AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 2TreoMelNCT05636787

Clinical Trial Investigating the Chemotherapeutic Compound Treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in Myeloma Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan and Melphalan in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Clinical trial investigating the chemotherapeutic compound treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in myeloma patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
Treosulfan and Melphalan
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
6 Jun 2023to Apr 2028
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible are myeloma patients after standard first-line induction treatment. Additional induction regimens in refractory myeloma patients are allowed.
  • Patients must be considered fit for subsequent consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.
  • Patients must be aged 18-75 years.
  • Patients must have an ECOG <3.
  • Patients must have a creatinine clearance ≥35 ml/min.
  • Patients must have an LVEF ≥40% within three months prior to start of study HDCT.
  • Patients must have given voluntary written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with an uncontrolled acute infection.
  • Patients with a transplantation comorbidity index (HCTCI) > 6 points.
  • Patients with concurrent active malignant disease with the exception of basalioma/spinalioma of the skin or early-stage cervix carcinoma, or early-stage prostate cancer. Previous treatment for other malignancies (not listed above) must have been terminated at least 6 months before registration and no evidence of active disease may be documented since then.
  • Patients with major coagulopathy or bleeding disorder.
  • Patients with other medical conditions that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol or that would impair tolerance to therapy or prolong hematological recovery.
  • Lack of patient cooperation to allow study treatment as outlined in this protocol.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Known pregnancy or lactating female patients. The pregnancy test could be omitted from the screening visit and postponed to the study treatment if indicated (a pregnancy test in female patients of child-bearing potential is not mandatory since patients are already under induction chemotherapy or mobilization chemotherapy, and pregnancy was excluded before starting induction chemotherapy; if, however, a pregnancy test is clinically indicated, it can be done either during screening or before the start of study treatment).
  • Patient not willing to implement adequate contraceptive measures (hormonal treatment p.o. or i.m., intra-uterine surgical devices, or latex condoms) to avoid pregnancy during study treatment and for 12 additional months.
  • Use of any anti-cancer investigational agents within 14 days prior to the expected start of trial treatment.
  • Contraindications and hypersensitivity to any of the active chemotherapy compounds.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Thomas Pabst, Prof Dr. med contact

+41 31 632 84 30

thomas.pabst@insel.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Departement of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Berne

    Bern, 3010

    Thomas Pabst, MD, +41 31 632 84 30, thomas.pabst@insel.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Treosulfan and Melphalan With Melphalan Alone as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Myeloma Patients (TreoMel Trial)

Clinical trial investigating the chemotherapeutic compound treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in myeloma patients.

Read the detailed description

Background and rationale:

Due to demographic changes, multiple myeloma with its preferential manifestation in the elderly population exerts increasing incidence worldwide. Since decades, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan is the standard first-line consolidation option for patients with multiple myeloma considered fit for this approach. Nevertheless, subsequent relapse despite this intensive treatment is inevitable in most myeloma patients, emphasizing the unmet clinical need for improved conditioning strategies to further enhance the effect of HDCT treatment.

The Inselspital in Bern represents one of the largest European centers for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma, lymphoma and leukemia patients, and it is the largest center in Switzerland for ASCT, with more than 150 ASCT performed annually. In parallel, the transplant team at the Inselspital has a dedicated history of clinical trials aiming to further improve tolerance and efficacy of HDCT with ASCT.

In a previous randomized phase 2 study performed at the department of medical oncology of the Inselspital, the combination of the cytotoxic compound bendamustin in addition to the standard melphalan dose as a novel HDCT regimen before autologous transplantation in 120 myeloma patients has been explored and established. This approach was successful in terms of increased anti-myeloma efficacy, but the nephrotoxicity of high-dose bendamustin was relevant in a significant subset of patients. This fact, ultimately, led to the propose of a novel approach.

The present study aims to combine high-dose melphalan (Melphalan Ideogen) with treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen), a well established bifunctional alkylating agent. Treosulfan has a favorable toxicity profile, and it is used in patients with acute leukemias in the allogeneic transplant setting as a standard approach in an increasing number of centers. However, no study so far evaluated treosulfan combined with melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Consequently, this approach is unique and novel in patients with multiple myeloma in the autologous transplant setting.

Compared to the closely related (and more known) compound busulfan, treosulfan compares favorably in terms of decreased neurotoxicity (for busulfan, antiepileptic prophylaxis is necessary), and it does not cause irreversible hair loss, which is often observed after busulfan treatment. The team at the Inselspital performed a pilot study in 25 patients with relapsed myeloma undergoing second-line HDCT/ASCT therapy. Treosulfan (14 mg/m2 i.v. at days -4, -3, and -2) combined with standard dose melphalan (day -1) had promising anti-myeloma activity and was well tolerated as expected from the previous studies. Standardized measurement of treosulfan serum levels by mass spectrometry (Metabolomics, University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Bern) in these patients demonstrated consistent pharmacokinetic profiles with peak levels within the therapeutic range and with low interindividual differences. Consequently, no modifications of the treosulfan dosage were needed during these initial experiences. With the clinical trial outlined in this protocol, the study team aim to gain insights into the use of treosulfan as part of the high-dose chemotherapy regimen before ASCT in myeloma patients. The study will be performed as an open-label, randomized phase 2 study, involving multiple recruiting regional Swiss centers, with all high-dose treatments being performed at the University Hospital Inselspital Bern. Patients will first undergo standardized induction therapy (e.g. VRD regimen, with or without Daratumumab), followed by a 1:1 randomization to two treatment arms:

Arm B, the experimental ("TreoMel") arm, combines treosulfan at three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2. Arm A, the standard arm, comprises standard 200 mg/m2 melphalan ("Mel"), split into two days à 100 mg/m2.

The stem cell transplantation is identical in both arms, as is the post-transplant management.

In patients with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and ≥ 35 ml/min), the melphalan total dose will be lowered to 140 mg/m2, split into two doses at 70 mg/m2. Treosulfan will be administered in a dosage of 14 mg/m2 i.v. on days -5, -4, and -3 in Arm A ("TreoMel"). The autologous cells will be transfused on day 0.

Patients will be stratified 1) according to the myeloma remission status as assessed based on the last available remission status: complete (CR) and very good partial remission (VGPR) versus partial remission (PR), minimal remission (MR), no change (NC) and progressive disease (PD); and 2) according to renal function: Renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min versus < 50 ml/min.

Based on a previous cohort of 122 myeloma patients at the Inselspital (2010-2013), a CR1 rate in the standard (Mel) arm of 50% is anticipate.

The primary endpoint is to show an improvement of the CR rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) in the standard arm A using melphalan only ("Mel") from 50% to 65% in the experimental arm B combining treosulfan and melphalan ("TreoMel").

Therefore, the study is considered successful if the experimental treosulfan/melphalan arm is superior by 15% points. With a statistical power of 80% and one-tailed significance level of 5%, 60 patients are required for cohorts A and B each. Thus, the total number of patients for the trial needed amounts to 120 patients. As the yearly number of myeloma patients undergoing HDCT/ASCT therapy at the Inselspital Bern is close to 80 patients, the recruitment of a sufficient number of patients in the planned study duration of 36 months appears feasible.

Patients can be included with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma after standard first-line induction therapy, commonly being the VRD regimen with or without additional daratumumab. In the case of refractory myeloma, one or several additional alternative induction regimens can be applied before the study treatment. Further preconditions are clinical fitness for HDCT/ASCT and age of at least 18 years, ECOG less than 3, and creatinine clearance of at least 35 mL/min or more (for additional incl./excl. criteria see the entire protocol).

The measurement of the endpoints of the study will be as follows: Primary endpoint is the complete remission (CR) rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) following measurement of myeloma parameters in the peripheral blood including M-gradient, quantitative immunoglobulins, kappa/lambda light chain ratio, and immunofixation. Secondary endpoints are: time to neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment, progression-free and overall survival, toxicities, infectious complications, hospitalization duration, minimal residual disease (MRD) load determined by next-generation immunophenotyping. Treosulfan serum levels will be assessed by pharmacokinetic drug monitoring based on mass spectrometry. Bone marrow punction for defining the response will be performed in all patients after neutrophil engraftment before hospital discharge around 15 days after ASCT. Bone marrow analyses comprise cytomorphology, histopathology, and flow cytometry at a sensitivity level of 10(-5) for MRD assessment.

The trial will be performed at the Department of Oncology at the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern. The CTU of the University of Bern will perform the on-site monitoring of the study.

Being tested
Treosulfan, Melphalan
Keywords
Multiple Myeloma, Melphalan, Treosulfan
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TreosulfanDrug

    Efficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan

  • MelphalanDrug

    Efficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan

Study groups in NCT05636787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm B - TreoMelExperimentalChemotherapy regime consisting of treosulfan on three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2.
Receives: Drug: Treosulfan; Drug: Melphalan
Arm A - MelActive comparatorChemotherapy regime consisting of 200 mg/m2 melphalan, split into two days à 100 mg/m2.
Receives: Drug: Melphalan

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete Remission (CR) Rate

    Number of patients experiencing CR ( Myeloma assessment (serum free light chain ratio, M-gradient, IgG, IgA, IgM), Flow cytometry MRD, FISH analysis (plasma), Bone marrow (aspirate and biopsy) is performed only in patients fulfilling the criteria for CR. Bone marrow should be assessed at the end of the ASCT hospitalization)

    Measured: 15 days after ASCT

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Adverse Events

    Number of patient experiencing toxicity (Assessment of CTCAE V5.0 highest toxicity score observed for toxicities of at least grade 3)

    Measured: 15 days after ASCT

  2. Infectious complications

    Number of patients experiencing infectious complications

    Measured: 15 days after ASCT

  3. Engraftment and hematologic recovery

    Number of days until neutrophils recovery 0.5 G/L (from day -5) and platelet recovery 20 G/L

    Measured: 15 days after ASCT

  4. Renal toxicity

    Number of patients experiencing renal toxicity (>1.5-3.0 x baseline)

    Measured: 15 days after ASCT

  5. Overall survival

    Days from ASCT until death of any cause or date of last follow-up

    Measured: 5 years

  6. Progression free survival

    Days from ASCT until first recurrence of myeloma or date of last follow-up

    Measured: 5 years

  7. Hospitalisation duration

    Days staying in hospital

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Minimal residual disease (MDR)

    Assessed by flow cytometry from bone marrow samples

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan

    Assessed by mass spectrometry

    Measured: Day -4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2022
  2. Study start6 Jun 2023
  3. Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized prospective non-blinded clinical phase II trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05636787
Sponsor's protocol ID
TreoMel Trial
Acronym
TreoMel
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
23 Nov 2022
Last updated
8 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan and Melphalan in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Thomas Pabst, Prof Dr. med (+41 31 632 84 30, thomas.pabst@insel.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete Remission (CR) Rate (time frame: 15 days after ASCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in