AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver Transplant RejectionPhase 4NCT05655273

Conversion of Maintenance Prograf to Envarsus in Liver Transplant Recipients

A Phase 4 study testing Prograf and Envarsus in people with Liver Transplant Rejection and Immune System Suppression, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Prograf and Envarsus
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Jan 2024to 28 Feb 2026
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (>18 years) prevalent liver transplant recipient
  • >12 months after liver transplant
  • Prograf-based maintenance immunosuppression with targeted tacrolimus trough level of 5-10 ug/L
  • Stable liver allograft function (defined as ASL \& ALT <30, Bilirubin <20 \& ALP<150 at baseline visit or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • Stable renal function (creatinine < 180 µmol/l and eGFR > 40 ml/min) at baseline visit (or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
  • No episode of acute rejection within 6 months of baseline visit
  • Elevated creatinine (defined as >ULN) OR Significant symptoms (by patient self-report) potentially associated with tacrolimus (eg. tremor, difficulty to concentrate, insomnia) OR difficulty to adhere to a twice daily regimen

Who cannot join

  • Multiorgan transplant;
  • severe intercurrent illness;
  • severe cognitive impairment (all as determined by clinical team);
  • unwilling to consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site
  • Toronto General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G2N2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Prograf/Envarsus Conversion Study in Liver Transplant Recipients to Improve Side Effects, Adherence and Quality of Life: a Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial

Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. This study will compare the use of Prograf and Envarsus and their effects on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects, and patient adherence. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Read the detailed description

Tacrolimus (Prograf ©) has become part of the standard of care for patients receiving solid organ transplants and is part of the immunosuppressive protocol (along with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept ©]) used by liver transplant recipients at University Health Network (UHN). Tacrolimus is associated with several toxicities including renal injury, tremor, pancreatic islet β-cell injury (leading to diabetes) and hyperlipidemia. As a result of these potential toxicities, careful therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is a key component of post-transplant management. Tacrolimus trough levels are known to correlate with total tacrolimus exposure, as shown from formal pharmacokinetic assessments. Accordingly, trough serum concentrations of tacrolimus are measured routinely in all recipients and are used to guide dosing. The Prograf formulation of tacrolimus has a short serum half-life and must be dosed twice daily to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. Further, Prograf administration results in a high peak tacrolimus level. Peak tacrolimus levels have been shown to correlate with toxicity; thus, avoidance of high peaks may be desirable to minimize tacrolimus toxicity.

Envarsus is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus that provides similar drug exposure to tacrolimus at a 30% lower dose but with a once daily dosing regimen. Envarsus dosing also results in a lower peak tacrolimus level compared to Prograf. In this way, it is hoped that Envarsus may provide similar therapeutic efficacy as Prograf but with fewer adverse effects. In addition, the simpler dosing regimen is expected to enhance patient adherence and quality of life.

The present study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a switch from Prograf to Envarsus on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects and adherence. It hypothesizes that once daily Envarsus can be substituted at reduced daily dose for twice daily Prograf in stable liver transplant recipients without clinically meaningful changes in liver allograft function while reducing tacrolimus side effects, reducing cumulative daily dose of the drug and increasing adherence to treatment and quality of life.The results of this study have the potential to change current practice. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.

Being tested
Prograf, Envarsus
Keywords
liver transplant, tacrolimus toxicity, drug conversion, tacrolimus, prograf, envarsus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PrografDrug

    Participants randomized to the Prograf (control) arm will continue with their current twice daily dosing of Prograf.

  • EnvarsusDrug

    Participants randomized to Envarsus arm will have their current daily dose of Prograf converted to once-daily Envarsus dose according to the following ratio: 0.7 x the current daily Prograf dose. Envarsus is available in 3 dose strengths- 0.75mg, 1.0mg, and 4.0mg. The actual dose of Envarsus will be rounded to an amount that can be administered using the above tablet strengths.

Study groups in NCT05655273
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Post-liver transplant patients receiving PrografActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Prograf
Post-liver transplant patients receiving EnvarsusActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Envarsus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in AST levels

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

  2. Change in ALT levels

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

  3. Change in ALP levels

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

  4. Change in Bilirubin blood levels

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

  5. Change in tacrolimus trough levels

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

  6. Change in overall daily dose of tacrolimus

    Measured: Baseline to week 12

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48

  2. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48

  3. Change in Renal function (eGFR)

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48

  4. Change in tremor severity (for subset of patients who report significant tremor at baseline)

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48

  5. Change in glycemic control (HbA1c)

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48

  6. Change in lipid profile

    Measured: Baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 48

  7. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' Pain Interference Bank 2.0

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  8. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Bank 1.0

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  9. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Anxiety Bank 1.0

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  10. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Depression Bank 1.0

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  11. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Global Health Scale version 1.2

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  12. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Fatigue bank 1.0

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

  13. Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

    Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2022
  2. Study start1 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
conversion v. control
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05655273
Sponsor's protocol ID
22-5210
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
22 Nov 2022
Last updated
11 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in