HemoptysisNCT05634200
Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan (ULYSSES)
An observational study of Hemoptysis, run by University of Milan at 14 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan. The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemoptysis
- What is being tested?
- Bronchoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2022to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years) of any nationality (inpatients and outpatients) with haemoptysis of unknown aetiology and negative chest CT scan/with CT scan showing non-diagnostic findings (i.e. focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm), in whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years old
- Haemoptysis of unknown origin
- Negative or non-diagnostic chest CT scan
Who cannot join
- Known bleeding lesions of the upper or lower respiratory airways
- Chest CT scan diagnostic for hemoptysis etiology
- Refusal to sign the informed consent
- Refusal of bronchoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 2 countries.
Michele Mondoni, MD contact
michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it
14 sites in 2 countries
Italy13 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
- Respiratory Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XVIII
Bergamo
Fabiano Di Marco, MD, fabiano.dimarco@unimi.it
- Recruiting
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna
Pietro Candoli, MD, pcandoli@libero.it
- Recruiting
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sant'Anna Hospital
Como
Claudio Sorino, MD, claudio.sorino@asst-lariana.it
- Recruiting
Respiratory Unit, ASST Lodi
Lodi
Giuseppe Cipolla, MD, giuseppe.cipolla@asst-lodi.it
- Recruiting
Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo
Milan, 20142
Michele Mondoni, MD, 0039 0281843025, michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it
Giulia Nalesso, MD, 0039 0281843025, giulia.nalesso@unimi.it
- Recruiting
- Respiratory Unit, Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco
Milan
Pierachille Santus, MD, pierachille.santus@unimi.it
- Recruiting
Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza
Monza
Fabrizio Luppi, MD, fabrizio.luppi@unimib.it
- Recruiting
Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Dept of Pulmonology, Oncology and Hematology, Cardarelli Hospital
Naples
Nadia Corcione, MD, nadia.corcione@gmail.com
- Active, not recruiting
- Respiratory Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia
- Recruiting
Pulmonology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia
Roberto Piro, MD, roberto.piro@ausl.re.it
- Recruiting
- Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
Roma
Rocco Trisolini, MD, rocco.trisolini@policlinicogemelli.it
- Recruiting
- Respiratory Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
Torino
Paolo Solidoro, MD, psolidoro@cittadellasalute.to.it
- Recruiting
Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Udine (ASUFC)
Udine
Alberto Fantin, alberto.fantin@asufc.sanita.fvg.it
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Respiratory Department, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Alfons Torrego, MD, atorrego@santpau.cat
About this study
Official title: Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan: an Observational, Prospective, Multicentre Study (ULYSSES)
Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan.
The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans. Secondary aims are related to the utility of bronchoscopy to detect occult malignancies, the source of the bleeding and the clinical features of the cohort
Read the detailed description
Haemoptysis, i.e., coughing up blood from the airways, is a common and alarming symptom in the context of respiratory diseases. Studies conducted in Europe and North America in the last ten years have identified lung cancer (13.9-30.3%), bronchiectasis (6-21%) and low respiratory tract infection (4.2-40%) as the most common causes of the symptom. No international guidelines exist suggesting the optimal diagnostic work-up in patients with haemoptysis, based on demographics characteristics, risk factors (such as smoking history) and clinical presentation. The full diagnostic pathway of the symptom includes patient anamnesis, blood tests, chest X-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy. The 2020 international guidelines of American College of Radiology recommends performing chest CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast or a CT angiography after the first episode of haemoptysis of any severity. Many studies recommend CT scan before bronchoscopy, underlining the diagnostic complementarity of the tests and the role of tCT as a guide for endoscopic examination. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with a negative CT scan or in cases of CT showing non-specific or non-diagnostic benign findings (e.g., calcified parenchymal nodule, linear subsegmental atelectasis, pleural thickening). Due to this conflicting evidence, we deem necessary to conduct a prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary aim is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis.
The secondary objectives are:
- to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
- to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with negative CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
- to evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.
The study will be performed in twelve Respiratory Units throughout Europe. The study will last two years, and it is estimated to enroll at least 150 adult patients of any nationality referred for haemoptysis of unknown origin with negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan, for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Patients will undergo pulmonary examination and blood tests (complete blood count, PT, PTT, urea, blood creatinine and CRP) before bronchoscopy. A chest CT scan with IV contrast is considered necessary, except for patients with absolute contraindications (renal failure, allergy to iodinate IV contrast). Only patients with chest CT scan performed within 72 hours from the last episode of haemoptysis will be enrolled in the study. Bronchoscopy will be performed within two weeks of the chest CT scan. All the enrolled patients will be followed-up for 12 months with a telephone interview at one, three, six and twelve months after the enrolment. In case of haemoptysis relapse, a clinical evaluation could be performed. Each centre will decide upon the subsequent diagnostic work-up.
- Conditions
- Hemoptysis
- Being tested
- Bronchoscopy
- Keywords
- Computed tomography, Bronchoscopy, Lung cancer, CT scan, Haemoptysis
- Medical subject headings
- Hemoptysis, Lung Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BronchoscopyProcedure or surgery
During bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA may be performed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan | Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan (i.e. with focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm) for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Receives: Procedure: Bronchoscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (6)
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
Measured: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
Measured: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
Measured: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a an endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological diagnosis
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
Measured: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
Measured: One year
To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity of haemoptysis) of these patients, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up.
To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Oct 2022
- Primary completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HemoptysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Milan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michele Mondoni, University of Milan
- Investigators
- Michele Mondoni, MD, Principal investigator, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05634200
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BrHaemoCTNeg
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan: an Observational, Prospective, Multicentre Study (ULYSSES)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05634200
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BrHaemoCTNeg
- Conditions
- Hemoptysis
- Keywords
- Computed tomography, Bronchoscopy, Lung cancer, CT scan, Haemoptysis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MilanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan.
The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans. Secondary aims are related to the utility of bronchoscopy to detect occult malignancies, the source of the bleeding and the clinical features of the cohort
Detailed description
Haemoptysis, i.e., coughing up blood from the airways, is a common and alarming symptom in the context of respiratory diseases. Studies conducted in Europe and North America in the last ten years have identified lung cancer (13.9-30.3%), bronchiectasis (6-21%) and low respiratory tract infection (4.2-40%) as the most common causes of the symptom. No international guidelines exist suggesting the optimal diagnostic work-up in patients with haemoptysis, based on demographics characteristics, risk factors (such as smoking history) and clinical presentation. The full diagnostic pathway of the symptom includes patient anamnesis, blood tests, chest X-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy. The 2020 international guidelines of American College of Radiology recommends performing chest CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast or a CT angiography after the first episode of haemoptysis of any severity. Many studies recommend CT scan before bronchoscopy, underlining the diagnostic complementarity of the tests and the role of tCT as a guide for endoscopic examination. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with a negative CT scan or in cases of CT showing non-specific or non-diagnostic benign findings (e.g., calcified parenchymal nodule, linear subsegmental atelectasis, pleural thickening). Due to this conflicting evidence, we deem necessary to conduct a prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary aim is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis.
The secondary objectives are:
- to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
- to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
- to evaluate the proportion of patients with negative CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
- to evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.
The study will be performed in twelve Respiratory Units throughout Europe. The study will last two years, and it is estimated to enroll at least 150 adult patients of any nationality referred for haemoptysis of unknown origin with negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan, for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Patients will undergo pulmonary examination and blood tests (complete blood count, PT, PTT, urea, blood creatinine and CRP) before bronchoscopy. A chest CT scan with IV contrast is considered necessary, except for patients with absolute contraindications (renal failure, allergy to iodinate IV contrast). Only patients with chest CT scan performed within 72 hours from the last episode of haemoptysis will be enrolled in the study. Bronchoscopy will be performed within two weeks of the chest CT scan. All the enrolled patients will be followed-up for 12 months with a telephone interview at one, three, six and twelve months after the enrolment. In case of haemoptysis relapse, a clinical evaluation could be performed. Each centre will decide upon the subsequent diagnostic work-up.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan | – | Procedure: BronchoscopyPatients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan (i.e. with focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm) for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years) of any nationality (inpatients and outpatients) with haemoptysis of unknown aetiology and negative chest CT scan/with CT scan showing non-diagnostic findings (i.e. focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm), in whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ≥18 years old
- Haemoptysis of unknown origin
- Negative or non-diagnostic chest CT scan
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Known bleeding lesions of the upper or lower respiratory airways
- Chest CT scan diagnostic for hemoptysis etiology
- Refusal to sign the informed consent
- Refusal of bronchoscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BronchoscopyDuring bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA may be performed | Procedure or surgery | Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
Time frame: One year
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
6 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a an endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological diagnosis
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
Time frame: One year
To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity of haemoptysis) of these patients, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up.
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2024.
Related trials for Hemoptysis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Chinese Hemoptysis Registry Study
Hemoptysis
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Comparison Between Efficacy of Inhaled VS Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Hemoptysis
Hemoptysis
RecruitingObservational study
Tracheal Cuff Pressure and Postoperative Complications
Tracheal Intubation, Postoperative Complications (Cardiopulmonary)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
HISTOACRYL® Used for Embolization of Thoracoabdominal Artery Bleeding
Hemorrhage, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Nebulized Versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Hemoptysis
Hemoptysis, Pulmonary Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michele Mondoni, MD contact
michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it
Michele Mondoni, MD principal investigator
Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan
14 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hemoptysis, run by University of Milan at 14 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michele Mondoni, MD (0039 0281843025, michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.