Temporomandibular Joint DisordersNCT05607823
Adding Core Stabilization Training to Manuel Therapy in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
A study testing Core Stabilization Training, Orofacial Manual Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in individuals with DDwR symptoms. It is hypothesized that adding core stabilization training (CST) to orofacial manual therapy (OMT) will enhance treatment outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Core Stabilization Training, Orofacial Manual Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 45 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2022to 10 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Volunteered to participate,
- Aged between 18-60 years old,
- Having the diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) - Reduction Disc Displacement (DDwR)
Who cannot join
- Having a malignant condition, trauma and surgery of the cranial and cervical region,
- Not being cooperative,
- Regular use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs,
- Having dentofacial anomalies,
- Having active arthritis,
- Having lumbal pathology,
Show all 10Show fewer
- Having metabolic diseases,
- Having connective tissue, rheumatological and hematological disorders,
- Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
- Receiving TMD-related physical therapy less than 6 months ago
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Adding Core Stabilization Training to Orofacial Manuel Therapy in Individuals With Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement With Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Study
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in individuals with DDwR symptoms. It is hypothesized that adding core stabilization training (CST) to orofacial manual therapy (OMT) will enhance treatment outcomes. Patients will be treated for 10 sessions once a week, for a total of 10 weeks. Evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the treatment.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in individuals with DDwR symptoms. It is hypothesized that adding core stabilization training (CST) to orofacial manual therapy (OMT) will enhance treatment outcomes. The patients to be included in the study will be randomly divided into three groups and it is planned to include 15 people in each group. Home exercises and patient education will be provided to all patients.
- Group 1 (CST group): Orofacial manual therapy + core stabilization training (CST) + home exercise and patient education
- Group 2 (OMT group): Orofacial manual therapy (OMT) + home exercise and patient education
- Group 3 (Control group): Home exercise and patient education.
Pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, joint range of motion, posture, flexibility, stabilization of core muscles, functionality and sleep quality will be evaluated by using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), digital algometer, ruler, Palpation Meter (PALM), bubble inclinometer, tape measure, Finger-to-floor distance (EPZM) and sit-reach test, pressure biofeedback unit, "Helkimo Index", "Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PUKI)" respectively. Patients will be treated for 10 sessions once a week, for a total of 10 weeks. Evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the treatment.
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Being tested
- Core Stabilization Training, Orofacial Manual Therapy, Conventional Physiotherapy
- Keywords
- core stability, exercise, Temporomandibular joint disorders, facial pain, comprehensive health care
- Medical subject headings
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Motor Activity, Facial Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Core Stabilization TrainingOther
Core Stabilization training will be based on dynamic neuromuscular stabilization and consists of three stages. In the first session, it is to teach the simultaneous activation of the transversus abdominis, pelvic floor, multifidus and diaphragm muscles and to improve muscle coordination and proprioception in the entire spinal region. In the second and third phases, exercises will be made more intense to improve muscular endurance and stability. The difficulty of the exercises will be increased by working in different positions, using resistance bands, exercise balls and body weight, and adding movements to the extremities. A total of 10 sessions of treatment program will be applied to the patients for ten weeks, once a week.
Orofacial Manual TherapyOther
As orofacial manual therapy, soft tissue (intraoral and extraoral trigger point therapy and myofascial release of painful muscles) and joint mobilization (caudal and ventro-caudal traction, ventral and mediolateral translation), muscle energy technique, fascia mandibularis release, occipital release and ligamentous treatment was planned.
Conventional PhysiotherapyOther
Conventional physiotherapy consists of home exercise and patient education. Patient education consists of parafunctional behaviors, habits, a diet with soft food, and posture education. The exercises consist of exercises for the mandible, cervical and thoracic region and breathing. All movements are planned to be done at home 3 times a day, every day of the week.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CST Group | Experimental | The core stabilization group. Participants in this group will be received core stabilization training, orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. Receives: Other: Core Stabilization Training; Other: Orofacial Manual Therapy; Other: Conventional Physiotherapy |
| OMT Group | Experimental | The orofacial manuel therapy group. Participants in this group will be received orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. Receives: Other: Orofacial Manual Therapy; Other: Conventional Physiotherapy |
| Control Group | Experimental | Participants in this group will be received only conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. Receives: Other: Conventional Physiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain severity: VAS
The severity of pain in the orofacial region was evaluated using a Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). The patients were instructed to mark the level of pain felt during rest, clenching and maximum mouth opening on a 10-cm line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (intolerable pain).
Measured: Change from Baseline pain severity at 10 weeks.
Pain Threshold: Digital algometer
The algometer is a reliable instrument for measuring the sensitivity of the masticatory muscles. The measurement will be made at 8 points. A force (Newton in force) of 1 kg (weight in kilogram) per square centimeter (surface area in centimeter square) is applied to the patient for 3 seconds, and this is continued until the patient feels pain (weight and surface area will be combined to report Newton in kg/ cm2). The physiotherapist will passively support the individual's head with the other hand. This process will be repeated three times and the average value will be calculated.
Measured: Change from Baseline pain threshold at 10 weeks.
Range of Motion
Mouth opening, protrusion and right and left lateral deviation will be measured starting from 0 using a 15 cm ruler. Repeated measuring reduces the standard error of measurement, hence repeated measurements were also included in our study (three times) with the largest recorded range taken.
Measured: Change from Baseline range of motion at 10 weeks.
Facial asymmetry
For facial asymmetry evaluation, the distance between the anterior notch of the chin and the mandible line will be measured with a tape measure.
Measured: Change from Baseline facial asymmetry at 10 weeks.
Degree of pelvic tilt
Palpation Meter (PALM), (Salt Lake City, United Kingdom, USA) will be used for pelvic tilt evaluation. The Palpation Meter has an angle inclinometer and two 360-swivel arms, one of arms will be placed in the Spina iliaca Anterior Superior (SIAS) and the other in the Spina iliaca Posterior Superior (SIPS). In this position, the angle indicated by the inclinometer will be recorded as the pelvic tilt angle.
Measured: Change from Baseline degree of pelvic tilt at 10 weeks.
Degree of lordosis
Bubble inclinometer (White Plains, New York 10602 USA) will be used for lumbar lordosis evaluation. The degree of lordosis will be determined by measuring the spinous processes of the T12-L1 and S2-3 vertebrae with a bubble inclinometer and adding the degrees found.
Measured: Change from Baseline degree of lordosis at 10 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Flexibility of lumbal extensor muscles
Finger-to-floor distance (EPZM) will be used for flexibility of lumbal extensor. In the EPZM test, individuals will stand on a stool and are asked to bend their torso forward to reach as far as possible with both hands without bending the knees. The distance between the stool level and the middle finger will be measured by the therapist and and this distance will be recorded in cm. The individual will be asked to repeat this movement three times and the highest value will be taken as the test score.
Measured: Change from Baseline Finger-to-floor distance (EPZM) at 10 weeks.
Flexibility of hamstring muscles
Sit-reach test will be used for flexibility of hamstring muscles. For the sit-and-reach test, the individual will be seated without shoes in a long sitting position on the floor, with his feet propped on a 30 cm bench that is scaled by dividing the top into cm. The body will be asked to lie forward on the coffee table as much as possible without bending the knees, wait 2 seconds at the extreme point where the fingers are extended, and this distance will be recorded in cm. The individual will be asked to repeat this movement three times and the highest value will be taken as the test score.
Measured: Change from Baseline sit-reach test at 10 weeks.
Performance of stabilizer muscles
Lumbopelvic stabilization will be assessed using a pressure biofeedback unit (Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback Unit, Chattanooga Group Inc., Hixson, Tennessee, USA). Individuals will be asked to lie on their back in a hooked position. The pressure cell of the instrument will be placed under the lumbar vertebrae. The subjects will be asked to perform the abdominal drawing-in maneuver as previously taught, with no spinal or pelvic movement. The change in pressure will be recorded in mmHg and the time that the contraction can be maintained in seconds.
Measured: Change from Baseline lumbopelvic stabilization at 10 weeks.
Functionality
"Helkimo Index" will be used to evaluate Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) pain and dysfunction. This index evaluates the clinical dysfunction of the stomatognathic system based on the 5 signs of TMD. Pain during mandible movement, TMJ pain, pain in masticatory muscles, TMJ sound and maximum mouth opening are evaluated with different questions between 0-5. The total dysfunction score ranges from 0 to 25. 0 no dysfunction; Values 1-4 are mild dysfunction; Values from 4 to 9 indicate moderate dysfunction; Values above 9 indicate severe dysfunction.
Measured: Change from Baseline Helkimo Index at 10 weeks.
Sleep
"Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PUKI)" will be used to assess sleep quality and impairment. It consists of 7 subscales that assess subjective sleep quality, sleep latency and duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disorders, use of sleep medication, and loss of daytime functionality. A high total score indicates poor sleep quality.
Measured: Change from Baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PUKI) at 10 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2022
- Study start6 Nov 2022
- Primary completion1 Nov 2023
- Study completion10 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Temporomandibular Joint DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- There are three study groups: 1.CST group: Participants in this group will be received core stabilization training, orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education). 2. OMT group: Participants in this group will be received orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. 3. Control Group: Participants in this group received only conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tugba Kuru Colak, Asst. Prof, Study director, Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05607823
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 09.2022.951
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Clinical Study Report (CSR) might be considered to be shared with clinicians studying in the same field one year after the publication of the study.
Publications
Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
PubMed 15928561Liu F, Steinkeler A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;57(3):465-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.04.006.
PubMed 23809304Anastassaki Kohler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson T. Prevalence of symptoms indicative of temporomandibular disorders in adults: cross-sectional epidemiological investigations covering two decades. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 May;70(3):213-23. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634832. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
PubMed 22126531Nekora-Azak A, Evlioglu G, Ordulu M, Issever H. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in a Turkish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Feb;33(2):81-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01543.x.
PubMed 16457666Hoffmann RG, Kotchen JM, Kotchen TA, Cowley T, Dasgupta M, Cowley AW Jr. Temporomandibular disorders and associated clinical comorbidities. Clin J Pain. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820215f5.
PubMed 21178593Lee KC, Wu YT, Chien WC, Chung CH, Chen LC, Shieh YS. The prevalence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder in low back pain and associated risk factors: A nationwide population-based cohort study with a 15-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18686. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018686.
PubMed 32011444Cuccia A, Caradonna C. The relationship between the stomatognathic system and body posture. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):61-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100011.
PubMed 19142553Gangloff P, Louis JP, Perrin PP. Dental occlusion modifies gaze and posture stabilization in human subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2000 Nov 3;293(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01528-7.
PubMed 11036196Espinosa de Santillana IA, Garcia-Juarez A, Rebollo-Vazquez J, Ustaran-Aquino AK. [Frequent postural alterations in patients with different types of temporomandibular disorders]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2018 May-Jun;20(3):384-389. doi: 10.15446/rsap.V20n3.53529. Spanish.
PubMed 30844014Saito ET, Akashi PM, Sacco Ide C. Global body posture evaluation in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):35-9. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100007.
PubMed 19142549Fischer MJ, Riedlinger K, Gutenbrunner C, Bernateck M. Influence of the temporomandibular joint on range of motion of the hip joint in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Jun;32(5):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.04.003.
PubMed 19539119Fink M, Wahling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H. The functional relationship between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio. 2003 Jul;21(3):202-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2003.11746252.
PubMed 12889677de Oliveira-Souza AIS, de O Ferro JK, Barros MMMB, Oliveira DA. Cervical musculoskeletal disorders in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):84-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 11.
PubMed 33218570von Piekartz H, Hall T. Orofacial manual therapy improves cervical movement impairment associated with headache and features of temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2013 Aug;18(4):345-50. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
PubMed 23415640Wright EF, Domenech MA, Fischer JR Jr. Usefulness of posture training for patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Feb;131(2):202-10. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0148.
PubMed 10680388
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adding Core Stabilization Training to Orofacial Manuel Therapy in Individuals With Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement With Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05607823
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 09.2022.951
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Keywords
- core stability, exercise, Temporomandibular joint disorders, facial pain, comprehensive health care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 45 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marmara UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in individuals with DDwR symptoms. It is hypothesized that adding core stabilization training (CST) to orofacial manual therapy (OMT) will enhance treatment outcomes. Patients will be treated for 10 sessions once a week, for a total of 10 weeks. Evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the treatment.
Detailed description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different treatment approaches in individuals with DDwR symptoms. It is hypothesized that adding core stabilization training (CST) to orofacial manual therapy (OMT) will enhance treatment outcomes. The patients to be included in the study will be randomly divided into three groups and it is planned to include 15 people in each group. Home exercises and patient education will be provided to all patients.
- Group 1 (CST group): Orofacial manual therapy + core stabilization training (CST) + home exercise and patient education
- Group 2 (OMT group): Orofacial manual therapy (OMT) + home exercise and patient education
- Group 3 (Control group): Home exercise and patient education.
Pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, joint range of motion, posture, flexibility, stabilization of core muscles, functionality and sleep quality will be evaluated by using Numeric Pain Scale (NPS), digital algometer, ruler, Palpation Meter (PALM), bubble inclinometer, tape measure, Finger-to-floor distance (EPZM) and sit-reach test, pressure biofeedback unit, "Helkimo Index", "Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PUKI)" respectively. Patients will be treated for 10 sessions once a week, for a total of 10 weeks. Evaluation was planned to be done twice, at the beginning and end of the treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- There are three study groups: 1.CST group: Participants in this group will be received core stabilization training, orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education). 2. OMT group: Participants in this group will be received orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. 3. Control Group: Participants in this group received only conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CST Group | Experimental | Other: Core Stabilization Training, Other: Orofacial Manual Therapy, Other: Conventional PhysiotherapyThe core stabilization group. Participants in this group will be received core stabilization training, orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. |
| OMT Group | Experimental | Other: Orofacial Manual Therapy, Other: Conventional PhysiotherapyThe orofacial manuel therapy group. Participants in this group will be received orofacial manuel therapy and conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. |
| Control Group | Experimental | Other: Conventional PhysiotherapyParticipants in this group will be received only conventional physiotherapy (Home exercise program and patient education) as treatment. The number of participants is planned to be 15. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Volunteered to participate,
- Aged between 18-60 years old,
- Having the diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) - Reduction Disc Displacement (DDwR)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Having a malignant condition, trauma and surgery of the cranial and cervical region,
- Not being cooperative,
- Regular use of analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs,
- Having dentofacial anomalies,
- Having active arthritis,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Core Stabilization TrainingCore Stabilization training will be based on dynamic neuromuscular stabilization and consists of three stages. In the first session, it is to teach the simultaneous activation of the transversus abdominis, pelvic floor, multifidus and diaphragm muscles and to improve muscle coordination and proprioception in the entire spinal region. In the second and third phases, exercises will be made more intense to improve muscular endurance and stability. The difficulty of the exercises will be increased by working in different positions, using resistance bands, exercise balls and body weight, and adding movements to the extremities. A total of 10 sessions of treatment program will be applied to the patients for ten weeks, once a week. | Other | CST Group |
| Orofacial Manual TherapyAs orofacial manual therapy, soft tissue (intraoral and extraoral trigger point therapy and myofascial release of painful muscles) and joint mobilization (caudal and ventro-caudal traction, ventral and mediolateral translation), muscle energy technique, fascia mandibularis release, occipital release and ligamentous treatment was planned. | Other | CST Group, OMT Group |
| Conventional PhysiotherapyConventional physiotherapy consists of home exercise and patient education. Patient education consists of parafunctional behaviors, habits, a diet with soft food, and posture education. The exercises consist of exercises for the mandible, cervical and thoracic region and breathing. All movements are planned to be done at home 3 times a day, every day of the week. | Other | CST Group, Control Group, OMT Group |
Primary outcome
Pain severity: VAS
Time frame: Change from Baseline pain severity at 10 weeks.
The severity of pain in the orofacial region was evaluated using a Numeric Pain Scale (NPS). The patients were instructed to mark the level of pain felt during rest, clenching and maximum mouth opening on a 10-cm line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (intolerable pain).
Pain Threshold: Digital algometer
Time frame: Change from Baseline pain threshold at 10 weeks.
The algometer is a reliable instrument for measuring the sensitivity of the masticatory muscles. The measurement will be made at 8 points. A force (Newton in force) of 1 kg (weight in kilogram) per square centimeter (surface area in centimeter square) is applied to the patient for 3 seconds, and this is continued until the patient feels pain (weight and surface area will be combined to report Newton in kg/ cm2). The physiotherapist will passively support the individual's head with the other hand. This process will be repeated three times and the average value will be calculated.
Range of Motion
Time frame: Change from Baseline range of motion at 10 weeks.
Mouth opening, protrusion and right and left lateral deviation will be measured starting from 0 using a 15 cm ruler. Repeated measuring reduces the standard error of measurement, hence repeated measurements were also included in our study (three times) with the largest recorded range taken.
Facial asymmetry
Time frame: Change from Baseline facial asymmetry at 10 weeks.
For facial asymmetry evaluation, the distance between the anterior notch of the chin and the mandible line will be measured with a tape measure.
Degree of pelvic tilt
Time frame: Change from Baseline degree of pelvic tilt at 10 weeks.
Palpation Meter (PALM), (Salt Lake City, United Kingdom, USA) will be used for pelvic tilt evaluation. The Palpation Meter has an angle inclinometer and two 360-swivel arms, one of arms will be placed in the Spina iliaca Anterior Superior (SIAS) and the other in the Spina iliaca Posterior Superior (SIPS). In this position, the angle indicated by the inclinometer will be recorded as the pelvic tilt angle.
Degree of lordosis
Time frame: Change from Baseline degree of lordosis at 10 weeks.
Bubble inclinometer (White Plains, New York 10602 USA) will be used for lumbar lordosis evaluation. The degree of lordosis will be determined by measuring the spinous processes of the T12-L1 and S2-3 vertebrae with a bubble inclinometer and adding the degrees found.
5 secondary outcomes
Flexibility of lumbal extensor muscles
Time frame: Change from Baseline Finger-to-floor distance (EPZM) at 10 weeks.
Flexibility of hamstring muscles
Time frame: Change from Baseline sit-reach test at 10 weeks.
Performance of stabilizer muscles
Time frame: Change from Baseline lumbopelvic stabilization at 10 weeks.
Functionality
Time frame: Change from Baseline Helkimo Index at 10 weeks.
Sleep
Time frame: Change from Baseline Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PUKI) at 10 weeks.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 15928561Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
- Background: PubMed 23809304Liu F, Steinkeler A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dent Clin North Am. 2013 Jul;57(3):465-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.04.006.
- Background: PubMed 22126531Anastassaki Kohler A, Hugoson A, Magnusson T. Prevalence of symptoms indicative of temporomandibular disorders in adults: cross-sectional epidemiological investigations covering two decades. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012 May;70(3):213-23. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2011.634832. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
- Background: PubMed 16457666Nekora-Azak A, Evlioglu G, Ordulu M, Issever H. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in a Turkish population. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Feb;33(2):81-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01543.x.
- Background: PubMed 21178593Hoffmann RG, Kotchen JM, Kotchen TA, Cowley T, Dasgupta M, Cowley AW Jr. Temporomandibular disorders and associated clinical comorbidities. Clin J Pain. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(3):268-74. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31820215f5.
- Background: PubMed 32011444Lee KC, Wu YT, Chien WC, Chung CH, Chen LC, Shieh YS. The prevalence of first-onset temporomandibular disorder in low back pain and associated risk factors: A nationwide population-based cohort study with a 15-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(3):e18686. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018686.
- Background: PubMed 19142553Cuccia A, Caradonna C. The relationship between the stomatognathic system and body posture. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):61-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100011.
- Background: PubMed 11036196Gangloff P, Louis JP, Perrin PP. Dental occlusion modifies gaze and posture stabilization in human subjects. Neurosci Lett. 2000 Nov 3;293(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01528-7.
- Background: PubMed 30844014Espinosa de Santillana IA, Garcia-Juarez A, Rebollo-Vazquez J, Ustaran-Aquino AK. [Frequent postural alterations in patients with different types of temporomandibular disorders]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2018 May-Jun;20(3):384-389. doi: 10.15446/rsap.V20n3.53529. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 19142549Saito ET, Akashi PM, Sacco Ide C. Global body posture evaluation in patients with temporomandibular joint disorder. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(1):35-9. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322009000100007.
- Background: PubMed 19539119Fischer MJ, Riedlinger K, Gutenbrunner C, Bernateck M. Influence of the temporomandibular joint on range of motion of the hip joint in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Jun;32(5):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.04.003.
- Background: PubMed 12889677Fink M, Wahling K, Stiesch-Scholz M, Tschernitschek H. The functional relationship between the craniomandibular system, cervical spine, and the sacroiliac joint: a preliminary investigation. Cranio. 2003 Jul;21(3):202-8. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2003.11746252.
- Investigation of the Relationship Between Temporomandibular Disorder and Postural Analysis.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunctions and the Position of PelvisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Manual Therapy for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature. J Body Mov Ther.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Effects of Core Stability Exercises, Lumbar Lordosis and Low- Back Pain: A Systematic Review.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Pressure pain threshold and pain perception in temporomandibular disorder patients: is there any correlation?Link provided by the sponsor.
- The Validity and Reliability of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Informed Consent Form (ICF), Clinical Study Report (CSR) might be considered to be shared with clinicians studying in the same field one year after the publication of the study.
Related trials for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Recruiting
R01_Pilot Jaw Muscle Phenotypes
Chronic TMD Pain, Temporomandibular Disorder
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Adding Sodium Bicarbonate to Lidocaine in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain, Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Recruiting
Clinical and Electromyographic Assessment of Occlusal Splint Therapy
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Recruiting
An Open Label Study Assessing REN Treatment in Headache Management in Temporomandibular Disorders
Temporomandibular Disorder, Orofacial Pain
Recruiting
Machine Learning for Evaluating and Diagnosing Temporomandibular Disorders
Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD), TMJ Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tugba Kuru Colak, Asst. Prof study director
Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Core Stabilization Training, Orofacial Manual Therapy and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain severity: VAS (time frame: Change from Baseline pain severity at 10 weeks.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05607823, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2025.