AzTrials
AzTrials

Kangaroo CareNCT05657886

Half Swaddle and Kangaroo Care in Preterm on Breastfeeding, Infant Attachment, Sleep Quality and Depression of Mothers

A study testing Half swaddle and Kangaroo care in people with Kangaroo Care, run by Trakya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of half swaddle and kangaroo care practices initiated in the early period in preterm infants on breastfeeding, mother-infant attachment, maternal sleep quality and postpartum depression. Design: The prospective, randomized controlled study Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 49 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Kangaroo Care
What is being tested?
Half swaddle and Kangaroo care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
5 Jul 2020to 2 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 49 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • For the mother;
  • Volunteer to participate in the research,
  • Over 18 years old,
  • Had a preterm birth (single birth less than 38 weeks),
  • After an uncomplicated pregnancy process, the delivery was completed by normal vaginal or cesarean delivery method,
  • Prepregnancy BMI <35,
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Stable vital signs, For baby;
  • Birth weight below 2500 g,
  • Stable vital signs,
  • APGAR score of 7 and above,
  • Hospitalized for a minimum of 5 days,
  • Babies who are 2 weeks or more postpartum.

Who cannot join

  • For the mother;
  • Over 49 years old,
  • Full-term birth (38-42 weeks single birth),
  • Using cigarettes, alcohol and stimulants,
  • Pre-pregnancy BMI>35,
  • Working night shift,
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Having received infertility treatment,
  • Having a chronic disease (such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus),
  • Experiencing severe depression, anxiety and stress,
  • Having any organic or non-organic disease that may cause cognitive impairment (such as Delirium, Dementia, Intellectual Retardation),
  • Mothers with serious maternal complications,
  • For baby;
  • Birth weight of 2500 g and above,
  • APGAR score below 7,
  • Having serious neonatal complications,
  • Congenital malformation,
  • Hospitalized for a maximum of 5 days,
  • Babies under 2 weeks postpartum.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Turkey, Trakya University

    Edirne, 22030

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Half Swaddle and Kangaroo Care Practıces Initiated in The Early Period In Preterm Infants on Breastfeeding, Mother-Infant Attachment, Maternal Sleep Quality and Postpartum Depression

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of half swaddle and kangaroo care practices initiated in the early period in preterm infants on breastfeeding, mother-infant attachment, maternal sleep quality and postpartum depression.

Design: The prospective, randomized controlled study

Read the detailed description

The prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted on 160 mothers with premature babies whose age were between 18 and 49 randomly divided into four groups as 40 case group, 40 half swaddle group, 40 kangaroo care group, 40 half swaddle and kangaroo care group at the neonatal intensive care service and birth service of Trakya University Health Research and Application Center between September 2020 and March 2022.

In order to determine the number of samples, in order to test the difference in the effect size of 0.3326851 calculated between the groups based on the 1-month difference in the EPDS scores in the study of Herizchi et al. (2017), with 5% margin of error and 95% power, a total of n=40 from each group was used. It was calculated that the mothers who gave =160 preterm births should be included in the study.

N=160 samples of preterm infants were randomized with the help of ASS 11 (NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah. www.ncss.com) computer program, HS group (n=40), KC group (n=40), HS+KC group. (n=40) and control (n=40) groups.

Data were collected using Survey Form, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS), Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF), Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form, Perception of Insufficient Milk Questionnaire (PIMQ). Data were evaluated using descriptive analyses, Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis Test, Friedman S Test, Spearmen Correlation, multiple linear regression analysis.

Research data It was collected using the Survey Form, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS), Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF), Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form, Perception of Insufficient Milk Questionnaire (PIMQ).

Survey form; It which was prepared by the researchers by reviewing the literature consists of 5 main sections and a total of 82 questions, including the personal characteristics of the mother who gave birth preterm, the characteristics of the birth and the baby, the characteristics of sleep, the characteristics of the baby's sleep pattern, and the characteristics of the baby's growth and development.

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): The scale was developed by Cox and Holden (1987). Adapted to Turkish by Engindeniz, Küey, and Kültür (1996). It is used to determine the risk for depression in the postnatal period and to measure the level and change of violence. It is a self-assessment scale. It is applied to postpartum women. It contains a total of 10 questions and measures depression. It provides a four-point Likert type measurement. The directive is at the beginning of the scale and subjects are asked to mark the substance most relevant to their situation when filling in the subjects. The total score of the scale is obtained by adding these item scores. As a result of the cut-off point scale study conducted in Turkey and it has ben calculated as 12/13

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): PSQI is a self-reported screening and assessment questionnaire that details information on the type and severity of sleep quality and disorders within the last month. It was developed by Buysse et al. (20), and its validity and reliability study in Turkish was performed by Agargün et al. (21). PUKI evaluates sleep quality in the last month. 18 items and 7 components (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pills, daytime dysfunction) are included in the scoring. Each item is evaluated over 0-3 points and the sum of 7 component points gives the total PUKI score. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worsening sleep quality. A total PUKI score of ≤5 is considered "good sleep", and >5 is considered "bad sleep".

Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS): MIBS was developed by Taylor et al.12. The MIBS is a measurement tool that can be applied easily and quickly by the puerperal from the first day of the postpartum period and that allows the mother to express her feelings for her baby. This scale shows the relationship between the bond between mother and infant and the mother's mood during the early postpartum period. The MIBS is a four-point Likert-type scale consisting of eight items. Answers are scored between 0-3, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0 and the highest score is 24. High scores indicate a problem with mother-infant bonding. A Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Karakulak and Alparslan.

Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF): The BSES-SF was developed by Dennis (1999). Later, the short form of the scale was developed by Dennis (2003) by reducing it. The BSES-SF is a 14-item instrument developed to measure breastfeeding confidence. All the items are preceded by the statement "I can always" and are anchored by a five-point Likert-type scale, with 1 = not at all confident and 5 = always confident. All the items are presented positively and the scores are summed up to produce a final score ranging from 14 to 70, with the higher scores indicating better BSE. Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were done by Tokat and Okumuş (2013).

Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form: It is a measurement tool developed by Jensen et al. (1994). The Turkish validity of the Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form was performed by Yenal and Okumus (2003). The Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form consists of the combination of the first letters of the English equivalent of the five evaluation criteria and is listed as follows: L (Latch on breast), A (Audible swallowing), T (Type of nipple), C (Comfort breast/nipple), H (Hold / Help). Each item in the scale is evaluated between 0-2 points. The lowest 0 and the highest 10 points are obtained from the scale. Total high score indicates the baby's sucking success.

Perception of Insufficient Milk Questionnaire (PIMQ): Designed based on the conceptual model of McCarter-Spaulding and Kearney (2001), clinical experience, and literature, this six-question questionnaire was designed to measure the perception of insufficient milk in breastfeeding mothers. Turkish validity and reliability study was done by Gökçeoğlu. The first question is a ''yes'' or ''no'' question about whether them other perceives her milk as sufficient and other questions assess whether the mother perceives her milk as insufficient. Mothers rated these questions between 0 and 10, with ''0" meaning that her milk is perceived as completely insufficient, and ''10" meaning that her milk is perceived as completely sufficient. The lowest and highest scores possible on the scale are 0 and 50, respectively. The value of the total score indicates how high the score is and whether the perception of the amount of milk is sufficient.

Data collection The mean scores of BSES-SF, IMPS, LATCH, MIAS, PSQI and EPDS at the beginning, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months of the half swaddling and kangaroo care group

Intervention. Half swaddle: HS applied to a newborn baby makes the baby feel completely safe, as if in the womb. After laying the soft fabric or baby blanket, it was placed in the supine position. Half swaddling was done so as not to restrict the baby's arm and leg movements. HS was performed 15 minutes before each sleep during the day until the 3rd month.

Kangaroo care: The application was applied at twice a day and for 60 min, every day for 6 months in a row. While the mothers were taken to the NICU and practiced at home prior to kangaroo care, hand hygiene and breast care were provided within the scope of infection prevention rules. During KC, the mother placed her baby between two breasts, and the baby's breast was placed on the mother's breast in an upright position. During the application of KC, a quiet, calm and suitable environment was created so that comfort of the baby and mother would not be disturbed. The mother and baby are covered with a blanket. The ambient temperature was 26 centigrade degrees during the kangaroo care. In the continuation of the KB application, the mother was asked to breastfeed her baby. In order to prevent the risk of aspiration of the baby after breastfeeding, the baby was placed in the left lateral position so that the mother and the baby could lie down together. The application steps of the mother's KC were observed by the researcher and the deficiencies, if any, were corrected by discussing with the mother during / after the application.

Control group: The mothers in the control group were given routine care.

Conditions
Kangaroo Care
Being tested
Half swaddle, Kangaroo care
Keywords
Breastfeeding, Mother-infant attachment, Maternal sleep quality, Postpartum depression, Half swaddle
Medical subject headings
Breast Feeding, Depression, Postpartum

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Half swaddleOther

    Half swaddle: HS applied to a newborn baby makes the baby feel completely safe, as if in the womb. After laying the soft fabric or baby blanket, it was placed in the supine position. Half swaddling was done so as not to restrict the baby's arm and leg movements. HS was performed 15 minutes before each sleep during the day until the 3rd month.

  • Kangaroo careOther

    The application was applied twice a day and for 60 minutes every day for 6 months in a row. During KC, the mother placed her baby between two breasts, and the baby's breast was placed on the mother's breast in an upright position. During the application of KC, a quiet, calm, and the suitable environment was created so that comfort of the baby and mother would not be disturbed. The mother and baby are covered with a blanket. The ambient temperature was 26 centigrade degrees during the kangaroo care. In the continuation of the KB application, the mother was asked to breastfeed her baby. In order to prevent the risk of aspiration of the baby after breastfeeding, the baby was placed in the left lateral position so that the mother and the baby could lie down together. The researcher observed the application steps of the mother's KC, and the deficiencies, if any, were corrected by discussing with the mother during/after the application.

Study groups in NCT05657886
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupNo interventionThe mothers in the control group were given routine care.
Half swaddleExperimentalHS applied to a newborn baby makes the baby feel completely safe, as if in the womb. After laying the soft fabric or baby blanket, it was placed in the supine position. Half swaddling was done so as not to restrict the baby's arm and leg movements. HS was performed 15 minutes before each sleep during the day until the 3rd month.
Receives: Other: Half swaddle
Kangaroo careExperimentalThe application was applied at twice a day and for 60 min, every day for 6 months in a row. While the mothers were taken to the NICU and practiced at home prior to kangaroo care, hand hygiene and breast care were provided within the scope of infection prevention rules. During KC, the mother placed her baby between two breasts, and the baby's breast was placed on the mother's breast in an upright position. During the application of KC, a quiet, calm and suitable environment was created so that comfort of the baby and mother would not be disturbed. The mother and baby are covered with a blanket. The ambient temperature was 26 centigrade degrees during the kangaroo care. In the continuation of the KB application, the mother was asked to breastfeed her baby. In order to prevent the risk of aspiration of the baby after breastfeeding, the baby was placed in the left lateral position so that the mother and the baby could lie down together.
Receives: Other: Kangaroo care
Half swaddle+Kangaroo careExperimentalHS applied to a newborn baby makes the baby feel completely safe, as if in the womb. After laying the soft fabric or baby blanket, it was placed in the supine position. Half swaddling was done so as not to restrict the baby's arm and leg movements. HS was performed 15 minutes before each sleep during the day until the 3rd month.The application was applied at twice a day and for 60 min, every day for 6 months in a row. During KC, the mother placed her baby between two breasts, and the baby's breast was placed on the mother's breast in an upright position. During the application of KC, a quiet, calm and suitable environment was created so that comfort of the baby and mother would not be disturbed. The mother and baby are covered with a blanket. In the continuation of the KB application, the mother was asked to breastfeed her baby.
Receives: Other: Half swaddle; Other: Kangaroo care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. breastfeeding evaluated using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form

    ): The BSES-SF was developed by Dennis (1999). Later, the short form of the scale was developed by Dennis (2003) by reducing it. The BSES-SF is a 14-item instrument developed to measure breastfeeding confidence. All the items are preceded by the statement "I can always" and are anchored by a five-point Likert-type scale, with 1 = not at all confident and 5 = always confident. All the items are presented positively and the scores are summed up to produce a final score ranging from 14 to 70, with the higher scores indicating better BSE. Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were done by Tokat and Okumuş (2013).

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

  2. breastfeeding evaluated using the Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form

    It is a measurement tool developed by Jensen et al. (1994). The Turkish validity of the Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form was performed by Yenal and Okumus (2003). The Latch Breastfeeding Diagnosis Measurement Form consists of the combination of the first letters of the English equivalent of the five evaluation criteria and is listed as follows: L (Latch on breast), A (Audible swallowing), T (Type of nipple), C (Comfort breast/nipple), H (Hold / Help). Each item in the scale is evaluated between 0-2 points. The lowest 0 and the highest 10 points are obtained from the scale. Total high score indicates the baby's sucking success.

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

  3. breastfeeding evaluated using the Perception of Insufficient Milk Questionnaire (PIMQ)

    Designed based on the conceptual model of McCarter-Spaulding and Kearney (2001), clinical experience, and literature, this six-question questionnaire was designed to measure the perception of insufficient milk in breastfeeding mothers. Turkish validity and reliability study was done by Gökçeoğlu. The first question is a ''yes'' or ''no'' question about whether them other perceives her milk as sufficient and other questions assess whether the mother perceives her milk as insufficient. Mothers rated these questions between 0 and 10, with ''0" meaning that her milk is perceived as completely insufficient, and ''10" meaning that her milk is perceived as completely sufficient. The lowest and highest scores possible on the scale are 0 and 50, respectively. The value of the total score indicates how high the score is and whether the perception of the amount of milk is sufficient.

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

  4. mother infant attachment evaluated using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS)

    MIBS was developed by Taylor et al.12. The MIBS is a measurement tool that can be applied easily and quickly by the puerperal from the first day of the postpartum period and that allows the mother to express her feelings for her baby. This scale shows the relationship between the bond between mother and infant and the mother's mood during the early postpartum period. The MIBS is a four-point Likert-type scale consisting of eight items. Answers are scored between 0-3, the lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0 and the highest score is 24. High scores indicate a problem with mother-infant bonding. A Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Karakulak and Alparslan.

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

  5. mother sleep quality evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    PSQI is a self-reported screening and assessment questionnaire that details information on the type and severity of sleep quality and disorders within the last month. It was developed by Buysse et al. (20), and its validity and reliability study in Turkish was performed by Agargün et al. (21). PUKI evaluates sleep quality in the last month. 18 items and 7 components (subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping pills, daytime dysfunction) are included in the scoring. Each item is evaluated over 0-3 points and the sum of 7 component points gives the total PUKI score. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worsening sleep quality. A total PUKI score of ≤5 is considered "good sleep", and >5 is considered "bad sleep".

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

  6. postpartum depression evaluated using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)

    The scale was developed by Cox and Holden (1987). Adapted to Turkish by Engindeniz, Küey, and Kültür (1996). It is used to determine the risk for depression in the postnatal period and to measure the level and change of violence. It is a self-assessment scale. It is applied to postpartum women. It contains a total of 10 questions and measures depression. It provides a four-point Likert type measurement. The directive is at the beginning of the scale and subjects are asked to mark the substance most relevant to their situation when filling in the subjects. The total score of the scale is obtained by adding these item scores. As a result of the cut-off point scale study conducted in Turkey and it has ben calculated as 12/13.

    Measured: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2022
  2. Study start5 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion5 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion2 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
160 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05657886
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020/P0226
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
12 Dec 2022
Last updated
22 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Half swaddle and Kangaroo care in people with Kangaroo Care, run by Trakya University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

breastfeeding evaluated using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (time frame: change from before implamentation patent and 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th months of practice.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in