Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationNCT05644119
Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers
A study testing V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer and Straight Wire Retainer in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication and Orthodontic Appliance Design, run by King Abdulaziz University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication, Orthodontic Appliance Design, Orthodontic Treatment
- What is being tested?
- V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer and Straight Wire Retainer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2022to 31 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients in need of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment
- Good periodontal health (i.e., no clinical attachment loss and < 10% bleeding on probing)
Who cannot join
- History of oral prophylaxis in the past 6 months
- History of any systemic illness such as diabetes
- Preexisting or post-orthodontic periodontal disease
- Current intake of antibiotic and/or anti-inflammatory medications
- Smoking
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
King Abdulaziz University, Department of Periodontics
Jeddah, 80209
Talal Zahid, M.S, 00966554667998, tzahid@kau.edu.sa
About this study
Official title: Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight Versus Looped Fixed Retainers: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment.
The main question it aims to answer is whether the V- loop bonded retainer is more effective than fixed straight retainer for periodontal health management.
Read more
Each patient will receive 2 lower fixed and bonded retainers: (1) a straight wire retainer (SWR) and (2) a looped wire retainer (LWR). Patients will be asked to floss once daily with a thread flosser.
Researchers will compare the effects of two types of retainers to see if there is a statistically significant difference.
Read the detailed description
Ensuring alignment stability is a major challenge for orthodontists following an orthodontic treatment. This has led to the development of various orthodontic retention methods to enhance stability. Both fixed and removable retainers have been in use for years. However, most orthodontists nowadays prefer fixed bonded retainers over removable ones due to their many advantages, including easy to wear, being patient compliance free, long-term usability and stability, and better aesthetics. Over the past decades, many variations of fixed retainers have been developed. Of these, the current gold standard is the straight type flexible spiral (multistranded) wire retainer. Nevertheless, a major concern of using fixed straight retainers is the potential for periodontal health compromise. They are known to make oral hygiene maintenance more difficult for the patient, which in turn may lead to periodontal diseases due to more plaque and calculus accumulation. The wave or V- loop bonded retainer may be a solution to this problem, as it provides stability of teeth yet allows flossing with ease.
- Being tested
- V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer, Straight Wire Retainer
- Keywords
- Orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retainer, V- loop bonded retainer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
V- loop Bonded Orthodontic RetainerDevice
Also called V-loop Bonded Lingual Retainer, Wave Orthodontic Retainer
The V- loop bonded retainer is a unique design that not just provides tooth stability but also allows flossing with ease.
Straight Wire RetainerDevice
The straight wire retainer is a fixed bonded orthodontic retainer. This involves attaching a metal wire to the back of the teeth to keep it in position.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| V-looped Wire Retainer (LWR) | Experimental | The LWR is a 0.569-mm (0.022-inch) Blue Elgiloy (soft) round wire (RMO). The retainer will extend from the left canine to the right central incisor. Receives: Device: V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer |
| Straight Wire Retainer (SWR) | Active comparator | The SWR is 0.8-mm twisted stainless steel wire (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). The retainer will extend from the right canine to the left central incisor. Receives: Device: Straight Wire Retainer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of retainer failures and teeth stability through clinical examination
The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome of bonds of assigned intervention immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Measurement of the Little's Irregularity Index to assess the crowding of Mandibular anterior arch
The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome assigned interventions immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.
The scale of the index includes the following:
- 0: Perfect Alignment
- 1-3: Minimal Irregularity
- 4-6: Moderate Irregularity
- 7-9: Severe Irregularity
- 10: Very Severe Irregularity
The value represents the total horizontal displacement of the anatomical contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth in millimeters.
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingivitis on the 4-point Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
The MGI is a non-invasive visual instrument designed to evaluate the progression of gingivitis. The scale ranges from 0 (normal gingiva) to 3. (severe inflammation with tendency to spontaneous bleeding). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in plaque accumulation on O'leary Plaque Index (PI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
The PI is a valid and reliable assessment tool that records the presence of mineralized deposits and soft debris on all 4 surfaces of every tooth. It utilizes a rating scale from 0 (no plaque) to 1 (plaque present at gingival margin). Change = (Year 2 Score - Baseline Score)
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingival bleeding on the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) by Ainamo and Bay at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
The GBI is a reliable measure of periodontal stability. It uses delicate probing of the gingival sulcus orifice. Using a standardized periodontal probe with a 0.6 mm tip and 1 mm marking, the bleeding on probing (BOP) will be evaluated. A skilled examiner will measure BOP using probes with 0.25 N or less of force (25 g). If bleeding starts within 10 seconds, a positive finding is recorded.
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in oral hygiene questionnaire at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Participants will be adminstered a self-reported oral hygiene questionnaire on brushing and flossing frequency, patient satisfaction with the retainers, and ease of flossing to determine their overall satisfaction with the interventions.
Measured: Approximately 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Nov 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Orthodontic Appliance ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Split-mouth Design
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Abdulaziz University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Talal Zahid, King Abdulaziz University
- Investigators
- Talal Zahid, M.S, Principal investigator, Associate Professor, King Abdulaziz University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05644119
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 084-09-22
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight Versus Looped Fixed Retainers: a Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05644119
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 084-09-22
- Keywords
- Orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retention, Fixed orthodontic retainer, V- loop bonded retainer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King Abdulaziz UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment.
The main question it aims to answer is whether the V- loop bonded retainer is more effective than fixed straight retainer for periodontal health management.
Each patient will receive 2 lower fixed and bonded retainers: (1) a straight wire retainer (SWR) and (2) a looped wire retainer (LWR). Patients will be asked to floss once daily with a thread flosser.
Researchers will compare the effects of two types of retainers to see if there is a statistically significant difference.
Detailed description
Ensuring alignment stability is a major challenge for orthodontists following an orthodontic treatment. This has led to the development of various orthodontic retention methods to enhance stability. Both fixed and removable retainers have been in use for years. However, most orthodontists nowadays prefer fixed bonded retainers over removable ones due to their many advantages, including easy to wear, being patient compliance free, long-term usability and stability, and better aesthetics. Over the past decades, many variations of fixed retainers have been developed. Of these, the current gold standard is the straight type flexible spiral (multistranded) wire retainer. Nevertheless, a major concern of using fixed straight retainers is the potential for periodontal health compromise. They are known to make oral hygiene maintenance more difficult for the patient, which in turn may lead to periodontal diseases due to more plaque and calculus accumulation. The wave or V- loop bonded retainer may be a solution to this problem, as it provides stability of teeth yet allows flossing with ease.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Split-mouth Design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| V-looped Wire Retainer (LWR) | Experimental | Device: V- loop Bonded Orthodontic RetainerThe LWR is a 0.569-mm (0.022-inch) Blue Elgiloy (soft) round wire (RMO). The retainer will extend from the left canine to the right central incisor. |
| Straight Wire Retainer (SWR) | Active comparator | Device: Straight Wire RetainerThe SWR is 0.8-mm twisted stainless steel wire (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). The retainer will extend from the right canine to the left central incisor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients in need of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment
- Good periodontal health (i.e., no clinical attachment loss and < 10% bleeding on probing)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- History of oral prophylaxis in the past 6 months
- History of any systemic illness such as diabetes
- Preexisting or post-orthodontic periodontal disease
- Current intake of antibiotic and/or anti-inflammatory medications
- Smoking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| V- loop Bonded Orthodontic RetainerAlso: V-loop Bonded Lingual Retainer, Wave Orthodontic RetainerThe V- loop bonded retainer is a unique design that not just provides tooth stability but also allows flossing with ease. | Device | V-looped Wire Retainer (LWR) |
| Straight Wire RetainerThe straight wire retainer is a fixed bonded orthodontic retainer. This involves attaching a metal wire to the back of the teeth to keep it in position. | Device | Straight Wire Retainer (SWR) |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of retainer failures and teeth stability through clinical examination
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome of bonds of assigned intervention immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years.
Measurement of the Little's Irregularity Index to assess the crowding of Mandibular anterior arch
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
The examination will be carried out for each participant to assess the final outcome assigned interventions immediately following the orthodontic treatment and after intervals of six months and two years. The scale of the index includes the following: * 0: Perfect Alignment * 1-3: Minimal Irregularity * 4-6: Moderate Irregularity * 7-9: Severe Irregularity * 10: Very Severe Irregularity The value represents the total horizontal displacement of the anatomical contact points of the mandibular anterior teeth in millimeters.
4 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingivitis on the 4-point Modified Gingival Index (MGI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in plaque accumulation on O'leary Plaque Index (PI) at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in gingival bleeding on the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) by Ainamo and Bay at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Change from Baseline (immediately following the orthodontic treatment) in oral hygiene questionnaire at the short-term (6 months) and long-term (2 years)
Time frame: Approximately 2 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
Bacterial Diversity Study Using 16S rRNA Sequencing of Periodontal Samples From Patients With Orthodontic Retainers
Fixed Orthodontic Retainer, Orthodontic Appliances, Removable
Recruiting
Comparison of MI Paste Plus and Resin Infiltration in White Spot Lesions Following Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesions, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Recruiting
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
Orthodontic Appliance, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of a 3-step Bonding System (Transbond™ XT) and a 2-step System (GC Ortho Connect™) on Demineralization Around Maxillary Orthodontic Brackets
Tooth Demineralization, White Spot Lesion
Recruiting
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
Orthodontic Appliances, Removable, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Talal Zahid, M.S principal investigator
Associate Professor, King Abdulaziz University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer and Straight Wire Retainer in people with Orthodontic Appliance Complication and Orthodontic Appliance Design, run by King Abdulaziz University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Talal Zahid, M.S (00966554667998, tzahid@kau.edu.sa), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of retainer failures and teeth stability through clinical examination (time frame: Approximately 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2022.