End Stage Renal DiseaseMedSafer-HDNCT05585268
Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis
A study testing Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochures in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Dialysis patients are prescribed an average of 10-12 medications per day, from up to 4-5 different clinicians and have the heaviest pill burden of all chronic conditions given their degree of comorbidity. One strategy for addressing the problem of "medication overload" is through scalable deprescribing interventions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Diabete Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochures
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 195 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 3 Oct 2022to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and older
- On outpatient maintenance hemodialysis
- On one of the study units
Who cannot join
- Patient is hospitalized during the period of the intervention
- Patient is newly initiated on hemodialysis during the intervention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
Dialysis patients are prescribed an average of 10-12 medications per day, from up to 4-5 different clinicians and have the heaviest pill burden of all chronic conditions given their degree of comorbidity. One strategy for addressing the problem of "medication overload" is through scalable deprescribing interventions. MedSafer is an electronic deprescribing tool that cross-references patient health data with existing deprescribing guidelines and provides a deprescribing report to clinicians to facilitate deprescribing and reducing the burden of polypharmacy. In this study the investigators will test MedSafer on dialysis patients paired with medication reconciliation on an intervention unit compared to a control unit.
Read the detailed description
Patients on dialysis are prescribed an average of 10-12 medications per day from up to 4-5 different clinicians and amounting to up to 19 pills per day. This patient population has one of the the heaviest pill burdens of all chronic conditions because of therapy to treat comorbidities like disease, hypertension, or diabetes as well as therapy directed at symptoms and drug side effects.
Over 90% of hemodialysis patients take 5 or more medications (polypharmacy), contributing to medication overload. Further, up to 50% of patients on dialysis are prescribed a potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), defined as a medication carrying an increased risk of contributing to an adverse drug event (ADE). Polypharmacy and associated ADEs increase emergency room visits, hospital admissions and the risk of premature death. Furthermore, some medications have little therapeutic benefit and simply add to pill burden.
Studies continue to document the pressing need for deprescribing, medication reconciliation, and medication management programs in dialysis patient populations for the above reasons. While deprescribing guidelines are available to clinicians, they can be difficult to implement as few tools consolidate the recommendations, guidelines are often long lists which require memorization, and they may not explain how to deprescribe and what rebound symptoms to watch out for. The investigators have previously demonstrated that the electronic tool MedSafer, which identifies deprescribing opportunities based on comparing medication lists and comorbidities to a curated ruleset which incorporates publicly available deprescribing guidance and emerging literature, can be a valuable aid in supporting deprescription of PIMs during acute care episodes. MedSafer has also been shown to be of benefit in Long Term Care settings. Dialysis patients, with a large burden of polypharmacy and complex medical histories, coupled with a high risk for adverse drug events leading to hospitalization and death, represent a unique population in which to study a systematic deprescribing intervention as a means of improving quality of care.
Objectives The primary aim is to provide deprescribing reports containing MedSafer recommendations to the clinical team of a hemodialysis unit during the process of Medication reconciliation, to determine if the identification of deprescribing opportunities can improve medication appropriateness as defined by the receipt of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at the patient level. This intervention will be compared to the efficacy of the intervention with a control dialysis unit that will undergo the standard of care medication reconciliation process with a MedSafer report.
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Diabete Type 2, Renal Failure Chronic, Anemia, Medication Interaction
- Being tested
- Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochures
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochuresOther
This unit will act as an intervention unit for the MedRec where MedSafer deprescribing reports will be handed to the treating team and deprescribing brochures from the Canadian Deprescribing Network will be given to patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MedSafer-supplemented medication reconciliation | Active comparator | This unit will act as an intervention unit for the MedRec where MedSafer deprescribing reports will be handed to the treating team and deprescribing brochures from the Canadian Deprescribing Network will be given to patients. Receives: Other: Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochures |
| Standard of care medication reconciliation | No intervention | This unit will serve as the control unit where standard of care will be provided and no deprescribing reports nor brochures will be delivered. MedSafer reports will be generated but withheld from the clinical team. This will serve as a comparator to determine if the intervention unit was more successful in deprescribing compared to this control unit. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients with one or more PIMs deprescribed
The proportion of participants with one or more PIMs deprescribed following a medication reconciliation, compared between intervention and control units.This will be conditioned on patients with 1 or more PIMs at baseline.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Mean number of total medications
The reduction in the mean number of drugs taken following a medication reconciliation compared between intervention and control unit
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2022
- Study start3 Oct 2022
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022
- Study completion1 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for End Stage Renal DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This quality improvement, parallel group, superiority trial will use two different dialysis sites of the McGill University Health Centre. One unit will act as a control unit. The other will act as an intervention unit. Participants are automatically enrolled in the study and assigned to the intervention when the MedSafer reports are handed to the clinical team at the time of performing a medication reconciliation.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emily McDonald, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Emily McDonald, MD MSc, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05585268
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0000
- Acronym
- MedSafer-HD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymous data will be made available for secondary analysis upon request with a data sharing agreement
Publications
Marin JG, Beresford L, Lo C, Pai A, Espino-Hernandez G, Beaulieu M. Prescription Patterns in Dialysis Patients: Differences Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Opportunities for Deprescription. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 May 1;7:2054358120912652. doi: 10.1177/2054358120912652. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32426145Moryousef J, Bortolussi-Courval E, Podymow T, Lee TC, Trinh E, McDonald EG. Deprescribing Opportunities for Hospitalized Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis: A Secondary Analysis of the MedSafer Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 May 13;9:20543581221098778. doi: 10.1177/20543581221098778. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35586025Battistella M, Jandoc R, Ng JY, McArthur E, Garg AX. A Province-wide, Cross-sectional Study of Demographics and Medication Use of Patients in Hemodialysis Units Across Ontario. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Mar 13;5:2054358118760832. doi: 10.1177/2054358118760832. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29568537Alshamrani M, Almalki A, Qureshi M, Yusuf O, Ismail S. Polypharmacy and Medication-Related Problems in Hemodialysis Patients: A Call for Deprescribing. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Jul 25;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6030076.
PubMed 30046021Sommer J, Seeling A, Rupprecht H. Adverse Drug Events in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Multiple Drug Interactions and Polypharmacy. Drugs Aging. 2020 May;37(5):359-372. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00747-0.
PubMed 32056163Halli-Tierney AD, Scarbrough C, Carroll D. Polypharmacy: Evaluating Risks and Deprescribing. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Jul 1;100(1):32-38.
PubMed 31259501Hovstadius B, Petersson G. Factors leading to excessive polypharmacy. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
PubMed 22500536McDonald EG, Wu PE, Rashidi B, Wilson MG, Bortolussi-Courval E, Atique A, Battu K, Bonnici A, Elsayed S, Wilson AG, Papillon-Ferland L, Pilote L, Porter S, Murphy J, Ross SB, Shiu J, Tamblyn R, Whitty R, Xu J, Fabreau G, Haddad T, Palepu A, Khan N, McAlister FA, Downar J, Huang AR, MacMillan TE, Cavalcanti RB, Lee TC. The MedSafer Study-Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):265-273. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7429.
PubMed 35040926Nadeau ME, Henry JL, Lee TC, Bortolussi-Courval E, Goodine C, McDonald EG. Spread and scale of an electronic deprescribing software to improve health outcomes of older adults living in nursing homes: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2021 Nov 2;22(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05729-0.
PubMed 34727956McDonald EG, Wu PE, Rashidi B, Forster AJ, Huang A, Pilote L, Papillon-Ferland L, Bonnici A, Tamblyn R, Whitty R, Porter S, Battu K, Downar J, Lee TC. The MedSafer Study: A Controlled Trial of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Deprescribing in Acute Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1843-1850. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16040. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
PubMed 31250427McIntyre C, McQuillan R, Bell C, Battistella M. Targeted Deprescribing in an Outpatient Hemodialysis Unit: A Quality Improvement Study to Decrease Polypharmacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Nov;70(5):611-618. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.02.374. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
PubMed 28416321Bortolussi-Courval E, Podymow T, Trinh E, Moryousef J, Hanula R, Huon JF, Mavrakanas T, Suri R, Lee TC, McDonald EG. Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jun 26;10:20543581231165712. doi: 10.1177/20543581231165712. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37435299
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05585268
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MedSafer-HD / 0000
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Diabete Type 2, Renal Failure Chronic, Anemia, Medication Interaction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 195 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dialysis patients are prescribed an average of 10-12 medications per day, from up to 4-5 different clinicians and have the heaviest pill burden of all chronic conditions given their degree of comorbidity. One strategy for addressing the problem of "medication overload" is through scalable deprescribing interventions. MedSafer is an electronic deprescribing tool that cross-references patient health data with existing deprescribing guidelines and provides a deprescribing report to clinicians to facilitate deprescribing and reducing the burden of polypharmacy. In this study the investigators will test MedSafer on dialysis patients paired with medication reconciliation on an intervention unit compared to a control unit.
Detailed description
Patients on dialysis are prescribed an average of 10-12 medications per day from up to 4-5 different clinicians and amounting to up to 19 pills per day. This patient population has one of the the heaviest pill burdens of all chronic conditions because of therapy to treat comorbidities like disease, hypertension, or diabetes as well as therapy directed at symptoms and drug side effects.
Over 90% of hemodialysis patients take 5 or more medications (polypharmacy), contributing to medication overload. Further, up to 50% of patients on dialysis are prescribed a potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), defined as a medication carrying an increased risk of contributing to an adverse drug event (ADE). Polypharmacy and associated ADEs increase emergency room visits, hospital admissions and the risk of premature death. Furthermore, some medications have little therapeutic benefit and simply add to pill burden.
Studies continue to document the pressing need for deprescribing, medication reconciliation, and medication management programs in dialysis patient populations for the above reasons. While deprescribing guidelines are available to clinicians, they can be difficult to implement as few tools consolidate the recommendations, guidelines are often long lists which require memorization, and they may not explain how to deprescribe and what rebound symptoms to watch out for. The investigators have previously demonstrated that the electronic tool MedSafer, which identifies deprescribing opportunities based on comparing medication lists and comorbidities to a curated ruleset which incorporates publicly available deprescribing guidance and emerging literature, can be a valuable aid in supporting deprescription of PIMs during acute care episodes. MedSafer has also been shown to be of benefit in Long Term Care settings. Dialysis patients, with a large burden of polypharmacy and complex medical histories, coupled with a high risk for adverse drug events leading to hospitalization and death, represent a unique population in which to study a systematic deprescribing intervention as a means of improving quality of care.
Objectives The primary aim is to provide deprescribing reports containing MedSafer recommendations to the clinical team of a hemodialysis unit during the process of Medication reconciliation, to determine if the identification of deprescribing opportunities can improve medication appropriateness as defined by the receipt of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at the patient level. This intervention will be compared to the efficacy of the intervention with a control dialysis unit that will undergo the standard of care medication reconciliation process with a MedSafer report.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This quality improvement, parallel group, superiority trial will use two different dialysis sites of the McGill University Health Centre. One unit will act as a control unit. The other will act as an intervention unit. Participants are automatically enrolled in the study and assigned to the intervention when the MedSafer reports are handed to the clinical team at the time of performing a medication reconciliation.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MedSafer-supplemented medication reconciliation | Active comparator | Other: Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochuresThis unit will act as an intervention unit for the MedRec where MedSafer deprescribing reports will be handed to the treating team and deprescribing brochures from the Canadian Deprescribing Network will be given to patients. |
| Standard of care medication reconciliation | No intervention | –This unit will serve as the control unit where standard of care will be provided and no deprescribing reports nor brochures will be delivered. MedSafer reports will be generated but withheld from the clinical team. This will serve as a comparator to determine if the intervention unit was more successful in deprescribing compared to this control unit. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 years and older
- On outpatient maintenance hemodialysis
- On one of the study units
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient is hospitalized during the period of the intervention
- Patient is newly initiated on hemodialysis during the intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochuresThis unit will act as an intervention unit for the MedRec where MedSafer deprescribing reports will be handed to the treating team and deprescribing brochures from the Canadian Deprescribing Network will be given to patients. | Other | MedSafer-supplemented medication reconciliation |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients with one or more PIMs deprescribed
Time frame: 1 month
The proportion of participants with one or more PIMs deprescribed following a medication reconciliation, compared between intervention and control units.This will be conditioned on patients with 1 or more PIMs at baseline.
1 secondary outcome
Mean number of total medications
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2023.
- Background: PubMed 32426145Marin JG, Beresford L, Lo C, Pai A, Espino-Hernandez G, Beaulieu M. Prescription Patterns in Dialysis Patients: Differences Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Opportunities for Deprescription. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020 May 1;7:2054358120912652. doi: 10.1177/2054358120912652. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 35586025Moryousef J, Bortolussi-Courval E, Podymow T, Lee TC, Trinh E, McDonald EG. Deprescribing Opportunities for Hospitalized Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis: A Secondary Analysis of the MedSafer Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2022 May 13;9:20543581221098778. doi: 10.1177/20543581221098778. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 29568537Battistella M, Jandoc R, Ng JY, McArthur E, Garg AX. A Province-wide, Cross-sectional Study of Demographics and Medication Use of Patients in Hemodialysis Units Across Ontario. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018 Mar 13;5:2054358118760832. doi: 10.1177/2054358118760832. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 30046021Alshamrani M, Almalki A, Qureshi M, Yusuf O, Ismail S. Polypharmacy and Medication-Related Problems in Hemodialysis Patients: A Call for Deprescribing. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Jul 25;6(3):76. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy6030076.
- Background: PubMed 32056163Sommer J, Seeling A, Rupprecht H. Adverse Drug Events in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Associated with Multiple Drug Interactions and Polypharmacy. Drugs Aging. 2020 May;37(5):359-372. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00747-0.
- Background: PubMed 31259501Halli-Tierney AD, Scarbrough C, Carroll D. Polypharmacy: Evaluating Risks and Deprescribing. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Jul 1;100(1):32-38.
- Background: PubMed 22500536Hovstadius B, Petersson G. Factors leading to excessive polypharmacy. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):159-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 35040926McDonald EG, Wu PE, Rashidi B, Wilson MG, Bortolussi-Courval E, Atique A, Battu K, Bonnici A, Elsayed S, Wilson AG, Papillon-Ferland L, Pilote L, Porter S, Murphy J, Ross SB, Shiu J, Tamblyn R, Whitty R, Xu J, Fabreau G, Haddad T, Palepu A, Khan N, McAlister FA, Downar J, Huang AR, MacMillan TE, Cavalcanti RB, Lee TC. The MedSafer Study-Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Mar 1;182(3):265-273. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7429.
- Background: PubMed 34727956Nadeau ME, Henry JL, Lee TC, Bortolussi-Courval E, Goodine C, McDonald EG. Spread and scale of an electronic deprescribing software to improve health outcomes of older adults living in nursing homes: study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2021 Nov 2;22(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05729-0.
- Background: PubMed 31250427McDonald EG, Wu PE, Rashidi B, Forster AJ, Huang A, Pilote L, Papillon-Ferland L, Bonnici A, Tamblyn R, Whitty R, Porter S, Battu K, Downar J, Lee TC. The MedSafer Study: A Controlled Trial of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Deprescribing in Acute Care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1843-1850. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16040. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 28416321McIntyre C, McQuillan R, Bell C, Battistella M. Targeted Deprescribing in an Outpatient Hemodialysis Unit: A Quality Improvement Study to Decrease Polypharmacy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Nov;70(5):611-618. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.02.374. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37435299Bortolussi-Courval E, Podymow T, Trinh E, Moryousef J, Hanula R, Huon JF, Mavrakanas T, Suri R, Lee TC, McDonald EG. Electronic Decision Support for Deprescribing in Patients on Hemodialysis: Clinical Research Protocol for a Prospective, Controlled, Quality Improvement Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jun 26;10:20543581231165712. doi: 10.1177/20543581231165712. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymous data will be made available for secondary analysis upon request with a data sharing agreement
Related trials for End Stage Renal Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Recruiting
Guiding Optimal Blood Pressure Management in Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Trial
End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), Hypertension (HTN)
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Children With Chronic Renal Failure
Chronic Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test the Safety of the Study Drug Fosmanogepix and How the Body Handles It in Adults With Severe Kidney Failure on Dialysis
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Adult
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily McDonald, MD MSc principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medication reconciliation supplemented with MedSafer and deprescribing brochures in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients with one or more PIMs deprescribed (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05585268, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2023.