AzTrials
AzTrials

Labor PainOCTAPPENALANCT05565274

Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients

A study of Labor Pain, run by Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Labour is a very painful experience and epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for pain relief in labour. Epidural scarcity, cost and shortage of skilled personnel to administer it is a limitation to it's usage in developing countries. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Labor Pain
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
166 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Oct 2022to Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • All pregnant women who presented in spontaneous labour at term, carrying Singleton Live Fetus in Active Phase of Labour with Cervical dilatation of 4-6cm who gave consent to participate in the study

Who cannot join

  • Women with severe medical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, severe pre-eclampsia, cardiac, liver and renal disease
  • Preterm Labour
  • Intrauterine Fetal Death
  • Fetal presentation other than cephalic
  • Patients with previous caeserean section
  • History of hypersensitivity to paracetamol, tramadol and pentazocine
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Complications such as antepartum haemarrhage, polyhydramnious, premature rupture of membrane
  • Use of any kind of analgesia before recruitment
  • Multiple gestation
  • All other delivery except spontaneous vertex delivery Labour that was induced or augmented

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Andrew Orhorho, MBBS contact

+2348068616620

andypee2016@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Outcome of Combined Tramadol and Paracetamol Versus Pentazocine as Labour Analgesia Among Parturients in the Federal Medical Center, Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Southern Nigeria: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Labour is a very painful experience and epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard for pain relief in labour. Epidural scarcity, cost and shortage of skilled personnel to administer it is a limitation to it's usage in developing countries. Parenteral opioid analgesics such as pethidine and pentazocine are effective labour analgesia commonly used in developing countries but are limited by their side effects. This limitation in their use call for the need for alternative analgesic with similar or superior analgesic effect but with minimal side effects.The study is aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of combined tramadol and paracetamol in reducing labour pain among parturients.

Read the detailed description

There is paucity of data in our environment looking at the efficacy and safety of combined tramadol and paracetamol in relieving labour pain. This study will offer us great opportunity to evaluate their synergistic effect in labour when compared to the commonly used single opioids such as pethidine or pentazocine.

It would be a double blinded randomized controlled trial. One hundred and sixty-six pregnant eligible women in labour would participate in this study. Participants will be randomized equally into two study arms ( Tramadol plus Paracetamol study arm and Pentazocine study arm) after informed consent. The Tramadol plus Paracetamol study arm will receive 100mg of tramadol plus 600mg of paracetamol intramuscularly in a 2ml and 5ml syringe respectively while the pentazocine study arm will receive 30mg of Pentazocine and 2 milliliters of water for injection as placebo intramuscularly in a 2l and 5 ml syringes respectively. Both drugs will be administered to the participants at 4-6cm cervical dilatation during labour. The outcome measures will be evaluated within 5 hours in labour and an hour immediately after delivery. The need for additional rescue analgesia will be assessed as well. Fetal outcome on both arms will be noted too.

Conditions
Labor Pain
Being tested
Pentazocine plus placebo
Keywords
Tramadol, Paracetamol, Pentazocine, Labour, Analgesia, Efficacy, Safety
Medical subject headings
Labor Pain, Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pentazocine plus placeboDrug

    30mg of pentazocine and 2milliLitre of injection water

Study groups in NCT05565274
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tramadol plus ParacetamolExperimental2ml of 100mg of intramuscular tramadol plus 2ml of 600mg of intramuscular paracetamol unlabeled
Receives: Drug: Pentazocine plus placebo
Pentazocine plus placeboActive comparator2ml of 30mg of pentazocine plus 2 ml of water for injection will be administered intramuscularly during labour
Receives: Drug: Pentazocine plus placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain After 1 hour of Analgesia Administration

    Pain was Assessed during Labour 1 hour Post Analgesia Administration using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain. The Numerical Rating Scale has a minimum score of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome (0=No Pain at all, 5 means Moderate Pain and 10= Worse pain imaginable)

    Measured: 1 hour post analgesia administration

  2. To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain After 2 hours of Analgesia Administration

    Pain was Assessed during Labour 2 hours Post Analgesia Administration using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain. The Numerical Rating Scale has a minimum score of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome (0=No Pain at all, 5 means Moderate Pain and 10= Worse pain imaginable)

    Measured: 2 hours post analgesia administration

  3. To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain After 3 hours of Analgesia Administration

    Pain was Assessed during Labour 3 hours Post Analgesia Administration using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain. The Numerical Rating Scale has a minimum score of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome (0=No Pain at all, 5 means Moderate Pain and 10= Worse pain imaginable)

    Measured: 3 hours post analgesia administration

  4. To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain 4 hours After Analgesia Administration

    Pain was Assessed during Labour 4 hours Post Analgesia Administration using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain. The Numerical Rating Scale has a minimum score of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome (0=No Pain at all, 5 means Moderate Pain and 10= Worse pain imaginable)

    Measured: 4 hours post analgesia administration

  5. To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain 5 hours After Analgesia Administration

    Pain was Assessed during Labour 5 hours Post Analgesia Administration using the Numerical Rating Scale for Pain. The Numerical Rating Scale has a minimum score of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score means a worse outcome (0=No Pain at all, 5 means Moderate Pain and 10= Worse pain imaginable)

    Measured: 5 hours post analgesia administration

  6. Number of Participants with Treatment Related Adverse Events on both arms

    Number of Participants with Treatment Related Adverse Events such as Nausea, Vomiting, Hypersensitivity Reaction, respiratory depression and any other Adverse Effects from the time of first administation to 2 hours post delivery

    Measured: Time of first analgesia administration to 2 hours Post Delivery

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Participants with Good Service Satisfaction

    Good Service Satisfaction among participants was Assessed on both arms of the study using the 5-Point Likert's Scale administered in the first 5 hours of delivery. The 5-Point Likert's Scale contains 5 response Options that consist of two extreme sides and a neutral option at the middle. The 5 responses are; very dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Neither Dissatisfied or Satisfied, Satisfied and Very Satisfied. Participants responsibility is to choose from any of these responses in the administered questionnaire.

    Measured: First 5 hours Post Delivery

  2. Analgesia Administration to Delivery interval

    To compare the interval between analgesia administration and the time it took participants to deliver on both arms of the study. This was recorded within the first 2 hours of delivery.

    Measured: First 2 hours Post Delivery

  3. Apgar Scores of the Neonates

    To Evaluate the well being of Neonates delivered on both arms of the study using the Apgar Scores taken at the first and fifth minutes. Apgar Score has a minimum of 0, a maximum score of 10 and a range of 0-10, where higher score mean a better outcome (0-3= low Apgar Score, 4-6= Moderately Abnormal Apgar Score and 7-10= Good Apgar Score

    Measured: At first and fifth minutes after birth

  4. Special Care Baby Unit Admissions

    To Evaluate the number of Neonates that were admitted into the Special Care Baby Unit within 2 hours of birth. The Special Care Baby Unit is an intensive care unit where optimal emergency treatment is given to the newborn with health related challenges to increase their chance of survival.

    Measured: First 2 hours Post Delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2022
  2. Study startOct 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
"Randomized"
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
166 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05565274
Sponsor's protocol ID
FMCY/O&G/OCTAPPENALA/2022
Acronym
OCTAPPENALA
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
26 Sep 2022
Last updated
4 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study of Labor Pain, run by Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Andrew Orhorho, MBBS (+2348068616620, andypee2016@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To Evaluate the Number of Participants with Pain After 1 hour of Analgesia Administration (time frame: 1 hour post analgesia administration). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in