AzTrials
AzTrials

HemoptysisNCT05634200

Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan (ULYSSES)

An observational study of Hemoptysis, run by University of Milan at 14 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan. The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hemoptysis
What is being tested?
Bronchoscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
150 participants
Where
14 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Oct 2022to 1 Oct 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients (i.e., ≥18 years) of any nationality (inpatients and outpatients) with haemoptysis of unknown aetiology and negative chest CT scan/with CT scan showing non-diagnostic findings (i.e. focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm), in whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years old
  • Haemoptysis of unknown origin
  • Negative or non-diagnostic chest CT scan

Who cannot join

  • Known bleeding lesions of the upper or lower respiratory airways
  • Chest CT scan diagnostic for hemoptysis etiology
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent
  • Refusal of bronchoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 2 countries.

14 sites in 2 countries

Italy13 sites, 12 recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XVIII

    Bergamo

    Fabiano Di Marco, MD, fabiano.dimarco@unimi.it

    Recruiting
  • - Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna

    Pietro Candoli, MD, pcandoli@libero.it

    Recruiting
  • Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sant'Anna Hospital

    Como

    Claudio Sorino, MD, claudio.sorino@asst-lariana.it

    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, ASST Lodi

    Lodi

    Giuseppe Cipolla, MD, giuseppe.cipolla@asst-lodi.it

    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo

    Milan, 20142

    Michele Mondoni, MD, 0039 0281843025, michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it

    Giulia Nalesso, MD, 0039 0281843025, giulia.nalesso@unimi.it

    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco

    Milan

    Pierachille Santus, MD, pierachille.santus@unimi.it

    Recruiting
  • Respiratory Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, ASST Monza

    Monza

    Fabrizio Luppi, MD, fabrizio.luppi@unimib.it

    Recruiting
  • Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Dept of Pulmonology, Oncology and Hematology, Cardarelli Hospital

    Naples

    Nadia Corcione, MD, nadia.corcione@gmail.com

    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, IRCCS Foundation Policlinico San Matteo

    Pavia

    Active, not recruiting
  • Pulmonology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia

    Reggio Emilia

    Roberto Piro, MD, roberto.piro@ausl.re.it

    Recruiting
  • - Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli

    Roma

    Rocco Trisolini, MD, rocco.trisolini@policlinicogemelli.it

    Recruiting
  • - Respiratory Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

    Torino

    Paolo Solidoro, MD, psolidoro@cittadellasalute.to.it

    Recruiting
  • Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Udine (ASUFC)

    Udine

    Alberto Fantin, alberto.fantin@asufc.sanita.fvg.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Interventional Pulmonology Unit, Respiratory Department, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona

    Alfons Torrego, MD, atorrego@santpau.cat

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Utility of Bronchoscopy in Patients With Haemoptysis and Negative Chest CT Scan: an Observational, Prospective, Multicentre Study (ULYSSES)

Conflicting evidence exist in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan.

The primary aim of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans. Secondary aims are related to the utility of bronchoscopy to detect occult malignancies, the source of the bleeding and the clinical features of the cohort

Read the detailed description

Haemoptysis, i.e., coughing up blood from the airways, is a common and alarming symptom in the context of respiratory diseases. Studies conducted in Europe and North America in the last ten years have identified lung cancer (13.9-30.3%), bronchiectasis (6-21%) and low respiratory tract infection (4.2-40%) as the most common causes of the symptom. No international guidelines exist suggesting the optimal diagnostic work-up in patients with haemoptysis, based on demographics characteristics, risk factors (such as smoking history) and clinical presentation. The full diagnostic pathway of the symptom includes patient anamnesis, blood tests, chest X-ray, chest computed tomography (CT) scan and bronchoscopy. The 2020 international guidelines of American College of Radiology recommends performing chest CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast or a CT angiography after the first episode of haemoptysis of any severity. Many studies recommend CT scan before bronchoscopy, underlining the diagnostic complementarity of the tests and the role of tCT as a guide for endoscopic examination. There is conflicting evidence in the literature on the utility of bronchoscopy in patients with a negative CT scan or in cases of CT showing non-specific or non-diagnostic benign findings (e.g., calcified parenchymal nodule, linear subsegmental atelectasis, pleural thickening). Due to this conflicting evidence, we deem necessary to conduct a prospective, observational, multicentre study. The primary aim is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis.

The secondary objectives are:

  • to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis
  • to evaluate the proportion of patients with negative CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up
  • to evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.

The study will be performed in twelve Respiratory Units throughout Europe. The study will last two years, and it is estimated to enroll at least 150 adult patients of any nationality referred for haemoptysis of unknown origin with negative/non-diagnostic chest CT scan, for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis. Patients will undergo pulmonary examination and blood tests (complete blood count, PT, PTT, urea, blood creatinine and CRP) before bronchoscopy. A chest CT scan with IV contrast is considered necessary, except for patients with absolute contraindications (renal failure, allergy to iodinate IV contrast). Only patients with chest CT scan performed within 72 hours from the last episode of haemoptysis will be enrolled in the study. Bronchoscopy will be performed within two weeks of the chest CT scan. All the enrolled patients will be followed-up for 12 months with a telephone interview at one, three, six and twelve months after the enrolment. In case of haemoptysis relapse, a clinical evaluation could be performed. Each centre will decide upon the subsequent diagnostic work-up.

Conditions
Hemoptysis
Being tested
Bronchoscopy
Keywords
Computed tomography, Bronchoscopy, Lung cancer, CT scan, Haemoptysis
Medical subject headings
Hemoptysis, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BronchoscopyProcedure or surgery

    During bronchoscopy endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy, transbronchial needle aspiration, bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage, EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA may be performed

Study groups in NCT05634200
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scanPatients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scan (i.e. with focal peripheral lung fibrosis, calcified parenchymal nodules with a maximum diameter <5 mm, linear subsegmental atelectasis, hilar-mediastinal lymph nodes with a short axis <1 cm, pleural thickening/pleural calcification and focal area of emphysema with a diameter <1 cm) for whom bronchoscopy is deemed necessary to obtain an aetiological diagnosis.
Receives: Procedure: Bronchoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)

    To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may detect occult endobronchial neoplasms (not detected with chest CT scan)

    Measured: One year

  2. To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding

    To evaluate the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy may identify the source of the bleeding

    Measured: One year

  3. To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative chest CT scan in whom bronchoscopic findings may induce variation in the treatment of the patients

    Measured: One year

  4. To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a an endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological diagnosis

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative bronchoscopy at baseline, in whom a subsequent endoscopic examination performed during the follow-up for recurrent haemoptysis may allow an aetiological (endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis

    Measured: One year

  5. To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up

    To evaluate the proportion of patients with a negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy in whom lung cancer may be diagnosed during the follow-up

    Measured: One year

  6. To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity of haemoptysis) of these patients, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up.

    To evaluate the main clinical characteristics (e.g., severity, duration of haemoptysis) of patients with haemoptysis with negative chest CT scan and bronchoscopy, the rate and severity of symptom recurrence and the mortality rate after one year of follow-up in this cohort.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2022
  2. Study start1 Oct 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05634200
Sponsor's protocol ID
BrHaemoCTNeg
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
21 Nov 2022
Last updated
21 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hemoptysis, run by University of Milan at 14 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Italy, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michele Mondoni, MD (0039 0281843025, michele.mondoni@asst-santipaolocarlo.it; michele.mondoni@unimi.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To evaluate the proportion of patients with haemoptysis and negative/non-diagnostic CT scans in whom bronchoscopy allows an aetiological (i.e., endoscopic and/or microbiological and/or anatomopathological) diagnosis (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in