Malignant Solid NeoplasmPhase 3ICE COMPRESSNCT05642611
Comparing Cooling and/or Compression Approaches of Limbs for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
A Phase 3 study testing Biospecimen Collection, Cryocompression Therapy and Pneumatic Compression Therapy in people with Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 36 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This phase III trial compares the effect of 3 study approaches in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: 1) cryocompression, 2) continuous compression, and 3) low cyclic compression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Biospecimen Collection, Cryocompression Therapy and Pneumatic Compression Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 777 participants
- Where
- 36 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2023to 30 Aug 2031
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must have a diagnosis of a solid tumor malignancy.
- Participants must be planning to begin neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with one of the protocol-specified chemotherapy regimens below for a solid tumor malignancy within 3 calendar days after randomization.
- Weekly paclitaxel x 12 consecutive weeks
- Weekly paclitaxel x 12 consecutive weeks + carboplatin (weekly x 12 consecutive weeks or every 3 weeks x 4 consecutive cycles)
- Paclitaxel + carboplatin every 3 weeks x 6 consecutive cycles without chemotherapy pause for surgery
- Docetaxel + carboplatin every 3 weeks x 6 consecutive cycles without chemotherapy pause for surgery NOTE: For any of the protocol-specified chemotherapy regimens, concurrent targeted therapy with biologic therapy is allowed. Pembrolizumab (or other immune checkpoint inhibitors), trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab, or bevacizumab are allowed.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Participant must be >= 18 years old.
- Participants must be offered the opportunity to participate in specimen banking. With participant consent, specimens must be collected and submitted via the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Specimen Tracking System.
- Participants must be able to complete Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires in English or Spanish.
- Participants must 1) agree to complete PROs at all scheduled assessments, and 2) complete the baseline PRO questionnaires within 14 days prior to randomization
- Participants must be informed of the investigational nature of this study and must sign and give informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines.
- For participants with impaired decision-making capabilities, legally authorized representatives may sign and give informed consent on behalf of study participants in accordance with applicable federal, local, and Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) regulations.
Who cannot join
- Participants must not have a history of skin or limb metastases.
- Participants must not have previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy for any reason (e.g., taxanes, platinum agents, vinca alkaloids, or bortezomib).
- Participants must not have pre-existing clinical peripheral neuropathy from any cause.
- Participants must not have a history of Raynaud's phenomenon, cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, post-traumatic cold dystrophy, or peripheral arterial ischemia.
- Participants must not have any open skin wounds or ulcers of the limbs at the time of randomization.
Trial locations and contacts
36 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
36 sites in 1 country
United States36 sites, 33 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Site Public Contact, 505-925-0348, HSC-ClinicalTrialInfo@salud.unm.edu
Bernard Tawfik
- Recruiting
Emory University Hospital/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Site Public Contact, 404-778-1868
Demetria Smith-Graziani
- Recruiting
University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Site Public Contact, gingerreeves@uabmc.edu
Nusrat Jahan
- Recruiting
Good Samaritan Hospital - Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
Site Public Contact, 720-874-1881, ResearchInstituteInquiries@CommonSpirit.org
Shahzad Siddique
- Recruiting
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital-Clinton Township
Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038
Site Public Contact, 313-916-3721, CTOResearch@hfhs.org
Dawn M. Severson
- Recruiting
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Site Public Contact, 313-916-3721, CTOResearch@hfhs.org
Dawn M. Severson
- Recruiting
STCC at DHR Health Institute for Research and Development
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Site Public Contact, 956-362-2390, dhrresearch@dhr-rgv.com
Jose Cruz
- Recruiting
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center-Fairfield
Fairfield, Connecticut, 06824
Site Public Contact, 203-785-5702, canceranswers@yale.edu
Maryam B. Lustberg
- Recruiting
McLeod Regional Medical Center
Florence, South Carolina, 29506
Site Public Contact, 843-777-0770, dorie.sturgill@mcleodhealth.org
Rajesh Bajaj
- Recruiting
Gibbs Cancer Center-Gaffney
Gaffney, South Carolina, 29341
Site Public Contact, 864-560-6104, kmertz-rivera@gibbscc.org
Isaac Alwine
- Recruiting
CaroMont Regional Medical Center
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
Site Public Contact, 704-834-2810, tammy.cozad@caromonthealth.org
Bolanle Gbadamosi
- Recruiting
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals - Butterworth Hospital
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Site Public Contact, 616-391-1230, crcwm-regulatory@crcwm.org
Kathleen Y. Butler
- Recruiting
Cone Health Cancer Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Site Public Contact, 336-832-0836, stacey.phelps@conehealth.com
Vinay K. Gudena
- Recruiting
Gibbs Cancer Center-Pelham
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Site Public Contact, 864-560-6104, kmertz-rivera@gibbscc.org
Isaac Alwine
- Recruiting
Margaret R Pardee Memorial Hospital
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28791
Site Public Contact, 828-696-4716, pardeecancerresearch@unchealth.unc.edu
John K. Hill
- Recruiting
Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96826
Site Public Contact, 808-983-6090
Christa Braun-Inglis
- Recruiting
Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Site Public Contact, 713-798-1354, burton@bcm.edu
Julie R. Nangia
- Recruiting
Regional Cancer Center at Johnson City Medical Center
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
Site Public Contact, 423-431-5654, charles.mays@balladhealth.org
Asheesh Shipstone
- Recruiting
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Site Public Contact, 913-588-3671, KUCC_Navigation@kumc.edu
Lauren Nye
- Recruiting
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center/Dartmouth Cancer Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Site Public Contact, 800-639-6918, cancer.research.nurse@dartmouth.edu
Elaine P. Kuhn
- Recruiting
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Site Public Contact, 859-260-6425
Arvinda Padmanabhan
- Suspended
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
Martinez, California, 94553-3156
- Recruiting
Bon Secours Saint Francis Medical Center
Midlothian, Virginia, 23114
Site Public Contact, 804-893-8978, anne_carmellat@bshsi.org
William J. Irvin
- Recruiting
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Site Public Contact, 203-785-5702, canceranswers@yale.edu
Maryam B. Lustberg
- Recruiting
NYP/Columbia University Medical Center/Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10032
Site Public Contact, 212-342-5162, cancerclinicaltrials@cumc.columbia.edu
Melissa K. Accordino
- Recruiting
University of Kansas Hospital-Indian Creek Campus
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
Site Public Contact, 913-588-3671, KUCC_Navigation@kumc.edu
Lauren Nye
- Recruiting
The Valley Hospital - Luckow Pavilion
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
Site Public Contact, 201-634-5792, clinicaltrialsresearch@valleyhealth.com
Eleonora Teplinsky
- Recruiting
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Site Public Contact, 401-444-1488
Stephanie L. Graff
- Recruiting
Valley Health System Ridgewood Campus
Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450
Site Public Contact, 201-634-5792, clinicaltrialsresearch@valleyhealth.com
Eleonora Teplinsky
- Suspended
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
- Recruiting
University of Washington Medical Center - Montlake
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Site Public Contact, 800-804-8824
Renata Urban
- Recruiting
Spartanburg Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Site Public Contact, 864-560-6104, kmertz-rivera@gibbscc.org
Isaac Alwine
- Active, not recruiting
State University of New York Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, 13210
- Recruiting
Smilow Cancer Hospital Care Center-Trumbull
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Site Public Contact, 203-785-5702, canceranswers@yale.edu
Maryam B. Lustberg
- Recruiting
SMC Center for Hematology Oncology Union
Union, South Carolina, 29379
Site Public Contact, 864-560-6104, kmertz-rivera@gibbscc.org
Isaac Alwine
- Recruiting
University of Kansas Hospital-Westwood Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
Site Public Contact, 913-588-3671, KUCC_Navigation@kumc.edu
Lauren Nye
About this study
Official title: Ice Compress: Randomized Trial of Limb Cryocompression Versus Continuous Compression Versus Low Cyclic Compression for the Prevention of Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
This phase III trial compares the effect of 3 study approaches in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: 1) cryocompression, 2) continuous compression, and 3) low cyclic compression. Taxane chemotherapy drugs, such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, can cause a nerve disorder called peripheral neuropathy, which can cause numbness, tingling, or pain in the arms and legs. The 3 study approaches will use a device, called the Paxman Limb Cryocompression System, made of wraps that cool and/or compress the arms and legs. This study may help researchers determine if any of the study approaches are able to prevent taxane chemotherapy from causing peripheral neuropathy.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) at 12 weeks, in participants treated with taxane-based chemotherapy randomized to cryocompression therapy versus continuous compression therapy versus low cyclic compression therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN.
II. To compare mean European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (EORTC-CIPN-20) sensory neuropathy subscale scores at 12 weeks by intervention study arm.
III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).
IV. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks in a sensitivity analysis with dropouts treated as failures.
- To compare rates of adverse events related to study device at 12 weeks (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other adverse events [AEs] as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) between the three interventions.
ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN separately at weeks 6, 24, and 52.
II. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at week 12 with additional covariate adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI).
III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in mean EORTC CIPN-20 motor subscale score and autonomic subscale score, and in mean individual Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 domain (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores.
IV. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in mean EORTC CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score, motor subscale score, and autonomic subscale score; and in mean PROMIS-29 individual domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores; and in changes in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).
- To evaluate the differences by intervention study arm in proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks by chemotherapy regimen.
VI. To assess the effect of the intervention in reducing CIPN occurring in the upper extremities and, separately, in the lower extremities.
VII. To explore the relationship between duration of intervention received at the prescribed level and outcome, analogous to a dose-delivered analysis in a treatment trial.
VIII. To compare rates by study arm of CTCAE Grade 2 or higher sensory and motor neuropathy at 12 weeks.
IX. To evaluate tolerability of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, as assessed by rate of temperature and/or pressure adjustments, interruptions, and early discontinuation of the device.
- To determine participant satisfaction of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, assessed by patient questionnaire.
XI. To compare taxane dose-reductions, treatment delays/discontinuation due to CIPN, and relative taxane dose intensity and total taxane dose received, between intervention study arms.
XII. To evaluate differences of intervention effect by sex, race, and ethnicity.
XIII. To confirm pretreatment biomarkers of CIPN risk (vitamin D) and on-treatment biomarker changes indicative of CIPN severity (Neurofilament light chain, NFL) as well as additional biomarkers of interest generated in S1714 for validation.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
- To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
ARM 2: Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
ARM 3: Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
- Conditions
- Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- Being tested
- Biospecimen Collection, Cryocompression Therapy, Pneumatic Compression Therapy, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biospecimen CollectionProcedure or surgery
Also called Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum
Cryocompression TherapyProcedure or surgery
Undergo cryocompression
Pneumatic Compression TherapyProcedure or surgery
Undergo continuous compression
Pneumatic Compression TherapyProcedure or surgery
Undergo low cyclic compression
Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther
Also called Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (Cryocompression) | Experimental | Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. Receives: Procedure: Biospecimen Collection; Procedure: Cryocompression Therapy; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
| Arm 2 (Continuous Compression) | Experimental | Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. Receives: Procedure: Biospecimen Collection; Procedure: Pneumatic Compression Therapy; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
| Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) | Active comparator | Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. Receives: Procedure: Biospecimen Collection; Procedure: Pneumatic Compression Therapy; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurrence of clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (binary outcome: yes vs. no)
Defined as an absolute increase of 8 or more points over baseline in the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score. Analysis will be conducted multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
Measured: At the 12-week assessment after randomization
Secondary outcomes (4)
Mean sensory neuropathy scores
Will assess by study arm. Will examine the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score as a continuous variable on the 0-100 scale. The differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuorpen, tuning fork, Get Up and Go test) will also be compared. Multiple linear regression analysis will be conducted, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
Measured: At 12 weeks
Dropouts
Any dropouts prior to the week 12 assessment as failures. Since death is anticipated to be unrelated to the intervention assignment, deaths will be censored. Failures will be analyzed with an aggregate failure variable defined as: experience of neuropathy according to the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score or dropout prior to week 12 (yes vs. no). Logistic regression will be used, adjusted for the stratification factor as a covariate.
Measured: Prior to the week 12 assessment
Trajectories over time
Trajectories over time by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN will be compared. Generalized estimating equations with a logit link and robust standard errors will be used, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
Measured: 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks
Rates of adverse events
Rates of adverse events related to study device (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other AEs as assessed by (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE]) between the three interventions will be compared.
Measured: At 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Dec 2022
- Study start6 Jun 2023
- Primary completion1 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Aug 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malignant Solid NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SWOG Cancer Research NetworkThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 777 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Melissa K Accordino, Principal investigator, SWOG - Columbia UniversityKatherine Pennington, MD, Principal investigator, NRG - University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05642611
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S2205
- Other IDs
- NCI-2022-09251, SWOG-S2205, SWOG-S2205, SWOG-S2205, UG1CA189974
- Acronym
- ICE COMPRESS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 6 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ice Compress: Randomized Trial of Limb Cryocompression Versus Continuous Compression Versus Low Cyclic Compression for the Prevention of Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05642611
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICE COMPRESS / S2205
- Conditions
- Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 777 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- SWOG Cancer Research NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This phase III trial compares the effect of 3 study approaches in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: 1) cryocompression, 2) continuous compression, and 3) low cyclic compression. Taxane chemotherapy drugs, such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, can cause a nerve disorder called peripheral neuropathy, which can cause numbness, tingling, or pain in the arms and legs. The 3 study approaches will use a device, called the Paxman Limb Cryocompression System, made of wraps that cool and/or compress the arms and legs. This study may help researchers determine if any of the study approaches are able to prevent taxane chemotherapy from causing peripheral neuropathy.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) at 12 weeks, in participants treated with taxane-based chemotherapy randomized to cryocompression therapy versus continuous compression therapy versus low cyclic compression therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
- To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in clinically meaningful CIPN.
II. To compare mean European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20 (EORTC-CIPN-20) sensory neuropathy subscale scores at 12 weeks by intervention study arm.
III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in changes from baseline in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).
IV. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks in a sensitivity analysis with dropouts treated as failures.
- To compare rates of adverse events related to study device at 12 weeks (including cold intolerance, skin changes, other adverse events [AEs] as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) between the three interventions.
ADDITIONAL OBJECTIVES:
- To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN separately at weeks 6, 24, and 52.
II. To compare the proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at week 12 with additional covariate adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI).
III. To compare differences by intervention study arm at 12 weeks in mean EORTC CIPN-20 motor subscale score and autonomic subscale score, and in mean individual Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 domain (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores.
IV. To compare trajectories over time (6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks) by intervention study arm in mean EORTC CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score, motor subscale score, and autonomic subscale score; and in mean PROMIS-29 individual domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, Pain Interference, and Pain Intensity) scores; and in changes in objective sensory and motor function tests (Neuropen, tuning fork, Timed Get Up and Go test).
- To evaluate the differences by intervention study arm in proportion of participants who develop clinically meaningful CIPN at 12 weeks by chemotherapy regimen.
VI. To assess the effect of the intervention in reducing CIPN occurring in the upper extremities and, separately, in the lower extremities.
VII. To explore the relationship between duration of intervention received at the prescribed level and outcome, analogous to a dose-delivered analysis in a treatment trial.
VIII. To compare rates by study arm of CTCAE Grade 2 or higher sensory and motor neuropathy at 12 weeks.
IX. To evaluate tolerability of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, as assessed by rate of temperature and/or pressure adjustments, interruptions, and early discontinuation of the device.
- To determine participant satisfaction of cryocompression compared to continuous compression therapy and low cyclic compression therapy, assessed by patient questionnaire.
XI. To compare taxane dose-reductions, treatment delays/discontinuation due to CIPN, and relative taxane dose intensity and total taxane dose received, between intervention study arms.
XII. To evaluate differences of intervention effect by sex, race, and ethnicity.
XIII. To confirm pretreatment biomarkers of CIPN risk (vitamin D) and on-treatment biomarker changes indicative of CIPN severity (Neurofilament light chain, NFL) as well as additional biomarkers of interest generated in S1714 for validation.
BANKING OBJECTIVE:
- To bank specimens for future correlative studies.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM 1: Patients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
ARM 2: Patients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
ARM 3: Patients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 (Cryocompression) | Experimental | Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Procedure: Cryocompression Therapy, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo cryocompression (cooling plus moderate and low pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. |
| Arm 2 (Continuous Compression) | Experimental | Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Procedure: Pneumatic Compression Therapy, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo continuous compression (moderate, steady pressure to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. |
| Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) | Active comparator | Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Procedure: Pneumatic Compression Therapy, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients undergo low cyclic compression (low pressure that comes and goes to the arms and legs) for 30-minutes pre-taxane chemotherapy infusion, during taxane chemotherapy infusion, and for 30 minutes after completion of each taxane infusion. Patients may also undergo collection of blood, serum and plasma samples during screening and on study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participants must have a diagnosis of a solid tumor malignancy.
- Participants must be planning to begin neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with one of the protocol-specified chemotherapy regimens below for a solid tumor malignancy within 3 calendar days after randomization.
- Participant must be >= 18 years old.
- Participants must be offered the opportunity to participate in specimen banking. With participant consent, specimens must be collected and submitted via the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Specimen Tracking System.
- Participants must be able to complete Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaires in English or Spanish.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants must not have a history of skin or limb metastases.
- Participants must not have previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy for any reason (e.g., taxanes, platinum agents, vinca alkaloids, or bortezomib).
- Participants must not have pre-existing clinical peripheral neuropathy from any cause.
- Participants must not have a history of Raynaud's phenomenon, cold agglutinin disease, cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, post-traumatic cold dystrophy, or peripheral arterial ischemia.
- Participants must not have any open skin wounds or ulcers of the limbs at the time of randomization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biospecimen CollectionAlso: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen CollectionUndergo collection of blood, plasma, and serum | Procedure or surgery | Arm 1 (Cryocompression), Arm 2 (Continuous Compression), Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) |
| Cryocompression TherapyUndergo cryocompression | Procedure or surgery | Arm 1 (Cryocompression) |
| Pneumatic Compression TherapyUndergo continuous compression | Procedure or surgery | Arm 2 (Continuous Compression) |
| Pneumatic Compression TherapyUndergo low cyclic compression | Procedure or surgery | Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) |
| Quality-of-Life AssessmentAlso: Quality of Life AssessmentAncillary studies | Other | Arm 1 (Cryocompression), Arm 2 (Continuous Compression), Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Arm 1 (Cryocompression), Arm 2 (Continuous Compression), Arm 3 (Low Cyclic Compression) |
Primary outcome
Occurrence of clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (binary outcome: yes vs. no)
Time frame: At the 12-week assessment after randomization
Defined as an absolute increase of 8 or more points over baseline in the CIPN-20 sensory neuropathy subscale score. Analysis will be conducted multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for the baseline score and the stratification factor as covariates.
4 secondary outcomes
Mean sensory neuropathy scores
Time frame: At 12 weeks
Dropouts
Time frame: Prior to the week 12 assessment
Trajectories over time
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks
Rates of adverse events
Time frame: At 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2026.
Related trials for Malignant Solid Neoplasm
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Risk Prediction in Solid Tumors
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
Tele-HOPE: A Telehealth Pharmacist Opioid Patient Education Pilot Study
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Melissa K Accordino principal investigator
SWOG - Columbia University
Katherine Pennington, MD principal investigator
NRG - University of Washington
36 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Biospecimen Collection, Cryocompression Therapy and Pneumatic Compression Therapy in people with Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by SWOG Cancer Research Network at 36 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 36 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Justine Trevino (210-614-8808, jtrevino@swog.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurrence of clinically meaningful chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (binary outcome: yes vs. no) (time frame: At the 12-week assessment after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2026.