CVVHNCT05638711
Built-in Calculator Optimizes Continuous Veno-venous Hemofiltration Prescription and Improves Therapeutic Quality in Critically-ill Acute Kidney Injury Patients
An observational study of CVVH and Filtration Fraction, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare in ICU patients received CVVH treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: Control of Filtration fraction by built-in calculator Reduced filter clotting and prolong filter lifespan Improve patient mortality Participants will divided into before group and after… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- CVVH, Filtration Fraction, Built-in Culculator
- What is being tested?
- Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fraction
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 1 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: ICU patients received CVVH during 2019~2021 (3 years) in our hospital, and excluded patients under age of 20, pregnant, or with HIV infection
Who may be able to join
- ICU patients received CVVH during 2019~2021 (3 years) in our hospital
Who cannot join
- under age of 20, pregnant, or with HIV infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The goal of this observational study is to compare in ICU patients received CVVH treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Control of Filtration fraction by built-in calculator
- Reduced filter clotting and prolong filter lifespan
- Improve patient mortality Participants will divided into before group and after group based on the day when built-in calculator for calculating Filtration fraction was utilized.
Researchers will compare before group to see if there were differences in clotting events, filter downtime, filter lifespan, mortality, etc.
Read the detailed description
# built-in calculator for calculating Filtration fraction
- The calculator was built in prescription system since 2020/10/01
- providing tempt filtration fraction for operators to adjust CVVH dose
- the protocol of patient care didn't change between before and after group.
- Conditions
- CVVH, Filtration Fraction, Built-in Culculator
- Being tested
- Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fraction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fractionDevice
A calculator built in electronic CVVH prescription system to calculate Filtration fraction
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Before group | * Patient: ICU patients received CVVH between 2019/01/01 - 2020/10/01 (before utilization of built-in calculator) * received regular protocol of ICU patient care (same in two groups) | |
| After group | * Patient: ICU patients received CVVH between 2020/10/01 - 2021/12/31 (after utilization of built-in calculator)
* received regular protocol of ICU patient care (same in two groups) Receives: Device: Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fraction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Patient death
Measured: 30 days, 60 days, "through study completion, an average of 1.5 year" mortality in ICU and in Hospital
Secondary outcomes (11)
Filter clotting events
Filter clotting events
Measured: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
Filter lifespan
average treatment time per filter
Measured: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
electrolytes_1
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_2
K
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_3
Ca
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_4
P
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
acid-base balance_1
pH
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
acid-base balance_2
bicarbonate
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
Filter downtime
downtime between filter replacement
Measured: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
others_1
body temperature
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
others_2
platelet
Measured: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2021
- Study completion1 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CVVHStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Taipei Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05638711
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- haomingwu
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: there is currently no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers
Publications
Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 22890468Davenport A. Continuous renal replacement therapies in patients with acute neurological injury. Semin Dial. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):165-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00548.x.
PubMed 19426422Rabindranath K, Adams J, Macleod AM, Muirhead N. Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD003773. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003773.pub3.
PubMed 17636735Wang AY, Bellomo R. Renal replacement therapy in the ICU: intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Dec;24(6):437-442. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000541.
PubMed 30247213Karkar A, Ronco C. Prescription of CRRT: a pathway to optimize therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-0648-y.
PubMed 32144519Tsujimoto Y, Fujii T. How to Prolong Filter Life During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy? Crit Care. 2022 Mar 22;26(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03910-8.
PubMed 35337352Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Nakata Y, Fujii T, Takahashi S, Akazawa M, Kataoka Y. Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 13;3(3):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub2.
PubMed 32164041Tsujimoto Y, Miki S, Shimada H, Tsujimoto H, Yasuda H, Kataoka Y, Fujii T. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD013330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013330.pub2.
PubMed 34519356Joannidis M, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care. 2007;11(4):218. doi: 10.1186/cc5937.
PubMed 17634148Cottle D, Mousdale S, Waqar-Uddin H, Tully R, Taylor B. Calculating evidence-based renal replacement therapy - Introducing an excel-based calculator to improve prescribing and delivery in renal replacement therapy - A before and after study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Feb;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1177/1751143715603383. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
PubMed 28979457Griffin BR, Thomson A, Yoder M, Francis I, Ambruso S, Bregman A, Feller M, Johnson-Bortolotto S, King C, Bonnes D, Dufficy L, Wu C, Bansal A, Tad-Y D, Faubel S, Jalal D. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Dec;74(6):727-735. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
PubMed 31540789Ruiz EF, Ortiz-Soriano VM, Talbott M, Klein BA, Thompson Bastin ML, Mayer KP, Price EB, Dorfman R, Adams BN, Fryman L, Neyra JA; University of Kentucky CRRT Quality Assurance Group. Development, implementation and outcomes of a quality assurance system for the provision of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76785-w.
PubMed 33244053Honore PM, Spapen HD. What a Clinician Should Know About a Renal Replacement Membrane? J Transl Int Med. 2018 Jun 26;6(2):62-65. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2018-0016. eCollection 2018 Jun. No abstract available.
PubMed 29984198Yessayan L, Yee J, Frinak S, Szamosfalvi B. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for the Management of Acid-Base and Electrolyte Imbalances in Acute Kidney Injury. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016 May;23(3):203-10. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.02.005.
PubMed 27113697Kraut JA, Madias NE. Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010 May;6(5):274-85. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2010.33. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
PubMed 20308999
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Built-in Calculator Optimizes Continuous Veno-venous Hemofiltration Prescription and Improves Therapeutic Quality in Critically-ill Acute Kidney Injury Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05638711
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- haomingwu
- Conditions
- CVVH, Filtration Fraction, Built-in Culculator
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to compare in ICU patients received CVVH treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Control of Filtration fraction by built-in calculator
- Reduced filter clotting and prolong filter lifespan
- Improve patient mortality Participants will divided into before group and after group based on the day when built-in calculator for calculating Filtration fraction was utilized.
Researchers will compare before group to see if there were differences in clotting events, filter downtime, filter lifespan, mortality, etc.
Detailed description
# built-in calculator for calculating Filtration fraction
- The calculator was built in prescription system since 2020/10/01
- providing tempt filtration fraction for operators to adjust CVVH dose
- the protocol of patient care didn't change between before and after group.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Before group | – | –* Patient: ICU patients received CVVH between 2019/01/01 - 2020/10/01 (before utilization of built-in calculator) * received regular protocol of ICU patient care (same in two groups) |
| After group | – | Device: Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fraction* Patient: ICU patients received CVVH between 2020/10/01 - 2021/12/31 (after utilization of built-in calculator) * received regular protocol of ICU patient care (same in two groups) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- ICU patients received CVVH during 2019~2021 (3 years) in our hospital, and excluded patients under age of 20, pregnant, or with HIV infection
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ICU patients received CVVH during 2019~2021 (3 years) in our hospital
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- under age of 20, pregnant, or with HIV infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Built-in calculator to calculate Filtration fractionA calculator built in electronic CVVH prescription system to calculate Filtration fraction | Device | After group |
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 30 days, 60 days, "through study completion, an average of 1.5 year" mortality in ICU and in Hospital
Patient death
11 secondary outcomes
Filter clotting events
Time frame: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
Filter lifespan
Time frame: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
electrolytes_1
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_2
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_3
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
electrolytes_4
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours, the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour)
acid-base balance_1
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
acid-base balance_2
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
Filter downtime
Time frame: "through the complete treatment course hours, an average of 24 hours"
others_1
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
others_2
Time frame: the last record received before CVVH (in an average of 1 hour before CVVH treatment), the first record received CVVH after 24 hours (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH treatment), the first record received after CVVH (in an average of 1 hour after CVVH)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 22890468Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 19426422Davenport A. Continuous renal replacement therapies in patients with acute neurological injury. Semin Dial. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):165-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00548.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 17636735Rabindranath K, Adams J, Macleod AM, Muirhead N. Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD003773. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003773.pub3.
- Results publication: PubMed 30247213Wang AY, Bellomo R. Renal replacement therapy in the ICU: intermittent hemodialysis, sustained low-efficiency dialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018 Dec;24(6):437-442. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000541.
- Results publication: PubMed 32144519Karkar A, Ronco C. Prescription of CRRT: a pathway to optimize therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-0648-y.
- Results publication: PubMed 35337352Tsujimoto Y, Fujii T. How to Prolong Filter Life During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy? Crit Care. 2022 Mar 22;26(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03910-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 32164041Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Nakata Y, Fujii T, Takahashi S, Akazawa M, Kataoka Y. Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 13;3(3):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 34519356Tsujimoto Y, Miki S, Shimada H, Tsujimoto H, Yasuda H, Kataoka Y, Fujii T. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD013330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013330.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 17634148Joannidis M, Oudemans-van Straaten HM. Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care. 2007;11(4):218. doi: 10.1186/cc5937.
- Results publication: PubMed 28979457Cottle D, Mousdale S, Waqar-Uddin H, Tully R, Taylor B. Calculating evidence-based renal replacement therapy - Introducing an excel-based calculator to improve prescribing and delivery in renal replacement therapy - A before and after study. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Feb;17(1):44-50. doi: 10.1177/1751143715603383. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 31540789Griffin BR, Thomson A, Yoder M, Francis I, Ambruso S, Bregman A, Feller M, Johnson-Bortolotto S, King C, Bonnes D, Dufficy L, Wu C, Bansal A, Tad-Y D, Faubel S, Jalal D. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Dec;74(6):727-735. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.06.013. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 33244053Ruiz EF, Ortiz-Soriano VM, Talbott M, Klein BA, Thompson Bastin ML, Mayer KP, Price EB, Dorfman R, Adams BN, Fryman L, Neyra JA; University of Kentucky CRRT Quality Assurance Group. Development, implementation and outcomes of a quality assurance system for the provision of continuous renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 26;10(1):20616. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76785-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. there is currently no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of CVVH and Filtration Fraction, run by Taipei Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 30 days, 60 days, "through study completion, an average of 1.5 year" mortality in ICU and in Hospital). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05638711, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2022.