AzTrials
AzTrials

Children, OnlyNCT05637918

Ultrasound for Prediction of Empty Stomach in Infants

An observational study of Children, Only and Pulmonary Aspiration, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 24 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Children, Only, Pulmonary Aspiration, Anesthesia
What is being tested?
Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0) and Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Nov 2021to 30 Jun 2022
How long will I take part?
1 Day
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 24 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy

Who may be able to join

  • All infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy under general anesthesia and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I -II, were included in this study

Who cannot join

  • Parental refusal
  • Previous lower esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Non-adherence with the fasting regimen
  • More than 5 minutes between gastric sonography and endoscopy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Feyza Sever

    Ankara, Çankaya, 06800

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Relationship Between Gastric Ultrasound Findings and Endoscopically Aspirated Volume in Infants and Determination of Antral Cut-off Value for the Diagnosis of Empty Stomach

Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Ultrasound examination of the gastric antrum is increasingly used and is emerging as a valuable perioperative noninvasive tool for the indirect assessment of gastric volumes in children. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum measured by gastric ultrasound and gastric volumes suctioned endoscopically, also to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age.

Read the detailed description

Protocol: This study was performed in Pediatric Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy Unit after receiving Institutional Ethics Board approval. Following induction of anaesthesia, antral sonography was performed in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions in 46 fasted infants prior to upper GI endoscopic evaluation. Antral CSA measurements in both positions and the qualitative evaluation of the antrum (according to the 3-point grading system) were recorded. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position. The calculation of the antral CSA was performed by measuring the longitudinal diameter (D1) and the antero-posterior diameter (D2) of the antrum at rest, between peristaltic contractions, from serosa to serosa. Cross-sectional area was calculated using the standard formula for surface area of an ellipse CSA= π x D1 x D2 / 4. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned and measured by a graduated specimen trap with 1 ml increments.

Sample size A sample of 23 from the positive group and 23 from the negative group achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0,2300 between the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) under the null hypothesis of ,5000 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0,7300 using a two-sided z-test at a significance level of 0,05000. The data are continuous responses. The AUC is computed between false positive rates of 0,000 and 1,000. The ratio of the standard deviation of the responses in the negative group to the standard deviation of the responses in the positive group is 1,000.

Statistical analysis:

All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for Windows Version 23.0 software. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [inter-quartile range (IQR); 25-75th percentile]. Categorical variables were shown as the number of patients and percentage (%). Whether the distributions of continuous variables were normal or not was determined by the Shapiro Wilks test. Correlations between continuous variables were given by Spearman Correlation Coefficient. Discriminative ability of the CSA was determined by ROC curve analysis. Optimal cut-off value was given by Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated at this point. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied to estimate CSA. The variables those p values <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in multiple regression model. The independent variables were determined as age, BMI and CSA-RLD. The adequacy of the established regression models was demonstrated by R2.

Being tested
Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0), Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)
Keywords
Gastric ultrasound, Infant, Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Empty stomach
Medical subject headings
Fasting

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)Other

    When the gastric contents were evaluated with the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the stomach was completely empty in Group 1 that patients who recorded as Grade 0.

  • Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)Other

    When the gastric contents were evaluated with the endoscope, small volume of gastric clear fluid was visible and gastric content aspirated and measured in Group 2 that patients who recorded as Grade 1.

Study groups in NCT05637918
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)Patients whose antrum appears empty in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions by gastric ultrasound (Grade 0). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination. The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position
Receives: Other: Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)
Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)Patients whose antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position by gastric ultrasound (Grade 1). Groups are classified according to the qualitative evaluation of the antrum by gastric sonographic examination The nature of the gastric contents (empty, clear liquid, dark liquid/solid) is established based on the qualitative findings by gastric antral ultrasonography. The qualitative evaluation of the antrum was recorded according to the 3-point grading system as Grade 0, Grade 1, and Grade 2. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD position. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position
Receives: Other: Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes

    The investigators wanted to evaluate the correlation between sonographically measured gastric antral CSA in both supine and RLD positions, and gastric volume suctioned under direct endoscopic visualization in infants between 0-24 months age.

    Measured: 30 minutes

  2. The best cut-off value of CSA for an empty antrum

    The investigators wanted to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for a truly empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age

    Measured: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. A mathematical model for gastric volume estimation

    The investigators wanted to generate a final predictive model for gastric volume estimation in infants.

    Measured: 30 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2022
  2. Study start1 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Day
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05637918
Sponsor's protocol ID
E2-21-490
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
24 Nov 2022
Last updated
14 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Children, Only and Pulmonary Aspiration, run by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes (time frame: 30 minutes). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in