week 52
Participants were assessed for abnormalities in targeted physical parameters.
3 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 50% Reduction in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score (SALT50 Response) From Baseline at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) Score ≤20 at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment (AA-IGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 24 With at Least a 2-Point Change From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BMS Clinical Trial InformationLink provided by the sponsor.
- FDA Safety Alerts and RecallsLink provided by the sponsor.
- BMS Clinical Trial Patient RecruitingLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. BMS will provide access to individual anonymized participant data upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria. Additional information regarding Bristol Myers Squibb's data sharing policy and process can be found at: https://www.bms.com/researchers-and-partners/clinical-trials-and-research/disclosurecommitment.html
Related trials for Alopecia Areata
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About Medicine Called Ritlecitinib in Children Aged Between 6 to 12 Years With Severe Alopecia Areata
Severe Alopecia Areata
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib on Hair Regrowth in Patients With Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy Candidiasis Ectodermal Dystrophy (APECED)-Associated Alopecia Areata
Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy Candidiasis Ectodermal Dystrophy (Apeced), Alopecia Areata
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Litfulo Capsules Special Investigation
Alopecia Areata
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real-World Effectiveness of Ritlecitinib in Alopecia Areata Patients in the US: A Retrospective Analysis Using EHR and Claims Data
Alopecia Areata
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Characterization And Clinical Outcomes of AA Patients Treated With Ritlecitinib
Alopecia Areata
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bristol-Myers Squibb study director
Bristol-Myers Squibb
28 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Deucravacitinib in people with Alopecia Areata, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 28 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 28 sites in United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, France and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool Score at Week 24 in Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2025.