Nutritional DeficiencyNCT05589077
Knowledge of Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Females
A study testing Education on Female Athlete Nutritional Concerns in people with Nutritional Deficiency, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether implementation of an educational tool for nutritional concerns in 18-25-year-old females who participate in sport increases their understanding of various nutritional concerns. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutritional Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- Education on Female Athlete Nutritional Concerns
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Jan 2023to 5 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Female
- Ages 18-25
- Participate in organized sport
Who cannot join
- Must meet all inclusion criteria (no previous or current health concerns will exclude a participant from the study)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Tool Related to Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Female Young Adults
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether implementation of an educational tool for nutritional concerns in 18-25-year-old females who participate in sport increases their understanding of various nutritional concerns. By studying an educational tool geared towards nutritional concerns of the female athlete, clinicians can use the information to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Procedure: Participants will be asked to complete a previously validated survey assessing knowledge of nutritional concerns of female athletes: the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders. The survey will be completed immediately pre- and post-receipt of the educational intervention. The intervention includes education on the previously mentioned nutritional concerns.
Read the detailed description
The current study is a quasi-experimental study consisting of one virtual session on Qualtrics. Eligible participants (as determined via a screening questionnaire) will use a link to access the questionnaire online. The questionnaire will collect information on participant's demographic background. Then, participants compete a 37-item survey on nutritional concerns and rate their confidence in each answer. Participants were given a score of 1 if the answer was correct, and a score of -1 if the answer was incorrect. Corresponding to each Knowledge question was a Likert scale for confidence (i.e. "How confident are you in this response?"). Response options on the Confidence options ranged from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating "No confidence" and 5 indicating "Completely sure". The range of total scores for Knowledge ranged from -37 to +37 with +37 indicating greatest amount of knowledge. The total Confidence score was the sum of all confidence responses from each of the scored knowledge questions. The total number of Confidence points ranged from 0-148. A higher confidence score indicated greater confidence from the participant in their knowledge answers. Impact scores were also calculated to measure the total composite score of Knowledge plus Confidence to identify an increased understanding of all scores.
Impact scores will be calculated using the same procedure as Lodge et al. (2020): "The total points of impact score from the questionnaire range between +37 and -37. A percentage of impact can be calculated using the limits -37 to +37 of the impact score (range of 74 points). A score of 0 will have a percentage of 50%, a score of -37 will have a percentage of 0%, and a score of +37 will have a percentage of 100%. Each question has a score range between +1 and -1. One point is given for the correct answer and high confidence and one point is subtracted for the incorrect answer and high confidence. The score of the questions is reduced when the respondent has lower confidence in their answer. The scale of confidence corresponds to the following points for impact scoring: Confidence 4 = 1 point, Confidence 3 = 0.75 points, Confidence 2 = 0.5 points, Confidence 1 = 0.25 points, Confidence 0 = 0 points. For example, if the answer is correct with the lowest confidence (1), it is scored as 0.25. If the answer is incorrect with the lowest confidence (1), it is scored as -0.25. If the answer selected if "I don't know", or a confidence of zero (0) is selected, it is scored as zero. For questions of "choose all that apply" nature, each possible sub-answer is considered individually".1
Then, participants will engage in a 10-minute educational intervention. The intervention will cover all the information regarding nutritional concerns that were tested in the survey. Participants will repeat the same survey to test their knowledge and confidence in nutritional concerns. Lastly, participants will answer 10 follow-up questions.
- Conditions
- Nutritional Deficiency
- Being tested
- Education on Female Athlete Nutritional Concerns
- Keywords
- Female Athlete, Sport Nutrition, Patient Education
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Education on Female Athlete Nutritional ConcernsBehavioural
Visual and audio information presented within the Qualtrics system will cover topics on the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Assessment and Educational Intervention | Experimental | All participants will be asked to complete the pre-intervention survey assessing knowledge and confidence of female athlete nutritional concerns. Then participants will engage in an educational intervention on these same topics. Following the intervention, participants will repeat the same survey. Receives: Behavioral: Education on Female Athlete Nutritional Concerns |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Knowledge Score
Participants will be asked 37 questions in the survey assessing their knowledge on nutritional concerns. Each correctly answered question is worth 1 point and each incorrectly answered question is worth -1 point. The highest possible score a participant can receive is 37. The lowest possible score a participant can receive is -37. Higher scores indicate higher levels of knowledge.
Measured: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Change in Confidence Score
Corresponding to each Knowledge question was a Likert scale for confidence (i.e. "How confident are you in this response?"). Response options on the Confidence options ranged from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating "No confidence" and 5 indicating "Completely sure". The total Confidence score is the sum of all confidence responses from each of the scored knowledge questions. The total number of Confidence points ranged from 0-148. A higher confidence score indicates greater confidence from the participant in their knowledge answers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of confidence.
Measured: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Change in Impact Score
The score quantifies the correctness of an answer combined with the level of confidence. Each question has a score range between -1 and 1. The correctness of the answer and level of confidence in the answer produces the Impact score. One point is given for the correct answer and high confidence and one point is subtracted for the incorrect answer and high confidence. The score of the questions is reduced when the respondent has lower confidence in their answer. The scale of confidence corresponds to the following points for impact scoring: Confidence 4 = 1 point, Confidence 3 = 0.75 points, Confidence 2 = 0.5 points, Confidence 1 = 0.25 points, Confidence 0 = 0 points. The total Impact score is the sum of each question's score. Higher scores indicate both high levels of knowledge and confidence simultaneously.
Measured: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2022
- Study start9 Jan 2023
- Primary completion28 Apr 2023
- Study completion5 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutritional DeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants will complete the same survey and engage in the same intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lauren Woelffer, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05589077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-1348
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 11 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Publications
Lodge MT, Ackerman KE, Garay J. Knowledge of Triad and RED-S in Female Cross-Country Athletes and Support Staff. J Athl Train. 2021 Jul 30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0175.21. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 34329432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention Tool Related to Nutritional Concerns in Physically Active Female Young Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05589077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 22-1348
- Conditions
- Nutritional Deficiency
- Keywords
- Female Athlete, Sport Nutrition, Patient Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine whether implementation of an educational tool for nutritional concerns in 18-25-year-old females who participate in sport increases their understanding of various nutritional concerns. By studying an educational tool geared towards nutritional concerns of the female athlete, clinicians can use the information to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes.
Procedure: Participants will be asked to complete a previously validated survey assessing knowledge of nutritional concerns of female athletes: the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders. The survey will be completed immediately pre- and post-receipt of the educational intervention. The intervention includes education on the previously mentioned nutritional concerns.
Detailed description
The current study is a quasi-experimental study consisting of one virtual session on Qualtrics. Eligible participants (as determined via a screening questionnaire) will use a link to access the questionnaire online. The questionnaire will collect information on participant's demographic background. Then, participants compete a 37-item survey on nutritional concerns and rate their confidence in each answer. Participants were given a score of 1 if the answer was correct, and a score of -1 if the answer was incorrect. Corresponding to each Knowledge question was a Likert scale for confidence (i.e. "How confident are you in this response?"). Response options on the Confidence options ranged from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating "No confidence" and 5 indicating "Completely sure". The range of total scores for Knowledge ranged from -37 to +37 with +37 indicating greatest amount of knowledge. The total Confidence score was the sum of all confidence responses from each of the scored knowledge questions. The total number of Confidence points ranged from 0-148. A higher confidence score indicated greater confidence from the participant in their knowledge answers. Impact scores were also calculated to measure the total composite score of Knowledge plus Confidence to identify an increased understanding of all scores.
Impact scores will be calculated using the same procedure as Lodge et al. (2020): "The total points of impact score from the questionnaire range between +37 and -37. A percentage of impact can be calculated using the limits -37 to +37 of the impact score (range of 74 points). A score of 0 will have a percentage of 50%, a score of -37 will have a percentage of 0%, and a score of +37 will have a percentage of 100%. Each question has a score range between +1 and -1. One point is given for the correct answer and high confidence and one point is subtracted for the incorrect answer and high confidence. The score of the questions is reduced when the respondent has lower confidence in their answer. The scale of confidence corresponds to the following points for impact scoring: Confidence 4 = 1 point, Confidence 3 = 0.75 points, Confidence 2 = 0.5 points, Confidence 1 = 0.25 points, Confidence 0 = 0 points. For example, if the answer is correct with the lowest confidence (1), it is scored as 0.25. If the answer is incorrect with the lowest confidence (1), it is scored as -0.25. If the answer selected if "I don't know", or a confidence of zero (0) is selected, it is scored as zero. For questions of "choose all that apply" nature, each possible sub-answer is considered individually".1
Then, participants will engage in a 10-minute educational intervention. The intervention will cover all the information regarding nutritional concerns that were tested in the survey. Participants will repeat the same survey to test their knowledge and confidence in nutritional concerns. Lastly, participants will answer 10 follow-up questions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants will complete the same survey and engage in the same intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Assessment and Educational Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Education on Female Athlete Nutritional ConcernsAll participants will be asked to complete the pre-intervention survey assessing knowledge and confidence of female athlete nutritional concerns. Then participants will engage in an educational intervention on these same topics. Following the intervention, participants will repeat the same survey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female
- Ages 18-25
- Participate in organized sport
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Must meet all inclusion criteria (no previous or current health concerns will exclude a participant from the study)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Education on Female Athlete Nutritional ConcernsVisual and audio information presented within the Qualtrics system will cover topics on the Female Athlete Triad, Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport, and eating disorders. | Behavioural | Knowledge Assessment and Educational Intervention |
Primary outcome
Change in Knowledge Score
Time frame: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Participants will be asked 37 questions in the survey assessing their knowledge on nutritional concerns. Each correctly answered question is worth 1 point and each incorrectly answered question is worth -1 point. The highest possible score a participant can receive is 37. The lowest possible score a participant can receive is -37. Higher scores indicate higher levels of knowledge.
Change in Confidence Score
Time frame: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
Corresponding to each Knowledge question was a Likert scale for confidence (i.e. "How confident are you in this response?"). Response options on the Confidence options ranged from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating "No confidence" and 5 indicating "Completely sure". The total Confidence score is the sum of all confidence responses from each of the scored knowledge questions. The total number of Confidence points ranged from 0-148. A higher confidence score indicates greater confidence from the participant in their knowledge answers. Higher scores indicate higher levels of confidence.
Change in Impact Score
Time frame: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.
The score quantifies the correctness of an answer combined with the level of confidence. Each question has a score range between -1 and 1. The correctness of the answer and level of confidence in the answer produces the Impact score. One point is given for the correct answer and high confidence and one point is subtracted for the incorrect answer and high confidence. The score of the questions is reduced when the respondent has lower confidence in their answer. The scale of confidence corresponds to the following points for impact scoring: Confidence 4 = 1 point, Confidence 3 = 0.75 points, Confidence 2 = 0.5 points, Confidence 1 = 0.25 points, Confidence 0 = 0 points. The total Impact score is the sum of each question's score. Higher scores indicate both high levels of knowledge and confidence simultaneously.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 34329432Lodge MT, Ackerman KE, Garay J. Knowledge of Triad and RED-S in Female Cross-Country Athletes and Support Staff. J Athl Train. 2021 Jul 30. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0175.21. Online ahead of print.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Related trials for Nutritional Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lauren Woelffer principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Education on Female Athlete Nutritional Concerns in people with Nutritional Deficiency, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Knowledge Score (time frame: ~10 min for pre-test followed by ~10 min intervention followed by ~10 min post-test.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05589077, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2023.