Ventilator LungNCT05647434
Effect of Sustained Inflations on Lung Atelectasis During Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery
A study testing sustained inflations in people with Ventilator Lung, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The aim of our study is to assess the beneficial effect of sustained inflations as a recruitment manoeuvre, using LUS examinations, on the degree of lung atelectasis that occurs in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilator Lung
- What is being tested?
- sustained inflations
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 30 Dec 2022to 30 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 6 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Signed Informed Parental Consent
- Scheduled for undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification Ⅰ-Ⅱ
Who cannot join
- Emergency and thoracic procedures
- Significant pre-existing pulmonary, cardiac or chest wall diseases
- Abdominal distension
- Acute airway infection
- Previous thoracic procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
karim k. fahim, M.D contact
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kasr Alainy
Cairo, 11562
Ahmed H. Sayed, M.D, +201068112464, drahmedhusseinanesth87@gmail.com
Rania s. Fahmy, M.D, +21270820372, ransam98@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effect of Sustained Inflations on Lung Atelectasis During Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery as Determined by Lung Ultrasound: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of our study is to assess the beneficial effect of sustained inflations as a recruitment manoeuvre, using LUS examinations, on the degree of lung atelectasis that occurs in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Objectives
Read more
- To assess the effect of general anaesthesia and capnoperitoneum on lung atelectasis in the paediatric patients by using LUS examination
- To assess the effect of sustained inflations as a recruitment manoeuvre in decreasing lung atelectasis caused by general anaesthesia and capnoperitoneum by using LUS examination
Hypothesis Our main hypothesis is that the use of repeated Sustained Inflation as a recruitment manoeuvre in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will result in decreased atelectasis compared to conventional ventilation.
Read the detailed description
Our study will be conducted in Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital (Abo El Reesh Hospital), after approval of the research ethical committee. An informed signed parental consent will be obtained from all study participants before their enrolment in the study. recruitment of cases will be started after registration in clinicaltrials.gov and getting unique number
Methodology
- Study Design Prospective Randomised Controlled Study
- Study Setting and Location The study will be conducted in the operating theatres at Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital (Abo El Rich Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.
- Study Population 40 pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will be included in the study. The patients will be randomly allocated into one of the two study groups; 20 patients per group.
- Study protocol Following approval from anesthesia department's ethics and research committee, all patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study. An informed signed parental consent will be obtained. Anesthesia Standard ECG, noninvasive blood pressure measurement, time-based capnography and pulse oximetry will be used as monitors. Anesthesia will be induced with Sevofluorane using a Mapelson E (modification of Ayre's T-piece) circuit. An Intravenous access will be obtained. Fentanyl 2 μg/kg and Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg will be administered intravenously before intubation with a cuffed endotracheal tube of appropriate size followed by controlled ventilation. The lungs will be ventilated in a volume control mode using a FiO2 of 0.5, a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O, an inspiratory: expiratory ratio of 1:2, respiratory rate between 20 and 30 breaths per minute to maintain end tidal CO2 between 30-35 mmHg. Anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane 2% in the supine position. Top up doses of muscle relaxant will be administered as needed. Randomisation The patients will be randomly allocated. The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes.
- Control group (C-group): patients will receive the conventional ventilatory settings as described above.
- Sustained inflation group (SI group): After induction of capnoperitoneum, LUS examination will be performed. Sustained inflation will be performed immediately after this LUS examination, and will be repeated every 20 minutes during the period of capnoperitoneum. Sustained inflation will be applied at a pressure of 30 cmH2O and will be held for a period of 30 secs. After each SI the standard ventilatory settings will be resumed with a PEEP setting of 8 cmH2O to prevent lung derecruitment. Lung recruitment will be stopped immediately if mean arterial pressure and/or heart rate change by at least 25% from baseline values. Lung Ultrasound LUS will be performed using the SonoSite M Turbo (USA) with a linear multi-frequency 6-13 MHz probe. Each hemithorax will be divided into six regions, using three longitudinal lines (parasternal, anterior and posterior axillary) and two axial lines (one above the diaphragm and the other 1 cm above the nipples). The 12 lung regions will be scanned sequentially from right to left, cranial to caudal and anterior to posterior. Each region will be assessed using a two dimensional view with the probe placed parallel to the ribs. In general, the posterior areas are those with the highest incidence of anesthesia-induced atelectasis. (30) An aeration score previously described for adults will be applied in our pediatric patients. (27) Four LUS patterns were defined according to the degree of B lines: (0) fewer than three isolated B lines; (1) multiple well defined B lines; (2) multiple coalescent B lines and (3) white lung. The sum of the points obtained in all the 12 lung areas will constitute the lung aeration score, ranging from 0-36 for the whole thorax. This score is inversely proportional to the degree of lung aeration and directly proportional to the degree of lung atelectasis. (30) Patients will be studied at three points:
- Before capnoperitoneum: 5 minutes after induction of anaesthesia, baseline recordings will be obtained.
- During capnoperitoneum: measurements will be performed 10 minutes after starting the capnoperitoneum.
- After capnoperitoneum: 5 minutes after the end of surgery.
- Measurement tools
- Lung aeration score.
- Hemodynamic parameters: HR, Non-invasive blood pressure, end-tidal CO2 and oxygen saturation.
- Respiratory mechanical parameters: Peak airway pressure (Paw peak) and plateau pressure (Paw plateau).
- Occurrence of intraoperative pulmonary adverse effects
- Occurrence of intraoperative desaturation (spo2 <92%) or change in heart rate and arterial blood pressure by at least 15% of baseline values <!-- -->
- Sample size Based on the primary outcome, sample size calculation was done using the comparison of incidence of lung collapse between standard ventilation and a lung recruitment manoeuver in pediatric patients scheduled for abdominal laparoscopic surgery using a four point aeration score by ultrasound imaging. Calculation was done based on comparing 2 proportions from independent samples in a prospective study using Chi test, the α-error level was fixed at 0.05, the power was set at 80% and the intervention groups ratio was set at 1. As previously published (30), the incidence of lung collapse among lung recruitment manoeuver group was 45% while it was 90% in standard ventilation group. Accordingly, the minimum optimum sample size should be 16 participants in each group to detect a real difference of 10% in incidence of lung collapse. Sample size calculation was done using PS Power and Sample Size Calculations software, version 3.0.11 for MS Windows (William D. Dupont and Walton D., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA).
- Statistical Analysis Normally distributed numerical data will be statistically described in terms of mean , standard deviation (SD), while not-normal data will be represented as median and range or inter-quartile range (IQR). Qualitative (categorical) data will be described in frequencies (number of cases) and percentage. Numerical data will be tested for the normal assumption using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups will be done using Student t test for independent samples in comparing normally distributed data and Mann Whitney U test for independent samples when data are not normally distributed. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square test will be performed. Exact test will be used instead when the expected frequency is less than 5. A probability value (p value) less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations will be done using computer programs Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, NY, USA) and IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) release 22 for Microsoft Windows.
- Conditions
- Ventilator Lung
- Being tested
- sustained inflations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
sustained inflationsProcedure or surgery
Sustained inflation will be applied at a pressure of 30 cmH2O and will be held for a period of 30 secs. After each SI the standard ventilatory settings will be resumed with a PEEP setting of 8 cmH2O to prevent lung derecruitment. Lung recruitment will be stopped immediately if mean arterial pressure and/or heart rate change by at least 25% from baseline values.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group C | No intervention | conventional ventilation |
| group SI | Active comparator | Sustained inflations done after ultrasound during capnoperitoneum every 20 min. Receives: Procedure: sustained inflations |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The lung aeration score by ultrasound
Four Lung ultrasound patterns were defined according to the degree of B lines: (0) fewer than three isolated B lines; (1) multiple well defined B lines; (2) multiple coalescent B lines and (3) white lung. The sum of the points obtained in all the 12 lung areas will constitute the lung aeration score, ranging from 0-36 for the whole thorax. This score is inversely proportional to the degree of lung aeration and directly proportional to the degree of lung atelectasis.
Measured: from start of surgery till half an hour postoperative
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of hemodynamic instability or oxygen desaturation
with the sustained inflation recruitment manoeuver
Measured: from start of surgery till half an hour postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2022
- Study start30 Dec 2022
- Primary completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ventilator LungStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Hussein Sayed Hasan, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05647434
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MD-240-2021
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Forgiarini Junior LA, Esquinas AM. [Atelectasis in postoperative bariatric surgery: how many understand them?]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;68(1):109-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 May 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 28551061Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, Lee JW, Henderson WG, Moss A, Mehdiratta N, Colwell MM, Bartels K, Kolodzie K, Giquel J, Vidal Melo MF. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065.
PubMed 27829093Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):317-334. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex002.
PubMed 28186222Malbrain ML, De Laet I, De Waele JJ, Sugrue M, Schachtrupp A, Duchesne J, Van Ramshorst G, De Keulenaer B, Kirkpatrick AW, Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh S, Mulier J, Pelosi P, Ivatury R, Pracca F, David M, Roberts DJ. The role of abdominal compliance, the neglected parameter in critically ill patients - a consensus review of 16. Part 2: measurement techniques and management recommendations. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):406-32. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0063.
PubMed 25432559Yang D, Grant MC, Stone A, Wu CL, Wick EC. A Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategies to Prevent Pulmonary Complications: Is Low Tidal Volume Alone Sufficient to Protect Healthy Lungs? Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):881-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001443.
PubMed 26720429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Sustained Inflations on Lung Atelectasis During Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery as Determined by Lung Ultrasound: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05647434
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MD-240-2021
- Conditions
- Ventilator Lung
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of our study is to assess the beneficial effect of sustained inflations as a recruitment manoeuvre, using LUS examinations, on the degree of lung atelectasis that occurs in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Objectives
- To assess the effect of general anaesthesia and capnoperitoneum on lung atelectasis in the paediatric patients by using LUS examination
- To assess the effect of sustained inflations as a recruitment manoeuvre in decreasing lung atelectasis caused by general anaesthesia and capnoperitoneum by using LUS examination
Hypothesis Our main hypothesis is that the use of repeated Sustained Inflation as a recruitment manoeuvre in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will result in decreased atelectasis compared to conventional ventilation.
Detailed description
Our study will be conducted in Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital (Abo El Reesh Hospital), after approval of the research ethical committee. An informed signed parental consent will be obtained from all study participants before their enrolment in the study. recruitment of cases will be started after registration in clinicaltrials.gov and getting unique number
Methodology
- Study Design Prospective Randomised Controlled Study
- Study Setting and Location The study will be conducted in the operating theatres at Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital (Abo El Rich Hospital), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University.
- Study Population 40 pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery will be included in the study. The patients will be randomly allocated into one of the two study groups; 20 patients per group.
- Study protocol Following approval from anesthesia department's ethics and research committee, all patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study. An informed signed parental consent will be obtained. Anesthesia Standard ECG, noninvasive blood pressure measurement, time-based capnography and pulse oximetry will be used as monitors. Anesthesia will be induced with Sevofluorane using a Mapelson E (modification of Ayre's T-piece) circuit. An Intravenous access will be obtained. Fentanyl 2 μg/kg and Atracurium 0.5 mg/kg will be administered intravenously before intubation with a cuffed endotracheal tube of appropriate size followed by controlled ventilation. The lungs will be ventilated in a volume control mode using a FiO2 of 0.5, a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O, an inspiratory: expiratory ratio of 1:2, respiratory rate between 20 and 30 breaths per minute to maintain end tidal CO2 between 30-35 mmHg. Anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane 2% in the supine position. Top up doses of muscle relaxant will be administered as needed. Randomisation The patients will be randomly allocated. The randomization sequence will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes.
- Control group (C-group): patients will receive the conventional ventilatory settings as described above.
- Sustained inflation group (SI group): After induction of capnoperitoneum, LUS examination will be performed. Sustained inflation will be performed immediately after this LUS examination, and will be repeated every 20 minutes during the period of capnoperitoneum. Sustained inflation will be applied at a pressure of 30 cmH2O and will be held for a period of 30 secs. After each SI the standard ventilatory settings will be resumed with a PEEP setting of 8 cmH2O to prevent lung derecruitment. Lung recruitment will be stopped immediately if mean arterial pressure and/or heart rate change by at least 25% from baseline values. Lung Ultrasound LUS will be performed using the SonoSite M Turbo (USA) with a linear multi-frequency 6-13 MHz probe. Each hemithorax will be divided into six regions, using three longitudinal lines (parasternal, anterior and posterior axillary) and two axial lines (one above the diaphragm and the other 1 cm above the nipples). The 12 lung regions will be scanned sequentially from right to left, cranial to caudal and anterior to posterior. Each region will be assessed using a two dimensional view with the probe placed parallel to the ribs. In general, the posterior areas are those with the highest incidence of anesthesia-induced atelectasis. (30) An aeration score previously described for adults will be applied in our pediatric patients. (27) Four LUS patterns were defined according to the degree of B lines: (0) fewer than three isolated B lines; (1) multiple well defined B lines; (2) multiple coalescent B lines and (3) white lung. The sum of the points obtained in all the 12 lung areas will constitute the lung aeration score, ranging from 0-36 for the whole thorax. This score is inversely proportional to the degree of lung aeration and directly proportional to the degree of lung atelectasis. (30) Patients will be studied at three points:
- Before capnoperitoneum: 5 minutes after induction of anaesthesia, baseline recordings will be obtained.
- During capnoperitoneum: measurements will be performed 10 minutes after starting the capnoperitoneum.
- After capnoperitoneum: 5 minutes after the end of surgery.
- Measurement tools
- Lung aeration score.
- Hemodynamic parameters: HR, Non-invasive blood pressure, end-tidal CO2 and oxygen saturation.
- Respiratory mechanical parameters: Peak airway pressure (Paw peak) and plateau pressure (Paw plateau).
- Occurrence of intraoperative pulmonary adverse effects
- Occurrence of intraoperative desaturation (spo2 <92%) or change in heart rate and arterial blood pressure by at least 15% of baseline values <!-- -->
- Sample size Based on the primary outcome, sample size calculation was done using the comparison of incidence of lung collapse between standard ventilation and a lung recruitment manoeuver in pediatric patients scheduled for abdominal laparoscopic surgery using a four point aeration score by ultrasound imaging. Calculation was done based on comparing 2 proportions from independent samples in a prospective study using Chi test, the α-error level was fixed at 0.05, the power was set at 80% and the intervention groups ratio was set at 1. As previously published (30), the incidence of lung collapse among lung recruitment manoeuver group was 45% while it was 90% in standard ventilation group. Accordingly, the minimum optimum sample size should be 16 participants in each group to detect a real difference of 10% in incidence of lung collapse. Sample size calculation was done using PS Power and Sample Size Calculations software, version 3.0.11 for MS Windows (William D. Dupont and Walton D., Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA).
- Statistical Analysis Normally distributed numerical data will be statistically described in terms of mean , standard deviation (SD), while not-normal data will be represented as median and range or inter-quartile range (IQR). Qualitative (categorical) data will be described in frequencies (number of cases) and percentage. Numerical data will be tested for the normal assumption using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups will be done using Student t test for independent samples in comparing normally distributed data and Mann Whitney U test for independent samples when data are not normally distributed. For comparing categorical data, Chi-square test will be performed. Exact test will be used instead when the expected frequency is less than 5. A probability value (p value) less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations will be done using computer programs Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corporation, NY, USA) and IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Science; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) release 22 for Microsoft Windows.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group C | No intervention | –conventional ventilation |
| group SI | Active comparator | Procedure: sustained inflationsSustained inflations done after ultrasound during capnoperitoneum every 20 min. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 6 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Signed Informed Parental Consent
- Scheduled for undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification Ⅰ-Ⅱ
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Emergency and thoracic procedures
- Significant pre-existing pulmonary, cardiac or chest wall diseases
- Abdominal distension
- Acute airway infection
- Previous thoracic procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| sustained inflationsSustained inflation will be applied at a pressure of 30 cmH2O and will be held for a period of 30 secs. After each SI the standard ventilatory settings will be resumed with a PEEP setting of 8 cmH2O to prevent lung derecruitment. Lung recruitment will be stopped immediately if mean arterial pressure and/or heart rate change by at least 25% from baseline values. | Procedure or surgery | group SI |
Primary outcome
The lung aeration score by ultrasound
Time frame: from start of surgery till half an hour postoperative
Four Lung ultrasound patterns were defined according to the degree of B lines: (0) fewer than three isolated B lines; (1) multiple well defined B lines; (2) multiple coalescent B lines and (3) white lung. The sum of the points obtained in all the 12 lung areas will constitute the lung aeration score, ranging from 0-36 for the whole thorax. This score is inversely proportional to the degree of lung aeration and directly proportional to the degree of lung atelectasis.
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of hemodynamic instability or oxygen desaturation
Time frame: from start of surgery till half an hour postoperative
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2023.
- Background: PubMed 28551061Forgiarini Junior LA, Esquinas AM. [Atelectasis in postoperative bariatric surgery: how many understand them?]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jan-Feb;68(1):109-110. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 May 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27829093Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, Lee JW, Henderson WG, Moss A, Mehdiratta N, Colwell MM, Bartels K, Kolodzie K, Giquel J, Vidal Melo MF. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065.
- Background: PubMed 28186222Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):317-334. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex002.
- Background: PubMed 25432559Malbrain ML, De Laet I, De Waele JJ, Sugrue M, Schachtrupp A, Duchesne J, Van Ramshorst G, De Keulenaer B, Kirkpatrick AW, Ahmadi-Noorbakhsh S, Mulier J, Pelosi P, Ivatury R, Pracca F, David M, Roberts DJ. The role of abdominal compliance, the neglected parameter in critically ill patients - a consensus review of 16. Part 2: measurement techniques and management recommendations. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):406-32. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2014.0063.
- Background: PubMed 26720429Yang D, Grant MC, Stone A, Wu CL, Wick EC. A Meta-analysis of Intraoperative Ventilation Strategies to Prevent Pulmonary Complications: Is Low Tidal Volume Alone Sufficient to Protect Healthy Lungs? Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):881-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001443.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ventilator Lung
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Recruiting
Controlled Remote Monitoring and Optimization of Oxygen Therapy in Preterm Infants
BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
karim k. fahim, M.D contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing sustained inflations in people with Ventilator Lung, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ahmed H. Sayed, M.D (+201068112464, drahmedhusseinanesth87@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The lung aeration score by ultrasound (time frame: from start of surgery till half an hour postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05647434, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2023.