FrailtyNCT05581082
Understanding Changes in Physical Function Using Principles of Precision Medicine
An observational study of Frailty, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pilot, feasibility study and the purpose of this study is exploratory. The goal is to provide the PI and study team with data using metabolomics that can be used to: a) demonstrate an ability to use such data in a future grant application; b) obtain data that determines the relationship between changes in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Frailty
- What is being tested?
- Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision Medicine
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2022to 30 Sep 2023
- How long will I take part?
- 12 Weeks
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Study population: The investigators aim to screen 35 patients in the clinic (40% ineligible + 15% drop out) to complete 18 participants.
Who may be able to join
- Older adults ≥65 years (of all genders and sexes) with diagnosis of frailty based on the Fried phenotype A UNC Geriatrics Medicine Specialty clinic at the Eastowne Clinic patient who has been referred for physical therapy to Elderfit;
- >2 Chronic medical conditions -these are based on the 21 Medicare multiple chronic conditions (e.g., alcohol abuse, Alzheimer's disease and related dementia, arthritis (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid), asthma, atrial fibrillation, autism spectrum disorders, cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, prostate), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, drug/substance abuse, heart failure, hepatitis, HIV/AIDS, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders, stroke);
- Callahan cognitive screen ≥3 - this is a measure routinely used for clinical research in older adults. A screen of ≥3 suggests capacity to consent
Who cannot join
- Age <65 years;
- A medical diagnosis of dementia - all participants are required to have the ability to engage in the physical therapy-based intervention, complete questionnaires, and interact with others, all of which may be challenging in individuals with cognitive impairment;
- Individuals with life-threatening or untreated psychiatric diagnosis that would interfere with study participation and require significant modification to meet their needs such as untreated major depressive disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or untreated severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder);
- Life-threatening illness including those receiving palliative care or hospice services;
- Individuals unwilling/unable to provide consent;
- Current participation in another physical therapy-based research study or program;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Inability to complete the protocol procedures;
- Elective surgery in the next six months;
- Co-morbidities including: hospitalization for heart failure in past 6 months, history of advanced non-skin cancer (Stage III or IV); Advanced liver failure; Chronic renal insufficiency on hemodialysis;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
This is a pilot, feasibility study and the purpose of this study is exploratory. The goal is to provide the PI and study team with data using metabolomics that can be used to: a) demonstrate an ability to use such data in a future grant application; b) obtain data that determines the relationship between changes in physical function (objective and subjective) and potential metabolites.
Read the detailed description
A pre/post, non-randomized, single-arm pilot natural clinical experiment trial of older adults (patients of UNC's Geriatrics Medicine Specialty Clinic, N=18) who will enroll in a physical therapy program as recommended by their primary care clinician. This pragmatic assessment consists of obtaining routine care data from the physical therapy visits and collecting blood to harness metabolomics data that can be used to: a) demonstrate an ability to use and analyze such data for a future grant application; b) determine the relationship between change in physical function and metabolites.
- Conditions
- Frailty
- Being tested
- Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision Medicine
- Medical subject headings
- Frailty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision MedicineOther
This pragmatic, exploratory study consists of individuals with frailty who are referred from routine care to a physical therapy-based strengthening intervention. This specific study will collect ancillary measures to evaluate our outcomes. The study staff will not be conducting any interventions themselves - the physical therapy program is as per usual care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Routine Clinical Care with PCP | All individuals will be seen by their primary care physician (PCP) in Geriatric Clinic. Patients previously diagnosed with frailty per their PCP. Their PCP visit will include independent assessment and physical therapy referral, and will begin a physical therapy-based strengthening intervention. Patients will be independently managed (assessment and intervention) by a Physical Therapist (PT). The PT will initiate an intervention plan (e.g., education and exercise) Receives: Other: Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision Medicine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in blood sample
The team will collect a blood sample at baseline (0- weeks) and follow-up (12-weeks) to conduct an untargeted metabolomic analysis to demonstrate potential peaks of protein within the blood reported in mg/dL.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Change in serum sample
The team will collect a blood sample at baseline (0- weeks) and follow-up (12-weeks) to conduct an untargeted metabolomic analysis to demonstrate potential peaks of protein within the blood reported in g/dL.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Global Health Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use the Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Global Health Questionnaire to gauge physical, mental, and social aspects of health (5-point scale) to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. A mean standardized score for the population is 50; 10 points indicate one standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better health.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale will measure the fatigue of each sedentary, social, lifestyle, and physical activities to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. 10 items total for physical and mental fatigue are summed to create two separate continuous scores, each ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater perceived physical or mental fatigability
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Patient Activation Measure Survey used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use the Patient Activation Measure Survey will assess knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing health revealing insights into motivators, behaviors, attitudes, and outcomes to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. An interval-level scale from 0-100. A lower patient activation score indicates a patient who is less active in managing their health, whereas a higher patient activation score indicates a patient who is more active in managing their health.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination to test orientation, memory, attention, and executive function, with items such as animal naming, digit span, figure recognition, clock drawing and size differentiation to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (30-point, 11 questions total) Scores of 27 to 30 are considered normal in a person with a high school education. Scores between 21 and 26 suggest a mild neurocognitive disorder. Scores between 0 and 20 indicate dementia.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Senior Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Senior Questionnaire to assesses weekly frequency and duration of various physical activities typically undertaken by older adults. Four different scores can be derived from the questionnaire: frequency of moderate or greater activity (MET >3.0, a composite score that ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better performance); frequency of all physical activity (light, moderate, and vigorous); caloric expenditure of moderate or greater activity (light, moderate, vigorous); caloric expenditure of moderate or great activity; caloric expenditure of all physical activity.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Brief Resilience Scale used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use the Brief Resilience Scale to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress in order to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. 6 total questions, scoring is on a range of 1-5. Once all six statements have been assessed, the total of the number is taken. This summing up will give an overall resilience score of between 6 and 30. Lower scores indicate lower levels of resilience.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants to perform a brief assessment of diet and physical activity to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (Total scores range from 13 to 39 --higher quantities represent dietary quality characterized by optimal intake of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains and decreased intake of sugary foods, processed meats, and fried foods).
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Providers will use the Patient Health Questionnaire to identify signs or symptoms of depression to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (9 questions total, ≤ 4 The score suggests the patient may not need depression treatment, >5-14 along with physician clinical judgment about treatment, based on patient's duration of symptoms and functional impairment, ≥ 15 Warrants treatment for depression, using antidepressant, psychotherapy and/or a combination of treatment).
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Gait Speed used to determine changes in Physical Health.
Providers will use gait speed to assess a comfortable gait speed for the patient to determine changes in physical health. Scale: healthy women aged 70-79 years is 1.13 meters per second (m/s) and for men 1.26 m/s. For women and men aged 80-99 the values are 0.94 meters per second (m/s) and 0.97 meters per second (m/s), respectively.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Grip Strength used to determine changes in Physical Health
Providers will use grip strength to assess a comfortable gait speed for the patient to determine changes in physical health. Scale: Optimal cut-points were 24.9 kg for men 65-74 years, 20.8 kg for men 75-90 years, 15.2 kg for women 65-74 years, and 13.5 kg for women 75-90 years.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2022
- Study start30 Jul 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for FrailtyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 12 Weeks
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John Batsis, MD, Principal investigator, UNC Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05581082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-1230
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding Changes in Physical Function Using Principles of Precision Medicine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05581082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22-1230
- Conditions
- Frailty
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot, feasibility study and the purpose of this study is exploratory. The goal is to provide the PI and study team with data using metabolomics that can be used to: a) demonstrate an ability to use such data in a future grant application; b) obtain data that determines the relationship between changes in physical function (objective and subjective) and potential metabolites.
Detailed description
A pre/post, non-randomized, single-arm pilot natural clinical experiment trial of older adults (patients of UNC's Geriatrics Medicine Specialty Clinic, N=18) who will enroll in a physical therapy program as recommended by their primary care clinician. This pragmatic assessment consists of obtaining routine care data from the physical therapy visits and collecting blood to harness metabolomics data that can be used to: a) demonstrate an ability to use and analyze such data for a future grant application; b) determine the relationship between change in physical function and metabolites.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 12 Weeks
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Routine Clinical Care with PCP | – | Other: Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision MedicineAll individuals will be seen by their primary care physician (PCP) in Geriatric Clinic. Patients previously diagnosed with frailty per their PCP. Their PCP visit will include independent assessment and physical therapy referral, and will begin a physical therapy-based strengthening intervention. Patients will be independently managed (assessment and intervention) by a Physical Therapist (PT). The PT will initiate an intervention plan (e.g., education and exercise) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
- Study population
- The investigators aim to screen 35 patients in the clinic (40% ineligible + 15% drop out) to complete 18 participants.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Older adults ≥65 years (of all genders and sexes) with diagnosis of frailty based on the Fried phenotype A UNC Geriatrics Medicine Specialty clinic at the Eastowne Clinic patient who has been referred for physical therapy to Elderfit;
- >2 Chronic medical conditions -these are based on the 21 Medicare multiple chronic conditions (e.g., alcohol abuse, Alzheimer's disease and related dementia, arthritis (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid), asthma, atrial fibrillation, autism spectrum disorders, cancer (breast, colorectal, lung, prostate), chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, diabetes, drug/substance abuse, heart failure, hepatitis, HIV/AIDS, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, osteoporosis, schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders, stroke);
- Callahan cognitive screen ≥3 - this is a measure routinely used for clinical research in older adults. A screen of ≥3 suggests capacity to consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age <65 years;
- A medical diagnosis of dementia - all participants are required to have the ability to engage in the physical therapy-based intervention, complete questionnaires, and interact with others, all of which may be challenging in individuals with cognitive impairment;
- Individuals with life-threatening or untreated psychiatric diagnosis that would interfere with study participation and require significant modification to meet their needs such as untreated major depressive disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or untreated severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder);
- Life-threatening illness including those receiving palliative care or hospice services;
- Individuals unwilling/unable to provide consent;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pragmatic, exploratory study of Precision MedicineThis pragmatic, exploratory study consists of individuals with frailty who are referred from routine care to a physical therapy-based strengthening intervention. This specific study will collect ancillary measures to evaluate our outcomes. The study staff will not be conducting any interventions themselves - the physical therapy program is as per usual care. | Other | Routine Clinical Care with PCP |
Primary outcome
Change in blood sample
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
The team will collect a blood sample at baseline (0- weeks) and follow-up (12-weeks) to conduct an untargeted metabolomic analysis to demonstrate potential peaks of protein within the blood reported in mg/dL.
Change in serum sample
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
The team will collect a blood sample at baseline (0- weeks) and follow-up (12-weeks) to conduct an untargeted metabolomic analysis to demonstrate potential peaks of protein within the blood reported in g/dL.
Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Global Health Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use the Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System-Global Health Questionnaire to gauge physical, mental, and social aspects of health (5-point scale) to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. A mean standardized score for the population is 50; 10 points indicate one standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better health.
Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale will measure the fatigue of each sedentary, social, lifestyle, and physical activities to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. 10 items total for physical and mental fatigue are summed to create two separate continuous scores, each ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater perceived physical or mental fatigability
Patient Activation Measure Survey used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use the Patient Activation Measure Survey will assess knowledge, skills, and confidence for managing health revealing insights into motivators, behaviors, attitudes, and outcomes to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. An interval-level scale from 0-100. A lower patient activation score indicates a patient who is less active in managing their health, whereas a higher patient activation score indicates a patient who is more active in managing their health.
Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination to test orientation, memory, attention, and executive function, with items such as animal naming, digit span, figure recognition, clock drawing and size differentiation to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (30-point, 11 questions total) Scores of 27 to 30 are considered normal in a person with a high school education. Scores between 21 and 26 suggest a mild neurocognitive disorder. Scores between 0 and 20 indicate dementia.
Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Senior Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Senior Questionnaire to assesses weekly frequency and duration of various physical activities typically undertaken by older adults. Four different scores can be derived from the questionnaire: frequency of moderate or greater activity (MET >3.0, a composite score that ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better performance); frequency of all physical activity (light, moderate, and vigorous); caloric expenditure of moderate or greater activity (light, moderate, vigorous); caloric expenditure of moderate or great activity; caloric expenditure of all physical activity.
Brief Resilience Scale used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use the Brief Resilience Scale to assess the ability to bounce back or recover from stress in order to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program. 6 total questions, scoring is on a range of 1-5. Once all six statements have been assessed, the total of the number is taken. This summing up will give an overall resilience score of between 6 and 30. Lower scores indicate lower levels of resilience.
Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants to perform a brief assessment of diet and physical activity to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (Total scores range from 13 to 39 --higher quantities represent dietary quality characterized by optimal intake of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains and decreased intake of sugary foods, processed meats, and fried foods).
Patient Health Questionnaire used to determine changes in Physical Function
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use the Patient Health Questionnaire to identify signs or symptoms of depression to record the changes in physical function prior and after beginning the physical-therapy based program (9 questions total, ≤ 4 The score suggests the patient may not need depression treatment, >5-14 along with physician clinical judgment about treatment, based on patient's duration of symptoms and functional impairment, ≥ 15 Warrants treatment for depression, using antidepressant, psychotherapy and/or a combination of treatment).
Gait Speed used to determine changes in Physical Health.
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use gait speed to assess a comfortable gait speed for the patient to determine changes in physical health. Scale: healthy women aged 70-79 years is 1.13 meters per second (m/s) and for men 1.26 m/s. For women and men aged 80-99 the values are 0.94 meters per second (m/s) and 0.97 meters per second (m/s), respectively.
Grip Strength used to determine changes in Physical Health
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Providers will use grip strength to assess a comfortable gait speed for the patient to determine changes in physical health. Scale: Optimal cut-points were 24.9 kg for men 65-74 years, 20.8 kg for men 75-90 years, 15.2 kg for women 65-74 years, and 13.5 kg for women 75-90 years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2024.
Related trials for Frailty
Not yet recruiting
Phenotyping Rehabilitation for Improving Frailty, Functional Capacity
Varicose Veins
Recruiting
Perioperative Multicomponent Rehabilitation and Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Frailty
Old Age; Debility, Digestive Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Function and Fall Risk in Older Adults in the Lalín Frailty Prevention Program
Frailty, Fall Risk, Fall Prevention
Not yet recruiting
Creatine and Beta-Hydroxy-Beta-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Plus Home-Based Exercise for Sarcopenia in Huntington's Disease
Huntington Disease, Sarcopenia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John Batsis, MD principal investigator
UNC Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Frailty, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in blood sample (time frame: Up to 12 weeks). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2024.