Children, OnlyNCT05637918
Ultrasound for Prediction of Empty Stomach in Infants
An observational study of Children, Only and Pulmonary Aspiration, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 24 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Children, Only, Pulmonary Aspiration, Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) and Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2021to 30 Jun 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Day
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 24 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: Infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy
Who may be able to join
- All infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy under general anesthesia and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I -II, were included in this study
Who cannot join
- Parental refusal
- Previous lower esophageal or gastric surgery
- Non-adherence with the fasting regimen
- More than 5 minutes between gastric sonography and endoscopy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Relationship Between Gastric Ultrasound Findings and Endoscopically Aspirated Volume in Infants and Determination of Antral Cut-off Value for the Diagnosis of Empty Stomach
Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Ultrasound examination of the gastric antrum is increasingly used and is emerging as a valuable perioperative noninvasive tool for the indirect assessment of gastric volumes in children. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum measured by gastric ultrasound and gastric volumes suctioned endoscopically, also to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age.
Read the detailed description
Protocol: This study was performed in Pediatric Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy Unit after receiving Institutional Ethics Board approval. Following induction of anaesthesia, antral sonography was performed in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions in 46 fasted infants prior to upper GI endoscopic evaluation. Antral CSA measurements in both positions and the qualitative evaluation of the antrum (according to the 3-point grading system) were recorded. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position. The calculation of the antral CSA was performed by measuring the longitudinal diameter (D1) and the antero-posterior diameter (D2) of the antrum at rest, between peristaltic contractions, from serosa to serosa. Cross-sectional area was calculated using the standard formula for surface area of an ellipse CSA= π x D1 x D2 / 4. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned and measured by a graduated specimen trap with 1 ml increments.
Sample size A sample of 23 from the positive group and 23 from the negative group achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0,2300 between the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) under the null hypothesis of ,5000 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0,7300 using a two-sided z-test at a significance level of 0,05000. The data are continuous responses. The AUC is computed between false positive rates of 0,000 and 1,000. The ratio of the standard deviation of the responses in the negative group to the standard deviation of the responses in the positive group is 1,000.
Statistical analysis:
All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for Windows Version 23.0 software. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [inter-quartile range (IQR); 25-75th percentile]. Categorical variables were shown as the number of patients and percentage (%). Whether the distributions of continuous variables were normal or not was determined by the Shapiro Wilks test. Correlations between continuous variables were given by Spearman Correlation Coefficient. Discriminative ability of the CSA was determined by ROC curve analysis. Optimal cut-off value was given by Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated at this point. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied to estimate CSA. The variables those p values <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in multiple regression model. The independent variables were determined as age, BMI and CSA-RLD. The adequacy of the established regression models was demonstrated by R2.
- Conditions
- Children, Only, Pulmonary Aspiration, Anesthesia, Fasting
- Being tested
- Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0), Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)
- Keywords
- Gastric ultrasound, Infant, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Empty stomach
- Medical subject headings
- Fasting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)Other
When the gastric contents were evaluated with the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the stomach was completely empty in Group 1 that patients who recorded as Grade 0.
Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)Other
When the gastric contents were evaluated with the endoscope, small volume of gastric clear fluid was visible and gastric content aspirated and measured in Group 2 that patients who recorded as Grade 1.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) | Patients whose antrum appears empty in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions by gastric ultrasound (Grade 0). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination.
The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2.
Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position.
Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position Receives: Other: Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) | |
| Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1) | Patients whose antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position by gastric ultrasound (Grade 1). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2.
Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position.
Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position Receives: Other: Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes
The investigators wanted to evaluate the correlation between sonographically measured gastric antral CSA in both supine and RLD positions, and gastric volume suctioned under direct endoscopic visualization in infants between 0-24 months age.
Measured: 30 minutes
The best cut-off value of CSA for an empty antrum
The investigators wanted to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for a truly empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age
Measured: 30 minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
A mathematical model for gastric volume estimation
The investigators wanted to generate a final predictive model for gastric volume estimation in infants.
Measured: 30 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2021
- Primary completion30 Jun 2022
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Children, OnlyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ankara City Hospital BilkentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Day
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Feyza Sever, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
- Investigators
- Feyza Sever, Principal investigator, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05637918
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2-21-490
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 14 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Relationship Between Gastric Ultrasound Findings and Endoscopically Aspirated Volume in Infants and Determination of Antral Cut-off Value for the Diagnosis of Empty Stomach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05637918
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2-21-490
- Conditions
- Children, Only, Pulmonary Aspiration, Anesthesia, Fasting
- Keywords
- Gastric ultrasound, Infant, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Empty stomach
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ankara City Hospital BilkentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Ultrasound examination of the gastric antrum is increasingly used and is emerging as a valuable perioperative noninvasive tool for the indirect assessment of gastric volumes in children. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum measured by gastric ultrasound and gastric volumes suctioned endoscopically, also to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age.
Detailed description
Protocol: This study was performed in Pediatric Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy Unit after receiving Institutional Ethics Board approval. Following induction of anaesthesia, antral sonography was performed in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions in 46 fasted infants prior to upper GI endoscopic evaluation. Antral CSA measurements in both positions and the qualitative evaluation of the antrum (according to the 3-point grading system) were recorded. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position. The calculation of the antral CSA was performed by measuring the longitudinal diameter (D1) and the antero-posterior diameter (D2) of the antrum at rest, between peristaltic contractions, from serosa to serosa. Cross-sectional area was calculated using the standard formula for surface area of an ellipse CSA= π x D1 x D2 / 4. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned and measured by a graduated specimen trap with 1 ml increments.
Sample size A sample of 23 from the positive group and 23 from the negative group achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0,2300 between the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) under the null hypothesis of ,5000 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0,7300 using a two-sided z-test at a significance level of 0,05000. The data are continuous responses. The AUC is computed between false positive rates of 0,000 and 1,000. The ratio of the standard deviation of the responses in the negative group to the standard deviation of the responses in the positive group is 1,000.
Statistical analysis:
All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for Windows Version 23.0 software. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [inter-quartile range (IQR); 25-75th percentile]. Categorical variables were shown as the number of patients and percentage (%). Whether the distributions of continuous variables were normal or not was determined by the Shapiro Wilks test. Correlations between continuous variables were given by Spearman Correlation Coefficient. Discriminative ability of the CSA was determined by ROC curve analysis. Optimal cut-off value was given by Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated at this point. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied to estimate CSA. The variables those p values <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in multiple regression model. The independent variables were determined as age, BMI and CSA-RLD. The adequacy of the established regression models was demonstrated by R2.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Day
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) | – | Other: Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)Patients whose antrum appears empty in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions by gastric ultrasound (Grade 0). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination. The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position |
| Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1) | – | Other: Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)Patients whose antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position by gastric ultrasound (Grade 1). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 24 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy under general anesthesia and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I -II, were included in this study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Parental refusal
- Previous lower esophageal or gastric surgery
- Non-adherence with the fasting regimen
- More than 5 minutes between gastric sonography and endoscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)When the gastric contents were evaluated with the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the stomach was completely empty in Group 1 that patients who recorded as Grade 0. | Other | Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) |
| Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)When the gastric contents were evaluated with the endoscope, small volume of gastric clear fluid was visible and gastric content aspirated and measured in Group 2 that patients who recorded as Grade 1. | Other | Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1) |
Primary outcome
The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes
Time frame: 30 minutes
The investigators wanted to evaluate the correlation between sonographically measured gastric antral CSA in both supine and RLD positions, and gastric volume suctioned under direct endoscopic visualization in infants between 0-24 months age.
The best cut-off value of CSA for an empty antrum
Time frame: 30 minutes
The investigators wanted to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for a truly empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age
1 secondary outcome
A mathematical model for gastric volume estimation
Time frame: 30 minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Dec 2022.
Related trials for Children, Only
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Provide Continued Access to Study Drug to Children and Adolescents Who Have Completed Clinical Studies Involving Gilead HIV Treatments
HIV-1-infection
RecruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Immunogenicity of the altSonflex1-2-3 Shigella Vaccine in African Children
Diarrhoea
RecruitingObservational study
Audiological Rehabilitation of Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss
Unilateral Hearing Loss
Recruiting
Mobility Performance in Daily Activities Among Children Wearing Spectacle Lenses
Myopia, Myopia Progression
RecruitingPhase 2
Entrectinib as a Single Agent in Upfront Therapy for Children <3 Years of Age With NTRK1/2/3 or ROS1-FUSED CNS Tumors
High Grade Glioma, CNS Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Feyza Sever principal investigator
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Children, Only and Pulmonary Aspiration, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes (time frame: 30 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2022.