Prostate CancerNCT05615909
PRO-MR-RT Systematic Patient-reported Outcomes to Pelvic Online MRgRT
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
In 2018 the Unity MR-linac was approved for treating patients with online magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. With the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Online MR-guided radiotherapy and CT-guided radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 156 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 19 Nov 2020to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) with a curative intent for prostate cancer in the Unity MR-linac or standard linear accelerators using cone-beam CT (CBCT) at Odense University Hospital
Who may be able to join
- patients diagnosed with cancer in the prostate
- referred for primary radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy
Who cannot join
- Cognitively unable to provide informed consent
- Unable ro read, understand and complete patient-reported surveys in Danish (electronic or paper-based)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PRO-MR-RT Systematic Web-based Patient-reported Outcomes for a Personalized, Patient-centered Symptom Management and Clinical Assessment of Pelvic Toxicity to Magnetic Resonance Radiation Therapy
In 2018 the Unity MR-linac was approved for treating patients with online magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. With the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. Patients with prostate cancer is one of the patient groups referred for this new treatment and potentially they will benefit with decreased margins around the tumour and increased local tumor control rates.
The acute toxicity is important when evaluating treatment tolerability. A prospective longitudinal observation of the acute treatment toxicity to online MR-guided radiotherapy is therefore essential in the evaluation of this new technology.
Read more
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are disease symptoms and treatment toxicity reported directly by patients themselves without clinician interpretation. Several studies have indicated that clinicians tend to underreport the incidence and severity of patient symptoms, thus a systematic use of PROs in clinical trials can provide valuable evidence to the clinicians. As online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a new technology there is limited research worldwide on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life.
The objective of this study is therefore to prospectively investigate the patient-reported acute toxicity and changes in quality of life during and after online MR-guided radiotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Background:
In 2018 the first patients worldwide were treated with the first 1.5 T MR-linac. The MR-linac is innovative technology in cancer treatment making precision radiotherapy possible, as it is a linear accelerator mounted on a ring around a 1.5-Tesla MRI Scanner combined with an online adaptive radiotherapy planning system. When the patient is positioned in the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. The improved visualization on the MR images makes it possible to see how the tumour and the organs around it changes and adapt the treatment plan every day. This opens up for a reduction of safety margins needed to insure target coverage and increased use of hypo- fractionation. Cancer patients will hopefully benefit from this with decreased treatment toxicity and increased local tumor control rates.
Today, computed tomography (CT)-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with pelvic or abdominal tumors. However, the visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue is poor due to low soft-tissue contrast in the cone-beam scans. When using MRI for online radiotherapy planning in pelvic and abdominal sites, the soft-tissue contrast will be high making it possible to improve contouring accuracy and reduce margins. The potential of the MR-linac lowering treatment toxicity can greatly impact survivorship and quality of life. This would particularly be beneficial for patients diagnosed with cancer in the pelvic region, like prostate cancer, having considerably high chances of survival.
The standard for toxicity monitoring in cancer clinical trials is the prospective clinician reporting of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE grading, as well as patient-reported outcomes (PRO), is also part of the proposed standard assessment methodology for clinical evaluation of radiotherapy innovations like online MRgRT. Several studies have identified discrepancies between clinician and patient reporting within systemic treatment where clinicians appear to underreport the severity of treatment toxicity, compared to patient-reported severity. Therefore, patient self-reports are an important supplement to the evaluation of online MRgRT as in other oncological settings where they have been used as direct indicators of worsening, persistence or improvement of symptoms and general well-being. Furthermore, patient self-reports reduces the risk of unanticipated treatment toxicities being undetected.
Methods:
Study Design:
The study is a prospective single-arm longitudinal observational study including all prostate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy or CT-guided radiotherapy in the study period.
Participants:
Patients with prostate cancer referred for radiotherapy at Odense University Hospital in the time period 15.11.2020 - 01.07.2022 will be eligible for inclusion.
Data collection:
A patient pathway app, My Hospital, will be used for data collection. A PRO item set for patients with prostate cancer has been developed and tested in a pilot study (PRO-CTCAE and EORTC items). The item set will be used weekly during treatment and 4 weeks following to capture expected and unanticipated symptoms of acute treatment toxicity. During follow-up patients wll be asked to report 8, 12 and 24 weeks after radiotherapy completion. Other questionnaires will be used to measure quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30+EORTC PR25), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), patient experience with ePRO (Patient Feedback Form) and patient experience with treatment on a 1.5 T Unity MR-linac (Patient Experience Questionnaire).
Data on clinician management of PROs will be drafted from the patient app My Hospital.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Online MR-guided radiotherapy, CT-guided radiotherapy
- Keywords
- Prostate, Cancer, Acute toxicity, Patient-reported outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Online MR-guided radiotherapyRadiation
Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac for localized intermediate risk prostate cancer (60 Gy/20 fx) or low-volume metastatic prostate cancer (36 Gy/6 fx).
CT-guided radiotherapyRadiation
CT-guided radiotherapy in linear accelerators for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (78 Gy/39 fx), intermediate risk prostata cancer (60 Gy/20 Fx) or having salvage radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fx)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Online MR-guided radiotherapy | Prostate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac. Receives: Radiation: Online MR-guided radiotherapy | |
| CT-guided radiotherapy | Prostate cancer patients treated with CT-guided radiotherapy (VMAT) in linear accerelators. Receives: Radiation: CT-guided radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ACUTE TOXICITY
Mean change in acute urinary and bowel toxicity when treated with MR-guided radiotherapy
Measured: During or up to six months following radiotherapy completion.
Secondary outcomes (4)
QUALITY OF LIFE (QoL) change after CT-guided or online MR-guided radiotherapy
Mean change in QoL from baseline to follow-up week 12. Measured with the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and Euroqol EQ-5D-5L.
Measured: QoL and HRQoL will be reported at baseline (before radiotherapy) and 12 weeks after radiotherapy completion.
EXPERIENCE
The patients are to report how weekly ePROs with real-time feedback in their course of radiotherapy impact their involvement, the quality of care and communication with clinicians. Patient satisfaction is measured with questions from the validated Patient Feedback Form on a 4-point likert scale (strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree).
Measured: Patient experience will be measured one week following radiotherapy completion.
ACUTE TOXICITY
A pelvic item set developed and tested in a pilot study is used to capture symptomatic adverse events (AEs). This item set includes PRO-CTCAE items (5-point likert scale, 0 being absence of symptoms) and EORTC items (4-point likert scale, 1 being absence of symptoms). Median number of weeks to first maximum worsening of the adverse events are measured. Persistence of symptoms is measured as being > baseline score until 12 weeks following radiotherapy.
Measured: Symptoms are reported weekly during treatment and in the four weeks following radiotherapy completion. Patient reporting of acute AEs during follow-up at week 8 and 12 after radiotherapy completion.
EXPERIENCE
Patient experience with online MR-guided radiotherapy will be measured with a questionnaire specifically developed and validated to capture patient experience in a MR-linac (4-point likert scale).The questionnaire will also be tested on patients undergoing CT-guided radiotherapy to descriptively look at the differences in the two cohorts.
Measured: The patients will be asked to report their experience in the last week of radiotherapy.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2022
- Study start19 Nov 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Odense University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novo Nordisk A/S, AgeCare Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Pia Krause Møller, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Pia KK Møller, MPH, Principal investigator, Research Unit of Oncology, Odense University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05615909
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OP_775
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PRO-MR-RT Systematic Web-based Patient-reported Outcomes for a Personalized, Patient-centered Symptom Management and Clinical Assessment of Pelvic Toxicity to Magnetic Resonance Radiation Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05615909
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OP_775
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Prostate, Cancer, Acute toxicity, Patient-reported outcome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Novo Nordisk A/S, AgeCare Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research
- Study start
- 19 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In 2018 the Unity MR-linac was approved for treating patients with online magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy. With the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. Patients with prostate cancer is one of the patient groups referred for this new treatment and potentially they will benefit with decreased margins around the tumour and increased local tumor control rates.
The acute toxicity is important when evaluating treatment tolerability. A prospective longitudinal observation of the acute treatment toxicity to online MR-guided radiotherapy is therefore essential in the evaluation of this new technology.
Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are disease symptoms and treatment toxicity reported directly by patients themselves without clinician interpretation. Several studies have indicated that clinicians tend to underreport the incidence and severity of patient symptoms, thus a systematic use of PROs in clinical trials can provide valuable evidence to the clinicians. As online MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a new technology there is limited research worldwide on patient-reported symptoms and quality of life.
The objective of this study is therefore to prospectively investigate the patient-reported acute toxicity and changes in quality of life during and after online MR-guided radiotherapy.
Detailed description
Background:
In 2018 the first patients worldwide were treated with the first 1.5 T MR-linac. The MR-linac is innovative technology in cancer treatment making precision radiotherapy possible, as it is a linear accelerator mounted on a ring around a 1.5-Tesla MRI Scanner combined with an online adaptive radiotherapy planning system. When the patient is positioned in the MR-linac it is possible to get real-time MR images with high soft tissue contrast, adapt the radiotherapy plan and subsequently irradiate at each treatment fraction. The improved visualization on the MR images makes it possible to see how the tumour and the organs around it changes and adapt the treatment plan every day. This opens up for a reduction of safety margins needed to insure target coverage and increased use of hypo- fractionation. Cancer patients will hopefully benefit from this with decreased treatment toxicity and increased local tumor control rates.
Today, computed tomography (CT)-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy is standard treatment for patients with pelvic or abdominal tumors. However, the visualization of the tumor and surrounding tissue is poor due to low soft-tissue contrast in the cone-beam scans. When using MRI for online radiotherapy planning in pelvic and abdominal sites, the soft-tissue contrast will be high making it possible to improve contouring accuracy and reduce margins. The potential of the MR-linac lowering treatment toxicity can greatly impact survivorship and quality of life. This would particularly be beneficial for patients diagnosed with cancer in the pelvic region, like prostate cancer, having considerably high chances of survival.
The standard for toxicity monitoring in cancer clinical trials is the prospective clinician reporting of the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). CTCAE grading, as well as patient-reported outcomes (PRO), is also part of the proposed standard assessment methodology for clinical evaluation of radiotherapy innovations like online MRgRT. Several studies have identified discrepancies between clinician and patient reporting within systemic treatment where clinicians appear to underreport the severity of treatment toxicity, compared to patient-reported severity. Therefore, patient self-reports are an important supplement to the evaluation of online MRgRT as in other oncological settings where they have been used as direct indicators of worsening, persistence or improvement of symptoms and general well-being. Furthermore, patient self-reports reduces the risk of unanticipated treatment toxicities being undetected.
Methods:
Study Design:
The study is a prospective single-arm longitudinal observational study including all prostate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy or CT-guided radiotherapy in the study period.
Participants:
Patients with prostate cancer referred for radiotherapy at Odense University Hospital in the time period 15.11.2020 - 01.07.2022 will be eligible for inclusion.
Data collection:
A patient pathway app, My Hospital, will be used for data collection. A PRO item set for patients with prostate cancer has been developed and tested in a pilot study (PRO-CTCAE and EORTC items). The item set will be used weekly during treatment and 4 weeks following to capture expected and unanticipated symptoms of acute treatment toxicity. During follow-up patients wll be asked to report 8, 12 and 24 weeks after radiotherapy completion. Other questionnaires will be used to measure quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30+EORTC PR25), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), patient experience with ePRO (Patient Feedback Form) and patient experience with treatment on a 1.5 T Unity MR-linac (Patient Experience Questionnaire).
Data on clinician management of PROs will be drafted from the patient app My Hospital.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Online MR-guided radiotherapy | – | Radiation: Online MR-guided radiotherapyProstate cancer patients treated with online MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac. |
| CT-guided radiotherapy | – | Radiation: CT-guided radiotherapyProstate cancer patients treated with CT-guided radiotherapy (VMAT) in linear accerelators. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) with a curative intent for prostate cancer in the Unity MR-linac or standard linear accelerators using cone-beam CT (CBCT) at Odense University Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients diagnosed with cancer in the prostate
- referred for primary radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cognitively unable to provide informed consent
- Unable ro read, understand and complete patient-reported surveys in Danish (electronic or paper-based)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Online MR-guided radiotherapyOnline adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy in the Unity MR-linac for localized intermediate risk prostate cancer (60 Gy/20 fx) or low-volume metastatic prostate cancer (36 Gy/6 fx). | Radiation | Online MR-guided radiotherapy |
| CT-guided radiotherapyCT-guided radiotherapy in linear accelerators for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (78 Gy/39 fx), intermediate risk prostata cancer (60 Gy/20 Fx) or having salvage radiotherapy (70 Gy/35 fx) | Radiation | CT-guided radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
ACUTE TOXICITY
Time frame: During or up to six months following radiotherapy completion.
Mean change in acute urinary and bowel toxicity when treated with MR-guided radiotherapy
4 secondary outcomes
QUALITY OF LIFE (QoL) change after CT-guided or online MR-guided radiotherapy
Time frame: QoL and HRQoL will be reported at baseline (before radiotherapy) and 12 weeks after radiotherapy completion.
EXPERIENCE
Time frame: Patient experience will be measured one week following radiotherapy completion.
ACUTE TOXICITY
Time frame: Symptoms are reported weekly during treatment and in the four weeks following radiotherapy completion. Patient reporting of acute AEs during follow-up at week 8 and 12 after radiotherapy completion.
EXPERIENCE
Time frame: The patients will be asked to report their experience in the last week of radiotherapy.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pia KK Møller, MPH principal investigator
Research Unit of Oncology, Odense University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostate Cancer, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ACUTE TOXICITY (time frame: During or up to six months following radiotherapy completion.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2024.