Celiac DiseasePhase 1/2NCT05574010
A Study of Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of KAN-101 in Celiac Disease (ACeD-it)
A Phase 1/2 study testing Cohort 1 in Part A, Cohort 2 in Part A and Group 2 in Part B and Part C in people with Celiac Disease, run by Kanyos Bio, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anokion SA at 36 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This study is to evaluate the Pharmacodynamic (PD), safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK), and plasma biomarker response of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Celiac Disease
- What is being tested?
- Cohort 1 in Part A, Cohort 2 in Part A and Group 2 in Part B and Part C
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 128 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2022to 19 May 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Previous diagnosis of celiac disease based on histology and positive celiac serology
- HLA-DQ2.5 genotype
- Gluten-free diet for at least 12 months
- Negative or weak positive for transglutaminase IgA and negative or weak positive for DGP-IgA/IgG during screening
Who cannot join
- Refractory celiac disease
- HLA-DQ8 genotype
- Previous oral gluten challenge within 12 months
- Selective IgA deficiency
- Diagnosis of Type-1 diabetes
- Active gastrointestinal diseases
- History of dermatitis herpetiformis
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 3 countries.
36 sites in 3 countries
United States23 sites
Anaheim Clinical Trials, LLC
Anaheim, California, 92801
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Aventiv Research, Inc. d/b/a Centricity Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
Indiana University Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Sneeze, Wheeze & Itch Associates, LLC
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Advanced Research Institute
Ogden, Utah, 84405
Quality Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
North Carolina Clinical Research
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Prism Research LLC dba Nucleus Network
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55114
Agile Clinical Research Trials
Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
GCP Research
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Digestive Research of Central Texas
Waco, Texas, 76712
Velocity Clinical Research, Salt Lake City
West Jordan, Utah, 84088
Northshore Gastroenterology Research, LLC
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
New Zealand7 sites
Optimal Clinical Trials
Auckland, Auckland, 1023
P3 Research - Dunedin
Dunedin, Otago, 9016
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, Hamilton, 3204
P3 Research - Palmerston North
Paraparaumu, Wellington Region, 5032
PCRN Trials
Takapuna, Auckland, 0622
P3 Research - Tauranga
Tauranga, Bay of Plenty, 3110
P3 Research - Wellington
Wellington, Wellington Region, 6021
Australia6 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Wesley Research Institute
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Campbelltown Hospital
Campbelltown, New South Wales, 2560
St John of God Midland Public and Private Hospitals
Midland, Western Australia, 6056
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1B Open-label/Phase 2 Double-blind Placebo- Controlled Study for Pharmacodynamic (PD) Activity, Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety, and Tolerability of KAN-101 In Patients With Celiac Disease (CeD)
This study is to evaluate the Pharmacodynamic (PD), safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK), and plasma biomarker response of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD).
Read the detailed description
The study is a 3-part, multicenter Phase 1b/2 study of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD) on a gluten free diet (GFD). The 3 parts include:
- Part A - Open-label, multiple ascending dose
- Part B - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design
- Part C - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design
Part A is a Phase 1b, open-label, multiple ascending dose (MAD) study design to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of KAN-101 in adult participants (18 to 70 years inclusive) with histology-confirmed CeD. Up to 12 participants who meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive 1 of 2 dose levels of KAN-101. The overall study duration will be about 56 days, including up to 28 days of screening, 7 days of treatment and 21 days of follow up. There will be a gluten challenge test (GC) on Day 15.
Parts B and C are Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study to characterize the biomarker response following GC, safety, tolerability, and PK of KAN-101 in adult participants with histology-confirmed CeD. Approximately 16 participants (4 participants per dose group) will be enrolled in Part B and 104 participants (26 participants per dose group) enrolled into Part C. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1:1 and stratified by participation in a biopsy substudy to 4 treatment groups: placebo and 3 treatment groups with KAN-101 doses based on information obtained from Part A.
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Being tested
- Cohort 1 in Part A, Cohort 2 in Part A, Placebo: Group 1 in Part B and Part C, Group 2 in Part B and Part C, Group 3 in Part B and Part C
- Keywords
- celiac disease, HLA-DQ2.5, gluten free diet
- Medical subject headings
- Celiac Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cohort 1 in Part ADrug
Also called KAN-101
Dose 1 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Cohort 2 in Part ADrug
Also called KAN-101
Dose 2 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Placebo: Group 1 in Part B and Part COther
Also called Placebo
Placebo Intravenous (IV) infusion
Group 2 in Part B and Part CDrug
Also called KAN-101
Dose 3 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Group 3 in Part B and Part CDrug
Also called KAN-101
Dose 4 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
Group 4 in Part B and Part CDrug
Also called KAN-101
Dose 5 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 in Part A | Experimental | All eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 1 Receives: Drug: Cohort 1 in Part A |
| Cohort 2 in Part A | Experimental | All eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 2 Receives: Drug: Cohort 2 in Part A |
| Group 1 in Part B and Part C | Placebo comparator | All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo Receives: Other: Placebo: Group 1 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 2 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 3 Receives: Drug: Group 2 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 3 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 4 Receives: Drug: Group 3 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 4 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | All eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 5 Receives: Drug: Group 4 in Part B and Part C |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence and Severity of TEAEs as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in Part A
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Measured: From screening until the safety follow-up visit on Day 28
Change in Pre- and Post-Gluten Challenge (GC) IL-2 Response From Baseline to Day 15
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
Measured: From Baseline screening to Day 15
Change in IL-2 Response From Day 15 Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
Measured: 0 (pre-GC) and 4 hours post-GC on Day 15
Secondary outcomes (12)
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUCinf
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUClast
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Cmax
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Tmax
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: t½
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part A.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUCinf
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUClast
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Cmax
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Tmax
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: t½
PK sample collection at pre- dose and post dose timepoints in Part B and Part C.
Measured: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part B
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Measured: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part C
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Measured: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2022
- Study start15 Nov 2022
- Primary completion29 Nov 2024
- Study completion19 May 2025
Why it stopped: Sponsor decision
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Celiac DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Part A: This part of the study is an open label with up to 6 participants in each dose cohort. There will be 2 dose cohorts. Part B and Part C: These parts of the study have a randomized, double- blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel study design.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kanyos Bio, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anokion SA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, Anokion SA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05574010
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KAN-101-02
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 7 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Murray JA, Wassaf D, Dunn K, Arora S, Winkle P, Stacey H, Cooper S, Goldstein KE, Manchanda R, Kontos S, Grebe KM. Safety and tolerability of KAN-101, a liver-targeted immune tolerance therapy, in patients with coeliac disease (ACeD): a phase 1 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;8(8):735-747. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00107-3. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PubMed 37329900Muhammad A, Xiao Y, Ahmad YM, Tang R, Zhang Y, Yuan Q, Xiao X. Reprogramming Pathogenic Immune Memory through Inverse Vaccination in Autoimmune Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2026 Aug 1;37(8):1809-1812. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000001070. Epub 2026 Feb 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 41758576
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1B Open-label/Phase 2 Double-blind Placebo- Controlled Study for Pharmacodynamic (PD) Activity, Pharmacokinetics (PK), Safety, and Tolerability of KAN-101 In Patients With Celiac Disease (CeD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05574010
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KAN-101-02
- Conditions
- Celiac Disease
- Keywords
- celiac disease, HLA-DQ2.5, gluten free diet
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Sponsor decision
- Enrolment
- 128 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kanyos Bio, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anokion SAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 10 Mar 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to evaluate the Pharmacodynamic (PD), safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK), and plasma biomarker response of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD).
Detailed description
The study is a 3-part, multicenter Phase 1b/2 study of KAN-101 in participants with Celiac Disease (CeD) on a gluten free diet (GFD). The 3 parts include:
- Part A - Open-label, multiple ascending dose
- Part B - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design
- Part C - Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design
Part A is a Phase 1b, open-label, multiple ascending dose (MAD) study design to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of KAN-101 in adult participants (18 to 70 years inclusive) with histology-confirmed CeD. Up to 12 participants who meet study inclusion/exclusion criteria will receive 1 of 2 dose levels of KAN-101. The overall study duration will be about 56 days, including up to 28 days of screening, 7 days of treatment and 21 days of follow up. There will be a gluten challenge test (GC) on Day 15.
Parts B and C are Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study to characterize the biomarker response following GC, safety, tolerability, and PK of KAN-101 in adult participants with histology-confirmed CeD. Approximately 16 participants (4 participants per dose group) will be enrolled in Part B and 104 participants (26 participants per dose group) enrolled into Part C. Participants will be randomized 1:1:1:1 and stratified by participation in a biopsy substudy to 4 treatment groups: placebo and 3 treatment groups with KAN-101 doses based on information obtained from Part A.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Part A: This part of the study is an open label with up to 6 participants in each dose cohort. There will be 2 dose cohorts. Part B and Part C: These parts of the study have a randomized, double- blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel study design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 in Part A | Experimental | Drug: Cohort 1 in Part AAll eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 1 |
| Cohort 2 in Part A | Experimental | Drug: Cohort 2 in Part AAll eligible Part A participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 2 |
| Group 1 in Part B and Part C | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo: Group 1 in Part B and Part CAll eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo |
| Group 2 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | Drug: Group 2 in Part B and Part CAll eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 3 |
| Group 3 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | Drug: Group 3 in Part B and Part CAll eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 4 |
| Group 4 in Part B and Part C | Experimental | Drug: Group 4 in Part B and Part CAll eligible Part B and Part C participants will receive 3 intravenous (IV) infusions of KAN-101 Dose 5 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous diagnosis of celiac disease based on histology and positive celiac serology
- HLA-DQ2.5 genotype
- Gluten-free diet for at least 12 months
- Negative or weak positive for transglutaminase IgA and negative or weak positive for DGP-IgA/IgG during screening
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Refractory celiac disease
- HLA-DQ8 genotype
- Previous oral gluten challenge within 12 months
- Selective IgA deficiency
- Diagnosis of Type-1 diabetes
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 in Part AAlso: KAN-101Dose 1 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion | Drug | Cohort 1 in Part A |
| Cohort 2 in Part AAlso: KAN-101Dose 2 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion | Drug | Cohort 2 in Part A |
| Placebo: Group 1 in Part B and Part CAlso: PlaceboPlacebo Intravenous (IV) infusion | Other | Group 1 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 2 in Part B and Part CAlso: KAN-101Dose 3 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion | Drug | Group 2 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 3 in Part B and Part CAlso: KAN-101Dose 4 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion | Drug | Group 3 in Part B and Part C |
| Group 4 in Part B and Part CAlso: KAN-101Dose 5 KAN-101 Intravenous (IV) infusion | Drug | Group 4 in Part B and Part C |
Primary outcome
Incidence and Severity of TEAEs as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in Part A
Time frame: From screening until the safety follow-up visit on Day 28
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. AEs included both serious and all non-serious adverse events. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or that was considered as an important medical event. According to NCI CTCAE version 5: Grade 1= mild AE; Grade 2= moderate AE; Grade 3=severe AE; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE.
Change in Pre- and Post-Gluten Challenge (GC) IL-2 Response From Baseline to Day 15
Time frame: From Baseline screening to Day 15
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
Change in IL-2 Response From Day 15 Pre-GC to Day 15 Post GC
Time frame: 0 (pre-GC) and 4 hours post-GC on Day 15
CeD increases the circulating level of IL-2. Plasma samples were collected to assess the magnitude of biomarker response of IL-2 at the baseline screening visit pre-GC and again post-GC on Day 15 after 3 doses of KAN-101, the IL-2 response to GC is the difference of IL-2 between pre-GC and post-GC.
12 secondary outcomes
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUCinf
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: AUClast
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Cmax
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: Tmax
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part A: t½
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 45 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hour, 2.5 hours, 4.5 hours and 7 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUCinf
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: AUClast
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Cmax
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: Tmax
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
KAN-101 Plasma Exposure in Part B and Part C: t½
Time frame: Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2.5 hours, and 4 hours after infusion start on Day 1 and Day 7
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part B
Time frame: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
Incidence and Severity of TEAE as Assessed by the CTCAE in Part C
Time frame: From the time the participant provided informed consent through Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 37329900Murray JA, Wassaf D, Dunn K, Arora S, Winkle P, Stacey H, Cooper S, Goldstein KE, Manchanda R, Kontos S, Grebe KM. Safety and tolerability of KAN-101, a liver-targeted immune tolerance therapy, in patients with coeliac disease (ACeD): a phase 1 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;8(8):735-747. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00107-3. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41758576Muhammad A, Xiao Y, Ahmad YM, Tang R, Zhang Y, Yuan Q, Xiao X. Reprogramming Pathogenic Immune Memory through Inverse Vaccination in Autoimmune Kidney Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2026 Aug 1;37(8):1809-1812. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000001070. Epub 2026 Feb 27. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Celiac Disease
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
VTP-1000 in Adults With Celiac Disease
Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Mediterranean Diet and Processed Food Consumption on Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Coeliac Patients on a Gluten-Free Diet
Celiac Disease, Gluten-free Diet
Recruiting
GF-NOURISH (Gluten Free Nutrition Optimization Through Ultra-processed Food Reduction and Improved Strategies for Health)
Celiac Disease in Children, Nutrition Disorder, Child
RecruitingObservational study
Celiac Disease Genomic Environmental Microbiome and Metabolomic Study
Celiac Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Pathogenic Study of Adult Immune Enteropathies
Celiac Disease, Autoimmune Enteropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
Anokion SA
36 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Cohort 1 in Part A, Cohort 2 in Part A and Group 2 in Part B and Part C in people with Celiac Disease, run by Kanyos Bio, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anokion SA at 36 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in United States, New Zealand, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence and Severity of TEAEs as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) in Part A (time frame: From screening until the safety follow-up visit on Day 28). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05574010, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2026.