AzTrials
AzTrials

Radiation ExposureDOSE RPW-CRINCT05561439

Individual Dosimetric Monitoring of Workers During Interventional Radiology and Cardiology Procedures for Cardiologists and Radiologists in France

An observational study of Radiation Exposure, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to review the results of annual radiation doses received by interventional cardiologists and radiologists in France. The results of this study will allow the improvement of classification of interventional cardiology and radiology activities and procedures to help define radiation dose… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Radiation Exposure
What is being tested?
Dosimetric monitoring
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
2 Sep 2022to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants in the study will be interventional cardiologists and interventional radiologists exposed to radiation during their interventional procedures performed as part of their activity.

Who may be able to join

  • Physician performing interventional cardiology or radiology procedures with a fixed C-arm system
  • Physician systematically wearing at least one of the following personal dosimeters: whole body, extremities, lens.

Who cannot join

  • Physician who did not perform an interventional procedure during the observation period (2019-2021)
  • For the primary endpoint by year, physician with more than 3 months of missing data (more than one 3-month period or more than 3 1-month periods)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Nîmes

    Nîmes

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Retrospective Study of Passive Dosimeter Results for Interventional Cardiologists and Radiologists

The objective of this study is to review the results of annual radiation doses received by interventional cardiologists and radiologists in France. The results of this study will allow the improvement of classification of interventional cardiology and radiology activities and procedures to help define radiation dose constraints for occupational exposure, according to the number and types of procedures performed.

The study is based on the hypothesis that some specialties in interventional cardiology (cardiology or rythmology procedures) and in interventional radiology (vascular, neuroradiology, osteoarticular) and some types of procedures present greater exposure risks for interventional cardiologists and radiologists. It is expected that the annual radiation dose limits for workers can be exceeded if good practices for both patient and worker radiation protection are not applied. Also, dosimetry equipment used to detect radiation dose although provided to the workers are not systematically worn by the physician during the procedure . The study is likely to show that for an equivalent speciality and number of procedures per type of act, the correct use of collective and personal radiation protection equipment (préciser) will lower occupational radiation exposure of physician . Similarly, for an equivalent activity and number of procedures per type of act , a trained physician would have a lower occupational exposure than an untrained physician. The physician's radiation exposure should therefore increase with a greater number of procedures per type of procedure performed and as the radiation dose delivered to the patient increase. Finally, there would be a different correlation between patient's radiation dose and physician's exposure depending on specialty, procedures, modality, experience and availability and use of collective and personal radiation protection equipment.

Being tested
Dosimetric monitoring

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dosimetric monitoringOther

    Dosimetric monitoring of workers Information retrieved from passive dosimeters results from the years 2019, 2020 and 2021

Study groups in NCT05561439
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cardiology: Coronary/ValvularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Cardiology: RhythmologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Cardiology: MixedNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Simple VascularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Complex VascularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Mixed VascularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Simple OsteoarticularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Complex OsteoarticularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Mixed OsteoarticularNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Simple NeuroradiologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Complex NeuroradiologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Mixed NeuroradiologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: MixedNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Simple OncologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Complex OncologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring
Radiology: Mixed OncologyNot described
Receives: Other: Dosimetric monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for effective dose for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2019

  2. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for effective dose for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2020

  3. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for effective dose for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2021

  4. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the skin for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2019

  5. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the skin for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2020

  6. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the skin for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2021

  7. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the lens of the eye for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2019

  8. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the lens of the eye for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2020

  9. Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for equivalent doses to the lens of the eye for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mSv

    Measured: 2021

Secondary outcomes (58)
  1. Availability and frequency of use for each passive dosimeter

    Yes/no for each passive dosimeter (whole body, extremities, lens) 4 categories: worn systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  2. Availability and frequency of use for each passive dosimeter

    Yes/no for each passive dosimeter (whole body, extremities, lens) 4 categories: worn systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  3. Availability and frequency of use for each passive dosimeter

    Yes/no for each passive dosimeter (whole body, extremities, lens) 4 categories: worn systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  4. High and low radiation protection equipment availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  5. High and low radiation protection equipment availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  6. High and low radiation protection equipment availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  7. High radiation protection alone (ceiling suspension) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  8. High radiation protection alone (ceiling suspension) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  9. High radiation protection alone (ceiling suspension) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  10. Low radiation protection alone (windscreen) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  11. Low radiation protection alone (windscreen) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  12. Low radiation protection alone (windscreen) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  13. Radioprotective sterile fields (e.g. RADPAD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  14. Radioprotective sterile fields (e.g. RADPAD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  15. Radioprotective sterile fields (e.g. RADPAD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  16. Arm support systems with a radioprotection (e.g. STARBOARD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  17. Arm support systems with a radioprotection (e.g. STARBOARD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  18. Arm support systems with a radioprotection (e.g. STARBOARD) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  19. Lead apron or vests and skirts availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  20. Lead apron or vests and skirts availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  21. Lead apron or vests and skirts availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  22. Leaded collars or thyroid protectors availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  23. Leaded collars or thyroid protectors availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  24. Leaded collars or thyroid protectors availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  25. Leaded sleeves (handle) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019,

  26. Leaded sleeves (handle) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  27. Leaded sleeves (handle) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  28. Leaded eye protection (glasses, over-glasses or visors) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019, 2020 and 2021

  29. Leaded eye protection (glasses, over-glasses or visors) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  30. Leaded eye protection (glasses, over-glasses or visors) availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  31. Gloves use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  32. Leaded head caps availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2019

  33. Leaded head caps availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2020

  34. Leaded head caps availability and use by interventional physicians according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Yes/no; classed as used systematically (100% of the time), often (> 50% of the time), infrequently (<50% of the time) or never (not worn) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Measured: 2021

  35. Patient radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2019,

  36. Patient radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2020

  37. Patient radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2021

  38. Worker radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2019

  39. Worker radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2020

  40. Worker radiation protection training status according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Up-to-date/needs renewing/never completed

    Measured: 2021

  41. Physician exposure according to total number of procedures

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2019

  42. Physician exposure according to total number of procedures

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2020

  43. Physician exposure according to total number of procedures

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2021

  44. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by type of specialty

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2019

  45. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by type of specialty

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2020

  46. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by type of specialty

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2021

  47. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by modality

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2219

  48. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by modality

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2020

  49. Physician exposure according to number of procedures by modality

    mSv: Information taken from Dosimetry Archiving and Communication System

    Measured: 2021

  50. Relationships between the whole body, extremity and lens radiation exposures and the Dose Area Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Gy.cm²

    Measured: 2019

  51. Relationships between the whole body, extremity and lens radiation exposures and the Dose Area Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Gy.cm²

    Measured: 2020

  52. Relationships between the whole body, extremity and lens radiation exposures and the Dose Area Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    Gy.cm²

    Measured: 2021

  53. Relationships between whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Air Kerma at the interventional reference point patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy

    Measured: 2019

  54. Relationships between whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Air Kerma at the interventional reference point patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy

    Measured: 2020

  55. Relationships between whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Air Kerma at the interventional reference point patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy

    Measured: 2021

  56. Relationships between the physician's whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Dose Length Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy.cm

    Measured: 2019

  57. Relationships between the physician's whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Dose Length Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy.cm

    Measured: 2020

  58. Relationships between the physician's whole body, extremity and lens exposures and the Dose Length Product patient dosimetric indicator per physician (dosimetric indicators) according to specialty, activity and type of procedures performed

    mGy.cm

    Measured: 2021

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Sep 2022
  2. Study start2 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05561439
Sponsor's protocol ID
NIMAO/2021-01 /CD-01
Acronym
DOSE RPW-CRI
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
27 Sep 2022
Last updated
10 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Radiation Exposure, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annual occupational radiation exposure levels for effective dose for interventional cardiologists and radiologists according to their specialty, activity and type of procedures performed (time frame: 2019). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in