AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer's Disease (AD)REALSOCOGNCT05558709

Social-cognitive Functioning: Validation of a New Neuropsychological Test

A study testing REALSOCOG, BCS and Hetero-questionnaires in people with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is now established that disturbances in social cognition are frequent in neurology and that they contribute to the development of social conduct disorders. Their assessment is therefore essential, particularly in order to propose early and adapted care. However, this assessment remains limited today. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
REALSOCOG, BCS and Hetero-questionnaires
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
4 Feb 2026to 4 Feb 2030
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For patients:
  • Patient aged between 18 and 90 years
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than or equal to 20
  • Patient able to express his or her non-opposition to participate in the study in an informed and autonomous manner
  • Patient with a neurodegenerative pathology: FTD, AD or LBD.
  • For caregivers:
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Regular contact with the patient (≥ 2 times per month)

Who cannot join

  • For patients:
  • Neurological or psychiatric comorbidity
  • Notable sensory disorders (e.g., profound or total deafness, age-related macular degeneration, blindness, etc.) that may interfere with experimental completion.
  • Opposition to participation in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière

    Paris, 75013

    Marc VERNY, Pr, 01 42 16 03 12 ext. +33, marc.verny@aphp.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Social-cognitive Functioning: Validation of a New Neuropsychological Test and Prediction of Social Behavioural Disorders in Daily Life

It is now established that disturbances in social cognition are frequent in neurology and that they contribute to the development of social conduct disorders. Their assessment is therefore essential, particularly in order to propose early and adapted care. However, this assessment remains limited today. A new serious game-type test, REALSoCog, has been developed to address the shortcomings of current tools and to highlight disturbances in social behaviors. The latter are not always observed in consultation although they are often reported by caregivers. The objective of this research is therefore to validate the REALSoCog task in a pathological population (currently being standardized in the general population: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). The clinical interest of this task will be tested with a group of patients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL), fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD)) in order to assess its sensitivity and specificity in the detection of social-cognitive disturbances, and in particular in terms of social behaviors (detection of social behavioral disorders reported in daily life). The objective is also to document the socio-cognitive profiles in the mentioned diseases thanks to a more ecological test, and to better understand the links between socio-cognitive processes on the one hand, and individual characteristics on the other hand (e.g. mood and social participation).

Read the detailed description

It is now established that disturbances in social cognition are frequent in neurology and that they contribute to the development of social conduct disorders. Their assessment is therefore essential, particularly in order to propose early and adapted care. However, this assessment remains limited today. A new serious game-type test, REALSoCog, has been developed to address the shortcomings of current tools and to highlight disturbances in social behaviors. The latter are not always observed in consultation although they are often reported by caregivers. The objective of this research is therefore to validate the REALSoCog task in a pathological population (currently being standardized in the general population: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). The clinical interest of this task will be tested with a group of patients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL), fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD)) in order to assess its sensitivity and specificity in the detection of social-cognitive disturbances, and in particular in terms of social behaviors (detection of social behavioral disorders reported in daily life). The objective is also to document the socio-cognitive profiles in the mentioned diseases thanks to a more ecological test, and to better understand the links between socio-cognitive processes on the one hand, and individual characteristics on the other hand (e.g. mood and social participation).

Being tested
REALSOCOG, BCS, Hetero-questionnaires
Keywords
Neurodegenerative diseases, Social behavior, Social cognition, Neuropsychological assessment
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Lewy Body Disease, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Social Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • REALSOCOGOther

    Also called neuropsychological test

    Patients will be asked to perform the REALSoCog serious game-type social cognition assessment task developed by the LMC2 laboratory (UR 7536). Their performance will be compared to those of control individuals recruited in parallel (independant clinical study: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). Participants will be asked to think about 16 social situations (6 control situations and 10 experimental situations) encountered in a virtual environment representing a city. REALSoCog can be used on a laptop computer, without any additional technical device.

  • BCSOther

    Also called Social-Cognition Battery

    Social-cognitive tasks from the BCS (Ehrlé et al., 2011) will also be offered to patients to test the concurrent validity of REALSoCog. This battery assesses social cognition. It includes paper-and-pencil tasks.

  • Hetero-questionnairesOther

    Hetero-questionnaires assessing patients' social behavior will be transmitted to their relative or primary caregiver (Godefroy \& le GREFEX, 2008; Gury and Ehrlé, in progress of validation) in order to verify the concurrent validity of REALSoCog. These hetero-questionnaires aim to identify and quantify the presence of social skills and behaviour disorders.

Study groups in NCT05558709
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PatientsExperimentalPatients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL) or fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD))
Receives: Other: REALSOCOG; Other: BCS
RelativesOtherCaregivers or relatives of included patients, having regular contact with the patient (≥ 2 times per month).
Receives: Other: Hetero-questionnaires

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. rate of inappropriate behavioural intentions

    It is measured by the REALSoCog task through a question asking the participant to specify his behavioral intention in the case where he would have declared his intention to act in front of the social situation presented. These questions are asked for each social situation presented, i.e. for a total of 16 situations

    Measured: 1 hour and a half

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Assessment of Moral cognition

    The ability to detect moral transgressions, the ability to detect conventional transgressions, and the ability to detect control situations (non-transgressive situations) are measured by the question "Does this situation seem appropriate or inappropriate to you?" asked after each REALSoCog situation. The severity judgment of moral transgressions and the severity judgment of conventional transgressions are measured by the question "How inappropriate does it [the situation] seem to you?" asked after each response characterizing the situation presented as inappropriate in REALSoCog.

    Measured: 1 hour and a half

  2. Evaluation of Empathy and emotional reactivity

    The intensity of emotional empathy and the intensity of emotional reactivity are measured by the question "How much are you affected by the situation? This question is asked after each experimental situation of REALSoCog (i.e. situations involving a transgression and situations constructed to elicit empathy), i.e. for 10 situations.

    The valence and congruence of the emotions felt are measured by the question "The emotion you feel at the sight of this situation is: 1 (very negative) to 5 (very positive)". This question is asked after each experimental situation of REALSoCog (i.e. situations involving a transgression and situations constructed to elicit empathy), i.e. for 10 situations.

    Measured: 1 hour and a half

  3. Assessment of theory of mind

    The ability to detect the intentionality of an action is measured by the question "Is the behavior of the [main protagonist in the situation] intentional? Yes / No". This question is asked for 5 REALSoCog situations.

    The ability to characterize the valence of this intention and the average valence of the attributed intentions is measured by the question "In your opinion the intention is: 1 (very malicious) to 5 (very benevolent)". This question is asked for 5 REALSoCog situations.

    The ability to infer an affect to others is measured by the question "How does [main protagonist of the situation] feel?". This question is asked for 8 REALSoCog situations.

    The intensity of the affect attributed to others is measured by the question "How does [main protagonist of the situation] feel about [subject's response to the previous question]?" This question is asked for 8 REALSoCog situations.

    Measured: 1 hour and a half

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2022
  2. Study start4 Feb 2026
  3. Primary completion4 Feb 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05558709
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP220748
Acronym
REALSOCOG
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
20 Sep 2022
Last updated
13 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing REALSOCOG, BCS and Hetero-questionnaires in people with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marc VERNY, Pr (01 42 16 03 12 ext. +33, marc.verny@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

rate of inappropriate behavioural intentions (time frame: 1 hour and a half). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in