Stroke, Acute IschemicPhase 3NCT05634382
Endovascular Thrombectomy With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis in Extended Time Window
A Phase 3 study testing Intravenous thrombolysis agents and endovascular thrombectomy in people with Stroke, Acute Ischemic, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The primary hypothesis being tested in this trial is that ischemic stroke patients in large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation at 4.5 - 9 hours post onset of stroke will have improved clinical outcomes when given endovascular thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis compared with that of given direct… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous thrombolysis agents and endovascular thrombectomy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 222 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2022to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient/Legally Authorized Representative has signed the Informed Consent form
- Age ≥ 18
- Clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
- Neurological deficit with a NIHSS of ≥ 6 (deficits judged to be clearly disabling at presentation)
- Patient is eligible for intravenous thrombolysis
- Patient is eligible for endovascular treatment
Show all 9Show fewer
- Randomization no later than 8 hours 45 minutes after stroke symptom onset and initiation of IV t-PA must be started within 9 hours of stroke symptoms onset (for stroke with unknown time of onset, the midpoint of the time last known to be well and symptom recognition time)
- ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion (carotid occlusions can be cervical or intracranial; with or without tandem MCA lesions) by MRA or CTA (including the reconstructed CTA derived from CTP). And target Mismatch Profile on CT perfusion or MRI (ischemic core volume is < 70 ml, mismatch ratio is >/= 1.8 and mismatch volume is >/= 15 ml)
- Core-infarct volume of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6 based on baseline CT or MR imaging (MRI) (a region has to have diffusion abnormality in 20% or more of its volume to be considered MR-ASPECTS positive)
Who cannot join
- Acute intracranial hemorrhage
- Any contraindication for IV t-PA
- Pre-treatment with IV t-PA
- Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomization is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
- Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals, or their alloys
- Known current participation in a clinical trial (investigational drug or medical device)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Renal insufficiency as defined by a serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl (or 176.8 µmol/l) or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min or requirement for hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
- Severe comorbid condition with life expectancy less than 90 days at baseline
- Known advanced dementia or significant pre-stroke disability (mRS score of ≥2)
- Foreseeable difficulties in follow-up due to geographic reasons (e.g. patients living abroad)
- Comorbid disease or condition that would confound the neurological and functional evaluations or compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments
- Subject currently uses or has a recent history of illicit drug(s) or abuses alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than four alcoholic drinks per day).
- Known history of arterial tortuosity, pre-existing stent, other arterial disease and/or known disease at the femoral access site that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel and/or preclude safe recovery after MT
- Radiological confirmed evidence of mass effect or intracranial tumor (except small meningioma)
- Radiological confirmed evidence of cerebral vasculitis
- CTA or MRA evidence of carotid artery dissection
- Evidence of additional distal intracranial vessel occlusion in another territory (i.e. A2 segment of anterior cerebral artery or M3, M4 segment of MCA) on initial NCCT/MRI or CTA/MRA
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Yi Chen, Doctor, ileen@163.com
About this study
Official title: Endovascular Thrombectomy With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Vessel Anterior Circulation Stroke in Extended Time Window
The primary hypothesis being tested in this trial is that ischemic stroke patients in large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation at 4.5 - 9 hours post onset of stroke will have improved clinical outcomes when given endovascular thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis compared with that of given direct endovascular thrombectomy alone.
Read the detailed description
A number of multicenter randomized controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the application of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. However, whether intravenous thrombolysis is necessary before endovascular therapy is still controversial. The combined trial data (including DEVT, DIRECT-MT, MR-CLEAN NO-IV and SKIP) assessing direct mechanical thrombectomy versus bridging therapy showed no difference in improving good functional outcome. However, a recent observational cohort study of 15832 patients treated with EVT, intravenous alteplase treatment was associated with better in-hospital survival and functional outcomes after adjusting for other covariates.
The 2019 AHA/ASA guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke states that mechanical thrombectomy is recommended for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 6-24 hours of last known normal who meet the DWAN or DEFUSE-3 criteria (level I recommendation, level A evidence). The DEFUSE 3 perfusion-infarction core mismatch criteria is: core infarct volume <70mL, ischemic penumbra volume >15mL, and hypoperfusion volume/core infarct volume >1.8. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy is recommended for patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. A meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials recently published in the Lancet found that ischemic stroke at 4.5 to 9 hours of onset or wake stroke was consistent with a core infarct volume <70mL, a penumbra volume >10mL, and a hypoperfusion volume/core infarct volume >1.2. Benefit from intravenous thrombolytic therapy (3 month mRS 0-1 ratio, thrombolytic vs non-thrombolytic: 36% vs 29%). It was also strongly recommended by 2021 ESO guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
For these reasons the investigators hypothesize that endovacular thrombectomy bridging with intravenous thrombolysis is superior to direct thrombectomy in patients of stroke at 4.5 to 9 hours, guided with perfusion imaging.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic
- Being tested
- Intravenous thrombolysis agents, endovascular thrombectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous thrombolysis agentsDrug
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA,alteplase) or TNK-tPA (Tenecteplase,Metalyse)
endovascular thrombectomyProcedure or surgery
endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with nonspecific device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Intravenous thrombolysis agents; Procedure: endovascular thrombectomy |
| Direct endovascular thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: endovascular thrombectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Good clinical outcome
Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 (mRS is short for modified ranking score, with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 6. Higher score means a worse outcome.)
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Secondary outcomes (8)
Mortality
Mortality due to any cause
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift analysis
(mRS is short for National Institute of health stroke scale, with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 6. Higher score means a worse outcome.)
Measured: day 0 and 90 days after randomization
National Institute of Health Score Scale (NIHSS)
(NIHSS is short for modified ranking score, with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 42. Higher score means a worse outcome.)
Measured: day 0 and day 1 after randomization
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale
TICI is for "Thrombolysis in cerebral Infarction", with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 3. Higher score means a better reperfusion state.
Measured: day 0 and day 1 after randomization
Serious adverse events
Leading to death or prolonged hospitalisation
Measured: day 0 until 90 days after randomization
Intracranial hemorrhage
Hemorrhagic finding on CT or MRI
Measured: day 1 after randomization
Quality of life assessed by questionnaire
Include but not limited to the Barthelindex of ADL, which is the abbreviation of " activities of daily living", with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 100. Higher score means a worse outcome.
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Overall costs incurred during hospitalisation
include charges and expenses of every description
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Dec 2022
- Study start3 Dec 2022
- Primary completion28 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Stroke, Acute IschemicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Min Lou, Professor, Principal investigator, Zhejiang University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05634382
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HOPE-BRIDGING
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 14 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endovascular Thrombectomy With and Without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Large Vessel Anterior Circulation Stroke in Extended Time Window
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05634382
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HOPE-BRIDGING
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute Ischemic
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 222 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary hypothesis being tested in this trial is that ischemic stroke patients in large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation at 4.5 - 9 hours post onset of stroke will have improved clinical outcomes when given endovascular thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis compared with that of given direct endovascular thrombectomy alone.
Detailed description
A number of multicenter randomized controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the application of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. However, whether intravenous thrombolysis is necessary before endovascular therapy is still controversial. The combined trial data (including DEVT, DIRECT-MT, MR-CLEAN NO-IV and SKIP) assessing direct mechanical thrombectomy versus bridging therapy showed no difference in improving good functional outcome. However, a recent observational cohort study of 15832 patients treated with EVT, intravenous alteplase treatment was associated with better in-hospital survival and functional outcomes after adjusting for other covariates.
The 2019 AHA/ASA guidelines for the early management of patients with ischemic stroke states that mechanical thrombectomy is recommended for patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion within 6-24 hours of last known normal who meet the DWAN or DEFUSE-3 criteria (level I recommendation, level A evidence). The DEFUSE 3 perfusion-infarction core mismatch criteria is: core infarct volume <70mL, ischemic penumbra volume >15mL, and hypoperfusion volume/core infarct volume >1.8. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy is recommended for patients with ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. A meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials recently published in the Lancet found that ischemic stroke at 4.5 to 9 hours of onset or wake stroke was consistent with a core infarct volume <70mL, a penumbra volume >10mL, and a hypoperfusion volume/core infarct volume >1.2. Benefit from intravenous thrombolytic therapy (3 month mRS 0-1 ratio, thrombolytic vs non-thrombolytic: 36% vs 29%). It was also strongly recommended by 2021 ESO guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
For these reasons the investigators hypothesize that endovacular thrombectomy bridging with intravenous thrombolysis is superior to direct thrombectomy in patients of stroke at 4.5 to 9 hours, guided with perfusion imaging.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy | Experimental | Drug: Intravenous thrombolysis agents, Procedure: endovascular thrombectomy |
| Direct endovascular thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis | Active comparator | Procedure: endovascular thrombectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient/Legally Authorized Representative has signed the Informed Consent form
- Age ≥ 18
- Clinical signs consistent with an acute ischemic stroke
- Neurological deficit with a NIHSS of ≥ 6 (deficits judged to be clearly disabling at presentation)
- Patient is eligible for intravenous thrombolysis
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Acute intracranial hemorrhage
- Any contraindication for IV t-PA
- Pre-treatment with IV t-PA
- Pregnancy or lactating women. A negative pregnancy test before randomization is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
- Known (serious) sensitivity to radiographic contrast agents, nickel, titanium metals, or their alloys
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous thrombolysis agentsIntravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA,alteplase) or TNK-tPA (Tenecteplase,Metalyse) | Drug | Intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy |
| endovascular thrombectomyendovascular mechanical thrombectomy with nonspecific device | Procedure or surgery | Direct endovascular thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis, Intravenous thrombolysis bridging with endovascular thrombectomy |
Primary outcome
Good clinical outcome
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Score in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 (mRS is short for modified ranking score, with minimum value of 0 and maximum value of 6. Higher score means a worse outcome.)
8 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift analysis
Time frame: day 0 and 90 days after randomization
National Institute of Health Score Scale (NIHSS)
Time frame: day 0 and day 1 after randomization
Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) scale
Time frame: day 0 and day 1 after randomization
Serious adverse events
Time frame: day 0 until 90 days after randomization
Intracranial hemorrhage
Time frame: day 1 after randomization
Quality of life assessed by questionnaire
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Overall costs incurred during hospitalisation
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Feb 2023.
Related trials for Stroke, Acute Ischemic
RecruitingObservational study
Continuous Dual Aspiration Technique With Zoom System for Stroke
Ischemic Stroke, Acute Stroke
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial With Blinded Endpoint Assessment of Early Tirofiban After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Phase II/III Clinical Study of SIM0811 in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Min Lou, Professor principal investigator
Zhejiang University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Intravenous thrombolysis agents and endovascular thrombectomy in people with Stroke, Acute Ischemic, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yi Chen, Doctor (08657113588187112, ileen@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Good clinical outcome (time frame: 90 days after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.