Recession, GingivalPhase 4NCT05565079
Root Coverage Using ADM and Coronally Positioned Tunnel With or Without Enamel Matrix Derivative
A Phase 4 study testing Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative and Regenerative tissue matrix in people with Recession, Gingival, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
24 patients will be treated with a coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM with or without the addition of Enamel Matrix Derivative to compare the baseline and 6-month changes in recession defect coverage, clinical attachment levels, amount of keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Recession, Gingival
- What is being tested?
- Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative and Regenerative tissue matrix
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2022to 30 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of at least one Miller class 1 or 2 soft tissue recession defect >3 mm on a non-molar tooth.
- Healthy patients, at least 18 years of age.
- Patient understands and signs an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville IRB.
Who cannot join
- Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, diseases that significantly affect the periodontium, infectious diseases, or psychological problems that may interfere with treatment.
- Previous head and neck radiation or chemotherapy within the previous 12 months.
- Patients with known allergies to any of the materials used in the study, including systemic antibiotics.
- Patients that use tobacco products (smoking, smokeless tobacco, or electronic cigarettes).
- Patients with alcohol abuse problems.
- Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Cemento-enamel unction not identifiable.
- Root surface restorations at the recession site.
- Patients undergoing long-term steroid therapy.
- History of previous root coverage procedure, graft, or guided tissue regeneration involving the recession site.
- Pregnant or lactating patients.
- Patients who fail to maintain oral hygiene levels of at least 80% plaque-free surfaces.
- Patients who fail to complete the informed consent form.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
About this study
Official title: Root Coverage Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and a Coronally Positioned Tunnel With or Without Biologic Materials
24 patients will be treated with a coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM with or without the addition of Enamel Matrix Derivative to compare the baseline and 6-month changes in recession defect coverage, clinical attachment levels, amount of keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness.
Read the detailed description
Study Design: 24 patients will be treated: 12 with a coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM (control), and 12 patients with a coronally positioned tunnel with Alloderm RTM and enamel matrix derivative (test). Included patients will undergo root coverage using the basic principles of a coronally positioned tunnel as described by Allen (2005). Six exams for measurements will be performed per patient: preoperative, two-week, one-, two-, four-, and six-months postoperatively.
Presurgical Management: Each patient will receive a diagnostic work-up, including standardized radiographs of the selected site and adjacent teeth (periapical and bitewing), clinical photographs, and a full mouth clinical examination. All women of childbearing potential will receive a pregnancy test. Presurgical preparation will include detailed oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing under local anesthesia, and occlusal adjustment (if indicated). Baseline data will be collected on the day of surgical treatment.
Clinical Measurements:
Baseline, two-week, one-, two-, four, and six-month data for the test site and adjacent dentition will include the following:
- Miller's recession defect classification: Miller (1985).
- Plaque index: Silness and Loe (1964).
- Gingival index: Loe (1967).
- Bleeding on probing index: Dichotomous scoring.
- Gingival margin levels (Recession): Measured from CEJ to the gingival margin.
- Keratinized tissue width: Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction.
- Clinical attachment level: Measured from CEJ to the bottom of the clinical periodontal pocket.
- Clinical tooth mobility: Modified Miller's Index, Laster (1975).
- Radiographic examination: Paralleling technique with pre-operative periapical and bitewing radiographs.
- Soft Tissue Thickness: Soft tissue measurements will be taken at three mid-buccal positions.
- Tooth vitality: Tested with electric pulp tester and cold testing.
- Patient models.
- Clinical photographs.
Primary Outcome Variable 1. Site recession defect changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation dimensions of soft tissues.
Secondary Outcome Variables
- Site clinical attachment level changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation sites.
- Site gingival thickness changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation dimensions of soft tissues.
- Site keratinized tissue changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation width of the keratinized soft tissues.
Surgical Treatment Treatment performed will be randomly assigned, via a coin toss, by the mentor at the beginning of the surgical appointment prior to local anesthesia. Root surfaces will be meticulously root planed using an ultrasonic instrument followed by hand instruments to obtain a smooth, hard root surface.
For control sites, the surgical procedure will consist of the preparation of a coronally positioned tunnel around the recession defect site without vertical releasing incisions. This technique is a modification of a previous tunnel technique described by Allen to include coronal positioning of the soft tissue over the allograft. The tissue will be elevated with a split-thickness incision beyond the mucogingival junction and extended until it is deemed enough release for tension-free coronal positioning of the tissue. The tunnel will be dissected with a microsurgical kit using loupes. The tunnel and AlloDerm RTM will extend one tooth mesial and distal to the recession site. Interproximal papillae will be elevated from the facial and lingual bone septum without papillary splitting incisions. The AlloDerm RTM will be positioned to completely cover the defect at the CEJ of the tooth and the inferior and lateral borders of the allograft will extend >3 mm beyond the osseous defect margins.
The test sites will be treated surgically in an identical manner for both tunnel preparation and AlloDerm graft placement. Additionally, enamel matrix derivative will be placed on the periosteal side of the soft tissue tunnel prior to placement and fixation of the ADM graft. Enamel matrix derivative will then be placed on both sides of the ADM prior to placement within the tunnel. After the graft and soft tissue have been secured in place, enamel matrix derivative will be placed over the entire area. For all sites, a monofilament polyglyconate Maxon 5-0 sling suture will be placed to maintain tensile strength for >6 weeks to secure the graft at the level of the CEJ. The marginal tissue will be placed as far coronal to the CEJ as possible to completely cover the AlloDerm graft and secured with sling sutures. Postoperative instructions will include: post-surgical regimen of at-home care instructions, 100 mg doxycycline hyclate qd for 14 days, 21 tablet 4 mg methylprednisolone dose pack, 600 mg ibuprofen q6h for 10 days, and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate bid for 10 days.
Surgical Measurements
- Recession defect coverage (Initial recession depth, initial augmented, and post-augmented at 6 months):
- Direct= periodontal probe measurement from CEJ to gingival margin mid-defect.
- Keratinized tissue height (Initial height, initial augmented, and post-augmented at 6 months)
- Direct= distance from the gingival margin to mucogingival junction stent. 16
- Clinical attachment levels (Initial attachment loss and post-augmentation at 6 months)
- Direct= distance from the gingival margin to the base of periodontal pocket +/- distance from CEJ to the gingival margin.
- Clinical photographs
Post-surgical patient management All patients will be seen at two weeks, one-, two-, four-, and six-months postoperative. Sutures will be removed between 4-8 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative visits will consist of supragingival plaque removal and oral hygiene reinforcement. Any patient who develops any significant post-operative complications, suffers an adverse reaction or allergy to the materials used, or shows attachment loss greater or > 2 mm on the treated tooth or adjacent teeth will be exited from the study and will receive appropriate treatment.
Potential risks:
There are known physical risks linked with root coverage procedures and the placement of soft tissue allografts. These risks include:
- Infection of the treated area
- Mild bruising and/or bleeding
- Mild swelling
- Transient or, rarely, permanent tooth sensitivity to hot, cold, sweet, or acidic foods
- Transient or, rarely, permanent paresthesia or numbness of lips, tongue, chin, or gums
- Loss of the soft tissue graft with occasionally more recession or increased spacing between teeth
- Allergic reaction to the soft tissue graft
- Accidental swallowing of foreign matter
There may also be additional, unforeseen risks involved with these procedures. In terms of economic risk, if the treatment fails, the patient will be retreated at no charge in the Graduate periodontics clinic. In terms of legal risks, if the patient is injured as a result of his/her participation in this study, treatment for the injury will be provided at the University of Louisville Hospital. The patient or the patient's insurance company will be billed for the costs of such medical treatment. Additional compensation, for things such as lost wages, inconvenience, or discomfort will not be provided.
Adverse events:
- An "adverse event" refers to any adverse experience occurring during the clinical study period, whether associated or not associated with the study test articles or procedures.
- A "serious adverse event" means any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution. With respect to human clinical experience, a serious adverse event includes any experience that is fatal or life-threatening, causes a persistent or permanent disability, requires initial or prolonged hospitalization, requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage, or is a congenital anomaly.
- An "unanticipated adverse event" is one that is not identified in nature, severity, or frequency in the investigator's brochure.
Adverse events will be collected by observing and interviewing the subject during the study. Subjects who experience any significant problems during the study are to call and discuss them with the investigator. Any suspected adverse event or allergic response is to be thoroughly examined by the investigator. All adverse events are to be reported. All subjects experiencing adverse events will be followed by the investigator until there is a return to the subject's baseline condition or a clinical satisfactory resolution is achieved.
Adverse events which are serious or unanticipated are to be reported immediately by phone to the study director and promptly reported to IRB (within five working days of the UofL site awareness) through completion of the Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting Form within the ESS system, which includes the date of the event, description of the adverse event, involved study treatment, and outcome of the event. Examples of expected, but rarely occurring adverse events related to grafting treatment include clinical observation of infection, flap necrosis, severe inflammation, and severe pain. Additionally, unanticipated problems (UPIRTSOs) require completion of teh UPIRTSO Reporting Form within the ESS system to IRB.
If the IRB requests any additional data or information regarding the reported events, Follow-Up Reports and Response to Stipulations will be reported within 15 working days after receiving the IRB request.
- Conditions
- Recession, Gingival
- Being tested
- Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative, Regenerative tissue matrix
- Keywords
- esthetic surgery, allograft, biologic materials, acellular dermis
- Medical subject headings
- Gingival Recession
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivativeBiological
Also called Emdogain, Straumann
Subjects in this group will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm, RTM) and a porcine-derived enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain).
Regenerative tissue matrixBiological
Also called AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizons
Subjects in both groups will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm, RTM).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM and Enamel Matrix Derivative | Experimental | 12 patients will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizons) and a porcine derived enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain, Straumann). Receives: Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative; Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix |
| Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM | Active comparator | 12 patients will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizons). Receives: Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recession defect coverage
To compare baseline and 6-month changes in recession defect coverage
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Clinical attachment levels
To compare baseline and 6-month changes in clinical attachment levels
Measured: 6 months
Keratinized tissue width
To compare baseline and 6-month changes in amount of keratinized tissue
Measured: 6 months
Soft tissue thickness
To compare baseline and 6-month changes in soft tissue thickness
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2022
- Study start6 Oct 2022
- Primary completion7 Oct 2024
- Study completion30 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Recession, GingivalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 24 patients will be recruited and randomly grouped as control or test treatment for root coverage using a coronally positioned flap and alloderm with (test) or without (control) enamel matrix derivative.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Louisville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Himabindu Dukka, University of Louisville
- Investigators
- Bindu Dukka, BDS, MSD, MPH, Principal investigator, Director, Graduate Periodontics, University of Louisville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05565079
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22.0637
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, Gera I, Nagy K, Azzi R, Etienne D. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jan;37(1):88-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01492.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
PubMed 19968743Vincent-Bugnas S, Charbit Y, Lamure J, Mahler P, Dard MM. Modified Tunnel Technique Combined with Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Minimally Invasive Treatment for Single or Multiple Class I Recession Defects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):145-54. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12170.
PubMed 26094684Shepherd N, Greenwell H, Hill M, Vidal R, Scheetz JP. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in humans. J Periodontol. 2009 Mar;80(3):397-404. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080438.
PubMed 19254123
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Root Coverage Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and a Coronally Positioned Tunnel With or Without Biologic Materials
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05565079
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22.0637
- Conditions
- Recession, Gingival
- Keywords
- esthetic surgery, allograft, biologic materials, acellular dermis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LouisvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
24 patients will be treated with a coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM with or without the addition of Enamel Matrix Derivative to compare the baseline and 6-month changes in recession defect coverage, clinical attachment levels, amount of keratinized tissue width, and soft tissue thickness.
Detailed description
Study Design: 24 patients will be treated: 12 with a coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM (control), and 12 patients with a coronally positioned tunnel with Alloderm RTM and enamel matrix derivative (test). Included patients will undergo root coverage using the basic principles of a coronally positioned tunnel as described by Allen (2005). Six exams for measurements will be performed per patient: preoperative, two-week, one-, two-, four-, and six-months postoperatively.
Presurgical Management: Each patient will receive a diagnostic work-up, including standardized radiographs of the selected site and adjacent teeth (periapical and bitewing), clinical photographs, and a full mouth clinical examination. All women of childbearing potential will receive a pregnancy test. Presurgical preparation will include detailed oral hygiene instructions, scaling and root planing under local anesthesia, and occlusal adjustment (if indicated). Baseline data will be collected on the day of surgical treatment.
Clinical Measurements:
Baseline, two-week, one-, two-, four, and six-month data for the test site and adjacent dentition will include the following:
- Miller's recession defect classification: Miller (1985).
- Plaque index: Silness and Loe (1964).
- Gingival index: Loe (1967).
- Bleeding on probing index: Dichotomous scoring.
- Gingival margin levels (Recession): Measured from CEJ to the gingival margin.
- Keratinized tissue width: Measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction.
- Clinical attachment level: Measured from CEJ to the bottom of the clinical periodontal pocket.
- Clinical tooth mobility: Modified Miller's Index, Laster (1975).
- Radiographic examination: Paralleling technique with pre-operative periapical and bitewing radiographs.
- Soft Tissue Thickness: Soft tissue measurements will be taken at three mid-buccal positions.
- Tooth vitality: Tested with electric pulp tester and cold testing.
- Patient models.
- Clinical photographs.
Primary Outcome Variable 1. Site recession defect changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation dimensions of soft tissues.
Secondary Outcome Variables
- Site clinical attachment level changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation sites.
- Site gingival thickness changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation dimensions of soft tissues.
- Site keratinized tissue changes by comparing the pre- to the 6-month post-augmentation width of the keratinized soft tissues.
Surgical Treatment Treatment performed will be randomly assigned, via a coin toss, by the mentor at the beginning of the surgical appointment prior to local anesthesia. Root surfaces will be meticulously root planed using an ultrasonic instrument followed by hand instruments to obtain a smooth, hard root surface.
For control sites, the surgical procedure will consist of the preparation of a coronally positioned tunnel around the recession defect site without vertical releasing incisions. This technique is a modification of a previous tunnel technique described by Allen to include coronal positioning of the soft tissue over the allograft. The tissue will be elevated with a split-thickness incision beyond the mucogingival junction and extended until it is deemed enough release for tension-free coronal positioning of the tissue. The tunnel will be dissected with a microsurgical kit using loupes. The tunnel and AlloDerm RTM will extend one tooth mesial and distal to the recession site. Interproximal papillae will be elevated from the facial and lingual bone septum without papillary splitting incisions. The AlloDerm RTM will be positioned to completely cover the defect at the CEJ of the tooth and the inferior and lateral borders of the allograft will extend >3 mm beyond the osseous defect margins.
The test sites will be treated surgically in an identical manner for both tunnel preparation and AlloDerm graft placement. Additionally, enamel matrix derivative will be placed on the periosteal side of the soft tissue tunnel prior to placement and fixation of the ADM graft. Enamel matrix derivative will then be placed on both sides of the ADM prior to placement within the tunnel. After the graft and soft tissue have been secured in place, enamel matrix derivative will be placed over the entire area. For all sites, a monofilament polyglyconate Maxon 5-0 sling suture will be placed to maintain tensile strength for >6 weeks to secure the graft at the level of the CEJ. The marginal tissue will be placed as far coronal to the CEJ as possible to completely cover the AlloDerm graft and secured with sling sutures. Postoperative instructions will include: post-surgical regimen of at-home care instructions, 100 mg doxycycline hyclate qd for 14 days, 21 tablet 4 mg methylprednisolone dose pack, 600 mg ibuprofen q6h for 10 days, and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate bid for 10 days.
Surgical Measurements
- Recession defect coverage (Initial recession depth, initial augmented, and post-augmented at 6 months):
- Direct= periodontal probe measurement from CEJ to gingival margin mid-defect.
- Keratinized tissue height (Initial height, initial augmented, and post-augmented at 6 months)
- Direct= distance from the gingival margin to mucogingival junction stent. 16
- Clinical attachment levels (Initial attachment loss and post-augmentation at 6 months)
- Direct= distance from the gingival margin to the base of periodontal pocket +/- distance from CEJ to the gingival margin.
- Clinical photographs
Post-surgical patient management All patients will be seen at two weeks, one-, two-, four-, and six-months postoperative. Sutures will be removed between 4-8 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative visits will consist of supragingival plaque removal and oral hygiene reinforcement. Any patient who develops any significant post-operative complications, suffers an adverse reaction or allergy to the materials used, or shows attachment loss greater or > 2 mm on the treated tooth or adjacent teeth will be exited from the study and will receive appropriate treatment.
Potential risks:
There are known physical risks linked with root coverage procedures and the placement of soft tissue allografts. These risks include:
- Infection of the treated area
- Mild bruising and/or bleeding
- Mild swelling
- Transient or, rarely, permanent tooth sensitivity to hot, cold, sweet, or acidic foods
- Transient or, rarely, permanent paresthesia or numbness of lips, tongue, chin, or gums
- Loss of the soft tissue graft with occasionally more recession or increased spacing between teeth
- Allergic reaction to the soft tissue graft
- Accidental swallowing of foreign matter
There may also be additional, unforeseen risks involved with these procedures. In terms of economic risk, if the treatment fails, the patient will be retreated at no charge in the Graduate periodontics clinic. In terms of legal risks, if the patient is injured as a result of his/her participation in this study, treatment for the injury will be provided at the University of Louisville Hospital. The patient or the patient's insurance company will be billed for the costs of such medical treatment. Additional compensation, for things such as lost wages, inconvenience, or discomfort will not be provided.
Adverse events:
- An "adverse event" refers to any adverse experience occurring during the clinical study period, whether associated or not associated with the study test articles or procedures.
- A "serious adverse event" means any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution. With respect to human clinical experience, a serious adverse event includes any experience that is fatal or life-threatening, causes a persistent or permanent disability, requires initial or prolonged hospitalization, requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage, or is a congenital anomaly.
- An "unanticipated adverse event" is one that is not identified in nature, severity, or frequency in the investigator's brochure.
Adverse events will be collected by observing and interviewing the subject during the study. Subjects who experience any significant problems during the study are to call and discuss them with the investigator. Any suspected adverse event or allergic response is to be thoroughly examined by the investigator. All adverse events are to be reported. All subjects experiencing adverse events will be followed by the investigator until there is a return to the subject's baseline condition or a clinical satisfactory resolution is achieved.
Adverse events which are serious or unanticipated are to be reported immediately by phone to the study director and promptly reported to IRB (within five working days of the UofL site awareness) through completion of the Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting Form within the ESS system, which includes the date of the event, description of the adverse event, involved study treatment, and outcome of the event. Examples of expected, but rarely occurring adverse events related to grafting treatment include clinical observation of infection, flap necrosis, severe inflammation, and severe pain. Additionally, unanticipated problems (UPIRTSOs) require completion of teh UPIRTSO Reporting Form within the ESS system to IRB.
If the IRB requests any additional data or information regarding the reported events, Follow-Up Reports and Response to Stipulations will be reported within 15 working days after receiving the IRB request.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 24 patients will be recruited and randomly grouped as control or test treatment for root coverage using a coronally positioned flap and alloderm with (test) or without (control) enamel matrix derivative.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM and Enamel Matrix Derivative | Experimental | Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative, Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix12 patients will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizons) and a porcine derived enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain, Straumann). |
| Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM | Active comparator | Biological: Regenerative tissue matrix12 patients will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizons). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of at least one Miller class 1 or 2 soft tissue recession defect >3 mm on a non-molar tooth.
- Healthy patients, at least 18 years of age.
- Patient understands and signs an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville IRB.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, diseases that significantly affect the periodontium, infectious diseases, or psychological problems that may interfere with treatment.
- Previous head and neck radiation or chemotherapy within the previous 12 months.
- Patients with known allergies to any of the materials used in the study, including systemic antibiotics.
- Patients that use tobacco products (smoking, smokeless tobacco, or electronic cigarettes).
- Patients with alcohol abuse problems.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivativeAlso: Emdogain, StraumannSubjects in this group will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm, RTM) and a porcine-derived enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain). | Biological | Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM and Enamel Matrix Derivative |
| Regenerative tissue matrixAlso: AlloDerm RTM, BioHorizonsSubjects in both groups will receive a coronally positioned tunnel with a regenerative tissue matrix (AlloDerm, RTM). | Biological | Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM, Coronally positioned tunnel with AlloDerm RTM and Enamel Matrix Derivative |
Primary outcome
Recession defect coverage
Time frame: 6 months
To compare baseline and 6-month changes in recession defect coverage
3 secondary outcomes
Clinical attachment levels
Time frame: 6 months
Keratinized tissue width
Time frame: 6 months
Soft tissue thickness
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 19968743Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, Gera I, Nagy K, Azzi R, Etienne D. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jan;37(1):88-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01492.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 26094684Vincent-Bugnas S, Charbit Y, Lamure J, Mahler P, Dard MM. Modified Tunnel Technique Combined with Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Minimally Invasive Treatment for Single or Multiple Class I Recession Defects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):145-54. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12170.
- Results publication: PubMed 19254123Shepherd N, Greenwell H, Hill M, Vidal R, Scheetz JP. Root coverage using acellular dermal matrix and comparing a coronally positioned tunnel with and without platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in humans. J Periodontol. 2009 Mar;80(3):397-404. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080438.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Recession, Gingival
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Active, not recruiting
Vertically Coronally Advanced Flap Versus Coronally Advanced Flap for Miller Class I Gingival Recession
Gingival Recession
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Smoking on Palatal Donor Site Tissue Profile in the Success of Connective Tissue Grafts
Soft Tissue Augmentation, Gingival Recession Localized Moderate
Recruiting
Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Hyaluronic Acid After Free Gingival Graft
Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
Recruiting
Impact of Root Surface Conditioning With Erythritol Air Polishing and Hand Instrumentation on Recession Coverage Using the Modified Tunnel Technique and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft.
Gingival Recession
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bindu Dukka, BDS, MSD, MPH principal investigator
Director, Graduate Periodontics, University of Louisville
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Regenerative tissue matrix and enamel matrix derivative and Regenerative tissue matrix in people with Recession, Gingival, run by University of Louisville at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recession defect coverage (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05565079, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.