AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerOPTIMALNCT05560776

Optimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling for Molecular Markers for NSCLC

A study testing Endobronchial ultrasound in people with Lung Cancer and Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval at 1 site in Canada.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this monocentric randomized controlled trial, 120 potential non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for which tissue diagnosis and material for next generation sequencing (NGS) is required for clinical management will be approached the day of their endobronchial ultrasound to participate in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Endobronchial ultrasound
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 May 2023to 1 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Suspected or confirmed NSCLC requiring tissue sample for NGS testing to guide clinical management
  • Presence of at least 2 targets accessible by EBUS or EUS suspicious of malignancy (primary tumor, lymph node > 10mm or with Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) > 2.5)

Who cannot join

  • Other modality then EBUS judged preferable by treating physician to obtain tumoral tissue for NGS testing

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Quebec

    Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: OPTimizing Endobronchial Ultrasound Sampling In Suspected Non Small Cell Lung Cancer for Molecular Markers : A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled TriaL

In this monocentric randomized controlled trial, 120 potential non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for which tissue diagnosis and material for next generation sequencing (NGS) is required for clinical management will be approached the day of their endobronchial ultrasound to participate in the study. They will be randomized to 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and will all undergo liquid biopsy. The co-primary outcomes are 1)the rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node and 2)the percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allows to identify clinically pertinent findings not available from tissue biopsy

Being tested
Endobronchial ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endobronchial ultrasoundProcedure or surgery

    Two or three passes per lymph node

Study groups in NCT05560776
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2 passes per target on EBUSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Endobronchial ultrasound
3 passes per target on EBUSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: Endobronchial ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node

    Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.

    Measured: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing

  2. Percentage of patients for which liquid biopsy allowed to identify genetic alterations not identified from tissue biopsy

    A case for which liquid biopsy NGS testing allows to identify a genetic alteration not identified by matched tissue biopsy (tissue inadequate, insufficient for molecular testing or adequate but genetic alteration not found) will be considered a case for which liquid biopsy provided additional clinical findings

    Measured: At 1 month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/patient

    Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.

    Measured: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing

  2. Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/sampling scheme

    Cell block will be reviewed by a blinded pathologist to determine the percentage of tumor cells within the sample by increment of 5%. More than 10% of tumor cell will be considered adequate.

    Measured: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2022
  2. Study start1 May 2023
  3. Primary completion1 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05560776
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-3850
Acronym
OPTIMAL
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
25 Sep 2022
Last updated
26 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endobronchial ultrasound in people with Lung Cancer and Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of obtention of adequate material for NGS testing with 2 vs 3 passes/lymph node (time frame: At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years), all cell blocks will be reviewed by the blinded pathologist to assess adequacy rate for NGS testing). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in