AzTrials
AzTrials

TelemedicineTelehealthNCT05654389

Effectiveness of Teleconsultation in Referring a Patient With Early Myocardial Infarction From Peripheral Hospital to Cardiac Centre in Hail, Saudi Arabia

A study testing Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospital in people with Telemedicine, run by The New Model of Care, Hail Health Cluster.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this pragmatic trial is to test the benefit of using a teleconsultation for referring a patient with a heart attack at an early stage from the suburban hospital to the heart centre. A teleconsultation with an expert cardiologist will be conducted by the physician at a suburban hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Telemedicine
What is being tested?
Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospital
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
440 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2023to Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • patient aged 18 to 80 with provisional diagnose of MI

Who cannot join

  • severely ill patient and patient with other chronic conditions or cancer

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Fakhralddin Elfakki, Researcher at MOC contact

+966530855161

abbasfakhraddin@gmail.com

Marwa Mahmoud Mahdy, CSoC Lead contact

+966508258235

maroo_79@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of a New Pathway of Referring a Patient With Early Myocardial Infarction From Peripheral Hospital to Cardiac Centre in Hail, Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Clustered Trial

The goal of this pragmatic trial is to test the benefit of using a teleconsultation for referring a patient with a heart attack at an early stage from the suburban hospital to the heart centre. A teleconsultation with an expert cardiologist will be conducted by the physician at a suburban hospital. The main questions it aims to answer are:

To what extent does the use of a teleconsultation for a patient with a heart attack work well in lowering the proportion of deaths among patients with heart attacks who will be referred from suburban hospitals to the heart centre? To what extent does the use of a teleconsultation for a patient with a heart attack work well in raising the proportion of stable cases with heart attacks who will be referred from suburban hospitals to the heart centre? Participants will be asked to participate in a teleconsultation referral pathway from the suburban hospital to the heart centre.

Read more

Researchers will compare the change in the proportion of death rate and survivors or stable cases in the intervention versus the control group during referral from suburban hospital to heart centre.

Making use of telehealth and smart applications will positively improve the quality of the provided health service at suburban hospitals where there is a limited number of specialized doctors.

Read the detailed description

The economic burden of myocardial infarction is the highest in Saudi Arabia. This burden is mainly due to the associated costs of medical interventions and the length of hospital stay.

It is advisable that the health system in Saudi Arabia deploy appropriate measures for the prevention and early detection of myocardial infarction among diabetic patients. Otherwise, the economic burden of cardiovascular diseases is expected to shoot up.

A practical approach for referring patients with Myocardial Infarction (MI) is the modified meta-plan methodology for refereeing a patient from primary care to a cardiology clinic. This approach is recommended as an additional practical pathway for a patient with cardiovascular disease in primary care.

A concentrated value assessment model (CVAM) for determining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) levels is suggested to predict MI using accumulated sessions of ECG observation.

Patients at high risk of future myocardial infarction could be identified by every optician at the eye clinic using retinal images and demographic data,

Research Questions:

To what extent does the use of a teleconsultation intervention is effective in reducing the proportion of deaths among patients with myocardial infarction who will be referred from peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre? To what extent does the use of teleconsultation is effective in increasing the proportion of stable cases with myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre?

General objective:

To estimate the effectiveness of using a teleconsultation for patients with myocardial infarction at peripheral hospitals in reducing the proportion of deaths and increasing the proportion of stable cases among referral cases.

Specific Objectives:

Aim 1: To compare the proportion of death among cases with myocardial infarction who will be referred from a peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

Aim 2: To compare the proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

Aim 3: To compare the proportion of cases who developed co-morbidities such as heart failure in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

Literature Review:

A positive protective effect of antidepressant use to protect against developing myocardial infarction as primary care intervention is evident.

Research Design and Methods:

This is a six months clustered randomized trial that will recruit patients with provisional a diagnosis of myocardial infarction at a governmental peripheral hospital in Hail city.

Participants (P):

The participants will be adults presented to the physician at the peripheral hospital with symptoms and signs of myocardial infarction. The participants are expected to be adults aged 18 years and above. Children and young adults will be excluded. The aim is to report eligible cases by the physician at the peripheral hospital upon satisfaction with the written criteria for early MI diagnosis. The reporting will continue for six months from the beginning of the trial. Cases in both intervention and control clusters will be notified and reported regularly.

Conditions
Telemedicine
Being tested
Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospital
Keywords
telemedicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospitalOther

    Using teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction during referral from the district hospital to the cardiac centre

Study groups in NCT05654389
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Application of teleconsultation using WhatsApp to refer patient with with myocardial infarctionExperimentalApplication of teleconsultation using WhatsApp for a patient with myocardial infarction with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction during referral from a district hospital to a cardiac centre.
Receives: Other: Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospital
Routine care and handling of a patient with mycardial infarction at peripheral hospitalNo interventionRoutine care and consultation received by a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction during referral from the district hospital to the cardiac centre

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The proportion of death among patients with myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre

    The proportion of death among patients with myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

    Measured: 6 month from the start of the study

  2. The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre

    The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

    Measured: 6 month from the start of the study

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who received Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TBA) before referral

    The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who received Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TBA) before referral from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre in the intervention group versus the control group (routine care).

    Measured: 6 months after the start of the study

  2. The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who developed co-morbidities

    The proportion of stable cases of myocardial infarction who developed co-morbidities such as heart failure in the intervention versus the control group (routine care).

    Measured: 6 months after the start of the study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2022
  2. Study startJan 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
440 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05654389
Sponsor's protocol ID
Model of Care
Acronym
Telehealth
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
7 Dec 2022
Last updated
28 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Application of teleconsultation for a patient with a provisional diagnosis of myocardial infarction at the district hospital in people with Telemedicine, run by The New Model of Care, Hail Health Cluster.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Fakhralddin Elfakki, Researcher at MOC (+966530855161, abbasfakhraddin@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The proportion of death among patients with myocardial infarction who will be referred from the peripheral hospital to the cardiac centre (time frame: 6 month from the start of the study). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in