AzTrials
AzTrials

Upper GI BleedingPhase 4NCT05582174

PPI Infusion Versus Oral Acid Pump Inhibitors for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

A Phase 4 study testing Vonoprazan and esomeprazole in people with Upper GI Bleeding and Proton Pump Inhibitors, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 8 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant.It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Upper GI Bleeding, Proton Pump Inhibitors
What is being tested?
Vonoprazan and esomeprazole
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
594 participants
Where
8 sitesChina
Study dates
18 May 2023to 3 Jul 2028
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • - Patients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) for sign and symptoms of aneamia or upper GI bleeding including haematochezia, melaena or haematemesis, and found to a non-variceal upper GI cause of bleeding (peptic ulcers, dieulafoy's lesions, Mallory Weiss tear with active bleeding or major stigmata of haemorrhage
  • Major stigmata of recent haemorrhage includes peptic ulcers with spurting or oozing bleeding (Forrest classification Ia and Ib, respectively) ,with a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest classification IIa) or an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb). For peptic ulcers with an adherent clot (Forrest classification IIb), the clot would be lifted (by irrigation using syringe boluses or water pump device, or manipulation with a snare or alligator etc.) and ulcer base examined to look for underlying vessels. Once the clot is removed, any identified underlying active bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessel should receive endoscopic haemostasis
  • Patients who had undergone endoscopic hemostatic treatment (a combination of hemoclipping therapy or contact thermocoagulation using multipolar/bipolar electrocautery probes or haemostatic forceps, with or without preinjection of diluted epinephrine. Endoscopic haemostasis is defined as no evidence of bleeding after irrigation and 3 minutes of observation

Who cannot join

  • No consent
  • Patients under the age of 18
  • Patients who were pregnant or in lactation
  • Hypersensitivity to PPI or Vonoprazan or any component of the formulation
  • Patients who were found to have tumour bleeding, oesophageal varices as the cause of the NVGIB
  • NVGIB due to post therapeutic endoscopic treatment such as gastric polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection etc.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

xiaobei luo, PhD contact

86 17688881428

luoxiaobei63@126.com

bingyee suen, Bachelor contact

35052640

bingyeesuen@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk

8 sites in 1 country

China8 sites, 8 recruiting
  • Nanfang Hospital Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

    Side Liu, PhD, 86 13902212459

    Xiaobei Luo, PhD, 86 17688881428

    Recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

    Hui Yang, PhD, 86 15915822551

    Yangzhi Xu, PhD, 86 13632392962

    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

    Beiping Zhang, PhD, 86 13602762766

    Sufen Wei, PhD, 86 13825081143

    Not yet recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR

    James Lau, MD, 35052640, laujyw@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk

    Not yet recruiting
  • Shenzhen Pingshan District People's Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong

    Xiaofeng Wang, MD, 86 13724310636

    Zhiwei Yao, 86 18118747115

    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen & Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen

    Shenzhen, Guangdong

    Li Xiang, PhD, 86 18025482496

    Chunlin Chen, MD, 86 13688849579

    Not yet recruiting
  • Yangjiang People's Hospital of Guangdong Medical University

    Yangjiang, Guangdong

    Rongguo Du, MD, 86 13432558666

    Dongyun Chen, MD, 86 13680625011

    Not yet recruiting
  • Zhuhai People's Hospital (Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated to Jinan University)

    Zhuhai, Guangdong

    Xiaohong Xu, PhD, 86 13798199161

    Zhenjiang Wang, MD, 86 15363971671

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Comparison Between a High Dose PPI Intravenous Infusion and Oral Acid Pump Inhibitors After Endoscopic Haemostasis to Bleeding Peptic Ulcers

Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant.It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. While many studies compared Vonoprazan against PPI in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, and gastric ulcers; thus far, there is a paucity of data on use of Vonoprazan on bleeding peptic ulcers.

We perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of oral Vonoprazan against standard high dose PPI therapy in bleeding peptic ulcers that had received successful endoscopic haemostasis We hypothesize that in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, the use of acid pump inhibitors Vonoprazan would not be inferior to standard treatment of a bolus plus high dose PPI intravenous infusion at preventing recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis.

Read the detailed description

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains an important medical emergency. While the annual incidence having decreased from about 100/100,000 adults in 1990s to 61-78/100,000 persons in 2009-2012 , 30-day mortality remains up to 11% . Despite advancement in various endoscopic haemostatic technology, peri-endoscopic management remains paramount to satisfactory outcome in acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (NVGIB), especially for peptic ulcer bleeding. Indeed, recurrent bleeding leads to prolonged hospital stay and is an independent risk factor for mortality . Current international guidelines advocate the use of high dose proton pump inhibitors (PPI), as defined as ≥80mg daily for ≥3 days, to be given intermittently or continuously after successful endoscopic haemostatic therapy . It is hypothesized that the lowering of gastric acidity by PPI can facilitate formation and stability of clot, as pepsin-induced clot lysis is inhibited when pH is above 4-5 . Studies including RCTs have shown that PPI therapy markedly reduced further bleeding (RR = 0.43,0.33-0.56), mortality (RR = 0.41, 0.22-0.79) and surgery compared (RR = 0.42, 0.25-0.71) with placebo or no treatment . When compared to other acid suppressants such as H2-blocker (H2B), studies have demonstrated superiority of PPI therapy in reducing rebleeding, but not mortality or need for further intervention . Study has shown PPI infusion can achieve intragastric pH 6 holding time ratio (HTR) for 67.8% over first 24 hour and intragastric pH 4 HTR for 90.5% of the period , while the pH 6 HTR for bolus PPI every 12 hour has been shown to be 49.0% . Despite the apparent difference in effect on intragastric pH, the optimal dose of PPI therapy is still not well defined, with data showing comparable outcome between infusion and intermittent dosing.

In recent years, Vonoprazan (VPZ), an oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) has emerged as an alternative potent acid-suppressant. It was first launched in Japan in February 2015 and has shown satisfactory effect and safety profile in treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, NSAID-associated ulcer, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) induced gastric ulcers and peptic ulcer disease, etc . A RCT has demonstrated non-inferiority of Vonoprazan when compared with lansoprazole in peptic ulcer treatment, while other studies also showed non-inferiority of Vonoprazan to PPI treatment in high risk conditions such as patient on dual-antiplatelet therapy or prevention of bleeding from endoscopic submucosal dissection induced gastric ulcers . It has a faster onset of action in 1 day (3-5 days in PPI), and is more stable in acidic condition than PPI. Studies has demonstrated that Vonoprazan 20 mg once daily achieves 63% pH4 HTR after 24 hours; and the median pH4time (intragastric pH ≥ 4 over 24h after ≥ 5 days of therapy) for Vonoprazan after 7 days of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg once daily was 60.2%, 85.2%, 90.1%, and 93.2%. . Extrapolating those results to pH4time for PPIs suggests that 10 mg of Vonoprazan once daily is approximately equivalent to 60 mg of omeprazole equivalents (OE), or 40mg of esomeprazole; and 20 mg is equivalent to 60 mg OE bid, or esomeprazole 40 mg bid .

While many studies compared Vonoprazan against PPI in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, H. Pylori eradication, and gastric ulcers; thus far, there is a paucity of data on use of Vonoprazan on bleeding peptic ulcers. Here, we perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of oral Vonoprazan against standard high dose PPI therapy, in the form of high dose intravenous bolus injection (80mg) followed by continuous infusion for 72 hours (8mg/h), in bleeding peptic ulcers that had received successful endoscopic haemostasis. With the hypothesis that 10mg Vonoprazan is approximately equivalent to 40mg of esomeprazole, the total volume of bolus injection and 72 hours infusion of 656mg esomeprazole is approximately equivalent to 164mg Vonoprazan. Therefore, we propose a dose of 40mg every 12hours for 72hours for the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. As part of the study, we also investigate the effect of Vonoprazan on intra-gastric pH in this clinical setting.

Being tested
Vonoprazan, esomeprazole
Medical subject headings
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VonoprazanDrug

    Also called Takecab

    Vonoprazan 40 mg bid orally for 72 hours, and from day 4-30 VPZ 20 mg daily

  • esomeprazoleDrug

    Also called nexium

    A high dose PPI infusion (esomeprazole 80mg iv bolus followed by 8mg per hour for 72 hours), and frorm day 4-30 oral esomeprazole daily

Study groups in NCT05582174
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PPI infusionActive comparatoresomeprazole 80mg iv bolus followed by 8mg per hour for 72 hours
Receives: Drug: esomeprazole
VonoprazanExperimentalVonoprazan 40 mg bid orally for 72 hours, and from day 4-30 VPZ 20 mg daily
Receives: Drug: Vonoprazan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The number of recurrent bleeding

    The number of recurrent bleeding that occurred after 1st endoscopic hemostasis and confirmed by endoscopy

    Measured: within 30 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. further treatment for hemostasis

    the rate of patients that required endoscopic treatment/surgery/embolization for hemostasis

    Measured: within 30 days after randomization

  2. Total Days of hospital stay and intensive unit stay

    hospital stays and intensive unit stays

    Measured: within 30 days after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2022
  2. Study start18 May 2023
  3. Primary completion2 Jan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion3 Jul 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
594 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05582174
Sponsor's protocol ID
PPI vs VPZ study
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
13 Oct 2022
Last updated
18 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in