ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary ArteriesNCT05610410
Peripheral Microvascular Blood Flow in ANOCA
An observational study of ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries and HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
An observational cross-sectional cohort study investigating whether peripheral endothelial function assessed using Laser speckle contrast analysis and coronary endothelial function measured with invasive coronary function testing are correlated in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
- What is being tested?
- Laser speckle contrast analysis
- How many people
- 43 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2022to 5 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: This study is designed to evaluate INOCA patients with a clinical indication of ICFT because of persistent angina without obstructive coronary artery disease and HFpEF patients with a clinical indication of ICFT.
Who may be able to join
- Clinical indication for elective invasive coronary function test (ICFT)
- Suited for one of the study groups:
- Persistent angina, defined as symptoms of angina; or
- HFpEF, diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology 2021 heart failure guidelines
- Absence of obstructive CAD, documented before inclusion, defined as
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) - indicative of absence of obstructed coronary arteries, or
- Coronary angiography (CAG) - <50% diameter stenosis (DS) in the epicardial coronary arteries or (fractional flow reserve (FFR) >0.80 or instant wave free ratio (iFR) >0.89)
Who cannot join
- Under 18 years of age
- Unable or unwilling to undergo ICFT
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Relationship Between Regulation of Peripheral and Intracoronary Microvascular Blood Flow in Patients With Ischemia and no Obstructive Coronary Arteries
An observational cross-sectional cohort study investigating whether peripheral endothelial function assessed using Laser speckle contrast analysis and coronary endothelial function measured with invasive coronary function testing are correlated in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) has been proposed to cause signs and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia in patients with angina but no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and has been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, as an element of the pro-inflammatory state causing cardiac functional and structural abnormalities in this syndrome. Research has shown that patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) often present with echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction combined with higher rates of detectable cardiac troponin and are at increased risk of developing HFpEF, indicating a major overlap in the complex pathophysiology underlying these syndromes. CED is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events and currently can only be detected with invasive coronary function testing (ICFT).
However, it has been suggested that CED is a component of systemic endothelial dysfunction and is associated with endothelial dysfunction in other microvascular beds. The cutaneous microcirculation is suitable for microvascular function studies and has been shown to correlate with muscle microvascular function. The recently developed Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) technique enables non-invasive monitoring of microvascular blood flow in superficial microvascular beds. In combination with iontophoresis of acetylcholine, nitroprusside and insulin, LASCA allows evaluation of peripheral microvascular endothelial and smooth muscle function. While LASCA is an established technique, the association between CED diagnosed with ICFT and an abnormal peripheral endothelial function measured by LASCA is currently unknown.
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to test whether peripheral endothelial function assessed using Laser speckle contrast analysis and CED measured with ICFT are correlated.
Study design: Observational cross-sectional cohort study.
Study population: 51 patients over the age of 18 with signs and symptoms of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and a clinical indication for ICFT because of persistent angina without obstructive coronary artery disease and 58 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a clinical indication for ICFT.
Primary study endpoint: The main study end point is the difference in peripheral endothelial function between patients with and without CED measured with ICFT in the INOCA group and the HFpEF group.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Study participants do not benefit from participation in this study. The burden of this study is low. The aim is that study procedures will be performed within 24 hours of the elective ICFT and study participants do not have to come to the hospital for an additional visit. The total risks associated with participation are classified as being low, because the risks for adverse events and serious adverse events from a local and transient stimulus in skin are minimal. Iontophoresis of acetylcholine, nitroprusside and insulin does not cause any skin damage and the used dosages are very small and as such, the stimuli do not cause any systemic effects.
- Conditions
- ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
- Being tested
- Laser speckle contrast analysis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laser speckle contrast analysisOther
Also called EndoPAT
Peripheral endothelial function assessment using Laser speckle contrast analysis and Peripheral reactive hyperemia assessment using EndoPAT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries | Not described Receives: Other: Laser speckle contrast analysis | |
| Patients with HFpEF | Not described Receives: Other: Laser speckle contrast analysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA)
Peripheral microvascular function measured with Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) between patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease with and without Coronary endothelial dysfunction. LASCA measures microvasclar function non invasively by measure perfusion units (APU/mmHg.)
Measured: 35 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
EndoPAT
The relationship between microvascular reactivity measured using EndoPAT in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary ateries (ANOCA) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The EndoPAT displays the pulse amplitude response to ischemia, and automatically calculates the Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI). RHI index measures post-ischemic vasodilatation, which is partly mediated by endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO). RHI is calculated as the post-to-pre occlusion PAT-signal ratio in the index finger of the occlude arm, divided by the corresponding ratio from the contralateral, control arm.
Measured: 15 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2022
- Primary completion5 Sep 2024
- Study completion5 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary ArteriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yolande Appelman, VU University of Amsterdam
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05610410
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VUmc_2021.0615
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Relationship Between Regulation of Peripheral and Intracoronary Microvascular Blood Flow in Patients With Ischemia and no Obstructive Coronary Arteries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05610410
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VUmc_2021.0615
- Conditions
- ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 43 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An observational cross-sectional cohort study investigating whether peripheral endothelial function assessed using Laser speckle contrast analysis and coronary endothelial function measured with invasive coronary function testing are correlated in patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries.
Detailed description
Rationale: Coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED) has been proposed to cause signs and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia in patients with angina but no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and has been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, as an element of the pro-inflammatory state causing cardiac functional and structural abnormalities in this syndrome. Research has shown that patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) often present with echocardiographic signs of diastolic dysfunction combined with higher rates of detectable cardiac troponin and are at increased risk of developing HFpEF, indicating a major overlap in the complex pathophysiology underlying these syndromes. CED is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events and currently can only be detected with invasive coronary function testing (ICFT).
However, it has been suggested that CED is a component of systemic endothelial dysfunction and is associated with endothelial dysfunction in other microvascular beds. The cutaneous microcirculation is suitable for microvascular function studies and has been shown to correlate with muscle microvascular function. The recently developed Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) technique enables non-invasive monitoring of microvascular blood flow in superficial microvascular beds. In combination with iontophoresis of acetylcholine, nitroprusside and insulin, LASCA allows evaluation of peripheral microvascular endothelial and smooth muscle function. While LASCA is an established technique, the association between CED diagnosed with ICFT and an abnormal peripheral endothelial function measured by LASCA is currently unknown.
Objective: The primary objective of the study is to test whether peripheral endothelial function assessed using Laser speckle contrast analysis and CED measured with ICFT are correlated.
Study design: Observational cross-sectional cohort study.
Study population: 51 patients over the age of 18 with signs and symptoms of ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and a clinical indication for ICFT because of persistent angina without obstructive coronary artery disease and 58 patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a clinical indication for ICFT.
Primary study endpoint: The main study end point is the difference in peripheral endothelial function between patients with and without CED measured with ICFT in the INOCA group and the HFpEF group.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Study participants do not benefit from participation in this study. The burden of this study is low. The aim is that study procedures will be performed within 24 hours of the elective ICFT and study participants do not have to come to the hospital for an additional visit. The total risks associated with participation are classified as being low, because the risks for adverse events and serious adverse events from a local and transient stimulus in skin are minimal. Iontophoresis of acetylcholine, nitroprusside and insulin does not cause any skin damage and the used dosages are very small and as such, the stimuli do not cause any systemic effects.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries | – | Other: Laser speckle contrast analysis |
| Patients with HFpEF | – | Other: Laser speckle contrast analysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This study is designed to evaluate INOCA patients with a clinical indication of ICFT because of persistent angina without obstructive coronary artery disease and HFpEF patients with a clinical indication of ICFT.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinical indication for elective invasive coronary function test (ICFT)
- Suited for one of the study groups:
- Absence of obstructive CAD, documented before inclusion, defined as
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Under 18 years of age
- Unable or unwilling to undergo ICFT
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laser speckle contrast analysisAlso: EndoPATPeripheral endothelial function assessment using Laser speckle contrast analysis and Peripheral reactive hyperemia assessment using EndoPAT | Other | Patients with HFpEF, Patients with angina and no obstructive coronary arteries |
Primary outcome
Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA)
Time frame: 35 minutes
Peripheral microvascular function measured with Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) between patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease with and without Coronary endothelial dysfunction. LASCA measures microvasclar function non invasively by measure perfusion units (APU/mmHg.)
1 secondary outcome
EndoPAT
Time frame: 15 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries
Active, not recruiting
Coronary Sinus Reducer Implantation in Patients With Ischaemia and Non-obstructed Coronary Arteries and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.
Refractory Angina, Microvascular Angina
Not yet recruiting
Invasive Evaluation and Phenotype-Guided Treatment of ANOCA in Women
ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD)
Recruiting
Analysis of Coronary Reactivity Testing With and Without Intracoronary Nitrate Testing
ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries, INOCA (Ischemia With Non Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Non-invasive Evaluation of Patients With Angina and Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries
RecruitingObservational study
Comprehensive Coronary Physiology in Patients With Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries - Czech Republic
ANOCA, ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of ANOCA - Angina With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries and HFpEF - Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) (time frame: 35 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.