Natural Blood and Blood Product ToxicityPhase 1/2NCT05585658
A Randomized, Double-blinded, Active Controlled Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate PK, PD and Safety of GBPD002
A Phase 1/2 study testing Erythropoietin alpha in people with Natural Blood and Blood Product Toxicity, run by Globe Biotech Limited at 2 sites in Bangladesh.
Trial summary
Erythropoietin (EPO) biosimilarity for GBPD002 (test candidate) and Eprex® (comparator) has been evaluated by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following subcutaneous injection in human subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Natural Blood and Blood Product Toxicity
- What is being tested?
- Erythropoietin alpha
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBangladesh
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2021to 16 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Inclusion Criteria: The inclusion criteria of subjects for the study are following Healthy adults
- age:18 - 45 years;
- BMI:18.0 - 27.0 kg/m2;
- body weight: 55 - 90 kg;
- able to swallow tablets,
- clinically and mentally fit subjects having no comorbid disease condition such as ISD, heart failure, CKD, Alzheimer's diseases, liver cirrhosis.
Exclusion Criteria: Those whose results meet more than one of the following in the screening including re-test;
- Hemoglobin level below 12 g/dL or over 17g/dL,
- Vitamin B12 level below 200 pg/mL,
- Ferritin level below 21.8 ng/mL,
- Transferrin level below 190 mg/dL,
- Reticulocyte, erythrocytes,
- insulin dependent diabetes,
- Thyroid disease, platelets or serum potassium level over/below normal range.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Bangladesh2 sites
Globe Biotech Limited
Dhaka, 1208
Farabi General Hospital
Dhaka, 1209
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blinded, Active Controlled, Single Dosing, Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of GBPD002 and Eprex® After Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Adult Volunteers.
Erythropoietin (EPO) biosimilarity for GBPD002 (test candidate) and Eprex® (comparator) has been evaluated by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following subcutaneous injection in human subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study. Subjects were randomly assigned and received a dose (4,000 IU) of either the test or comparator EPO. The subjects received the alternative formulation after the wash out period (4 weeks) of the first administration. The primary PK parameters, viz., maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC00-inf), were calculated with the serum EPO concentrations from blood samples and were found comparable for both formulations. The geometric mean ratios (@90% CI) of the Cmax and AUCinf were 1.16 and 0.89, respectively, which were within the regulatory range of 0.80-1.25. The reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts were measured as PD markers. The time-matched serum EPO concentrations and PD markers denoted a counterclockwise hysteresis, and thereby suggesting a time delay between the observed concentration and the response. ANOVA derived P-values (all were greater than 0.05) for the effectors clearly revealed the similarity between effects on PD markers for both formulations. Both formulations were found tolerated well, and anti-drug antibodies were not observed. Thus, the two formulations are projected to be used interchangeably in clinical settings.
Read the detailed description
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone that plays a key role in the formation of red blood cells (RBCs). EPO is primarily synthesized in the peritubular cells of the kidney and released into the systemic circulation in adult individuals. Circulating EPO binds to the EPO receptor on bone marrow erythroid progenitors, triggering multiple signaling pathways that support differentiation into mature RBCs. A reduction in EPO production is the primary cause of anemia in people with chronic renal failure [4]. Human recombinant epoetin (rHuEPO) or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) have been demonstrated to stimulate erythropoiesis in anemic patients with chronic renal failure, including those who need and don't need dialysis. ESAs are used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients and to reduce the requirement for allogenic blood transfusions in patients with mild anemia who are undergoing surgery. Furthermore, human recombinant epoetin is recommended for patients who are at high risk for perioperative transfusions due to considerable blood loss.
Recombinant rHuEPO was manufactured using recombinant DNA techniques. Alpha epoetins are the most commonly used type of rHuEPO among the other forms. Eprex®, the pioneer product of alpha epoetins, is a regular medicine with proven efficacy and tolerability. Globe Biotech Limited, a Bangladeshi biopharmaceutical company has developed GBPD002, a biosimilar of Eprex® which is synthesized in genetically engineered Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Upstream and downstream process development and validation was done for large scale production. Step by step identical analytical results confirmed the biosimilarity of GBP002 with Eprex®. Single and repeat dose toxicity was performed in Wister rat to analyze the toxicity of GBPD002 with Eprex®.
The aim of this study is to analyze the bioequivalence of GBPD002 and Eprex®. The purpose of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of human recombinant erythropoietin, GBPD002, developed by Globe Biotech Limited and the reference product Eprex® manufactured by Janssen Cilag Ltd., UK in healthy volunteers. An independent ethics committee gave ethical clearance for this study and the protocol for this study was approved by the Directorate General of Drug Administration (DGDA) of Bangladesh.
A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and two-sequence crossover trial was conducted in 42 healthy volunteers in 2 groups/cohorts/arms. The Clinical Research Organization (CRO Ltd.) conducted this investigation at Farabi General Hospital, Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka 1209, in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization's Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Bangladesh's Directorate General of Drug Administration (DGDA) approved the study methodology and informed consent form. Volunteers were given thorough information about the study and they have signed an informed consent form to affirm their willingness to participate.
The study was open to healthy male participants aged 19-45 years old who weighed 55.0-90.0 kg and had a body mass index of 18.0-27.0 kg/m2. Subjects were eliminated if they had at least one of the following clinical laboratory test results: Hemoglobin level <12 g/dL or >17 g/dL, vitamin B12 level <200 pg/mL, ferritin level <21.8 ng/mL, transferrin level <190 mg/dL and any anomalous range for the reticulocyte (RET) count, erythrocytes, platelets or serum potassium levels. The number of subjects was determined based on the results of a previous clinical study on a single subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa in healthy subjects. The total number of subjects was 42, assuming a 20% dropout rate. COVID-19, HIV, HBsAg, and HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) positive individuals were excluded from the study.The recruited volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the two sequences and received a single subcutaneous injection of 4,000 IU of either the comparator drug (Eprex®) or the test drug (GBPD002) in the abdomen from a prefilled syringe (PFS), based on the allocated sequences with a 28-day washout period: sequence A, administered the comparator drug in period 1 followed by the test drug in period 2; sequence B, given the test drug in period 1 followed by the comparator drug in period 2.Blood samples were taken for the PK evaluation at predose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h postdose. For the PD evaluation, the reticulocyte count (RET; %), hematocrit (HCT; %), haemoglobin (HB) (g/L) and red blood cell (RBC) count (106/mm3) were calculated at predose and at 72, 144, 216, and 312 h postdose.
- Conditions
- Natural Blood and Blood Product Toxicity
- Being tested
- Erythropoietin alpha
- Keywords
- human recombinant erythropoietin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Erythropoietin alphaBiological
To analyze bio-similarity of GBPD002 with Eprex®, the Globe Biotech Ltd performed quite a few experiments to determine total analytical study of GBPD002. They performed peptide mapping to determine amino acid composition of GBPD002 and found similar result with erythropoietin alpha. The molecular weight was determined through SDS-PAGE analysis of GBPD002 and was compared with Eprex. The western blot analysis was performed to determine immune chemical characterization. Characterization of different isoforms was conducted through 2D gel electrophoresis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Erythropoietin alpha Eprex® | Active comparator | Group/cohort/Arm 1 (participating 21 volunteers): Eprex® injection 4,000 IU will be administered subcutaneously on Day 1; and wash out for 4 weeks. GBPD002 injection 4,000 IU/1 mL will be administered subcutaneously on Day 29. Receives: Biological: Erythropoietin alpha |
| Erythropoietin alpha, GBPD002 | Experimental | Group/cohort/Arm 2 (participating 21 volunteers):GBPD002 PFS (Pre-Filled Syringe) 4,000 IU/ 1 mL (Erythropoietin alfa 4,000 IU) will be administered subcutaneously on Day 1.And wash out for 4 weeks (28 days from the 1st injection day). Eprex® inj. (Injection) 4,000 IU (Erythropoietin alfa 4,000 IU) will be administered subcutaneously on Day 29.
Total 42 volunteers participated in the clinical trial. Receives: Biological: Erythropoietin alpha |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary endpoint to measure safety, efficacy and acceptability of Erythropoietin medicine
EDTA-containing tube needs to be arranged for whole blood collection; for each test ~350 µL sample may require.Area under Curve last (AUC0-last) of Erythropoietin: Area Under Curve last (AUC0-last) of Erythropoietin [Time Frame: Once 1 hour before administration (day 1/day 29); 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 (day 6/day 34) hrs after administration for each period]
Measured: 34 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary endpoints to measure safety, efficacy and acceptability of Erythropoietin medicine
EDTA-containing tubes need to be arranged for whole blood collection; for each test ~350 µL sample may require.Time of maximum concentration (Tmax) of Erythropoietin: Time of maximum concentration (Tmax) of Erythropoietin [Time Frame: Once 1 hour before administration (day 1/day 29); 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 (day 6/day 34) hrs after administration for each period]
Measured: 34 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2022
- Study start16 Oct 2021
- Primary completion14 Nov 2021
- Study completion16 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Natural Blood and Blood Product ToxicityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Healthy volunteers participating in two cohorts. In each cohort 21 volunteers are participating in the clinical trial.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Globe Biotech Limited
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mamun Al Mahtab, PhD, Principal investigator, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05585658
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DGDA/CTP-1/06/2016/9916
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: We have NDA with volunteers to keep personal information's not to be published.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blinded, Active Controlled, Single Dosing, Crossover Clinical Trial to Investigate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of GBPD002 and Eprex® After Subcutaneous Administration in Healthy Adult Volunteers.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05585658
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DGDA/CTP-1/06/2016/9916
- Conditions
- Natural Blood and Blood Product Toxicity
- Keywords
- human recombinant erythropoietin
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Globe Biotech LimitedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Erythropoietin (EPO) biosimilarity for GBPD002 (test candidate) and Eprex® (comparator) has been evaluated by comparing the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties following subcutaneous injection in human subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, two-sequence, crossover study. Subjects were randomly assigned and received a dose (4,000 IU) of either the test or comparator EPO. The subjects received the alternative formulation after the wash out period (4 weeks) of the first administration. The primary PK parameters, viz., maximum observed concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC00-inf), were calculated with the serum EPO concentrations from blood samples and were found comparable for both formulations. The geometric mean ratios (@90% CI) of the Cmax and AUCinf were 1.16 and 0.89, respectively, which were within the regulatory range of 0.80-1.25. The reticulocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin and red blood cell counts were measured as PD markers. The time-matched serum EPO concentrations and PD markers denoted a counterclockwise hysteresis, and thereby suggesting a time delay between the observed concentration and the response. ANOVA derived P-values (all were greater than 0.05) for the effectors clearly revealed the similarity between effects on PD markers for both formulations. Both formulations were found tolerated well, and anti-drug antibodies were not observed. Thus, the two formulations are projected to be used interchangeably in clinical settings.
Detailed description
Erythropoietin (EPO) is a glycoprotein hormone that plays a key role in the formation of red blood cells (RBCs). EPO is primarily synthesized in the peritubular cells of the kidney and released into the systemic circulation in adult individuals. Circulating EPO binds to the EPO receptor on bone marrow erythroid progenitors, triggering multiple signaling pathways that support differentiation into mature RBCs. A reduction in EPO production is the primary cause of anemia in people with chronic renal failure [4]. Human recombinant epoetin (rHuEPO) or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) have been demonstrated to stimulate erythropoiesis in anemic patients with chronic renal failure, including those who need and don't need dialysis. ESAs are used to treat chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients and to reduce the requirement for allogenic blood transfusions in patients with mild anemia who are undergoing surgery. Furthermore, human recombinant epoetin is recommended for patients who are at high risk for perioperative transfusions due to considerable blood loss.
Recombinant rHuEPO was manufactured using recombinant DNA techniques. Alpha epoetins are the most commonly used type of rHuEPO among the other forms. Eprex®, the pioneer product of alpha epoetins, is a regular medicine with proven efficacy and tolerability. Globe Biotech Limited, a Bangladeshi biopharmaceutical company has developed GBPD002, a biosimilar of Eprex® which is synthesized in genetically engineered Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Upstream and downstream process development and validation was done for large scale production. Step by step identical analytical results confirmed the biosimilarity of GBP002 with Eprex®. Single and repeat dose toxicity was performed in Wister rat to analyze the toxicity of GBPD002 with Eprex®.
The aim of this study is to analyze the bioequivalence of GBPD002 and Eprex®. The purpose of this study is to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of human recombinant erythropoietin, GBPD002, developed by Globe Biotech Limited and the reference product Eprex® manufactured by Janssen Cilag Ltd., UK in healthy volunteers. An independent ethics committee gave ethical clearance for this study and the protocol for this study was approved by the Directorate General of Drug Administration (DGDA) of Bangladesh.
A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and two-sequence crossover trial was conducted in 42 healthy volunteers in 2 groups/cohorts/arms. The Clinical Research Organization (CRO Ltd.) conducted this investigation at Farabi General Hospital, Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka 1209, in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization's Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Bangladesh's Directorate General of Drug Administration (DGDA) approved the study methodology and informed consent form. Volunteers were given thorough information about the study and they have signed an informed consent form to affirm their willingness to participate.
The study was open to healthy male participants aged 19-45 years old who weighed 55.0-90.0 kg and had a body mass index of 18.0-27.0 kg/m2. Subjects were eliminated if they had at least one of the following clinical laboratory test results: Hemoglobin level <12 g/dL or >17 g/dL, vitamin B12 level <200 pg/mL, ferritin level <21.8 ng/mL, transferrin level <190 mg/dL and any anomalous range for the reticulocyte (RET) count, erythrocytes, platelets or serum potassium levels. The number of subjects was determined based on the results of a previous clinical study on a single subcutaneous injection of epoetin alfa in healthy subjects. The total number of subjects was 42, assuming a 20% dropout rate. COVID-19, HIV, HBsAg, and HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) positive individuals were excluded from the study.The recruited volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the two sequences and received a single subcutaneous injection of 4,000 IU of either the comparator drug (Eprex®) or the test drug (GBPD002) in the abdomen from a prefilled syringe (PFS), based on the allocated sequences with a 28-day washout period: sequence A, administered the comparator drug in period 1 followed by the test drug in period 2; sequence B, given the test drug in period 1 followed by the comparator drug in period 2.Blood samples were taken for the PK evaluation at predose and at 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 and 144 h postdose. For the PD evaluation, the reticulocyte count (RET; %), hematocrit (HCT; %), haemoglobin (HB) (g/L) and red blood cell (RBC) count (106/mm3) were calculated at predose and at 72, 144, 216, and 312 h postdose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Healthy volunteers participating in two cohorts. In each cohort 21 volunteers are participating in the clinical trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Erythropoietin alpha Eprex® | Active comparator | Biological: Erythropoietin alphaGroup/cohort/Arm 1 (participating 21 volunteers): Eprex® injection 4,000 IU will be administered subcutaneously on Day 1; and wash out for 4 weeks. GBPD002 injection 4,000 IU/1 mL will be administered subcutaneously on Day 29. |
| Erythropoietin alpha, GBPD002 | Experimental | Biological: Erythropoietin alphaGroup/cohort/Arm 2 (participating 21 volunteers):GBPD002 PFS (Pre-Filled Syringe) 4,000 IU/ 1 mL (Erythropoietin alfa 4,000 IU) will be administered subcutaneously on Day 1.And wash out for 4 weeks (28 days from the 1st injection day). Eprex® inj. (Injection) 4,000 IU (Erythropoietin alfa 4,000 IU) will be administered subcutaneously on Day 29. Total 42 volunteers participated in the clinical trial. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Erythropoietin alphaTo analyze bio-similarity of GBPD002 with Eprex®, the Globe Biotech Ltd performed quite a few experiments to determine total analytical study of GBPD002. They performed peptide mapping to determine amino acid composition of GBPD002 and found similar result with erythropoietin alpha. The molecular weight was determined through SDS-PAGE analysis of GBPD002 and was compared with Eprex. The western blot analysis was performed to determine immune chemical characterization. Characterization of different isoforms was conducted through 2D gel electrophoresis. | Biological | Erythropoietin alpha Eprex®, Erythropoietin alpha, GBPD002 |
Primary outcome
Primary endpoint to measure safety, efficacy and acceptability of Erythropoietin medicine
Time frame: 34 days
EDTA-containing tube needs to be arranged for whole blood collection; for each test ~350 µL sample may require.Area under Curve last (AUC0-last) of Erythropoietin: Area Under Curve last (AUC0-last) of Erythropoietin [Time Frame: Once 1 hour before administration (day 1/day 29); 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 14, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144 (day 6/day 34) hrs after administration for each period]
1 secondary outcome
Secondary endpoints to measure safety, efficacy and acceptability of Erythropoietin medicine
Time frame: 34 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. We have NDA with volunteers to keep personal information's not to be published.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mamun Al Mahtab, PhD principal investigator
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Erythropoietin alpha in people with Natural Blood and Blood Product Toxicity, run by Globe Biotech Limited at 2 sites in Bangladesh.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Bangladesh. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary endpoint to measure safety, efficacy and acceptability of Erythropoietin medicine (time frame: 34 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2022.