StrokeNCT05609136
The Effect of Scapular Stabilization Exercises on the Upper Extremity in Patients With Chronic Stroke
A study testing Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises in people with Stroke, run by Suleyman Demirel University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
There is still no approved exact treatment for stroke, one of the leading causes of disability. Neurorehabilitation is an important treatment option for stroke patients with anatomical and functional impairments in their interhemispheric connections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 15 Oct 2022to 15 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18
- 3 months past the stroke history
- No previous history of stroke
- Mini mental test score ≥ 24
- Upper extremity (elbow, wrist and finger) spasticity level to be 1-3 according to Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
- Upper extremity Brunnstrom recovery stage 2-5
Show all 9Show fewer
- No botulinum toxin injection for the affected upper extremity in the last 6 months
- If he is using antispastic medication, his dose has not been changed in the last 1 month.
- Consent to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Having any neurological, psychiatric, orthopedic, unstable cardiovascular disease other than stroke
- being pregnant
- Having upper extremity contractures
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Scapular Stabilization Exercises on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Motor Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
There is still no approved exact treatment for stroke, one of the leading causes of disability. Neurorehabilitation is an important treatment option for stroke patients with anatomical and functional impairments in their interhemispheric connections. However, special techniques with high effectiveness are being investigated to increase the success of general rehabilitation. In this context, scapula-focused stabilization techniques have been used in stroke patients recently. In this randomized controlled study, investigators aimed to examine the effect of scapular stabilization exercises on upper extremity spasticity and motor function in addition to neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. 22 chronic stroke patients will be included in the study. The patients will be divided into two groups as scapular exercise group and control group using the simple randomization method. Scapular stabilization exercises will be applied in combination with neurorehabilitation to the first group, while only neurorehabilitation will be applied to the control group. A 6-week (30 sessions) neurorehabilitation program will be applied to all groups, specially planned for the patient. Spasticity of the patients participating in the study Modified Ashworth Scale, upper extremity recovery levels Brunnstrom Recovery Stage, upper extremity functions Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Scale and Wolf Motor Function Test, independence levels Functional Independence Scale , activities of daily living will be evaluated with the Modified Barthel Index and quality of life will be evaluated with the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. The first evaluation of the patients will be made before the treatment, and each patient will be evaluated after the 6-week exercise program. After all data are collected, in-group and intergroup comparisons will be made.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises
- Keywords
- Stroke, Rehabilitation, Upper extremity, Stabilization, Scapula, Recovery of function, Spasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bobath+Scapular Stabilization ExercisesOther
Scapular stabilization exercises will be given to patients in addition to Bobath therapy. It will be applied with the patient in a sitting position, with the shoulder at 90 degrees and the elbow extended. The patient will be given exercises with isometric contraction while the shoulder is in protraction and retraction by the physiotherapist. Isometric contraction will last for 5 seconds and each exercise will be repeated 2x15 times. There will be a 1-minute rest period between sets. The exercises will be performed in 2 different positions, in the flexion position and in the diagonal position.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bobath+ Scapular Stabilization Group | Experimental | In addition to the Bobath approach, which is one of the neurophysiological treatment methods for the upper extremity, 5 sessions a week for 6 weeks, scapular stabilization exercises will be applied to this group for an additional 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Scapular Stabilization Exercises will be performed with the patient in a sitting position, with the shoulder at 90 degrees and the elbow extended. The patient will be given exercises with isometric contraction while the shoulder is in protraction and retraction by the physiotherapist. Isometric contraction will last for 5 seconds and each exercise will be repeated 2x15 times. There will be a 1-minute rest period between sets. The exercises will be performed in 2 different positions, in the flexion position and in the diagonal position. Receives: Other: Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises |
| Bobath Group | Active comparator | The Bobath approach, one of the neurodevelopmental treatment methods for the upper extremities, was applied to all participants included in the study for 6 weeks, 5 sessions per week. Before starting the Bobath exercises, preparation was made with 10 minutes of stretching and upper extremity mobilization. The Bobath approach included functional exercises that patients could perform at home. Bobath program; shoulder flexion, protraction, abduction and extranal rotation; It included extension of the elbow and wrist, extension and opposition of the fingers. After these exercises, task-specific functional upper extremity exercises were performed with or without an object that could help the treatment. These tasks are; required reaching, grasping, or lifting objects such as a cup, pen, cylindrical box, etc., in different body positions. Each session lasted for 1 hour and at the end of each session, patients were given a home exercise program. Receives: Other: Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brunnstrom Recovery Stage
It is a classification method developed to evaluate the upper extremities of patients. Staging used in prognosis follow-up also aims to create a common language among clinicians. For the upper extremity, stage 1 (flash stage), stage 2 (reflexes and spasticity start stage), stage 3 (stage where limb synergies are seen), stage 4 (stage where limb synergies begin to break down), stage 5 (stage where limb synergies are broken except for certain activities) It is a scale that grades impairment between stage 6 (normal motor movement) and stage 6 (normal motor movement).
Measured: six weeks
Modified Ashworth Scale
It is the most universally accepted clinical tool used to measure the increase in muscle tone. The Ashworth Scale was published in 1964 to assess spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. The original Ashworth scale is a 5-point numerical scale that grades spasticity from 0 to 5 (0 without resistance and 5 with one limb rigid in flexion or extension). In 1987, 1+ was added and modified to increase the sensitivity of the Ashworth Scale. Since the scale was modified, Modified Ashworth Scale has been applied as a measure of spasticity in clinical practice and research. The purpose of the Modified Ashworth Scale is to rate muscle tone between 0 (normal muscle tone) and 4 (rigid muscle) points.
Measured: six weeks
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale
It is a commonly used scale to determine the severity of stroke and measure recovery. Upper extremity sensorimotor impairment after stroke is usually evaluated using The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale. It is considered the gold standard. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale is clinically applicable and has excellent reliability, validity and responsiveness. The scale consists of 33 items divided into 4 subscales: shoulder/elbow (18 items), wrist (5 items), hand (7 items) and coordination/speed (3 items). For each item, it is scored as 2 (performs the movement fully), 1 (does the movement partially), and 0 (the movement cannot be performed). A total of 66 points, with higher scores indicating better sensorimotor function.
Measured: six weeks
Wolf Motor Function Test
The test consists of 17 items. While 15 items evaluate skill and performance time for different functional activities, 2 items evaluate muscle strength. In performance time measurement, a maximum of 120 seconds is given for each of the 15 tasks and the individual is asked to complete the task as soon as possible during this time. All functional movements evaluated 0 = no interference, 1 = interference, 2 = plegia side involved but unable to complete task, 3 = performs task but in synergy pattern or moves very slowly, 4 = performs task near normal but slightly slower than normal; the target may have fine coordination or fluency problems, scored as 5 = doing the task and having normal movement. The average value of the total score is calculated for the functional skill score.
Measured: six weeks
Functional Independence Measure
It is a reliable assessment of the burden of care acquired due to the assistance patients need in performing a range of activities of daily living. Functional Independence Measure consists of 13-item motor domain (Functional Independence Measure-motor) and 5-item cognitive domain (Functional Independence Measure-cognitive) subcategory. All activities are rated on a seven-point ranking scale ranging from 1 (needs full assistance during activities) to 7 (does the activity completely independently). The Functional Independence Measure motor score ranges from 13 to 91 points, the cognitive score ranges from 5 to 35 points, and the total Functional Independence Measure score ranges from 18 to 126 points. Low scores indicate more addiction.
Measured: six weeks
Modified Barthel Index
Modified Barthel Index, which is used to measure the independence of patients in activities of daily living, was created by modifying the Barthel Index. It includes 10 items related to activities of daily living (nutrition, personal care, bathing, dressing, bowel and bladder care, toilet use, ambulation, transfers and stair climbing). There are levels between 0 and 5 for each item in Modified Barthel Index. Leveling points are different for each activity. At level 1, the patient is insufficient to perform the activity, while at level 5, the patient can do the activity without assistance, even if slowly. The total score is between 0-100 points. The higher the score, the lower the dependence of the patients on activities of daily living. Modified Barthel Index has good reliability and validity
Measured: six weeks
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale
It is a 49-item scale for 12 subcategories (mobility, vitality, upper extremity functionality, work/productivity, mood, self-care, social roles, family roles, language, vision, thinking, and personality) assessing the independence of stroke patients. It is rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1=Totally agree, 2=Somewhat partially agree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Partly disagree, 5=Disagree). The higher the score, the better the quality of life of stroke patients.
Measured: six weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2022
- Study start15 Oct 2022
- Primary completion30 Mar 2023
- Study completion15 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- The patients will be divided into two groups as scapular exercise group and control group using the simple randomization method. Scapular stabilization exercises will be applied in combination with neurorehabilitation to the first group, while only neurorehabilitation will be applied to the control group. A 6-week (30 sessions) neurorehabilitation program specially planned for the patient will be applied to all groups.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suleyman Demirel University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Huseyin Atceken, Suleyman Demirel University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05609136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 268
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Atceken H, Duray M. Effects of scapular stabilization exercises on upper extremity spasticity and motor function in patients post-stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Nov;41(11):2328-2341. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2025.2522175. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
PubMed 40568721
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Scapular Stabilization Exercises on Upper Extremity Spasticity and Motor Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05609136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 268
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Rehabilitation, Upper extremity, Stabilization, Scapula, Recovery of function, Spasticity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suleyman Demirel UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is still no approved exact treatment for stroke, one of the leading causes of disability. Neurorehabilitation is an important treatment option for stroke patients with anatomical and functional impairments in their interhemispheric connections. However, special techniques with high effectiveness are being investigated to increase the success of general rehabilitation. In this context, scapula-focused stabilization techniques have been used in stroke patients recently. In this randomized controlled study, investigators aimed to examine the effect of scapular stabilization exercises on upper extremity spasticity and motor function in addition to neurorehabilitation in patients with chronic stroke. 22 chronic stroke patients will be included in the study. The patients will be divided into two groups as scapular exercise group and control group using the simple randomization method. Scapular stabilization exercises will be applied in combination with neurorehabilitation to the first group, while only neurorehabilitation will be applied to the control group. A 6-week (30 sessions) neurorehabilitation program will be applied to all groups, specially planned for the patient. Spasticity of the patients participating in the study Modified Ashworth Scale, upper extremity recovery levels Brunnstrom Recovery Stage, upper extremity functions Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Scale and Wolf Motor Function Test, independence levels Functional Independence Scale , activities of daily living will be evaluated with the Modified Barthel Index and quality of life will be evaluated with the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale. The first evaluation of the patients will be made before the treatment, and each patient will be evaluated after the 6-week exercise program. After all data are collected, in-group and intergroup comparisons will be made.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The patients will be divided into two groups as scapular exercise group and control group using the simple randomization method. Scapular stabilization exercises will be applied in combination with neurorehabilitation to the first group, while only neurorehabilitation will be applied to the control group. A 6-week (30 sessions) neurorehabilitation program specially planned for the patient will be applied to all groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bobath+ Scapular Stabilization Group | Experimental | Other: Bobath+Scapular Stabilization ExercisesIn addition to the Bobath approach, which is one of the neurophysiological treatment methods for the upper extremity, 5 sessions a week for 6 weeks, scapular stabilization exercises will be applied to this group for an additional 6 weeks from the beginning of the treatment. Scapular Stabilization Exercises will be performed with the patient in a sitting position, with the shoulder at 90 degrees and the elbow extended. The patient will be given exercises with isometric contraction while the shoulder is in protraction and retraction by the physiotherapist. Isometric contraction will last for 5 seconds and each exercise will be repeated 2x15 times. There will be a 1-minute rest period between sets. The exercises will be performed in 2 different positions, in the flexion position and in the diagonal position. |
| Bobath Group | Active comparator | Other: Bobath+Scapular Stabilization ExercisesThe Bobath approach, one of the neurodevelopmental treatment methods for the upper extremities, was applied to all participants included in the study for 6 weeks, 5 sessions per week. Before starting the Bobath exercises, preparation was made with 10 minutes of stretching and upper extremity mobilization. The Bobath approach included functional exercises that patients could perform at home. Bobath program; shoulder flexion, protraction, abduction and extranal rotation; It included extension of the elbow and wrist, extension and opposition of the fingers. After these exercises, task-specific functional upper extremity exercises were performed with or without an object that could help the treatment. These tasks are; required reaching, grasping, or lifting objects such as a cup, pen, cylindrical box, etc., in different body positions. Each session lasted for 1 hour and at the end of each session, patients were given a home exercise program. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age ≥ 18
- 3 months past the stroke history
- No previous history of stroke
- Mini mental test score ≥ 24
- Upper extremity (elbow, wrist and finger) spasticity level to be 1-3 according to Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having any neurological, psychiatric, orthopedic, unstable cardiovascular disease other than stroke
- being pregnant
- Having upper extremity contractures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bobath+Scapular Stabilization ExercisesScapular stabilization exercises will be given to patients in addition to Bobath therapy. It will be applied with the patient in a sitting position, with the shoulder at 90 degrees and the elbow extended. The patient will be given exercises with isometric contraction while the shoulder is in protraction and retraction by the physiotherapist. Isometric contraction will last for 5 seconds and each exercise will be repeated 2x15 times. There will be a 1-minute rest period between sets. The exercises will be performed in 2 different positions, in the flexion position and in the diagonal position. | Other | Bobath Group, Bobath+ Scapular Stabilization Group |
Primary outcome
Brunnstrom Recovery Stage
Time frame: six weeks
It is a classification method developed to evaluate the upper extremities of patients. Staging used in prognosis follow-up also aims to create a common language among clinicians. For the upper extremity, stage 1 (flash stage), stage 2 (reflexes and spasticity start stage), stage 3 (stage where limb synergies are seen), stage 4 (stage where limb synergies begin to break down), stage 5 (stage where limb synergies are broken except for certain activities) It is a scale that grades impairment between stage 6 (normal motor movement) and stage 6 (normal motor movement).
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: six weeks
It is the most universally accepted clinical tool used to measure the increase in muscle tone. The Ashworth Scale was published in 1964 to assess spasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis. The original Ashworth scale is a 5-point numerical scale that grades spasticity from 0 to 5 (0 without resistance and 5 with one limb rigid in flexion or extension). In 1987, 1+ was added and modified to increase the sensitivity of the Ashworth Scale. Since the scale was modified, Modified Ashworth Scale has been applied as a measure of spasticity in clinical practice and research. The purpose of the Modified Ashworth Scale is to rate muscle tone between 0 (normal muscle tone) and 4 (rigid muscle) points.
The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale
Time frame: six weeks
It is a commonly used scale to determine the severity of stroke and measure recovery. Upper extremity sensorimotor impairment after stroke is usually evaluated using The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale. It is considered the gold standard. The Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale is clinically applicable and has excellent reliability, validity and responsiveness. The scale consists of 33 items divided into 4 subscales: shoulder/elbow (18 items), wrist (5 items), hand (7 items) and coordination/speed (3 items). For each item, it is scored as 2 (performs the movement fully), 1 (does the movement partially), and 0 (the movement cannot be performed). A total of 66 points, with higher scores indicating better sensorimotor function.
Wolf Motor Function Test
Time frame: six weeks
The test consists of 17 items. While 15 items evaluate skill and performance time for different functional activities, 2 items evaluate muscle strength. In performance time measurement, a maximum of 120 seconds is given for each of the 15 tasks and the individual is asked to complete the task as soon as possible during this time. All functional movements evaluated 0 = no interference, 1 = interference, 2 = plegia side involved but unable to complete task, 3 = performs task but in synergy pattern or moves very slowly, 4 = performs task near normal but slightly slower than normal; the target may have fine coordination or fluency problems, scored as 5 = doing the task and having normal movement. The average value of the total score is calculated for the functional skill score.
Functional Independence Measure
Time frame: six weeks
It is a reliable assessment of the burden of care acquired due to the assistance patients need in performing a range of activities of daily living. Functional Independence Measure consists of 13-item motor domain (Functional Independence Measure-motor) and 5-item cognitive domain (Functional Independence Measure-cognitive) subcategory. All activities are rated on a seven-point ranking scale ranging from 1 (needs full assistance during activities) to 7 (does the activity completely independently). The Functional Independence Measure motor score ranges from 13 to 91 points, the cognitive score ranges from 5 to 35 points, and the total Functional Independence Measure score ranges from 18 to 126 points. Low scores indicate more addiction.
Modified Barthel Index
Time frame: six weeks
Modified Barthel Index, which is used to measure the independence of patients in activities of daily living, was created by modifying the Barthel Index. It includes 10 items related to activities of daily living (nutrition, personal care, bathing, dressing, bowel and bladder care, toilet use, ambulation, transfers and stair climbing). There are levels between 0 and 5 for each item in Modified Barthel Index. Leveling points are different for each activity. At level 1, the patient is insufficient to perform the activity, while at level 5, the patient can do the activity without assistance, even if slowly. The total score is between 0-100 points. The higher the score, the lower the dependence of the patients on activities of daily living. Modified Barthel Index has good reliability and validity
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: six weeks
It is a 49-item scale for 12 subcategories (mobility, vitality, upper extremity functionality, work/productivity, mood, self-care, social roles, family roles, language, vision, thinking, and personality) assessing the independence of stroke patients. It is rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale (1=Totally agree, 2=Somewhat partially agree, 3=Neither agree nor disagree, 4=Partly disagree, 5=Disagree). The higher the score, the better the quality of life of stroke patients.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40568721Atceken H, Duray M. Effects of scapular stabilization exercises on upper extremity spasticity and motor function in patients post-stroke: a double-blind randomized controlled study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2025 Nov;41(11):2328-2341. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2025.2522175. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Foot Drop Rehabilitation and Mobility in Chronic Stroke
Stroke
Enrolling by invitation
Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface With MRI-Guided Multi-Channel Time-Domain Interference Stimulation in Treating Motor Dysfunction in Acute Cerebral Infarction Patients
Acute Ichemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Development, Validation and Normative Data of the Italian Battery for the Recognition of Famous Faces (FAME)
Stroke, Alzheimer s Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Long-Term Clinical, Health Economic, and Process Evaluation of Intensive Technology-Integrated Motor Rehabilitation in Chronic Neurological Conditions (INTeRAcT-bis)
Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Rimonabant for Improving Walking Ability in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Chronic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bobath+Scapular Stabilization Exercises in people with Stroke, run by Suleyman Demirel University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brunnstrom Recovery Stage (time frame: six weeks). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05609136, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2024.