AzTrials
AzTrials

Pit and Fissure SealantNCT05606874

Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant

A study testing Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant. and Conventional resin fissure sealant in people with Pit and Fissure Sealant, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Retention rate and caries preventive effect of preheated flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant versus conventional resin-based fissure sealant in patients with permanent molars with deep pit and fissure over one year follow up. A randomized clinical trial Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 22 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pit and Fissure Sealant
What is being tested?
Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant. and Conventional resin fissure sealant
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
28 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
20 Nov 2022to 10 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 22 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • participant:
  • Young adults (16_22y)
  • Patients who have existing pits and fissures that are anatomically deep and caries susceptible.
  • Teeth
  • Permanent molars teeth without any caries and cavitation. (Azarpazhooh \& Main 2008)
  • Permanent molar teeth that have deep pit and fissure morphology, with "sticky" fissures.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Permanent molar teeth with stained grooves.
  • Stained pits and fissures with minimum decalcification of opacification and no softness at the base of the fissure (ICDAS 1 and 2).
  • -

Who cannot join

  • participant:
  • Uncooperative behavior, limits the use of sealants due to hampering of adequate field or isolation techniques throughout the procedure.
  • Patients allergic to sealant material.
  • Patient with history of medical disease, drug therapies or any other serious relevant problem.
  • Teeth:
  • An individual with no previous caries experience and well coalesced pits and fissures
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Partially erupted teeth.
  • Teeth with cavitation or caries of the dentin.
  • A large restoration is present on occlusal surface.
  • If pits and fissures are self-cleansable.
  • Teeth with dental fluorosis, hypocalcification or hypercalcification

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo university

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant Versus Conventional Resin-based Fissure Sealant in Patients With Permanent Molars With Deep Pit and Fissure Over One Year Follow up. A Randomized Clinical Trial

Retention rate and caries preventive effect of preheated flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant versus conventional resin-based fissure sealant in patients with permanent molars with deep pit and fissure over one year follow up. A randomized clinical trial

Read the detailed description

Statement of the problem:

Pit and fissure sealant placement is considered as an effective modality for prevention of caries on occlusal surfaces. Penetration, retention and lateral wall adaptation are the key factors in success of pit and fissure sealant restorations .

The retention is very critical for the sealing material and the successful penetration of the material into the pits and fissures However, the morphology of the fissures significantly influences the penetration of the sealing material occlusal fissure pattern like in deep and narrow fissures like I-type and IK- type where lesser penetration may be encountered fillers are added to the pit and fissure sealants in order to increase their wear and abrasion resistance. However, these fillers could lead to increase in the viscosity with subsequent decrease in the penetration.

Rationale:

According to a systematic review, they found that preheating of resin composite apparently increases the flowability of regular consistency composites, which improves the adaptation of the material into the cavity walls. Also studied the effect of heat and sonic vibration on penetration of flowable resin composite, they found that higher penetration was associated with heat compared with the conventional application method. So, this proposal is introduced with the hypothesis that preheating of filled fissure sealants may enhance their flowability and penetration especially into those fissures with complex structure.

Being tested
Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant., Conventional resin fissure sealant
Keywords
preheated flowable composite, pit and fissure sealant, Retention Rate
Medical subject headings
Van der Woude syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant.Other

    Also called (Filtek™ Z350Xt Flowable Restorative, 3M ESPSE, USA)

    The occlusal fissures will be etched with a 37% phosphoric acid gel for 30 s. After rinsing the enamel with water for 30 s the enamel will be dried for 15 s with compressed air. After completing the fissure preparations a single coat of adhesive (3M ESPE ADPER ,USA) will be applied to the etched surface ,dried under gentle air flow for 2- 3 s and light cured for 20 s using a LED light curing unit with a 1000 mw output .Conventional resin fissure sealant (total etch), (UltraSeal XT®, Ultradent, USA) will be applied to the etched pits and fissures. After removing the rubber dam the occlusion will be checked the sealant will be adjusted with a composite finishing bur and polished with polishing points.

  • Conventional resin fissure sealantOther

    Also called (total etch), (UltraSeal XT®, Ultradent, USA)

    The occlusal fissures will be etched with a 37% phosphoric acid gel for 30 s. After rinsing the enamel with water for 30 s the enamel will be dried for 15 s with compressed air. After completing the fissure preparations a single coat of adhesive (3M ESPE ADPER ,USA) will be applied to the etched surface ,dried under gentle air flow for 2- 3 s and light cured for 20 s using a LED light curing unit with a 1000 mw output .Conventional resin fissure sealant (total etch), (UltraSeal XT®, Ultradent, USA) will be applied to the etched pits and fissures. After removing the rubber dam the occlusion will be checked the sealant will be adjusted with a composite finishing bur and polished with polishing points.

Study groups in NCT05606874
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pre-heating of flowable resin composite .Experimental(Filtek™ Z350Xt Flowable Restorative, 3M ESPSE, USA)
Receives: Other: Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant.
Conventional resin fissure sealantActive comparator(total etch), (UltraSeal XT®, Ultradent, USA)
Receives: Other: Conventional resin fissure sealant

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Retention rate

    Retention criteria

    Measured: T1: 3 months

  2. Retention rate

    Retention criteria

    Measured: T2: 6 months

  3. Retention rate

    Retention criteria

    Measured: T3: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Caries incidence

    ICDAS-II visual criteria

    Measured: T1: 3 months

  2. Caries incidence

    ICDAS-II visual criteria

    Measured: T2: 6 months

  3. Caries incidence

    ICDAS-II visual criteria

    Measured: T3: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2022
  2. Study start20 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Nov 2023
  4. Study completion10 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
28 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05606874
Sponsor's protocol ID
preheated flowable composite
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
29 Oct 2022
Last updated
14 May 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008 Sep;53(3):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x.

    PubMed 18782377
  • Erbas Unverdi G, Atac SA, Cehreli ZC. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Sep;21(7):2235-2243. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2016-8. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

    PubMed 27900529
  • Subramaniam P, Konde S, Mandanna DK. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Sep;26(3):114-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.43192.

    PubMed 18923223
  • Rickman LJ, Padipatvuthikul P, Chee B. Clinical applications of preheated hybrid resin composite. Br Dent J. 2011 Jul 22;211(2):63-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.571.

    PubMed 21779058
  • Ramesh H, Ashok R, Rajan M, Balaji L, Ganesh A. Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2020 Sep 24;6(9):e04964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964. eCollection 2020 Sep.

    PubMed 33005790
  • Nahvi A, Razavian A, Abedi H, Charati JY. A comparison of microleakage in self-etch fissure sealants and conventional fissure sealants with total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems. Eur J Dent. 2018 Apr-Jun;12(2):242-246. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_63_18.

    PubMed 29988227
  • Lopes LCP, Terada RSS, Tsuzuki FM, Giannini M, Hirata R. Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials-a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4225-4235. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03637-2. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

    PubMed 33083851
  • Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):444-453. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12281. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

    PubMed 28024165
  • Kim HJ, Choi HJ, Kim KY, Kim KM. Effect of Heat and Sonic Vibration on Penetration of a Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44(1):41-46. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.1.7.

    PubMed 31995416
  • Jafarzadeh M, Malekafzali B, Tadayon N, Fallahi S. Retention of a Flowable Composite Resin in Comparison to a Conventional Resin-Based Sealant: One-year Follow-up. J Dent (Tehran). 2010 Winter;7(1):1-5. Epub 2010 Mar 31.

    PubMed 21998768
  • Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, Tsuchiya T. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;25(4):274-82.

    PubMed 11203831
  • Ganesh M, Shobha T. Comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability of Fuji VII and Concise as pit and fissure sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 May 1;8(4):10-8.

    PubMed 17486182
  • Rishika, Garg N, Mayall SS, Pathivada L, Yeluri R. Combined Effect of Enamel Deproteinization and Intermediate Bonding in the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;42(6):427-433. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-42.6.4. Epub 2018 Aug 7.

    PubMed 30085876
  • Garg N, Indushekar KR, Saraf BG, Sheoran N, Sardana D. Comparative Evaluation of Penetration Ability of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants and Their Relationship with Fissure Patterns. J Dent (Shiraz). 2018 Jun;19(2):92-99.

    PubMed 29854882
  • Erdemir U, Sancakli HS, Yaman BC, Ozel S, Yucel T, Yildiz E. Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study. J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

    PubMed 24296163

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pre-heating of flowable resin composite used as a pit and fissure sealant. and Conventional resin fissure sealant in people with Pit and Fissure Sealant, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Retention rate (time frame: T1: 3 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05606874, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in