AzTrials
AzTrials

Non Carious Cervical LesionNCT05635981

Effect of an Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer Application on the Class V Composite Restorations

A study testing Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions in people with Non Carious Cervical Lesion, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In restorative dentistry, to enhance bond strength between dentin and simplified adhesive systems, new materials or applications are constantly being developed all the time. In order to create a better hybrid layer quality, modifications are made to the chemical contents and application methods of the adhesives. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Non Carious Cervical Lesion
What is being tested?
Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Jan 2019to 1 Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 and over 18 years old
  • Having acceptable oral hygiene
  • Good general health
  • Having at least 20 teeth in occlusion
  • Presence of at least 4 non-carious cervical lesions in the mouth that require treatment
  • Lesions without caries
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patient's consent to come to control appointments
  • Vital and non-mobility of the tooth with the lesion
  • During occlusion, the tooth with the lesion is in contact with the antagonist tooth.

Who cannot join

  • Under 18 years old
  • Having poor oral hygiene
  • Poor general health condition
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding status
  • Orthodontic application in the last 3 months
  • The tooth with the lesion has pulpitis, mobility or it is non-vital
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Presence of advanced bruxism
  • The tooth with the lesion is a prosthetic abutment
  • Presence of advanced periodontitis or periodontal surgery in the last 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Istanbul University

    Istanbul, Fatih

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Effect of an Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer Application on the Clinical Performance of Class V Composite Restorations: an 18-month Randomized Clinical Trial

In restorative dentistry, to enhance bond strength between dentin and simplified adhesive systems, new materials or applications are constantly being developed all the time. In order to create a better hybrid layer quality, modifications are made to the chemical contents and application methods of the adhesives. For inhibition or slow down of collagen or resin matrix degradation at the adhesive interface, procedures like using protease enzyme inhibitors or additional hydrophobic layer applications are tested by in vitro and in vivo studies.

The main goal of this double-blind randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the 18-month clinical performances of two different one-step dentin adhesives that were applied alone or with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer to non-carious cervical lesions.

The hypotheses are that (1) Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive layer application can provide better clinical performance in class V restorations and, (2) the HEMA content will cause statistically different clinical performances.

Read the detailed description

In this study, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus (one-step self-etch adhesive), G-Premio Bond (Universal adhesive), Heliobond (additional hydrophobic adhesive), and Clearfil Majesty ES-2 (nano-hybrid composite) materials will be used. After performing selective etching with Scotchbond Universal Etchant, four different adhesive procedures will be applied according to manufacturers' instructions to the non-carious cervical lesions selected by the randomized method. In the first group Clearfil S3 Bond Plus, in the second group Clearfil S3 Bond Plus and additional hydrophobic adhesive layer (Heliobond), in the third group G-Premio Bond, in the fourth group, G-Premio Bond and additional hydrophobic adhesive layer (Heliobond) will be applied to the NCCL lesions. Restorations will be accomplished by using Clearfil Majesty ES-2 composite material. Restorations will be evaluated according to FDI criteria. Esthetic properties will be evaluated with surface luster, marginal staining, color match and translucency, esthetic anatomical form parameters. Functional properties will be evaluated with fracture and retention, and marginal adaptation parameters. Biological properties will be evaluated with post-operative sensitivity, periodontal response, and secondary caries parameters. Scores 1, 2, and 3 represent clinically acceptable restorations, and scores 4 and 5 represent clinically unacceptable restorations.

Being tested
Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Keywords
Non Carious Cervical Lesion, Additional Adhesive Layer Application, FDI Criteria, Class V Restorations, Split-Mouth Clinical Study

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical LesionsOther

    A restorative treatment method that is applied to non-carious cervical lesions using composite resin restoration after adhesive material application.

Study groups in NCT05635981
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Clearfil S3 Bond PlusActive comparatorAfter selective etching is applied to the enamel surface, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus is applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, restorations are completed with Clearfil Majesty ES-2. Clearfil S3 Bond Plus: one-step self-etch adhesive with HEMA
Receives: Other: Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions
Clearfil S3 Bond Plus with Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer ApplicationExperimentalAfter selective etching is applied to the enamel surface, Clearfil S3 Bond Plus is applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Heliobond is applied as an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer and restorations are completed with Clearfil Majesty ES-2. Clearfil S3 Bond Plus: one-step self-etch adhesive with HEMA Heliobond: hydrophobic adhesive with Bis-GMA and TEGDMA
Receives: Other: Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions
G-Premio BondActive comparatorAfter selective etching is applied to the enamel surface, G-Premio Bond is applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, restorations are completed with Clearfil Majesty ES-2. G-Premio Bond: universal adhesive without HEMA
Receives: Other: Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions
G-Premio Bond with Additional Hydrophobic Adhesive Layer ApplicationExperimentalAfter selective etching is applied to the enamel surface, G-Premio Bond is applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Heliobond is applied as an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer and restorations are completed with Clearfil Majesty ES-2. G-Premio Bond: universal adhesive without HEMA Heliobond: hydrophobic adhesive with Bis-GMA and TEGDMA
Receives: Other: Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fracture and Retention

    While scoring the fracture and retention parameters, restoration; If there is no fracture with a score of 1 if there are linear cracks with a score of 2 if there are large cracks and fractures that do not affect the marginal integrity and contact with a score of 3 if there are small fractures affecting the marginal integrity or contact or if there are fractures less than half the size of the restoration a score of 4 is a large part of the restoration or In case of losing all, it is evaluated with a score of 5.

    Measured: 18 month

  2. Surface Luster

    Restoration; A score of 1 if the surface's glossiness is at the same level as enamel, a score of 2 if there are opacity and pores that cannot be noticed from the speaking distance, an acceptable opacity when covered with saliva, or a score of 3 if more than 1/3 of the surface has pores, and a score of 4 if there is a roughness that cannot be masked with saliva and cannot be removed by polishing. If there is a roughness that causes plaque retention, it is evaluated with a score of 5.

    Measured: 18 month

  3. Marginal Staining

    It is scored as 1 if there is no discoloration on the marginal edges, 2 if there is discoloration that can be easily removed by polishing, 3 if there is moderate discoloration that cannot be accepted aesthetically, 4 if there is noticeable large discoloration that requires repair, and 5 if there is deep marginal discoloration that cannot be repaired.

    Measured: 18 month

  4. Marginal Adaptation

    If there is no gap at the marginal margins and the tooth tissue is compatible 1, if there is a small gap, line, fracture or step that can be removed by polishing, 2 if there are indentations, if there is a small gap that cannot be removed by polishing, if there is more than one marginal fracture or large indentations 3, if the dentin is exposed repair It is scored 4 if there are large openings, fractures, or indentations that require it, and 5 if there are large openings and irregularities where part of the restoration is lost.

    Measured: 18 month

  5. Color Match and Translucency

    While scoring the color match and translucency, the restoration and the tissue color are compatible with each other and there is no difference in translucency 1, if there are minor changes in color or translucency 2, if there is a clear but acceptable color difference (more opaque-translucent-light-dark) 3, at a level that can be corrected with repair and 4 if there is a significant color difference, and 5 if there is an unacceptable color difference.

    Measured: 18 month

  6. Esthetic Anatomical Form

    While scoring the aesthetic anatomical form, the form of the restoration is scored 1 if it is ideal, 2 if it is not ideal but will be ideal with a small intervention, 3 if it is not ideal but aesthetically acceptable, 4 if it is not aesthetically acceptable and repair is required, and 5 if it is unacceptable and needs to be changed.

    Measured: 18 month

  7. Periodontal Response

    During periodontal response scoring, if there is no plaque accumulation, pocket formation or inflammation in the restored tooth, 1, if there is a small amount of plaque accumulation and no inflammation and pocket formation, 2, if the papillary bleeding index increases by 1 point compared to the baseline, 3 if the papillary bleeding index increases by more than 1 point and periodontal bleeding index increases by more than 1 point It is scored 4 if there is an increase in the pocket more than 1 mm, and 5 if there is acute gingivitis or acute periodontitis.

    Measured: 18 month

  8. Post Operative Sensitivity

    Restoration; It is evaluated with a score of 1 if there is no sensitivity complaint, with a score of 2 if there is a small amount of sensitivity for a short time, and a score of 3 if the patient has no complaints and moderate sensitivity, with a score of 3 if there is hypersensitivity that does not require restoration replacement but requires repair, and a score of 4 if endodontic treatment is required.

    Measured: 18 month

  9. Secondary Caries

    Restoration; It is evaluated with a score of 1 if there is no caries formation, with a score of 2 if there is small and localized demineralization, and a score of 3 if there is demineralization in a large area that requires only precautions, and a score of 4 if there is cavitation that requires repair, and a score of 5 if there is a deep caries that cannot be repaired.

    Measured: 18 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2022
  2. Study start20 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05635981
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018/76
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
28 Oct 2022
Last updated
2 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clearfil Majesty ES-2 Resin Composit Application to Non-carious Cervical Lesions in people with Non Carious Cervical Lesion, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fracture and Retention (time frame: 18 month). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in