AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Ischemic StrokeNCT05632458

TWIN2WIN (Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT))

A study testing Thrombectomy in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
Thrombectomy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
21 Apr 2022to Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinic
  • Age ≥18 and ≤85 years. Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
  • A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
  • Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points. Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2. Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
  • Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).
  • Neuroimaging
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Occlusion (flow TICI 0 or TICI 1), of the terminal internal carotid artery, segments or distal M1 of the basilar or middle cerebral artery, suitable for mechanical embolectomy, confirmed by conventional angiography.
  • The patient is indicated for neurothrombectomy treatment by the Interventionist.
  • Participating NRIs will have to complete a teaching module on the DS-EVT

Who cannot join

  • Clinic
  • Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2). Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device. Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
  • Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
  • Baseline platelet count < 50,000. Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
  • Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors. Brain vasculitis. Evidence of active systemic infection. Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment. Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
  • Patient participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device that may affect this study.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patients who are unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (eg, homeless, visitor from abroad).
  • Neurological imaging
  • Hypodensity on CT or diffusion-restricted resulting in an ASPECTS score of < 6 on CT or < 5 on DMR (diffusion-weighted MRI).
  • Evidence of hemorrhage on CT or MRI (the presence of microbleeds is allowed). Angiographic evidence of carotid artery dissection, high-grade stenosis impeding access to the clot, or vasculitis.
  • Significant mass effect with midline shift. Patients with known or suspected underlying intracranial atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion.
  • Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (for example, bilateral anterior circulation or anterior/posterior circulation).
  • Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningiomas). Suspected aortic dissection, suspected septic embolus, or suspected bacterial endocarditis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Marc Ribó, Medicine contact

93489300 ext. 4448

marcriboj@hotmail.com

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón

    Barcelona, 08035

    Marc Ribo, Medicine, +3493489300 ext. 4448, marcriboj@hotmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy of Primary Thrombectomy With Double Stent (DS-EVT) Versus Primary Thrombectomy With One Stent (SS-EVT) as an Initial Attempt at Thrombectomy

The use of a double stent retriever (Dual-SR) has been proposed as a safe and effective technique. The invesigators hypothesized that the use of Dual-SR primary could lead to higher first-pass effect rates and better outcomes compared to Single-SR primary.

Our goal is to develop a research project to provide additional information on the potential benefits of the simultaneous double stent approach primarily in stroke patients receiving TVS.

A randomized study to compare the efficacy of double primary SR versus single primary SR

Read the detailed description

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open and blinded trial of patients with acute stroke with acute large vessel occlusion (LGO) identified by ASD, in which two strategies will be compared: primary double stent (DS-EVT) versus simple stent (SS-EVT) as an initial attempt at thrombectomy.

Assignment will be stratified according to the initial location of the occlusion: terminal ICA, distal M1, and basilar artery.

The primary objective will be to evaluate the efficacy of the primary strategy DS-EVT defined as first-pass angiographic complete recanalization (TICI 2c-3) compared to SS-EVT.

The primary safety endpoint will assess the safety of the primary DS-EVT strategy compared to SS-EVT, defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), along with any other serious procedure-related adverse events. (excluding those already accounted for in sICH) within 24 hours (-8/+12) after the procedure.

A designated Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the primary safety endpoint after every 25 new patients enrolled in the study and determine continuation of the study based on the occurrence of adverse events in each study arm to assess early completion of the study. A first interim efficacy analysis will be performed after enrolling 106 patients and enrollment will be stopped if a significant difference in first-pass recanalization between both groups is demonstrated according to pre-specified stopping rules.

The primary analysis will be a between-group comparison of first-pass effect rate (TICI 2c-3). The primary analysis for this study will be conducted using the intention-to-treat paradigm.

As secondary criteria, the following will be assessed:

Security

  • Evaluation of ICH (Intracerebral Hemorrhage); Any symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 (-8/+12h) hours, evaluated by MRI/CT. ICH is defined as any extravascular blood in the brain or within the skull, ICH is considered symptomatic if it is associated with clinical deterioration, (NIHSS score worsening of ≥4 points), or leading to death and is identified as the predominant cause of neurological impairment as adjudicated by investigators.
  • Assessment of neurological deterioration in ≥4 NIHSS points at 24 hours (-8/+12h), evaluated by an investigator not involved in the thrombectomy procedure.
  • Evaluation of embolization in a territory previously not involved in the cerebral angiogram.
  • Mortality rate related to the procedure at 5 days (+/- 12h) or at discharge.
  • Evaluation of the complications of the procedure: arterial perforation, arterial dissection and embolization in a previously uninvolved vascular territory.
  • Evaluation of the infarct in a previously unaffected vascular territory, as assessed by 24-hour imaging (MRI/CT) after the procedure.

Effectiveness

  • Satisfactory reperfusion, defined as the achievement of a modified Thrombolysis in ----.----Cerebral Infarction - mTICI ≥2b in the target vessel in 3 passes and at the end of the procedure.
  • Procedure time, defined as the time from the puncture to obtaining mTICI ≥2b or, if not obtained, until the final angiography.
  • Neurological status at 24 hours, at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or discharge, and at 90 days (+/- 14 days), determined by NIHSS score.
  • mRS score at day 5 (+/- 12 hours) or at discharge and at 90 days

The sample size is expected to be 180 patients. Informed consent will be obtained after the identification of the possible candidates once the reference neuroimaging has been obtained. Once the location of the occlusion is confirmed, the patient will be included in the study and randomized to receive one of the two treatment strategies.

Patients will be included if all of the following criteria are met:

Clinic

  • Age ≥18 and ≤85 years.
  • Informed consent obtained from the patient or an acceptable surrogate for the patient (ie, next of kin or legal representative).
  • A new disabling focal neurological deficit compatible with acute cerebral ischemia.
  • Baseline NIHSS obtained before the procedure, ≥ 6 points.
  • Preictal mRS score of 0 or 2.
  • Treatable as soon as possible and at least within 24 hours of symptom onset, defined as the time the patient was last seen well (at baseline).
  • Patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and who are available for treatment are treated with IV t-PA. For those patients for whom IV t-PA is indicated and available for treatment, IV t-PA should be administered as recommended in the AHA/ASA Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke ( AIS).

Neuroimaging

  • Occlusion (flow TICI 0 or TICI 1), of the terminal internal carotid artery, segments or distal M1 of the basilar or middle cerebral artery, suitable for mechanical embolectomy, confirmed by conventional angiography.
  • The patient is indicated for neurothrombectomy treatment by the Interventionist.
  • Participating NRIs will have to complete a teaching module on the DS-EVT

The patient will not be included if any of the following conditions exist Clinic

  • Functional disability prior to stroke on the modified Rankin scale (mRS >2).
  • Initial treatment with a different thrombectomy device.
  • Clinical symptoms suggestive of bilateral stroke or stroke in multiple territories.
  • Known bleeding diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or known oral anticoagulant therapy with INR > 3.0.
  • Baseline platelet count < 50,000.
  • Serious, advanced or terminal illness with an expected life expectancy of less than six months.
  • Subjects with identifiable intracranial tumors.
  • Brain vasculitis.
  • Evidence of active systemic infection.
  • Known current use of cocaine at the time of treatment.
  • Woman of childbearing age who is known to be pregnant, and/or breastfeeding, or who has a positive pregnancy test at the time of admission.
  • Patient participating in a study involving an investigational drug or device that may affect this study.
  • Patients who are unlikely to be available for a 90-day follow-up (eg, homeless, visitor from abroad).

Neurological imaging

  • Hypodensity on CT or diffusion-restricted resulting in an ASPECTS score of < 6 on CT or < 5 on DMR (diffusion-weighted MRI).
  • Evidence of hemorrhage on CT or MRI (the presence of microbleeds is allowed).
  • Angiographic evidence of carotid artery dissection, high-grade stenosis impeding access to the clot, or vasculitis.
  • Significant mass effect with midline shift.
  • Patients with known or suspected underlying intracranial atherosclerotic lesions responsible for the target occlusion.
  • Patients with occlusions in multiple vascular territories (for example, bilateral anterior circulation or anterior/posterior circulation).
  • Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningiomas).
  • Suspected aortic dissection, suspected septic embolus, or suspected bacterial endocarditis.

Estimated Enrollment Duration: 4-6 patients/month/site, 5 Recruitment Sites: 160 patients should be enrolled in 6-9 months.

Being tested
Thrombectomy
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ThrombectomyDevice

    Thrombectomy using double stent retriever vs thrombectomy using single stent retriever.

Study groups in NCT05632458
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
double stent retrieverExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Thrombectomy
single stent retrieverActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Thrombectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete recanalization on first pass

    Comparison of the complete recanalization rate in the first pass in the double stent group compared to the simple stent group, defined as TiCI greater than 2c on the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (eTICI scale)

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Intracerebral hemorrhage

    Evaluation of symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at 24h evaluated by CT or MRI

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Neurological impairment

    Evaluation of neurological deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] >4; range 0-42, with higher scores indicating greater stroke severity at 24 hours (-8/+12h)

    Measured: 4 months

  3. Embolization in new territories

    Rate of embolization in a territory previously not affected in the initial cerebral angiogram.

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Mortality

    Mortality rate related to the procedure at 5 days (+/- 12h) or at discharge

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Infarct in new territory

    Presence of infarction in a previously unaffected vascular territory on baseline imaging, based on evaluation of 24-hour imaging (MRI/CT) after the procedure

    Measured: 4 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2022
  2. Study start21 Apr 2022
  3. Primary completionMar 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
180 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05632458
Sponsor's protocol ID
PR(AG)652/2021
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
4 Nov 2022
Last updated
30 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tomasello A, Moreu M, Terceno M, Dinia L, Barrena Caballo MR, Requena M, Jablonska M, Cendrero J, Flores A, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Diana F, Henandez D, de Dios M, Rubiera M, Garcia-Tornel A, Rizzo F, Olive M, Perez-Garcia C, Trejo Gallego C, Carmona T, Rodrigo-Gisbert M, Molina C, Ribo M. Randomized Study Comparing First-Line Dual Versus Single-Stent Retriever Technique: TWIN2WIN. Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):326-334. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048496. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

    PubMed 39704055

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Thrombectomy in people with Acute Ischemic Stroke, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marc Ribó, Medicine (93489300 ext. 4448, marcriboj@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete recanalization on first pass (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05632458, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in