Prostate CancerNCT05576766
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
A study testing Routine care and ERAS management pathway in people with Prostate Cancer and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, run by Peking University First Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Prostate cancer ranks second among all malignances in men and has become a significant threat to men's health. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a standard treatment for prostate cancer. How to improve recovery following RARP surgery is worth investigating. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 90 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol
- What is being tested?
- Routine care and ERAS management pathway
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Sep 2025to Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 90 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 60 years or over but below 90 years.
- Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer.
- Agree to participate in this study and give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Scheduled to undergo combined surgery, including RARP combined with pelvic lymph node dissection or other procedures.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification ≥IV.
- Inability to receive preoperative aerobic exercise because of severe cardiovascular disease, motor system diseases (arthritis, lumbar vertebrae disease), or central nervous system diseases (epilepsy, parkinsonism).
- Inability to communicate in the preoperative period because of profound dementia, deafness, or language barriers.
- History of schizophrenia, anxiety or depressive disorders, or other mental disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100034
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD, +86 13910731903, wangdongxin@hotmail.com
Shu-Ting He, MD, +86 15210585081, heshuting0809@163.com
About this study
Official title: Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Prostate cancer ranks second among all malignances in men and has become a significant threat to men's health. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a standard treatment for prostate cancer. How to improve recovery following RARP surgery is worth investigating. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway involves a series of evidence-based procedures. It is aimed to reduce the systemic stress response to surgery and shorten the length of hospital stay. This randomized trial aims to investigate the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway on early outcomes after RARP surgery.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer ranks second among all malignancies in men and has become a significant threat to men's health. Surgical resection is the main treatment for patients with early and locally advanced prostate cancer. With the progress of technology, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is gradually accepted by surgeons and become the first line treatment for prostate cancer. How to improve recovery after RARP surgery is worth investigating.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was first reported by Dr. Kehlet. The ERAS pathway involves a series of evidence-based managements to accelerate patients' rehabilitation, including selective bowel preparation, nutritional therapy, fluid management, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, etc. It has been applied to many patient populations including those undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and urological surgery. Previous studies showed that practicing ERAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic prostate surgery shortened the time to flatus and defecate and the length of hospital stay. Specifically, prehabilitation including aerobic exercise and pelvic floor training may be beneficial and improve physical wellbeing in patients undergoing prostatectomy. However, little is known regarding the effects of ERAS in patients undergoing RARP surgery.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the impact of ERAS management, including prehabilitation, on early outcomes in patients undergoing RARP surgery.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol, Prehabilitation, Length of Hospital Stay
- Being tested
- Routine care, ERAS management pathway
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, RARP, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ERAS, Prehabilitation, Length of hospital stay
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Routine careProcedure or surgery
- Routine information provided before surgery.
- No nutritional therapy.
- No aerobic exercise.
- No pelvic floor muscle training.
- No psychiatrist intervention.
- Bowel preparation with oral cathartic agent.
- Fasting for over 8 hours; no oral carbohydrate solution (OCS) loading before surgery.
- Hypothermia prevention not emphasized.
- General anesthesia; regional block not emphasized.
- Routine blood pressure management.
- Mobilization from postoperative day 1.
- Start oral feeding from postoperative day 1.
- Patient-controlled analgesia with opioids.
- Thromboembolism prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).
- Routine pelvic drainage tube removal (usually at postoperative day 4).
- Routine urinary catheterization removal (usually at postoperative day 14).
ERAS management pathwayProcedure or surgery
- Patient consultation and education before surgery.
- Nutritional intervention for patients whose BMI<18.5 or BMI>24 kg/m2.
- Aerobic exercise for 2 weeks before surgery.
- Pelvic floor muscle training for 2 weeks before surgery.
- Psychiatrist intervention for patients with severe depression and anxiety.
- No bowel preparation before surgery.
- Provide oral carbohydrate solution 2 hours before surgery.
- Hypothermia prevention.
- General anesthesia combined with regional block.
- Goal-directed fluid infusion and targeted blood pressure management.
- Early mobilization.
- Early oral feeding.
- Multimodal analgesia, including opioids and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs.
- Thromboembolism prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin; rivaroxaban for high-risk patients.
- Early pelvic drainage tube removal (at postoperative day 2) unless contraindicated.
- Early urinary catheterization removal (at postoperative day 7) unless contraindicated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Routine care group | Active comparator | Perioperative management according to routine care. Receives: Procedure: Routine care |
| ERAS group | Experimental | Perioperative management according to the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. Receives: Procedure: ERAS management pathway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The time required for the PADS score to meet the standard.
The time required to achieve a post-anesthesia discharge score (PADS) of 9 or above after surgery.
Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Perioperative anxiety score
The score of anxiety is assessed by using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire; each item is rated from 1 to 4 denoting the increasing severity or frequency of anxiety; the sum score times 1.25 as a standard score, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher score indicating more severe anxiety.
Measured: On the day before surgery and at day 1 after surgery.
Perioperative depression score
The score of depression is assessed by using the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). This is a 20-item self-report questionnaire; each item is rated from 1 to 4 denoting the increasing severity or frequency of depression; the sum score times 1.25 as a standard score, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher score indicating more severe depression.
Measured: On the day before surgery and at day 1 after surgery.
Pain score within 3 days after surgery
Pain score is assessed twice daily (8:00-10:00 am, and 18:00-20:00 pm) with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=the worst pain.
Measured: Up to 3 days after surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery
Postoperative complications are defined as new-onset medical events that are harmful to patients' recovery and required therapeutic intervention, that is grade II or higher on the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery
Incidence of readmission within 30 days after surgery
Readmission is defined as hospitalization for the second time after discharge within 30 days after surgery.
Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery
Overall survival within 90 days after surgery
Overall survival within 90 days after surgery.
Measured: Up to 90 days after surgery
Total hospitalization cost within 30 days after surgery
Total hospitalization cost is defined as the sum cost of hospitalization from admission up to 30 days after surgery, including re-hospitalization within 30 days.
Measured: Up to 30 days after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Oct 2022
- Study startSep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionNov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University First Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dong-Xin Wang, Peking University First Hospital
- Investigators
- Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Peking University First Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05576766
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-235
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Scott JM, Zabor EC, Schwitzer E, Koelwyn GJ, Adams SC, Nilsen TS, Moskowitz CS, Matsoukas K, Iyengar NM, Dang CT, Jones LW. Efficacy of Exercise Therapy on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2297-2305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.5809. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
PubMed 29894274Xing J, Wang J, Liu G, Jia Y. Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery on robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2021 Dec;10(12):3264-3271. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-699.
PubMed 35070886Xu Y, Liu A, Chen L, Huang H, Gao Y, Zhang C, Xu Y, Huang D, Xu D, Zhang M. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway optimizes outcomes and costs for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520920072. doi: 10.1177/0300060520920072.
PubMed 32485118Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Mishima T, Yanishi M, Komai Y, Yasuda K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Watanabe M. Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;99(2):194-200. doi: 10.1159/000457805. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PubMed 28222423Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E, Attwood K, Kukar M, Nurkin S. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Noncolorectal Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Major Abdominal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002267.
PubMed 28437313Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999 Feb;86(2):227-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x.
PubMed 10100792Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
PubMed 27568654Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PubMed 30207593Magheli A, Knoll N, Lein M, Hinz S, Kempkensteffen C, Gralla O. Impact of fast-track postoperative care on intestinal function, pain, and length of hospital stay after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1143-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0020.
PubMed 21740262Lv Z, Cai Y, Jiang H, Yang C, Tang C, Xu H, Li Z, Fan B, Li Y. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery or fast track surgery pathways in minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1037-1052. doi: 10.21037/tau-19-884.
PubMed 32676388Lin C, Wan F, Lu Y, Li G, Yu L, Wang M. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):114-121. doi: 10.1177/0300060518796758. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
PubMed 30198392Milliken D, Lawrence H, Brown M, Cahill D, Newhall D, Barker D, Ayyash R, Kasivisvanathan R. Anaesthetic management for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the first UK national survey of current practice. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01105-3. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
PubMed 32583048Santa Mina D, Hilton WJ, Matthew AG, Awasthi R, Bousquet-Dion G, Alibhai SMH, Au D, Fleshner NE, Finelli A, Clarke H, Aprikian A, Tanguay S, Carli F. Prehabilitation for radical prostatectomy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 7.
PubMed 29937184Zhao Y, Zhang S, Liu B, Li J, Hong H. Clinical efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 17;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01897-6.
PubMed 32552894Segal RJ, Reid RD, Courneya KS, Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Prud'Homme DG, Malone SC, Wells GA, Scott CG, Slovinec D'Angelo ME. Randomized controlled trial of resistance or aerobic exercise in men receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 20;27(3):344-51. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4963. Epub 2008 Dec 8.
PubMed 19064985
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05576766
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-235
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol, Prehabilitation, Length of Hospital Stay
- Keywords
- Prostate Cancer, Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, RARP, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, ERAS, Prehabilitation, Length of hospital stay
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University First HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prostate cancer ranks second among all malignances in men and has become a significant threat to men's health. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a standard treatment for prostate cancer. How to improve recovery following RARP surgery is worth investigating. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway involves a series of evidence-based procedures. It is aimed to reduce the systemic stress response to surgery and shorten the length of hospital stay. This randomized trial aims to investigate the impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway on early outcomes after RARP surgery.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer ranks second among all malignancies in men and has become a significant threat to men's health. Surgical resection is the main treatment for patients with early and locally advanced prostate cancer. With the progress of technology, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is gradually accepted by surgeons and become the first line treatment for prostate cancer. How to improve recovery after RARP surgery is worth investigating.
The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) was first reported by Dr. Kehlet. The ERAS pathway involves a series of evidence-based managements to accelerate patients' rehabilitation, including selective bowel preparation, nutritional therapy, fluid management, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, etc. It has been applied to many patient populations including those undergoing gastrointestinal surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, and urological surgery. Previous studies showed that practicing ERAS in patients undergoing laparoscopic prostate surgery shortened the time to flatus and defecate and the length of hospital stay. Specifically, prehabilitation including aerobic exercise and pelvic floor training may be beneficial and improve physical wellbeing in patients undergoing prostatectomy. However, little is known regarding the effects of ERAS in patients undergoing RARP surgery.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the impact of ERAS management, including prehabilitation, on early outcomes in patients undergoing RARP surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Routine care group | Active comparator | Procedure: Routine carePerioperative management according to routine care. |
| ERAS group | Experimental | Procedure: ERAS management pathwayPerioperative management according to the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 90 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 60 years or over but below 90 years.
- Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer.
- Agree to participate in this study and give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Scheduled to undergo combined surgery, including RARP combined with pelvic lymph node dissection or other procedures.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification ≥IV.
- Inability to receive preoperative aerobic exercise because of severe cardiovascular disease, motor system diseases (arthritis, lumbar vertebrae disease), or central nervous system diseases (epilepsy, parkinsonism).
- Inability to communicate in the preoperative period because of profound dementia, deafness, or language barriers.
- History of schizophrenia, anxiety or depressive disorders, or other mental disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Routine care1. Routine information provided before surgery. 2. No nutritional therapy. 3. No aerobic exercise. 4. No pelvic floor muscle training. 5. No psychiatrist intervention. 6. Bowel preparation with oral cathartic agent. 7. Fasting for over 8 hours; no oral carbohydrate solution (OCS) loading before surgery. 8. Hypothermia prevention not emphasized. 9. General anesthesia; regional block not emphasized. 10. Routine blood pressure management. 11. Mobilization from postoperative day 1. 12. Start oral feeding from postoperative day 1. 13. Patient-controlled analgesia with opioids. 14. Thromboembolism prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). 15. Routine pelvic drainage tube removal (usually at postoperative day 4). 16. Routine urinary catheterization removal (usually at postoperative day 14). | Procedure or surgery | Routine care group |
| ERAS management pathway1. Patient consultation and education before surgery. 2. Nutritional intervention for patients whose BMI<18.5 or BMI>24 kg/m2. 3. Aerobic exercise for 2 weeks before surgery. 4. Pelvic floor muscle training for 2 weeks before surgery. 5. Psychiatrist intervention for patients with severe depression and anxiety. 6. No bowel preparation before surgery. 7. Provide oral carbohydrate solution 2 hours before surgery. 8. Hypothermia prevention. 9. General anesthesia combined with regional block. 10. Goal-directed fluid infusion and targeted blood pressure management. 11. Early mobilization. 12. Early oral feeding. 13. Multimodal analgesia, including opioids and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. 14. Thromboembolism prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin; rivaroxaban for high-risk patients. 15. Early pelvic drainage tube removal (at postoperative day 2) unless contraindicated. 16. Early urinary catheterization removal (at postoperative day 7) unless contraindicated. | Procedure or surgery | ERAS group |
Primary outcome
The time required for the PADS score to meet the standard.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
The time required to achieve a post-anesthesia discharge score (PADS) of 9 or above after surgery.
7 secondary outcomes
Perioperative anxiety score
Time frame: On the day before surgery and at day 1 after surgery.
Perioperative depression score
Time frame: On the day before surgery and at day 1 after surgery.
Pain score within 3 days after surgery
Time frame: Up to 3 days after surgery
Incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery
Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
Incidence of readmission within 30 days after surgery
Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
Overall survival within 90 days after surgery
Time frame: Up to 90 days after surgery
Total hospitalization cost within 30 days after surgery
Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29894274Scott JM, Zabor EC, Schwitzer E, Koelwyn GJ, Adams SC, Nilsen TS, Moskowitz CS, Matsoukas K, Iyengar NM, Dang CT, Jones LW. Efficacy of Exercise Therapy on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;36(22):2297-2305. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.5809. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 35070886Xing J, Wang J, Liu G, Jia Y. Effects of enhanced recovery after surgery on robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2021 Dec;10(12):3264-3271. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-699.
- Background: PubMed 32485118Xu Y, Liu A, Chen L, Huang H, Gao Y, Zhang C, Xu Y, Huang D, Xu D, Zhang M. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway optimizes outcomes and costs for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520920072. doi: 10.1177/0300060520920072.
- Background: PubMed 28222423Sugi M, Matsuda T, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Mishima T, Yanishi M, Komai Y, Yasuda K, Kinoshita H, Yoshida K, Watanabe M. Introduction of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urol Int. 2017;99(2):194-200. doi: 10.1159/000457805. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 28437313Visioni A, Shah R, Gabriel E, Attwood K, Kukar M, Nurkin S. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Noncolorectal Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Major Abdominal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):57-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002267.
- Background: PubMed 10100792Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999 Feb;86(2):227-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01023.x.
- Background: PubMed 27568654Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, van der Poel HG, van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
- Background: PubMed 30207593Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 21740262Magheli A, Knoll N, Lein M, Hinz S, Kempkensteffen C, Gralla O. Impact of fast-track postoperative care on intestinal function, pain, and length of hospital stay after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011 Jul;25(7):1143-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0020.
- Background: PubMed 32676388Lv Z, Cai Y, Jiang H, Yang C, Tang C, Xu H, Li Z, Fan B, Li Y. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery or fast track surgery pathways in minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Jun;9(3):1037-1052. doi: 10.21037/tau-19-884.
- Background: PubMed 30198392Lin C, Wan F, Lu Y, Li G, Yu L, Wang M. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):114-121. doi: 10.1177/0300060518796758. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 32583048Milliken D, Lawrence H, Brown M, Cahill D, Newhall D, Barker D, Ayyash R, Kasivisvanathan R. Anaesthetic management for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: the first UK national survey of current practice. J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):335-341. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01105-3. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruiting
Daily Adaptive Post-Prostatectomy With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Malignant Prostate Neoplasm
Enrolling by invitation
Use of Tracking Devices to Locate Abnormalities During Invasive Procedures
Adenocarcinoma, Prostate Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Studies to Check the Local Response of Prostate Cancer to Radiation Therapy
Prostatic Neoplasms, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LY4257496 in Participants With Cancer (OMNIRAY)
Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD principal investigator
Peking University First Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Routine care and ERAS management pathway in people with Prostate Cancer and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy, run by Peking University First Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shu-Ting He, MD (+86 15210585081, heshuting0809@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The time required for the PADS score to meet the standard. (time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05576766, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2025.