AgingBEACONNCT05619107
Boosting Exercise cApaCity With autOnomic Neuromodulation
A study testing Active Transauricular nerve stimulation in people with Aging and Inflammation, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Background: Exercise performance is a key predictor for healthy ageing. Laboratory and clinical data have shown strength of a nerve called the vagus nerve, which is lost during age-related disease processes, determines exercise performance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging, Inflammation, Cardiovascular Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Active Transauricular nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2022to 10 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-75y
- Male or female
- Able and willing to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- Current smoker
- Currently undertaking a dedicated training/exercise regime (i.e. not sedentary)
- Excess alcohol intake (as determined via a medical questionnaire)
- Contraindications to cardiopulmonary exercise testing
- Pregnancy
- Auricular dermatitis
- Unwilling or unable to give consent
- Inability to understand written and/or verbal English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square
London, EC1M 6BQ
About this study
Official title: Transauricular Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Exercise Capacity: Protocol for a Double-blind, Open Crossover, Randomised Sham-controlled Trial
Background: Exercise performance is a key predictor for healthy ageing. Laboratory and clinical data have shown strength of a nerve called the vagus nerve, which is lost during age-related disease processes, determines exercise performance. The investigators describe a study protocol designed to test the hypothesis that stimulation of the ear (where the vagus nerve can be safely stimulated) may improve exercise performance alongside beneficial changes in vagus nerve activity in human volunteers.
Methods. 28 healthy participants aged 18-75y will be randomly allocated to electrical ear stimulation or placebo treatment for 30 minutes at the same time of day, for 7 consecutive days. Heart monitoring, exercise bike testing, a simple sit-to-stand test and blood sampling will be performed immediately before the first day's intervention and after the last day's intervention. Participants and investigators will be masked to the treatment allocations and analyses. After a 14-day break, participants will perform the same protocol for the opposite intervention to their first treatment allocation. The primary outcome will be the change in VO2Peak (the best measure of exercise performance) following stimulation or placebo protocol. Secondary outcomes include reduction in heart rate after ending the exercise bike test, reduction from peak heart rate after standing from sitting, beat-to-beat heart rate measures and blood inflammatory marker levels. These outcomes will measure exercise performance and vagus nerve function. Safety and complications of the intervention will also be recorded. The study was approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (21/LO/0856).
Discussion. This 'first-in-man' study will explore whether non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation safely boosts exercise performance and/or vagus nerve activity using electrical ear stimulation, providing data for a device-based approach that may be broadly generalisable to improving health outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Background A cardinal feature of acute tissue injury/systemic inflammation is the development of autonomic dysfunction, characterised by sustained sympathetic hyperactivity and loss of vagal function. Elevated resting heart rate is repeatedly associated with both cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in the general population. Vagal tone, which declines variably during ageing processes, is the chief determinant of resting heart rate. Healthy ageing is characterised by lower sympathetic and preserved vagal activity, reflected by lower resting heart rate. The gold-standard measure of vagal tone is heart rate recovery (HRR), obtainable from exercise testing. Loss of vagal tone in humans - as quantified by HRR - is associated with lower peak aerobic exercise capacity, a major barrier to rehabilitation. Persistent sympathetic hyperactivity downregulates G-protein coupled β-receptor recycling. This impairs cardiac function, lowers exercise capacity and increases systemic inflammation, thereby promoting cardiometabolic disease. Exercise tolerance may be enhanced by dedicated exercise training programmes, even in healthy individuals. Greater exercise capacity is linked with lower risks of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, malignancy, osteoporosis, depression and premature death.
Although in healthy ageing cardiac vagal tone is predominantly determined by genetic factors, with strong associations identified between HRR and various genes expressed by key autonomic pathway components, vagal neuromodulation techniques have gained traction. Laboratory and clinical translational data have shown restoring (or preventing the loss of) vagal activity may therefore offer a therapeutic target to help optimise cardiopulmonary fitness and improve health outcomes. Stimulation of the dorsal vagal motor nucleus (DVMN) neurones using an optogenetic approach increases exercise capacity in rats. In heart failure patents, vagus nerve stimulation applied for 15 days was reported to increase the distance of the 6-min walk test. Proof-of-concept studies, primarily in human volunteers, using non-invasive electrical stimulation of either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve suggest that maintenance, or augmentation, of vagal activity is feasible, effective and associated with minimal side effects. Although transcutaneous stimulation of auricular nerves is readily accessible, studies lack focus on autonomic activation and have yet to examine effects on exercise capacity.
Here, the investigators describe the protocol for a randomised controlled crossover trial, hypothesizing that bilateral transauricular nerve stimulation (TAN) augments exercise capacity in human volunteers. Furthermore, the investigators aim to identify whether TAN augments exercise capacity in tandem with autonomic changes that are mechanistically implicated in favourably modulating cardiopulmonary fitness.
Recruitment/screening Potential participants (including NHS patients with no specific disease) will be found through posters displayed on NHS premises. After potential participants contact the research team, two independent members of the research team at the clinical research facility shall be involved - one will obtain informed consent while the other will deliver the interventional protocol. The member obtaining consent will call the potential participant and screen them against the eligibility criteria before asking for consent. All eligible participants that undergo screening will be recorded on a screening log on the Investigator Site File, even if they decline the study. Participants will be given a participant information sheet (PIS) one week in advance of the first day of intervention. Written informed consent must be obtained before the first intervention.
Informed consent The principal investigator or suitably qualified nominee will obtain written informed consent from each participant, including provision of a PIS accompanied by the relevant consent form, and an explanation of the aims, methods, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of the trial. All potential participants are free to refuse to enter the trial or to withdraw at any time during the trial, for any reason. If new safety information results in significant changes in the risk/benefit assessment, the PIS and consent form will be reviewed and/or amended accordingly. Participants will be informed that, as defined by the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research, all documentation will be stored for a minimum of 20 years at the end of the study.
Sample size Consensus CPET guidelines recommend that the VO2peak should be used to assess exercise capacity. The investigators require 28 participants [alpha=0.05; 1-beta=0.9], based on the experimental intervention increasing VO2peak (from each individual's own baseline) by the same degree as high intensity exercise training (which increases VO2peak by 0.51 l·min-1; 95% ci: 0.43 to 0.60 l min-1, SD 0.9). The sample size allows for a dropout rate of 10% per group.
Randomisation Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) by block randomisation to receive active or sham stimulation first to ensure a balance in sample size across groups over time (Power Analysis \& Sample Size (PASS) 2021, Utah, USA). Randomisation is performed one week before the first intervention, with a random block size of four. A randomisation sequence is created by a biostatistician who did not participate in the implementation or statistical analysis of trial. Allocation concealment is achieved through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Bias/blinding Participants and investigators are blinded to treatment allocations throughout data collection and analysis. Participants and investigators are unable to see the device settings. Participants are instructed by the investigators that the stimulation is imperceptible after determination of the prescription dose. Participants and investigators are also masked to the Holter data, which will be analysed offline by an independent trial statistician not involved with patient recruitment/device application who is masked to the treatment allocations. Interventions are performed at the same time of day to minimise the possible influence of circadian variations.
Data collection Clinical data will be recorded. CPET data will be extracted from the cycle ergometer software (Zan, nSpire). Heart rate data will be analysed using Kubios HRV Premium [version 3.5.0]. Plasma will be stored at -80ºC having been obtained after both intervention periods for exploratory analyses of biomarkers related to autonomic activation. These data will be collected by a member of the research team not involved with administering the interventions, and analysed by an independent member of the research team - both will be masked to the treatment allocations. Data will be entered electronically on a secure database (REDCAP).
Statistical analysis Analyses will be conducted using the intention-to-treat principle, where all participants with a recorded outcome are analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised. Baseline participant characteristics will be presented and stratified according to treatment allocation. The primary outcome (absolute change in VO2peak) will be analysed using repeat-measures analysis of variance (intervention allocation x intervention period) (before versus after TAN/sham). For secondary outcomes, heart rate, CPET, HRV data and plasma acetylcholine levels will be compared in each group using repeat-measures analysis of variance. Sensitivity analysis for variables that may affect exercise capacity and/or autonomic measures will also be conducted. The significance level will be set at 0.05. A full statistical analysis plan will be developed prior to analysis and the end of the study.
Trial management/data monitoring The Sponsor organisation is Queen Mary University of London (QMUL). Daily trial management will be coordinated by a trial management group consisting of the Chief Investigator and his/her support staff. An independent study committee will oversee the trial, including assessing the safety of the intervention, reviewing relevant new external evidence, and monitoring the overall conduct of the trial. This committee consists of an independent clinical trialist, lay representative and an independent Chair.
Adverse events Prespecified and any other adverse events directly related to the trial intervention will be recorded.
Confidentiality Information related to participants will be kept confidential and managed in accordance with the Data Protection Act (UK), NHS Caldecott Principles (UK), the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (UK), and the conditions of Research Ethics Committee Approval, or corresponding legislation or approvals for a particular participating country or site. The principal investigator will maintain in strict confidence trial documents (e.g. written consent forms) and confidentiality.
Discussion Exercise capacity serves as an excellent preoperative prognosticator of an individual's ability to cope with the physiological (and pathophysiological) processes underlying ageing. Experimental animal studies and human exercise performance data have shown intact vagal tone enhances exercise capacity. However, acute tissue injury and systemic inflammation disrupt autonomic control. This proof-of-concept study aims to demonstrate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of TAN in augmenting cardiopulmonary fitness in tandem with autonomic changes that are mechanistically associated with favourable modulation of exercise capacity. These healthy volunteer data may offer key insights into potentially accelerating functional rehabilitation.
Experimental data indicate that cardiac vagal activity is a direct determinant of exercise capacity. Persistent autonomic dysfunction directly impairs cardiopulmonary fitness and therefore muscle mass and strength; key determinants of functional recovery cannot be increased. Furthermore, disruption of autonomic-mediated immunoregulatory mechanisms promotes a pro-inflammatory state whereby mechanisms controlling the resolution of inflammation are suppressed. The development and persistence of autonomic dysfunction therefore directly impairs cardiopulmonary fitness and rehabilitation. Therefore, individuals at high risk of morbidity and mortality are characterized by reduced vagal tone and slow heart rate recovery following incremental exercise.
Studies of non-invasive autonomic neuromodulation conducted in healthy volunteers and are susceptible to bias. The investigators utilised a double-blind, open crossover. randomised controlled design to address these issues. Although participants have varying fitness levels before the study, each individual serves as their own control. The use of a designated sham stimulation device is critical to minimise participant and investigator biases. Far more invasive studies have successfully recruited patients into trials where sham procedures served as the key control in cardiac and noncardiac orthopaedic surgery.
Assessing the effects of TAN on exercise capacity in healthy volunteers is broadly generalisable to the general population. Provided that the investigators can confirm in this setting that autonomic changes after TAN occur by measuring HRV, the low cost, non-invasive device used suggests a very low potential risk-to-benefit ratio. Systematic review identified TAN stimulation parameters that alter HRV, although there is no certainty that there may be minimum thresholds for the duration and/or intensity required to be clinically effective. Nonetheless, a 30-minute period of daily tragal stimulation has not been associated with any major adverse events.
- Conditions
- Aging, Inflammation, Cardiovascular Diseases
- Being tested
- Active Transauricular nerve stimulation, Sham transauricular nerve stimulation
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Exercise Training
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammation, Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active Transauricular nerve stimulationDevice
The first allocated intervention will be undertaken for 30 minutes. The electrode placement and stimulation parameters are described in the arm/group section. After the 30-minute intervention, day 1 of the protocol will be complete. The investigator will remain present in the room with the participant to ensure compliance and adherence to the protocol. The allocated intervention will then be repeated by the participant at a similar time of day for 7 consecutive days. The investigator will arrange video-calls with the participant whilst off-site to ensure ongoing compliance and adherence to the protocol. On the seventh day, participants return to the clinical research facility to take the final first allocated intervention. A 14-day rest period will follow. Then the participants will perform the same 7-day protocol for the opposite intervention to their first treatment allocation.
Sham transauricular nerve stimulationDevice
Protocol as for active but sham ear leads are applied, unable to deliver current.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active transauricular nerve stimulation | Active comparator | Using a training device, two conductive clips are placed securely on both the left and right tragus areas of the outer ear. Using parameters we have identified through systematic review, electrical stimulation (pulse width:200μs; frequency:30Hz) is initiated at 10mA, until the participant feels a 'tingling' sensation within 20s of commencing. At this point the current is reduced to a level just below this perceptible threshold (20-60 mA), which is defined as the 'prescription dose'. The participant then receives another active device set at the 'prescription dose'. Receives: Device: Active Transauricular nerve stimulation |
| Sham transauricular nerve stimulation | Sham comparator | Using a training device, two conductive clips are placed securely on both the left and right tragus areas of the outer ear. Using parameters we have identified through systematic review, electrical stimulation (pulse width:200μs; frequency:30Hz) is initiated at 10mA, until the participant feels a 'tingling' sensation within 20s of commencing (Figure 2). At this point the current is reduced to a level just below this perceptible threshold (20-60 mA), which is defined as the 'prescription dose'. The participant then receives another device set at the 'prescription dose' but this sham device is disabled from delivering any current . Receives: Device: Sham transauricular nerve stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2peak)
Gold standard measure of exercise capacity
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in heart rate recovery (HRR)
Gold standard clinical measure of vagal tone. Obtained from exercise bike test.
Measured: 7 days
Change in decline from peak heart rate (PeakHRdecline) after standing from the sitting position
Surrogate marker for HRR. Obtained from orthostatic (sit-to-stand) test.
Measured: 7 days
Change in heart rate variability (HRV)
Time- and frequency-domain components indicative of autonomic balance
Measured: 7 days
Change in plasma acetylcholine levels (PlasmaACh)
Key neurotransmitter of the parasympathetic nervous system; quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting
Measured: 7 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2022
- Study start9 Nov 2022
- Primary completion10 May 2023
- Study completion10 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Double-blind, open crossover, randomised sham-controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, British Heart Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gareth L Ackland, FRCA, Principal investigator, Queen Mary University of London
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05619107
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 299987
- Acronym
- BEACON
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2022
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: N/A. Double-blinded study. Participants, investigators and analysers masked to data as detailed in study design section.
Publications
Machhada A, Trapp S, Marina N, Stephens RCM, Whittle J, Lythgoe MF, Kasparov S, Ackland GL, Gourine AV. Vagal determinants of exercise capacity. Nat Commun. 2017 May 18;8:15097. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15097.
PubMed 28516907Gourine AV, Ackland GL. Cardiac Vagus and Exercise. Physiology (Bethesda). 2019 Jan 1;34(1):71-80. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00041.2018.
PubMed 30540229
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transauricular Nerve Stimulation to Enhance Exercise Capacity: Protocol for a Double-blind, Open Crossover, Randomised Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05619107
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEACON / 299987
- Conditions
- Aging, Inflammation, Cardiovascular Diseases
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Exercise Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, British Heart Foundation
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Exercise performance is a key predictor for healthy ageing. Laboratory and clinical data have shown strength of a nerve called the vagus nerve, which is lost during age-related disease processes, determines exercise performance. The investigators describe a study protocol designed to test the hypothesis that stimulation of the ear (where the vagus nerve can be safely stimulated) may improve exercise performance alongside beneficial changes in vagus nerve activity in human volunteers.
Methods. 28 healthy participants aged 18-75y will be randomly allocated to electrical ear stimulation or placebo treatment for 30 minutes at the same time of day, for 7 consecutive days. Heart monitoring, exercise bike testing, a simple sit-to-stand test and blood sampling will be performed immediately before the first day's intervention and after the last day's intervention. Participants and investigators will be masked to the treatment allocations and analyses. After a 14-day break, participants will perform the same protocol for the opposite intervention to their first treatment allocation. The primary outcome will be the change in VO2Peak (the best measure of exercise performance) following stimulation or placebo protocol. Secondary outcomes include reduction in heart rate after ending the exercise bike test, reduction from peak heart rate after standing from sitting, beat-to-beat heart rate measures and blood inflammatory marker levels. These outcomes will measure exercise performance and vagus nerve function. Safety and complications of the intervention will also be recorded. The study was approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee (21/LO/0856).
Discussion. This 'first-in-man' study will explore whether non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation safely boosts exercise performance and/or vagus nerve activity using electrical ear stimulation, providing data for a device-based approach that may be broadly generalisable to improving health outcomes.
Detailed description
Background A cardinal feature of acute tissue injury/systemic inflammation is the development of autonomic dysfunction, characterised by sustained sympathetic hyperactivity and loss of vagal function. Elevated resting heart rate is repeatedly associated with both cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in the general population. Vagal tone, which declines variably during ageing processes, is the chief determinant of resting heart rate. Healthy ageing is characterised by lower sympathetic and preserved vagal activity, reflected by lower resting heart rate. The gold-standard measure of vagal tone is heart rate recovery (HRR), obtainable from exercise testing. Loss of vagal tone in humans - as quantified by HRR - is associated with lower peak aerobic exercise capacity, a major barrier to rehabilitation. Persistent sympathetic hyperactivity downregulates G-protein coupled β-receptor recycling. This impairs cardiac function, lowers exercise capacity and increases systemic inflammation, thereby promoting cardiometabolic disease. Exercise tolerance may be enhanced by dedicated exercise training programmes, even in healthy individuals. Greater exercise capacity is linked with lower risks of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, malignancy, osteoporosis, depression and premature death.
Although in healthy ageing cardiac vagal tone is predominantly determined by genetic factors, with strong associations identified between HRR and various genes expressed by key autonomic pathway components, vagal neuromodulation techniques have gained traction. Laboratory and clinical translational data have shown restoring (or preventing the loss of) vagal activity may therefore offer a therapeutic target to help optimise cardiopulmonary fitness and improve health outcomes. Stimulation of the dorsal vagal motor nucleus (DVMN) neurones using an optogenetic approach increases exercise capacity in rats. In heart failure patents, vagus nerve stimulation applied for 15 days was reported to increase the distance of the 6-min walk test. Proof-of-concept studies, primarily in human volunteers, using non-invasive electrical stimulation of either the auricular branch or the cervical bundle of the vagus nerve suggest that maintenance, or augmentation, of vagal activity is feasible, effective and associated with minimal side effects. Although transcutaneous stimulation of auricular nerves is readily accessible, studies lack focus on autonomic activation and have yet to examine effects on exercise capacity.
Here, the investigators describe the protocol for a randomised controlled crossover trial, hypothesizing that bilateral transauricular nerve stimulation (TAN) augments exercise capacity in human volunteers. Furthermore, the investigators aim to identify whether TAN augments exercise capacity in tandem with autonomic changes that are mechanistically implicated in favourably modulating cardiopulmonary fitness.
Recruitment/screening Potential participants (including NHS patients with no specific disease) will be found through posters displayed on NHS premises. After potential participants contact the research team, two independent members of the research team at the clinical research facility shall be involved - one will obtain informed consent while the other will deliver the interventional protocol. The member obtaining consent will call the potential participant and screen them against the eligibility criteria before asking for consent. All eligible participants that undergo screening will be recorded on a screening log on the Investigator Site File, even if they decline the study. Participants will be given a participant information sheet (PIS) one week in advance of the first day of intervention. Written informed consent must be obtained before the first intervention.
Informed consent The principal investigator or suitably qualified nominee will obtain written informed consent from each participant, including provision of a PIS accompanied by the relevant consent form, and an explanation of the aims, methods, anticipated benefits and potential hazards of the trial. All potential participants are free to refuse to enter the trial or to withdraw at any time during the trial, for any reason. If new safety information results in significant changes in the risk/benefit assessment, the PIS and consent form will be reviewed and/or amended accordingly. Participants will be informed that, as defined by the UK Policy Framework for Health and Social Care Research, all documentation will be stored for a minimum of 20 years at the end of the study.
Sample size Consensus CPET guidelines recommend that the VO2peak should be used to assess exercise capacity. The investigators require 28 participants [alpha=0.05; 1-beta=0.9], based on the experimental intervention increasing VO2peak (from each individual's own baseline) by the same degree as high intensity exercise training (which increases VO2peak by 0.51 l·min-1; 95% ci: 0.43 to 0.60 l min-1, SD 0.9). The sample size allows for a dropout rate of 10% per group.
Randomisation Participants are randomly assigned (1:1) by block randomisation to receive active or sham stimulation first to ensure a balance in sample size across groups over time (Power Analysis \& Sample Size (PASS) 2021, Utah, USA). Randomisation is performed one week before the first intervention, with a random block size of four. A randomisation sequence is created by a biostatistician who did not participate in the implementation or statistical analysis of trial. Allocation concealment is achieved through sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Bias/blinding Participants and investigators are blinded to treatment allocations throughout data collection and analysis. Participants and investigators are unable to see the device settings. Participants are instructed by the investigators that the stimulation is imperceptible after determination of the prescription dose. Participants and investigators are also masked to the Holter data, which will be analysed offline by an independent trial statistician not involved with patient recruitment/device application who is masked to the treatment allocations. Interventions are performed at the same time of day to minimise the possible influence of circadian variations.
Data collection Clinical data will be recorded. CPET data will be extracted from the cycle ergometer software (Zan, nSpire). Heart rate data will be analysed using Kubios HRV Premium [version 3.5.0]. Plasma will be stored at -80ºC having been obtained after both intervention periods for exploratory analyses of biomarkers related to autonomic activation. These data will be collected by a member of the research team not involved with administering the interventions, and analysed by an independent member of the research team - both will be masked to the treatment allocations. Data will be entered electronically on a secure database (REDCAP).
Statistical analysis Analyses will be conducted using the intention-to-treat principle, where all participants with a recorded outcome are analysed according to the treatment group to which they were randomised. Baseline participant characteristics will be presented and stratified according to treatment allocation. The primary outcome (absolute change in VO2peak) will be analysed using repeat-measures analysis of variance (intervention allocation x intervention period) (before versus after TAN/sham). For secondary outcomes, heart rate, CPET, HRV data and plasma acetylcholine levels will be compared in each group using repeat-measures analysis of variance. Sensitivity analysis for variables that may affect exercise capacity and/or autonomic measures will also be conducted. The significance level will be set at 0.05. A full statistical analysis plan will be developed prior to analysis and the end of the study.
Trial management/data monitoring The Sponsor organisation is Queen Mary University of London (QMUL). Daily trial management will be coordinated by a trial management group consisting of the Chief Investigator and his/her support staff. An independent study committee will oversee the trial, including assessing the safety of the intervention, reviewing relevant new external evidence, and monitoring the overall conduct of the trial. This committee consists of an independent clinical trialist, lay representative and an independent Chair.
Adverse events Prespecified and any other adverse events directly related to the trial intervention will be recorded.
Confidentiality Information related to participants will be kept confidential and managed in accordance with the Data Protection Act (UK), NHS Caldecott Principles (UK), the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (UK), and the conditions of Research Ethics Committee Approval, or corresponding legislation or approvals for a particular participating country or site. The principal investigator will maintain in strict confidence trial documents (e.g. written consent forms) and confidentiality.
Discussion Exercise capacity serves as an excellent preoperative prognosticator of an individual's ability to cope with the physiological (and pathophysiological) processes underlying ageing. Experimental animal studies and human exercise performance data have shown intact vagal tone enhances exercise capacity. However, acute tissue injury and systemic inflammation disrupt autonomic control. This proof-of-concept study aims to demonstrate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of TAN in augmenting cardiopulmonary fitness in tandem with autonomic changes that are mechanistically associated with favourable modulation of exercise capacity. These healthy volunteer data may offer key insights into potentially accelerating functional rehabilitation.
Experimental data indicate that cardiac vagal activity is a direct determinant of exercise capacity. Persistent autonomic dysfunction directly impairs cardiopulmonary fitness and therefore muscle mass and strength; key determinants of functional recovery cannot be increased. Furthermore, disruption of autonomic-mediated immunoregulatory mechanisms promotes a pro-inflammatory state whereby mechanisms controlling the resolution of inflammation are suppressed. The development and persistence of autonomic dysfunction therefore directly impairs cardiopulmonary fitness and rehabilitation. Therefore, individuals at high risk of morbidity and mortality are characterized by reduced vagal tone and slow heart rate recovery following incremental exercise.
Studies of non-invasive autonomic neuromodulation conducted in healthy volunteers and are susceptible to bias. The investigators utilised a double-blind, open crossover. randomised controlled design to address these issues. Although participants have varying fitness levels before the study, each individual serves as their own control. The use of a designated sham stimulation device is critical to minimise participant and investigator biases. Far more invasive studies have successfully recruited patients into trials where sham procedures served as the key control in cardiac and noncardiac orthopaedic surgery.
Assessing the effects of TAN on exercise capacity in healthy volunteers is broadly generalisable to the general population. Provided that the investigators can confirm in this setting that autonomic changes after TAN occur by measuring HRV, the low cost, non-invasive device used suggests a very low potential risk-to-benefit ratio. Systematic review identified TAN stimulation parameters that alter HRV, although there is no certainty that there may be minimum thresholds for the duration and/or intensity required to be clinically effective. Nonetheless, a 30-minute period of daily tragal stimulation has not been associated with any major adverse events.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Double-blind, open crossover, randomised sham-controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active transauricular nerve stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Active Transauricular nerve stimulationUsing a training device, two conductive clips are placed securely on both the left and right tragus areas of the outer ear. Using parameters we have identified through systematic review, electrical stimulation (pulse width:200μs; frequency:30Hz) is initiated at 10mA, until the participant feels a 'tingling' sensation within 20s of commencing. At this point the current is reduced to a level just below this perceptible threshold (20-60 mA), which is defined as the 'prescription dose'. The participant then receives another active device set at the 'prescription dose'. |
| Sham transauricular nerve stimulation | Sham comparator | Device: Sham transauricular nerve stimulationUsing a training device, two conductive clips are placed securely on both the left and right tragus areas of the outer ear. Using parameters we have identified through systematic review, electrical stimulation (pulse width:200μs; frequency:30Hz) is initiated at 10mA, until the participant feels a 'tingling' sensation within 20s of commencing (Figure 2). At this point the current is reduced to a level just below this perceptible threshold (20-60 mA), which is defined as the 'prescription dose'. The participant then receives another device set at the 'prescription dose' but this sham device is disabled from delivering any current . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18-75y
- Male or female
- Able and willing to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Current smoker
- Currently undertaking a dedicated training/exercise regime (i.e. not sedentary)
- Excess alcohol intake (as determined via a medical questionnaire)
- Contraindications to cardiopulmonary exercise testing
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active Transauricular nerve stimulationThe first allocated intervention will be undertaken for 30 minutes. The electrode placement and stimulation parameters are described in the arm/group section. After the 30-minute intervention, day 1 of the protocol will be complete. The investigator will remain present in the room with the participant to ensure compliance and adherence to the protocol. The allocated intervention will then be repeated by the participant at a similar time of day for 7 consecutive days. The investigator will arrange video-calls with the participant whilst off-site to ensure ongoing compliance and adherence to the protocol. On the seventh day, participants return to the clinical research facility to take the final first allocated intervention. A 14-day rest period will follow. Then the participants will perform the same 7-day protocol for the opposite intervention to their first treatment allocation. | Device | Active transauricular nerve stimulation |
| Sham transauricular nerve stimulationProtocol as for active but sham ear leads are applied, unable to deliver current. | Device | Sham transauricular nerve stimulation |
Primary outcome
Change in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2peak)
Time frame: 7 days
Gold standard measure of exercise capacity
4 secondary outcomes
Change in heart rate recovery (HRR)
Time frame: 7 days
Change in decline from peak heart rate (PeakHRdecline) after standing from the sitting position
Time frame: 7 days
Change in heart rate variability (HRV)
Time frame: 7 days
Change in plasma acetylcholine levels (PlasmaACh)
Time frame: 7 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28516907Machhada A, Trapp S, Marina N, Stephens RCM, Whittle J, Lythgoe MF, Kasparov S, Ackland GL, Gourine AV. Vagal determinants of exercise capacity. Nat Commun. 2017 May 18;8:15097. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15097.
- Background: PubMed 30540229Gourine AV, Ackland GL. Cardiac Vagus and Exercise. Physiology (Bethesda). 2019 Jan 1;34(1):71-80. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00041.2018.
- Statistical analysis planLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. N/A. Double-blinded study. Participants, investigators and analysers masked to data as detailed in study design section.
Related trials for Aging
RecruitingObservational study
PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)
Aging
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Cannabidiol on Memory and Attention in Adults Aged 60-70: A Pilot Study
Healthy Aging, Cognition
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MCR Syndrome in Quebec : Results From NuAge Study
Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, Aging Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Passive Limb Movement: A Tool to Assess Vascular Health and Guide Rehabilitation
Aging, Cardiovascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gareth L Ackland, FRCA principal investigator
Queen Mary University of London
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active Transauricular nerve stimulation in people with Aging and Inflammation, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in peak volume of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05619107, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2023.