Multiple MyelomaPhase 2TreoMelNCT05636787
Clinical Trial Investigating the Chemotherapeutic Compound Treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in Myeloma Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan and Melphalan in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Clinical trial investigating the chemotherapeutic compound treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in myeloma patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Treosulfan and Melphalan
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2023to Apr 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible are myeloma patients after standard first-line induction treatment. Additional induction regimens in refractory myeloma patients are allowed.
- Patients must be considered fit for subsequent consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.
- Patients must be aged 18-75 years.
- Patients must have an ECOG <3.
- Patients must have a creatinine clearance ≥35 ml/min.
- Patients must have an LVEF ≥40% within three months prior to start of study HDCT.
- Patients must have given voluntary written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with an uncontrolled acute infection.
- Patients with a transplantation comorbidity index (HCTCI) > 6 points.
- Patients with concurrent active malignant disease with the exception of basalioma/spinalioma of the skin or early-stage cervix carcinoma, or early-stage prostate cancer. Previous treatment for other malignancies (not listed above) must have been terminated at least 6 months before registration and no evidence of active disease may be documented since then.
- Patients with major coagulopathy or bleeding disorder.
- Patients with other medical conditions that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol or that would impair tolerance to therapy or prolong hematological recovery.
- Lack of patient cooperation to allow study treatment as outlined in this protocol.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Known pregnancy or lactating female patients. The pregnancy test could be omitted from the screening visit and postponed to the study treatment if indicated (a pregnancy test in female patients of child-bearing potential is not mandatory since patients are already under induction chemotherapy or mobilization chemotherapy, and pregnancy was excluded before starting induction chemotherapy; if, however, a pregnancy test is clinically indicated, it can be done either during screening or before the start of study treatment).
- Patient not willing to implement adequate contraceptive measures (hormonal treatment p.o. or i.m., intra-uterine surgical devices, or latex condoms) to avoid pregnancy during study treatment and for 12 additional months.
- Use of any anti-cancer investigational agents within 14 days prior to the expected start of trial treatment.
- Contraindications and hypersensitivity to any of the active chemotherapy compounds.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Departement of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Berne
Bern, 3010
Thomas Pabst, MD, +41 31 632 84 30, thomas.pabst@insel.ch
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Treosulfan and Melphalan With Melphalan Alone as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Myeloma Patients (TreoMel Trial)
Clinical trial investigating the chemotherapeutic compound treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in myeloma patients.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale:
Due to demographic changes, multiple myeloma with its preferential manifestation in the elderly population exerts increasing incidence worldwide. Since decades, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan is the standard first-line consolidation option for patients with multiple myeloma considered fit for this approach. Nevertheless, subsequent relapse despite this intensive treatment is inevitable in most myeloma patients, emphasizing the unmet clinical need for improved conditioning strategies to further enhance the effect of HDCT treatment.
The Inselspital in Bern represents one of the largest European centers for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma, lymphoma and leukemia patients, and it is the largest center in Switzerland for ASCT, with more than 150 ASCT performed annually. In parallel, the transplant team at the Inselspital has a dedicated history of clinical trials aiming to further improve tolerance and efficacy of HDCT with ASCT.
In a previous randomized phase 2 study performed at the department of medical oncology of the Inselspital, the combination of the cytotoxic compound bendamustin in addition to the standard melphalan dose as a novel HDCT regimen before autologous transplantation in 120 myeloma patients has been explored and established. This approach was successful in terms of increased anti-myeloma efficacy, but the nephrotoxicity of high-dose bendamustin was relevant in a significant subset of patients. This fact, ultimately, led to the propose of a novel approach.
The present study aims to combine high-dose melphalan (Melphalan Ideogen) with treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen), a well established bifunctional alkylating agent. Treosulfan has a favorable toxicity profile, and it is used in patients with acute leukemias in the allogeneic transplant setting as a standard approach in an increasing number of centers. However, no study so far evaluated treosulfan combined with melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Consequently, this approach is unique and novel in patients with multiple myeloma in the autologous transplant setting.
Compared to the closely related (and more known) compound busulfan, treosulfan compares favorably in terms of decreased neurotoxicity (for busulfan, antiepileptic prophylaxis is necessary), and it does not cause irreversible hair loss, which is often observed after busulfan treatment. The team at the Inselspital performed a pilot study in 25 patients with relapsed myeloma undergoing second-line HDCT/ASCT therapy. Treosulfan (14 mg/m2 i.v. at days -4, -3, and -2) combined with standard dose melphalan (day -1) had promising anti-myeloma activity and was well tolerated as expected from the previous studies. Standardized measurement of treosulfan serum levels by mass spectrometry (Metabolomics, University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Bern) in these patients demonstrated consistent pharmacokinetic profiles with peak levels within the therapeutic range and with low interindividual differences. Consequently, no modifications of the treosulfan dosage were needed during these initial experiences. With the clinical trial outlined in this protocol, the study team aim to gain insights into the use of treosulfan as part of the high-dose chemotherapy regimen before ASCT in myeloma patients. The study will be performed as an open-label, randomized phase 2 study, involving multiple recruiting regional Swiss centers, with all high-dose treatments being performed at the University Hospital Inselspital Bern. Patients will first undergo standardized induction therapy (e.g. VRD regimen, with or without Daratumumab), followed by a 1:1 randomization to two treatment arms:
Arm B, the experimental ("TreoMel") arm, combines treosulfan at three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2. Arm A, the standard arm, comprises standard 200 mg/m2 melphalan ("Mel"), split into two days à 100 mg/m2.
The stem cell transplantation is identical in both arms, as is the post-transplant management.
In patients with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and ≥ 35 ml/min), the melphalan total dose will be lowered to 140 mg/m2, split into two doses at 70 mg/m2. Treosulfan will be administered in a dosage of 14 mg/m2 i.v. on days -5, -4, and -3 in Arm A ("TreoMel"). The autologous cells will be transfused on day 0.
Patients will be stratified 1) according to the myeloma remission status as assessed based on the last available remission status: complete (CR) and very good partial remission (VGPR) versus partial remission (PR), minimal remission (MR), no change (NC) and progressive disease (PD); and 2) according to renal function: Renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min versus < 50 ml/min.
Based on a previous cohort of 122 myeloma patients at the Inselspital (2010-2013), a CR1 rate in the standard (Mel) arm of 50% is anticipate.
The primary endpoint is to show an improvement of the CR rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) in the standard arm A using melphalan only ("Mel") from 50% to 65% in the experimental arm B combining treosulfan and melphalan ("TreoMel").
Therefore, the study is considered successful if the experimental treosulfan/melphalan arm is superior by 15% points. With a statistical power of 80% and one-tailed significance level of 5%, 60 patients are required for cohorts A and B each. Thus, the total number of patients for the trial needed amounts to 120 patients. As the yearly number of myeloma patients undergoing HDCT/ASCT therapy at the Inselspital Bern is close to 80 patients, the recruitment of a sufficient number of patients in the planned study duration of 36 months appears feasible.
Patients can be included with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma after standard first-line induction therapy, commonly being the VRD regimen with or without additional daratumumab. In the case of refractory myeloma, one or several additional alternative induction regimens can be applied before the study treatment. Further preconditions are clinical fitness for HDCT/ASCT and age of at least 18 years, ECOG less than 3, and creatinine clearance of at least 35 mL/min or more (for additional incl./excl. criteria see the entire protocol).
The measurement of the endpoints of the study will be as follows: Primary endpoint is the complete remission (CR) rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) following measurement of myeloma parameters in the peripheral blood including M-gradient, quantitative immunoglobulins, kappa/lambda light chain ratio, and immunofixation. Secondary endpoints are: time to neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment, progression-free and overall survival, toxicities, infectious complications, hospitalization duration, minimal residual disease (MRD) load determined by next-generation immunophenotyping. Treosulfan serum levels will be assessed by pharmacokinetic drug monitoring based on mass spectrometry. Bone marrow punction for defining the response will be performed in all patients after neutrophil engraftment before hospital discharge around 15 days after ASCT. Bone marrow analyses comprise cytomorphology, histopathology, and flow cytometry at a sensitivity level of 10(-5) for MRD assessment.
The trial will be performed at the Department of Oncology at the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern. The CTU of the University of Bern will perform the on-site monitoring of the study.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Treosulfan, Melphalan
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Melphalan, Treosulfan
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TreosulfanDrug
Efficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan
MelphalanDrug
Efficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm B - TreoMel | Experimental | Chemotherapy regime consisting of treosulfan on three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2. Receives: Drug: Treosulfan; Drug: Melphalan |
| Arm A - Mel | Active comparator | Chemotherapy regime consisting of 200 mg/m2 melphalan, split into two days à 100 mg/m2. Receives: Drug: Melphalan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Number of patients experiencing CR ( Myeloma assessment (serum free light chain ratio, M-gradient, IgG, IgA, IgM), Flow cytometry MRD, FISH analysis (plasma), Bone marrow (aspirate and biopsy) is performed only in patients fulfilling the criteria for CR. Bone marrow should be assessed at the end of the ASCT hospitalization)
Measured: 15 days after ASCT
Secondary outcomes (9)
Adverse Events
Number of patient experiencing toxicity (Assessment of CTCAE V5.0 highest toxicity score observed for toxicities of at least grade 3)
Measured: 15 days after ASCT
Infectious complications
Number of patients experiencing infectious complications
Measured: 15 days after ASCT
Engraftment and hematologic recovery
Number of days until neutrophils recovery 0.5 G/L (from day -5) and platelet recovery 20 G/L
Measured: 15 days after ASCT
Renal toxicity
Number of patients experiencing renal toxicity (>1.5-3.0 x baseline)
Measured: 15 days after ASCT
Overall survival
Days from ASCT until death of any cause or date of last follow-up
Measured: 5 years
Progression free survival
Days from ASCT until first recurrence of myeloma or date of last follow-up
Measured: 5 years
Hospitalisation duration
Days staying in hospital
Measured: 30 days
Minimal residual disease (MDR)
Assessed by flow cytometry from bone marrow samples
Measured: 30 days
Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan
Assessed by mass spectrometry
Measured: Day -4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Dec 2022
- Study start6 Jun 2023
- Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized prospective non-blinded clinical phase II trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thomas Pabst, Prof Dr. med, Study chair, Department for Medical Oncology; University Hospital/Inselspital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05636787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TreoMel Trial
- Acronym
- TreoMel
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Treosulfan and Melphalan With Melphalan Alone as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Myeloma Patients (TreoMel Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05636787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TreoMel / TreoMel Trial
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Melphalan, Treosulfan
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical trial investigating the chemotherapeutic compound treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen) in myeloma patients.
Detailed description
Background and rationale:
Due to demographic changes, multiple myeloma with its preferential manifestation in the elderly population exerts increasing incidence worldwide. Since decades, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan is the standard first-line consolidation option for patients with multiple myeloma considered fit for this approach. Nevertheless, subsequent relapse despite this intensive treatment is inevitable in most myeloma patients, emphasizing the unmet clinical need for improved conditioning strategies to further enhance the effect of HDCT treatment.
The Inselspital in Bern represents one of the largest European centers for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in myeloma, lymphoma and leukemia patients, and it is the largest center in Switzerland for ASCT, with more than 150 ASCT performed annually. In parallel, the transplant team at the Inselspital has a dedicated history of clinical trials aiming to further improve tolerance and efficacy of HDCT with ASCT.
In a previous randomized phase 2 study performed at the department of medical oncology of the Inselspital, the combination of the cytotoxic compound bendamustin in addition to the standard melphalan dose as a novel HDCT regimen before autologous transplantation in 120 myeloma patients has been explored and established. This approach was successful in terms of increased anti-myeloma efficacy, but the nephrotoxicity of high-dose bendamustin was relevant in a significant subset of patients. This fact, ultimately, led to the propose of a novel approach.
The present study aims to combine high-dose melphalan (Melphalan Ideogen) with treosulfan (Trecondi® Ideogen), a well established bifunctional alkylating agent. Treosulfan has a favorable toxicity profile, and it is used in patients with acute leukemias in the allogeneic transplant setting as a standard approach in an increasing number of centers. However, no study so far evaluated treosulfan combined with melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma. Consequently, this approach is unique and novel in patients with multiple myeloma in the autologous transplant setting.
Compared to the closely related (and more known) compound busulfan, treosulfan compares favorably in terms of decreased neurotoxicity (for busulfan, antiepileptic prophylaxis is necessary), and it does not cause irreversible hair loss, which is often observed after busulfan treatment. The team at the Inselspital performed a pilot study in 25 patients with relapsed myeloma undergoing second-line HDCT/ASCT therapy. Treosulfan (14 mg/m2 i.v. at days -4, -3, and -2) combined with standard dose melphalan (day -1) had promising anti-myeloma activity and was well tolerated as expected from the previous studies. Standardized measurement of treosulfan serum levels by mass spectrometry (Metabolomics, University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Bern) in these patients demonstrated consistent pharmacokinetic profiles with peak levels within the therapeutic range and with low interindividual differences. Consequently, no modifications of the treosulfan dosage were needed during these initial experiences. With the clinical trial outlined in this protocol, the study team aim to gain insights into the use of treosulfan as part of the high-dose chemotherapy regimen before ASCT in myeloma patients. The study will be performed as an open-label, randomized phase 2 study, involving multiple recruiting regional Swiss centers, with all high-dose treatments being performed at the University Hospital Inselspital Bern. Patients will first undergo standardized induction therapy (e.g. VRD regimen, with or without Daratumumab), followed by a 1:1 randomization to two treatment arms:
Arm B, the experimental ("TreoMel") arm, combines treosulfan at three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2. Arm A, the standard arm, comprises standard 200 mg/m2 melphalan ("Mel"), split into two days à 100 mg/m2.
The stem cell transplantation is identical in both arms, as is the post-transplant management.
In patients with reduced renal function (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and ≥ 35 ml/min), the melphalan total dose will be lowered to 140 mg/m2, split into two doses at 70 mg/m2. Treosulfan will be administered in a dosage of 14 mg/m2 i.v. on days -5, -4, and -3 in Arm A ("TreoMel"). The autologous cells will be transfused on day 0.
Patients will be stratified 1) according to the myeloma remission status as assessed based on the last available remission status: complete (CR) and very good partial remission (VGPR) versus partial remission (PR), minimal remission (MR), no change (NC) and progressive disease (PD); and 2) according to renal function: Renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min versus < 50 ml/min.
Based on a previous cohort of 122 myeloma patients at the Inselspital (2010-2013), a CR1 rate in the standard (Mel) arm of 50% is anticipate.
The primary endpoint is to show an improvement of the CR rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) in the standard arm A using melphalan only ("Mel") from 50% to 65% in the experimental arm B combining treosulfan and melphalan ("TreoMel").
Therefore, the study is considered successful if the experimental treosulfan/melphalan arm is superior by 15% points. With a statistical power of 80% and one-tailed significance level of 5%, 60 patients are required for cohorts A and B each. Thus, the total number of patients for the trial needed amounts to 120 patients. As the yearly number of myeloma patients undergoing HDCT/ASCT therapy at the Inselspital Bern is close to 80 patients, the recruitment of a sufficient number of patients in the planned study duration of 36 months appears feasible.
Patients can be included with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma after standard first-line induction therapy, commonly being the VRD regimen with or without additional daratumumab. In the case of refractory myeloma, one or several additional alternative induction regimens can be applied before the study treatment. Further preconditions are clinical fitness for HDCT/ASCT and age of at least 18 years, ECOG less than 3, and creatinine clearance of at least 35 mL/min or more (for additional incl./excl. criteria see the entire protocol).
The measurement of the endpoints of the study will be as follows: Primary endpoint is the complete remission (CR) rate after ASCT (before initiation of maintenance treatment) following measurement of myeloma parameters in the peripheral blood including M-gradient, quantitative immunoglobulins, kappa/lambda light chain ratio, and immunofixation. Secondary endpoints are: time to neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment, progression-free and overall survival, toxicities, infectious complications, hospitalization duration, minimal residual disease (MRD) load determined by next-generation immunophenotyping. Treosulfan serum levels will be assessed by pharmacokinetic drug monitoring based on mass spectrometry. Bone marrow punction for defining the response will be performed in all patients after neutrophil engraftment before hospital discharge around 15 days after ASCT. Bone marrow analyses comprise cytomorphology, histopathology, and flow cytometry at a sensitivity level of 10(-5) for MRD assessment.
The trial will be performed at the Department of Oncology at the Inselspital, University Hospital Bern. The CTU of the University of Bern will perform the on-site monitoring of the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized prospective non-blinded clinical phase II trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm B - TreoMel | Experimental | Drug: Treosulfan, Drug: MelphalanChemotherapy regime consisting of treosulfan on three days at 14 g/m2 followed by 200 mg/m2 melphalan given on two days at 100 mg/m2. |
| Arm A - Mel | Active comparator | Drug: MelphalanChemotherapy regime consisting of 200 mg/m2 melphalan, split into two days à 100 mg/m2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Eligible are myeloma patients after standard first-line induction treatment. Additional induction regimens in refractory myeloma patients are allowed.
- Patients must be considered fit for subsequent consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation.
- Patients must be aged 18-75 years.
- Patients must have an ECOG <3.
- Patients must have a creatinine clearance ≥35 ml/min.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients with an uncontrolled acute infection.
- Patients with a transplantation comorbidity index (HCTCI) > 6 points.
- Patients with concurrent active malignant disease with the exception of basalioma/spinalioma of the skin or early-stage cervix carcinoma, or early-stage prostate cancer. Previous treatment for other malignancies (not listed above) must have been terminated at least 6 months before registration and no evidence of active disease may be documented since then.
- Patients with major coagulopathy or bleeding disorder.
- Patients with other medical conditions that could potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to this protocol or that would impair tolerance to therapy or prolong hematological recovery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TreosulfanEfficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan | Drug | Arm B - TreoMel |
| MelphalanEfficacy of standard treatment melphalan will be compared to the combination melphalan with treosulfan | Drug | Arm A - Mel, Arm B - TreoMel |
Primary outcome
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Time frame: 15 days after ASCT
Number of patients experiencing CR ( Myeloma assessment (serum free light chain ratio, M-gradient, IgG, IgA, IgM), Flow cytometry MRD, FISH analysis (plasma), Bone marrow (aspirate and biopsy) is performed only in patients fulfilling the criteria for CR. Bone marrow should be assessed at the end of the ASCT hospitalization)
9 secondary outcomes
Adverse Events
Time frame: 15 days after ASCT
Infectious complications
Time frame: 15 days after ASCT
Engraftment and hematologic recovery
Time frame: 15 days after ASCT
Renal toxicity
Time frame: 15 days after ASCT
Overall survival
Time frame: 5 years
Progression free survival
Time frame: 5 years
Hospitalisation duration
Time frame: 30 days
Minimal residual disease (MDR)
Time frame: 30 days
Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan
Time frame: Day -4
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Thomas Pabst, Prof Dr. med study chair
Department for Medical Oncology; University Hospital/Inselspital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Treosulfan and Melphalan in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Thomas Pabst, Prof Dr. med (+41 31 632 84 30, thomas.pabst@insel.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete Remission (CR) Rate (time frame: 15 days after ASCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2024.