Liver Transplant RejectionPhase 4NCT05655273
Conversion of Maintenance Prograf to Envarsus in Liver Transplant Recipients
A Phase 4 study testing Prograf and Envarsus in people with Liver Transplant Rejection and Immune System Suppression, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Transplant Rejection, Immune System Suppression
- What is being tested?
- Prograf and Envarsus
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 28 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (>18 years) prevalent liver transplant recipient
- >12 months after liver transplant
- Prograf-based maintenance immunosuppression with targeted tacrolimus trough level of 5-10 ug/L
- Stable liver allograft function (defined as ASL \& ALT <30, Bilirubin <20 \& ALP<150 at baseline visit or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
- Stable renal function (creatinine < 180 µmol/l and eGFR > 40 ml/min) at baseline visit (or within 4 weeks of baseline visit)
- No episode of acute rejection within 6 months of baseline visit
- Elevated creatinine (defined as >ULN) OR Significant symptoms (by patient self-report) potentially associated with tacrolimus (eg. tremor, difficulty to concentrate, insomnia) OR difficulty to adhere to a twice daily regimen
Who cannot join
- Multiorgan transplant;
- severe intercurrent illness;
- severe cognitive impairment (all as determined by clinical team);
- unwilling to consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Prograf/Envarsus Conversion Study in Liver Transplant Recipients to Improve Side Effects, Adherence and Quality of Life: a Single-centre Randomized Controlled Trial
Prograf and Envarsus are two different formulations of Tacrolimus which is used as an immunosuppressant in liver transplant (LT) patients. Prograf is currently used as part of the standard immunosuppression regimen for LT recipients at UHN. This study will compare the use of Prograf and Envarsus and their effects on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects, and patient adherence. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.
Read the detailed description
Tacrolimus (Prograf ©) has become part of the standard of care for patients receiving solid organ transplants and is part of the immunosuppressive protocol (along with prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept ©]) used by liver transplant recipients at University Health Network (UHN). Tacrolimus is associated with several toxicities including renal injury, tremor, pancreatic islet β-cell injury (leading to diabetes) and hyperlipidemia. As a result of these potential toxicities, careful therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus is a key component of post-transplant management. Tacrolimus trough levels are known to correlate with total tacrolimus exposure, as shown from formal pharmacokinetic assessments. Accordingly, trough serum concentrations of tacrolimus are measured routinely in all recipients and are used to guide dosing. The Prograf formulation of tacrolimus has a short serum half-life and must be dosed twice daily to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. Further, Prograf administration results in a high peak tacrolimus level. Peak tacrolimus levels have been shown to correlate with toxicity; thus, avoidance of high peaks may be desirable to minimize tacrolimus toxicity.
Envarsus is an extended-release formulation of tacrolimus that provides similar drug exposure to tacrolimus at a 30% lower dose but with a once daily dosing regimen. Envarsus dosing also results in a lower peak tacrolimus level compared to Prograf. In this way, it is hoped that Envarsus may provide similar therapeutic efficacy as Prograf but with fewer adverse effects. In addition, the simpler dosing regimen is expected to enhance patient adherence and quality of life.
The present study is aimed at evaluating the impact of a switch from Prograf to Envarsus on liver and renal function, trough tacrolimus levels, drug-related adverse effects and adherence. It hypothesizes that once daily Envarsus can be substituted at reduced daily dose for twice daily Prograf in stable liver transplant recipients without clinically meaningful changes in liver allograft function while reducing tacrolimus side effects, reducing cumulative daily dose of the drug and increasing adherence to treatment and quality of life.The results of this study have the potential to change current practice. Trial design is a pilot randomized trial. The study aims to recruit 40 patients from UHN's LT program and they will be randomized 1:1 to either stay on their current dose of Prograf or be converted to a once-daily equivalent dose of Envarsus. Both groups of patients will be followed for 48 weeks. This study will compare the change from baseline to week 48 in liver and renal function, tacrolimus-related side effects and patient reported outcomes between the two study groups.
- Being tested
- Prograf, Envarsus
- Keywords
- liver transplant, tacrolimus toxicity, drug conversion, tacrolimus, prograf, envarsus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrografDrug
Participants randomized to the Prograf (control) arm will continue with their current twice daily dosing of Prograf.
EnvarsusDrug
Participants randomized to Envarsus arm will have their current daily dose of Prograf converted to once-daily Envarsus dose according to the following ratio: 0.7 x the current daily Prograf dose. Envarsus is available in 3 dose strengths- 0.75mg, 1.0mg, and 4.0mg. The actual dose of Envarsus will be rounded to an amount that can be administered using the above tablet strengths.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Post-liver transplant patients receiving Prograf | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Prograf |
| Post-liver transplant patients receiving Envarsus | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Envarsus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in AST levels
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Change in ALT levels
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Change in ALP levels
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Change in Bilirubin blood levels
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Change in tacrolimus trough levels
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Change in overall daily dose of tacrolimus
Measured: Baseline to week 12
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48
Change in Renal function (eGFR)
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48
Change in tremor severity (for subset of patients who report significant tremor at baseline)
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48
Change in glycemic control (HbA1c)
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and week 48
Change in lipid profile
Measured: Baseline to week 24 and baseline to week 48
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' Pain Interference Bank 2.0
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance Bank 1.0
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Anxiety Bank 1.0
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Depression Bank 1.0
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Global Health Scale version 1.2
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Fatigue bank 1.0
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems' (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Measured: Baseline to Week 48 (inclusive)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Liver Transplant RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Health Network, TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- conversion v. control
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Health Network, Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Paladin Labs Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nazia Selzner, MD, Principal investigator, University Health Network, Toronto
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05655273
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 22-5210
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No