AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT05614882

New Model of Stroke Education

A study testing Written Stroke Education and Verbal Stroke Education in people with Stroke, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this study is to reorganize how stroke educational materials are given to patients from written delivery of information to using verbal delivery of information. Another goal is to compare post stroke behavior and medication compliance in participants receiving the new verbal model of stroke education… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Written Stroke Education and Verbal Stroke Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2023to May 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female ≥18 years of age at time of stroke.
  • Documentation of a stroke diagnosis as evidenced by one or more clinical features consistent with deficits in physical mobility, mild deficits in language

Who cannot join

  • Documented history of stroke
  • Documented cognitive deficits
  • Individuals <18 years of age
  • Individuals who are unable to provide consent
  • Those who are pregnant will be excluded from this sample (pregnancy tests are typically completed on admission, for applicable individuals).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • YNHH Rehabilitation & Wellness Center

    Milford, Connecticut, 06460

Other trials in United States

About this study

The main goal of this study is to reorganize how stroke educational materials are given to patients from written delivery of information to using verbal delivery of information. Another goal is to compare post stroke behavior and medication compliance in participants receiving the new verbal model of stroke education vs. those receiving the current written stroke education.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does the current delivery of stroke education provide the necessary knowledge base for patients who have suffered a stroke as measured by a stroke questionnaire?
  • Does verbal education provide better understanding for patients post-stroke?
  • Are patients more likely to be compliant with medications and followup visits with their medical team after receiving verbal education? Participants will receive a health literacy assessment and based on their scores will be categorized into a high health literacy (HHL) or low health literacy group (LHL). Individuals in both literacy groups will be randomized into receiving verbal or written stroke education. All participants will be tested with the stroke knowledge assessment to measure learning after education.

Researchers will compare written to verbal education to see if verbal results in more stroke education and compliance.

Read the detailed description

The primary objective of this study is to restructure the current model of stroke education using verbal delivery of information that is accessible and understood by individuals of different cultural backgrounds and various literacy levels. Participants in this study will be provided with a new model of stroke education through verbal communication to educate them on factors related to stroke using vocabulary that is more familiar and understood by individuals with lower literacy levels. The current delivery of stroke information is carried out through a model that involves mainly written communication. Data will be collected to better understand the efficacy of the current written model of stroke education compared to the new verbal education and determine which of the two methods of delivering information is more compatible with the literacy levels of the community served by Yale New Haven Hospital.

The second part of the study, participants' electronic medical record (EMR) will be reviewed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post stroke to evaluate the attendance post stroke follow up visits, post stroke blood pressure readings and overall medication compliance.

Participants in this study will be based from a convenience sample from the Rehabilitation and Wellness Center in Milford, Connecticut. Participants will be admitted post-stroke after being diagnosed with stroke of mild to moderate severity.

All the participants will receive a health literacy assessment and based on their scores will be categorized into a high health literacy (HHL) or low health literacy group (LHL) prior to randomization.

Assessments will be completed during the participants inpatient stay. A run in pilot study of 20 anticipated participants will be carried out prior to the larger study. The larger study was registered in anticipation of NIH funding.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Written Stroke Education, Verbal Stroke Education
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Written Stroke EducationBehavioural

    The written education will be provided in the stroke folder currently in use by the Yale New Haven Health system. This written information is presented in a stroke folder and includes how to respond to the signs of stroke, dialing 9-1-1, following up with a health care provider after hospitalization due to a stroke and the importance of medication management as well as stroke risk factors, healthy eating habits, exercise habits, common changes following a stroke, stroke recurrence and stroke types. After being given two days to review the materials, patients will be asked to complete the stroke knowledge test (SKT). All participants will receive a health literacy assessment and based on their scores will be categorized into a high health literacy (HHL) or low health literacy group (LHL) prior to randomization.

  • Verbal Stroke EducationBehavioural

    Participants in the verbal education group will be provided with education over two days from therapists including occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech therapy as well as a physician or nurse. The disciplines will present general stroke information including causes, risk factors, prevention, nutrition and exercise recommendations, importance of managing chronic conditions and the significance of medication compliance. After the verbal education topics are presented, the participants will be tested with the stroke knowledge test (SKT) to measure learning. All the participants will receive a health literacy assessment and based on their scores will be categorized into a high health literacy (HHL) or low health literacy group (LHL) prior to randomization.

Study groups in NCT05614882
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Written Stroke EducationActive comparatorParticipants in this arm will be given the current written standard of care for stroke education. Assessments will be completed during the participants inpatient stay.
Receives: Behavioral: Written Stroke Education
Verbal Stroke EducationExperimentalParticipants in this arm will be given the experimental verbal stroke education. Assessments will be completed during the participants inpatient stay.
Receives: Behavioral: Verbal Stroke Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Stroke Knowledge Test (SKT)

    SKT is a 20 question assessment to determine if written or verbal delivery of post stroke education was more successful in educating participants. The assessment is scored as a percentage of correct questions out of a total of 20 questions. Higher scores indicate more educated on stroke.

    Measured: 1 day post intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Count of post stroke follow up visits attended

    Electronic medical records will be reviewed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge to evaluate if participants had post stroke follow up visits with their care providers (recorded as yes/no). This will demonstrate which method is more likely to support patients in gathering information that is needed to manage their chronic conditions, maintaining compliance and decrease their chance of stroke recurrence.

    Measured: Month 1 up to Month 12 post discharge

  2. Count of post stroke blood pressure readings above 130/80 mmHG systolic

    Electronic medical records will be reviewed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge to monitor how many post stroke blood pressure readings are above 130/80 mmHG systolic.This will demonstrate which method is more likely to support patients in gathering information that is needed to manage their chronic conditions, maintaining compliance and decrease their chance of stroke recurrence.

    Measured: Month 1 up to Month 12 post discharge

  3. Medical compliance measured by count of prescriptions filled

    Electronic medical records will be reviewed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post discharge to count the number of prescriptions filled that were ordered by the provider. Medical compliance will be assessed by the number of prescriptions filled. This will demonstrate which method is more likely to support patients in gathering information that is needed to manage their chronic conditions, maintaining compliance and decrease their chance of stroke recurrence.

    Measured: Month 1 up to Month 12 post discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2022
  2. Study startOct 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Lack of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Individuals in this study will be based from a convenience sample from the Rehabilitation and Wellness Center in Milford, Connecticut. Participants will be admitted post-stroke after being diagnosed with stroke of mild to moderate severity. Individuals will be over 18 years of age with no history of prior stroke who are able to read basic information, having no more than a mild aphasia with intact language comprehension skills who speak English or Spanish (assessment materials are available in these two languages). All the participants will receive a health literacy assessment and based on their scores will be categorized into a high health literacy (HHL) or low health literacy group (LHL) prior to randomization. Anticipated enrollment of 20 for pilot and 200 for larger study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05614882
Sponsor's protocol ID
2000033911
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
4 Nov 2022
Last updated
21 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Written Stroke Education and Verbal Stroke Education in people with Stroke, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Stroke Knowledge Test (SKT) (time frame: 1 day post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in