Cerebral PalsyNCT05593406
Mechanical Vibration on Children With Cerebral Palsy
A study testing Vibration Group in people with Cerebral Palsy and Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Thessaly at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of mechanical vibration on spasticity and balance in children with cerebral palsy. The participants of the clinical study are 13 children with CP and age 4-17 years, with a diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- Vibration Group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 30 Oct 2022to 30 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- The children from 4 - 17 years old
- diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
- ability to understand simple commands.
- up to level GMFCS III,
- able to stand and walk (with or without mobility aids).
Who cannot join
- children who have been injected with botulinum toxin up to 3 months before
- children who have undergone selective rhizotomy surgery up to 1 year before,
- uncontrolled epilepsy,
- other pathologies that will affect the outcome of the intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Mechanical Vibration on Spasticity and Balance in Children With Cerebral Palsy
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of mechanical vibration on spasticity and balance in children with cerebral palsy. The participants of the clinical study are 13 children with CP and age 4-17 years, with a diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. More specifically, the participants were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group, with the first group continuing conventional physical therapy, while the experimental group outside the physical therapy program did also receive mechanical vibration using a hybervibe G10 vibration platform (lasting 15 minutes). The intervention lasted 8 weeks and participants were assessed before the start of the intervention (T1), 1 month after the first assessment (T2) and rechecked 1 month (T3) after the completion of the program using valid and reliable tools.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized clinical study and 13 children, aged 4-17 with diagnosed spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy participated in the research. The collection of the sample and the recording of the data took place in Pediatric Physiotherapy Private Practice centers in Lamia, Trikala and Katerini. Sampling was completed after written consent of the children's parents, as long as they were fully informed about the purposes of the research, the private physical therapy centers and the Human Performance \& Rehabilitation Laboratory of the University of Thessaly.
The time period that the clinical study intervention lasted was 8 weeks. The children who participated in the study were randomly divided through folders into an intervention group and a control group. The control group continued the physical therapy program they were already following, while the intervention group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy they received, did also resceive mechanical vibration. The program they were already following was based on the Bobath NDT Neuroevolutionary Method, where, through special manipulations, the emphasis is placed on improving the quality of movement and the functionality of the children, as well as the inclusion of the family in the wider treatment is considered important.
The inclusion of mechanical vibration in the children was carried out in parallel with the conventional physical therapy program they followed. The protocol with the appropriate exercises to be followed on the HyperVibe G10 mini vibration platform had a duration of 15 minutes, with a 2 minute break, the frequency of the mechanical vibration was 14Hz, the opening of the legs (amplitude) on the platform and the range of bending the knees depended on each participant and how safe they felt during the procedure. In front of them there was the possibility of supporting the upper limbs, for a possible loss of balance or if they felt insecure.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- Vibration Group, Control Group
- Keywords
- Cerebral palsy, Balance, Neurodevelopmental treatment, Whole body vibration, Spasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vibration GroupDevice
Also called Mechanical Vibration, Neurodevelopmental treatment
Whole body vibration for 15 minutes in squat and lunge position.
Control GroupOther
Also called Neurodevelopmental Treatment
NDT treatment 2 sessions per week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vibration Group | Experimental | The intervention-vibration group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy- NDT they received, were also included in mechanical vibration. Receives: Device: Vibration Group |
| Control Group | Active comparator | The Control group received only conventional physical therapy- NDT. Receives: Other: Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
TUG
TIMED UP AND GO (Scale to asses speed) (the minimum time the better)
Measured: 2 months
PBS
PAEDIATRIC BALANCE SCALE (BERG BALANNCE SCALE MODIFIED) (Scale for assess the balance) (score 0-56)
Measured: 2 months
MAS
Modified Asworth scale (spasticity)
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2022
- Study start30 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Dec 2022
- Study completion30 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ThessalyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The children who participated in the study were randomly divided through folders into an intervention group and a control group. The control group continued the physical therapy program they were already following, while the intervention group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy they received, did also receive mechanical vibration.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Thessaly
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Thomas Besios, Georgios Paras, Konstantinos Chandolias
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aourela Gkioni, University of Thessaly
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05593406
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AG12071996
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
1. Ahlborg, L., Andersson, C., & Julin, P. (2006). Whole-body vibration training compared with resistance training: Effect on spasticity, muscle strength and motor performance in adults with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600680262 2. Ahmadizadeh, Z., Khalili, M. A., Ghalam, M. S., & Mokhlesin, M. (2019). Effect of whole body vibration with stretching exercise on active and passive range of motion in lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.84436 3. Alashram, A. R., Padua, E., & Annino, G. (2019). Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Motor Impairments in Patients With Neurological Disorders. In American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 98, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001252 4. Ali, M. S., Awad, A. S., & Elassal, M. I. (2019). The effect of two therapeutic interventions on balance in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A comparative study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.05.005 5. Andrew Harb and Stephen Kishner. (2022). Modified Ashworth Scale. StatPearls. 6. Bax, M., Goldstein, M., Rosenbaum, P., Leviton, A., Paneth, N., & Dan, B. et al. (2005). Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47(8), 571-576. doi: 10.1017/s001216220500112x 7. Cans, C., Dolk, H., Platt, M. J., Colver, A., Prasauskiene, A., & Krägel-Oh-Mann, I. (2007). Recommendations from the SCPE collaborative group for defining and classifying cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12626.x 8. Cheng, H. Y. K., Ju, Y. Y., Chen, C. L., Chuang, L. L., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). Effects of whole body vibration on spasticity and lower extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. Human Movement Science, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.003 9. Christopher, A., Kraft, E., Olenick, H., Kiesling, R., & Doty, A. (2021). The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review: Psychometric properties of the Timed Up and Go. In Disability and Rehabilitation (Vol. 43, Issue 13). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1682066 10. El-Shamy, S. M. (2014). Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a541a4 11. Franjoine, M., Darr, N., Held, S., Kott, K., & Young, B. (2010). The Performance of Children Developing Typically on the Pediatric Balance Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 22(4), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0b013e3181f9d5eb 12. Fratini, A., Bonci, T., & Bull, A. M. J. (2016). Whole body vibration treatments in postmenopausal women can improve bone mineral density: Results of a stimulus focussed meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166774
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Mechanical Vibration on Spasticity and Balance in Children With Cerebral Palsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05593406
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AG12071996
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- Cerebral palsy, Balance, Neurodevelopmental treatment, Whole body vibration, Spasticity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ThessalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Thomas Besios, Georgios Paras, Konstantinos Chandolias
- Study start
- 30 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of mechanical vibration on spasticity and balance in children with cerebral palsy. The participants of the clinical study are 13 children with CP and age 4-17 years, with a diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. More specifically, the participants were randomly divided into a control group and an intervention group, with the first group continuing conventional physical therapy, while the experimental group outside the physical therapy program did also receive mechanical vibration using a hybervibe G10 vibration platform (lasting 15 minutes). The intervention lasted 8 weeks and participants were assessed before the start of the intervention (T1), 1 month after the first assessment (T2) and rechecked 1 month (T3) after the completion of the program using valid and reliable tools.
Detailed description
This is a randomized clinical study and 13 children, aged 4-17 with diagnosed spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy participated in the research. The collection of the sample and the recording of the data took place in Pediatric Physiotherapy Private Practice centers in Lamia, Trikala and Katerini. Sampling was completed after written consent of the children's parents, as long as they were fully informed about the purposes of the research, the private physical therapy centers and the Human Performance \& Rehabilitation Laboratory of the University of Thessaly.
The time period that the clinical study intervention lasted was 8 weeks. The children who participated in the study were randomly divided through folders into an intervention group and a control group. The control group continued the physical therapy program they were already following, while the intervention group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy they received, did also resceive mechanical vibration. The program they were already following was based on the Bobath NDT Neuroevolutionary Method, where, through special manipulations, the emphasis is placed on improving the quality of movement and the functionality of the children, as well as the inclusion of the family in the wider treatment is considered important.
The inclusion of mechanical vibration in the children was carried out in parallel with the conventional physical therapy program they followed. The protocol with the appropriate exercises to be followed on the HyperVibe G10 mini vibration platform had a duration of 15 minutes, with a 2 minute break, the frequency of the mechanical vibration was 14Hz, the opening of the legs (amplitude) on the platform and the range of bending the knees depended on each participant and how safe they felt during the procedure. In front of them there was the possibility of supporting the upper limbs, for a possible loss of balance or if they felt insecure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The children who participated in the study were randomly divided through folders into an intervention group and a control group. The control group continued the physical therapy program they were already following, while the intervention group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy they received, did also receive mechanical vibration.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vibration Group | Experimental | Device: Vibration GroupThe intervention-vibration group, in addition to the conventional physical therapy- NDT they received, were also included in mechanical vibration. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Control GroupThe Control group received only conventional physical therapy- NDT. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The children from 4 - 17 years old
- diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy
- ability to understand simple commands.
- up to level GMFCS III,
- able to stand and walk (with or without mobility aids).
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- children who have been injected with botulinum toxin up to 3 months before
- children who have undergone selective rhizotomy surgery up to 1 year before,
- uncontrolled epilepsy,
- other pathologies that will affect the outcome of the intervention.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vibration GroupAlso: Mechanical Vibration, Neurodevelopmental treatmentWhole body vibration for 15 minutes in squat and lunge position. | Device | Vibration Group |
| Control GroupAlso: Neurodevelopmental TreatmentNDT treatment 2 sessions per week | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
TUG
Time frame: 2 months
TIMED UP AND GO (Scale to asses speed) (the minimum time the better)
PBS
Time frame: 2 months
PAEDIATRIC BALANCE SCALE (BERG BALANNCE SCALE MODIFIED) (Scale for assess the balance) (score 0-56)
MAS
Time frame: 2 months
Modified Asworth scale (spasticity)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2023.
- Background1. Ahlborg, L., Andersson, C., & Julin, P. (2006). Whole-body vibration training compared with resistance training: Effect on spasticity, muscle strength and motor performance in adults with cerebral palsy. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970600680262 2. Ahmadizadeh, Z., Khalili, M. A., Ghalam, M. S., & Mokhlesin, M. (2019). Effect of whole body vibration with stretching exercise on active and passive range of motion in lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy: A randomized clinical trial. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics, 29(5). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.84436 3. Alashram, A. R., Padua, E., & Annino, G. (2019). Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Motor Impairments in Patients With Neurological Disorders. In American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Vol. 98, Issue 12). https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001252 4. Ali, M. S., Awad, A. S., & Elassal, M. I. (2019). The effect of two therapeutic interventions on balance in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A comparative study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.05.005 5. Andrew Harb and Stephen Kishner. (2022). Modified Ashworth Scale. StatPearls. 6. Bax, M., Goldstein, M., Rosenbaum, P., Leviton, A., Paneth, N., & Dan, B. et al. (2005). Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47(8), 571-576. doi: 10.1017/s001216220500112x 7. Cans, C., Dolk, H., Platt, M. J., Colver, A., Prasauskiene, A., & Krägel-Oh-Mann, I. (2007). Recommendations from the SCPE collaborative group for defining and classifying cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(SUPPL. 2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12626.x 8. Cheng, H. Y. K., Ju, Y. Y., Chen, C. L., Chuang, L. L., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). Effects of whole body vibration on spasticity and lower extremity function in children with cerebral palsy. Human Movement Science, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.11.003 9. Christopher, A., Kraft, E., Olenick, H., Kiesling, R., & Doty, A. (2021). The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review: Psychometric properties of the Timed Up and Go. In Disability and Rehabilitation (Vol. 43, Issue 13). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1682066 10. El-Shamy, S. M. (2014). Effect of whole-body vibration on muscle strength and balance in diplegic cerebral palsy: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182a541a4 11. Franjoine, M., Darr, N., Held, S., Kott, K., & Young, B. (2010). The Performance of Children Developing Typically on the Pediatric Balance Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 22(4), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1097/pep.0b013e3181f9d5eb 12. Fratini, A., Bonci, T., & Bull, A. M. J. (2016). Whole body vibration treatments in postmenopausal women can improve bone mineral density: Results of a stimulus focussed meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166774
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruiting
Functional Outcomes and Control Using Synchron BCI - Australia
Neurologic Disorder, Neurologic Diseases
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vibration Group in people with Cerebral Palsy and Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Thessaly at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
TUG (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05593406, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2023.