Acute Ischemic StrokeNCT05632458
TWIN2WIN (Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT))
A study testing Thrombectomy in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Thrombectomy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 21 Apr 2022to Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinic
- Age ≥18 and ≤85 years. Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
- A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
- Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points. Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2. Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
- Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).
- Neuroimaging
Show all 9Show fewer
- Occlusion (flow TICI 0 or TICI 1), of the terminal internal carotid artery, segments or distal M1 of the basilar or middle cerebral artery, suitable for mechanical embolectomy, confirmed by conventional angiography.
- The patient is indicated for neurothrombectomy treatment by the Interventionist.
- Participating NRIs will have to complete a teaching module on the DS-EVT
Who cannot join
- Clinic
- Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2). Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device. Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
- Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
- Baseline platelet count < 50,000. Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
- Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors. Brain vasculitis. Evidence of active systemic infection. Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment. Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
- Patient participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device that may affect this study.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Patients who are unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (eg, homeless, visitor from abroad).
- Neurological imaging
- Hypodensity on CT or diffusion-restricted resulting in an ASPECTS score of < 6 on CT or < 5 on DMR (diffusion-weighted MRI).
- Evidence of hemorrhage on CT or MRI (the presence of microbleeds is allowed). Angiographic evidence of carotid artery dissection, high-grade stenosis impeding access to the clot, or vasculitis.
- Significant mass effect with midline shift. Patients with known or suspected underlying intracranial atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion.
- Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (for example, bilateral anterior circulation or anterior/posterior circulation).
- Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningiomas). Suspected aortic dissection, suspected septic embolus, or suspected bacterial endocarditis.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón
Barcelona, 08035
Marc Ribo, Medicine, +3493489300 ext. 4448, marcriboj@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy of Primary Thrombectomy With Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT) as an Initial Attempt at Thrombectomy
The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary.
Our goal is to develop a research project to provide additional information on the potential benefits of the simultaneous double stent approach primarily in stroke patients receiving TVS.
A randomized study to compare the efficacy of double primary SR versus single primary SR
Read the detailed description
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open and blinded trial of patients with acute stroke with acute large vessel occlusion (LGO) identified by ASD, in which two strategies will be compared: primary double stent (DS-EVT) versus simple stent (SS-EVT) as an initial attempt at thrombectomy.
Assignment will be stratified according to the initial location of the occlusion: terminal ICA, distal M1, and basilar artery.
The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of the primary strategy DS-EVT defined as first-pass angiographic complete recanalization (TICI 2c-3) compared to SS-EVT.
The primary safety endpoint will assess the safety of the primary DS-EVT strategy compared to SS-EVT, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), along with any other serious procedure-related adverse events. (excluding those already accounted for in sICH) within 24 hours (-8/+12) after the procedure.
A designated Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the primary safety endpoint after every 25 new patients enrolled in the study and determine continuation of the study based on the occurrence of adverse events in each study arm to assess early completion of the study. A first interim efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolling 106 patients and enrollment will be stopped if a significant difference in first-pass recanalization between both groups is demonstrated according to pre-specified stopping rules.
The primary analysis will be a between-group comparison of first-pass effect rate (TICI 2c-3). The primary analysis for this study will be conducted using the intention-to-treat paradigm.
As secondary criteria, the following will be assessed:
Security
- Evaluation of ICH (Intracerebral Hemorrhage); Any symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 (-8/+12h) hours, evaluated by MRI/CT. ICH is defined as any extravascular blood in the brain or within the skull, ICH is considered symptomatic if it is associated with clinical deterioration, (NIHSS score worsening of ≥4 points), or leading to death and is identified as the predominant cause of neurological impairment as adjudicated by investigators.
- Assessment of neurological deterioration in ≥4 NIHSS points at 24 hours (-8/+12h), evaluated by an investigator not involved in the thrombectomy procedure.
- Evaluation of embolization in a territory previously not involved in the cerebral angiogram.
- Mortality rate related to the procedure at 5 days (+/- 12h) or at discharge.
- Evaluation of the complications of the procedure: arterial perforation, arterial dissection and embolization in a previously uninvolved vascular territory.
- Evaluation of the infarct in a previously unaffected vascular territory, as assessed by 24-hour imaging (MRI/CT) after the procedure.
Effectiveness
- Satisfactory reperfusion, defined as the achievement of a modified Thrombolysis in ----.----Cerebral Infarction - mTICI ≥2b in the target vessel in 3 passes and at the end of the procedure.
- Procedure time, defined as the time from the puncture to obtaining mTICI ≥2b or, if not obtained, until the final angiography.
- Neurological status at 24 hours, at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or discharge, and at 90 days (+/- 14 days), determined by NIHSS score.
- mRS score at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or at discharge and at 90 days
The sample size is expected to be 180 patients. Informed consent will be obtained after the identification of the possible candidates once the reference neuroimaging has been obtained. Once the location of the occlusion is confirmed, the patient will be included in the study and randomized to receive one of the two treatment strategies.
Patients will be included if all of the following criteria are met:
Clinic
- Age ≥18 and ≤85 years.
- Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
- A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
- Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points.
- Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2.
- Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
- Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).
Neuroimaging
- Occlusion (flow TICI 0 or TICI 1), of the terminal internal carotid artery, segments or distal M1 of the basilar or middle cerebral artery, suitable for mechanical embolectomy, confirmed by conventional angiography.
- The patient is indicated for neurothrombectomy treatment by the Interventionist.
- Participating NRIs will have to complete a teaching module on the DS-EVT
The patient will not be included if any of the following conditions exist Clinic
- Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2).
- Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device.
- Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
- Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
- Baseline platelet count < 50,000.
- Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
- Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors.
- Brain vasculitis.
- Evidence of active systemic infection.
- Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment.
- Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
- Patient participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device that may affect this study.
- Patients who are unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (eg, homeless, visitor from abroad).
Neurological imaging
- Hypodensity on CT or diffusion-restricted resulting in an ASPECTS score of < 6 on CT or < 5 on DMR (diffusion-weighted MRI).
- Evidence of hemorrhage on CT or MRI (the presence of microbleeds is allowed).
- Angiographic evidence of carotid artery dissection, high-grade stenosis impeding access to the clot, or vasculitis.
- Significant mass effect with midline shift.
- Patients with known or suspected underlying intracranial atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion.
- Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (for example, bilateral anterior circulation or anterior/posterior circulation).
- Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningiomas).
- Suspected aortic dissection, suspected septic embolus, or suspected bacterial endocarditis.
Estimated Enrollment Duration: 4-6 patients/month/site, 5 Recruitment Sites: 160 patients should be enrolled in 6-9 months.
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Thrombectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ThrombectomyDevice
Thrombectomy using double stent retriever vs thrombectomy using single stent retriever.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| double stent retriever | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Thrombectomy |
| single stent retriever | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Thrombectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete recanalization on first pass
Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the simple stent group, defined as TiCI greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale)
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Evaluation of symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24h evaluated by CT or MRI
Measured: 4 months
Neurological impairment
Evaluation of neurological deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] >4; range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity at 24 hours (-8/+12h)
Measured: 4 months
Embolization in new territories
Rate of embolization in a territory previously not affected in the initial cerebral angiogram.
Measured: 4 months
Mortality
Mortality rate related to the procedure at 5 days (+/- 12h) or at discharge
Measured: 4 months
Infarct in new territory
Presence of infarction in a previously unaffected vascular territory on baseline imaging, based on evaluation of 24-hour imaging (MRI/CT) after the procedure
Measured: 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2022
- Study start21 Apr 2022
- Primary completionMar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05632458
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR(AG)652/2021
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tomasello A, Moreu M, Terceno M, Dinia L, Barrena Caballo MR, Requena M, Jablonska M, Cendrero J, Flores A, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Diana F, Henandez D, de Dios M, Rubiera M, Garcia-Tornel A, Rizzo F, Olive M, Perez-Garcia C, Trejo Gallego C, Carmona T, Rodrigo-Gisbert M, Molina C, Ribo M. Randomized Study Comparing First-Line Dual Versus Single-Stent Retriever Technique: TWIN2WIN. Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):326-334. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048496. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
PubMed 39704055
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy of Primary Thrombectomy With Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT) as an Initial Attempt at Thrombectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05632458
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PR(AG)652/2021
- Conditions
- Acute Ischemic Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary.
Our goal is to develop a research project to provide additional information on the potential benefits of the simultaneous double stent approach primarily in stroke patients receiving TVS.
A randomized study to compare the efficacy of double primary SR versus single primary SR
Detailed description
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open and blinded trial of patients with acute stroke with acute large vessel occlusion (LGO) identified by ASD, in which two strategies will be compared: primary double stent (DS-EVT) versus simple stent (SS-EVT) as an initial attempt at thrombectomy.
Assignment will be stratified according to the initial location of the occlusion: terminal ICA, distal M1, and basilar artery.
The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of the primary strategy DS-EVT defined as first-pass angiographic complete recanalization (TICI 2c-3) compared to SS-EVT.
The primary safety endpoint will assess the safety of the primary DS-EVT strategy compared to SS-EVT, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), along with any other serious procedure-related adverse events. (excluding those already accounted for in sICH) within 24 hours (-8/+12) after the procedure.
A designated Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the primary safety endpoint after every 25 new patients enrolled in the study and determine continuation of the study based on the occurrence of adverse events in each study arm to assess early completion of the study. A first interim efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolling 106 patients and enrollment will be stopped if a significant difference in first-pass recanalization between both groups is demonstrated according to pre-specified stopping rules.
The primary analysis will be a between-group comparison of first-pass effect rate (TICI 2c-3). The primary analysis for this study will be conducted using the intention-to-treat paradigm.
As secondary criteria, the following will be assessed:
Security
- Evaluation of ICH (Intracerebral Hemorrhage); Any symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 (-8/+12h) hours, evaluated by MRI/CT. ICH is defined as any extravascular blood in the brain or within the skull, ICH is considered symptomatic if it is associated with clinical deterioration, (NIHSS score worsening of ≥4 points), or leading to death and is identified as the predominant cause of neurological impairment as adjudicated by investigators.
- Assessment of neurological deterioration in ≥4 NIHSS points at 24 hours (-8/+12h), evaluated by an investigator not involved in the thrombectomy procedure.
- Evaluation of embolization in a territory previously not involved in the cerebral angiogram.
- Mortality rate related to the procedure at 5 days (+/- 12h) or at discharge.
- Evaluation of the complications of the procedure: arterial perforation, arterial dissection and embolization in a previously uninvolved vascular territory.
- Evaluation of the infarct in a previously unaffected vascular territory, as assessed by 24-hour imaging (MRI/CT) after the procedure.
Effectiveness
- Satisfactory reperfusion, defined as the achievement of a modified Thrombolysis in ----.----Cerebral Infarction - mTICI ≥2b in the target vessel in 3 passes and at the end of the procedure.
- Procedure time, defined as the time from the puncture to obtaining mTICI ≥2b or, if not obtained, until the final angiography.
- Neurological status at 24 hours, at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or discharge, and at 90 days (+/- 14 days), determined by NIHSS score.
- mRS score at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or at discharge and at 90 days
The sample size is expected to be 180 patients. Informed consent will be obtained after the identification of the possible candidates once the reference neuroimaging has been obtained. Once the location of the occlusion is confirmed, the patient will be included in the study and randomized to receive one of the two treatment strategies.
Patients will be included if all of the following criteria are met:
Clinic
- Age ≥18 and ≤85 years.
- Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
- A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
- Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points.
- Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2.
- Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
- Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).
Neuroimaging
- Occlusion (flow TICI 0 or TICI 1), of the terminal internal carotid artery, segments or distal M1 of the basilar or middle cerebral artery, suitable for mechanical embolectomy, confirmed by conventional angiography.
- The patient is indicated for neurothrombectomy treatment by the Interventionist.
- Participating NRIs will have to complete a teaching module on the DS-EVT
The patient will not be included if any of the following conditions exist Clinic
- Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2).
- Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device.
- Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
- Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
- Baseline platelet count < 50,000.
- Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
- Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors.
- Brain vasculitis.
- Evidence of active systemic infection.
- Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment.
- Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
- Patient participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device that may affect this study.
- Patients who are unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (eg, homeless, visitor from abroad).
Neurological imaging
- Hypodensity on CT or diffusion-restricted resulting in an ASPECTS score of < 6 on CT or < 5 on DMR (diffusion-weighted MRI).
- Evidence of hemorrhage on CT or MRI (the presence of microbleeds is allowed).
- Angiographic evidence of carotid artery dissection, high-grade stenosis impeding access to the clot, or vasculitis.
- Significant mass effect with midline shift.
- Patients with known or suspected underlying intracranial atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion.
- Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (for example, bilateral anterior circulation or anterior/posterior circulation).
- Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningiomas).
- Suspected aortic dissection, suspected septic embolus, or suspected bacterial endocarditis.
Estimated Enrollment Duration: 4-6 patients/month/site, 5 Recruitment Sites: 160 patients should be enrolled in 6-9 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| double stent retriever | Experimental | Device: Thrombectomy |
| single stent retriever | Active comparator | Device: Thrombectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Clinic
- Age ≥18 and ≤85 years. Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
- A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
- Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points. Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2. Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
- Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Clinic
- Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2). Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device. Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
- Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
- Baseline platelet count < 50,000. Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
- Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors. Brain vasculitis. Evidence of active systemic infection. Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment. Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ThrombectomyThrombectomy using double stent retriever vs thrombectomy using single stent retriever. | Device | double stent retriever, single stent retriever |
Primary outcome
Complete recanalization on first pass
Time frame: 4 months
Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the simple stent group, defined as TiCI greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale)
5 secondary outcomes
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Time frame: 4 months
Neurological impairment
Time frame: 4 months
Embolization in new territories
Time frame: 4 months
Mortality
Time frame: 4 months
Infarct in new territory
Time frame: 4 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Nov 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39704055Tomasello A, Moreu M, Terceno M, Dinia L, Barrena Caballo MR, Requena M, Jablonska M, Cendrero J, Flores A, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Diana F, Henandez D, de Dios M, Rubiera M, Garcia-Tornel A, Rizzo F, Olive M, Perez-Garcia C, Trejo Gallego C, Carmona T, Rodrigo-Gisbert M, Molina C, Ribo M. Randomized Study Comparing First-Line Dual Versus Single-Stent Retriever Technique: TWIN2WIN. Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):326-334. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048496. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitor Combined With Endovascular Treatment in Patients With Acute Posterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Short-Term External Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Sham-Controlled Trial
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ARTEMIS: UC-MSCs After Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Tenecteplase Bridging Thrombolysis Prior to Inter-hospital Transfer for Endovascular Therapy in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Within 4.5-24 Hours
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Timing of Anticoagulation After Emergency Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke With Atrial Fibrillation
Ischemic Stroke, Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Thrombectomy in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marc Ribó, Medicine (93489300 ext. 4448, marcriboj@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete recanalization on first pass (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05632458, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2022.