AzTrials
AzTrials

Class V Dental CariesNCT05614076

Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin

A study testing conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities in people with Class V Dental Caries, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to compare the clinical performance of conserved chalky white demineralized enamel margins with total removal of demineralized enamel margins in class v cavities restored with composite in patients with acute carious cervical lesions Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years
Conditions the study is for
Class V Dental Caries
What is being tested?
conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
4 Nov 2021to May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • class V carious lesions in premolars and molars.
  • Vital upper or lower teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis.
  • Presence of favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact with the adjacent teeth.

Who cannot join

  • Deep carious defects (close to pulp, less than 1 mm distance).
  • Periapical pathology or signs of pulpal pathology.
  • Endodontically treated teeth
  • Tooth hypersensitivity.
  • Possible prosthodontic restoration of teeth.
  • Heavy occlusion or occlusal contacts or history of bruxism.
  • Severe periodontal affection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Maryam Salim Dawood, master contact

00201011270500

maryam.salim@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Mohamed Refaat El-Bialy, PHD contact

00201202552666

mohamed.refaat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of dentistry, Cairo University

    Cairo, 11511

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

This study aims to compare the clinical performance of conserved chalky white demineralized enamel margins with total removal of demineralized enamel margins in class v cavities restored with composite in patients with acute carious cervical lesions

Read the detailed description

With limited evidence-based information about the clinical performance of conserved white chalky enamel margins in class v .it is beneficial to compare the newly concept of preserved the white chalky deminerlized enamel margins using a randomized clinical trial to test the null hypothesis that this new concept has the same clinical performance as total removal of demineralized enamel margins in class v cavities restored with composite in patients with acute carious cervical lesions .The comparator will be the concept of total removal of demineralized enamel margins in class v cavities restored with composite Patients are selected according to the eligibility criteria, Local anesthesia will be administered and the operative field will be isolated before starting the restorative procedure. For the comparator group, standard class V cavities will be prepared at labial surface with totally removed carious enamel margins. For interventional group, class V cavity prepared at labial surface with preserved the chalky demineralized enamel margins then applications of remineralizing agent(MI paste plus) before the application of resin composite restoration. Local anesthesia will be administered and the operative field will be isolated before starting the restorative procedure. For control group, standard class V cavities will be prepared at labial surface with totally removed carious enamel margins. For experimental group, class V cavity prepared at labial surface with preserved the chalky demineralized enamel margins then applications of remineralizing agent(MI paste plus) before the application of resin composite restoration. both cavities groups restored with resin composite restorations. The restorations are assessed using the modified USPHS criteria at the time intervals stated in the outcome measures

Being tested
conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities, Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavitiesProcedure or surgery

    during cavity preparation, we conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and then restored them with resin composite restorations,we assessed the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer according to USPHS Criteria

  • Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavitiesProcedure or surgery

    during cavity preparation, we removed the total chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and then restored them with resin composite restorations, we assessed the restorations with visual inspection using a mirror and explorer according to USPHS Criteria

Study groups in NCT05614076
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conservation of the demineralized chalky white enamel margin of class V cavitiesExperimentalfor cavity design in this arm we Conserved the demineralized chalky white enamel margin of class V cavities then application of resin composite restoration
Receives: Procedure: conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities
Total removal of demineralized enamel margin of class V cavitiesActive comparatorfor cavity design in this arm is Total removal of demineralized enamel margin of class V cavities and restoration with resin composite
Receives: Procedure: Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. marginal discoloration

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 3 months

  2. marginal discoloration

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. marginal discoloration

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. color change

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 3 month

  2. color change

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 6 month

  3. color change

    ordinal criteria scoring system (ordinal)

    Measured: 12 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2022
  2. Study start4 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completionMar 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
1:1
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
34 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05614076
Sponsor's protocol ID
14422019474770
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
9 Jun 2022
Last updated
9 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Abdalla AI, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive in Class V restorations made with and without acid etching. J Dent. 2007 Jul;35(7):558-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Apr 27.

    PubMed 17467137
  • Alexandria AK, Nassur C, Nobrega CBC, Valenca AMG, Rosalen PL, Maia LC. In situ effect of titanium tetrafluoride varnish on enamel demineralization. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Nov 6;31:e86. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0086.

    PubMed 29116298
  • Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):209-14. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16421996
  • Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Critical appraisal. To bevel or not in anterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(4):264-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00126.x.

    PubMed 16231497
  • Chen H, Liu X, Dai J, Jiang Z, Guo T, Ding Y. Effect of remineralizing agents on white spot lesions after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Mar;143(3):376-382.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.013.

    PubMed 23452972
  • Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Schmidl R, Schuller C, Frank W, Werth VD. Resin infiltration of deproteinised natural occlusal subsurface lesions improves initial quality of fissure sealing. Int J Oral Sci. 2017 Jun;9(2):117-124. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2017.15. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

    PubMed 28621326
  • Korner P, El Gedaily M, Attin R, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Taubock TT. Margin Integrity of Conservative Composite Restorations after Resin Infiltration of Demineralized Enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(6):483-489. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39280.

    PubMed 29152623
  • Lata S, Varghese NO, Varughese JM. Remineralization potential of fluoride and amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phospho peptide on enamel lesions: An in vitro comparative evaluation. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jan;13(1):42-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.62634.

    PubMed 20582219
  • Koc Vural U, Kerimova L, Kiremitci A. Clinical comparison of a micro-hybride resin-based composite and resin modified glass ionomer in the treatment of cervical caries lesions: 36-month, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Odontology. 2021 Apr;109(2):376-384. doi: 10.1007/s10266-020-00550-8. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

    PubMed 32902766
  • Brkanovic S, Ivanisevic A, Miletic I, Mezdic D, Jukic Krmek S. Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material. Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 5;14(4):755. doi: 10.3390/ma14040755.

    PubMed 33562810

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing conserved chalky white enamel margins of class V cavities and Total removal of demineralized enamel margins of class V cavities in people with Class V Dental Caries, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Maryam Salim Dawood, master (00201011270500, maryam.salim@dentistry.cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

marginal discoloration (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05614076, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in