AzTrials
AzTrials

Working MemoryNCT05662280

NIMH K23: Modulation of Frontoparietal Dynamics in Adolescent Working Memory Deficits

A study testing Active Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in people with Working Memory, run by Bradley Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Working memory (WM) deficits are a transdiagnostic feature of adolescent psychopathology that substantially contribute to poor clinical and functional outcomes. This proposal will utilize a multimodal neuroscientific approach to investigate whether non-invasive brain stimulation can modulate the neural mechanisms… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Working Memory
What is being tested?
Active Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Dec 2022to 1 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ability to provide assent and have parent provide parental permission
  • English fluency of the participant and the legal guardian/parent
  • 12-18 years
  • Parent rating on BRIEF-2 Working Memory: Greater than 1.0 SD above normative mean.
  • IQ > 80
  • Clinical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): predominantly inattentive type, predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type, combined type, or unspecified type. Diagnostic criteria will be confirmed with NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales-Parent.
Show all 30Show fewer
  • Exclusion Criteria: Participants will be screened to exclude individuals with neurological or medical conditions that might confound the results, as well as to exclude participants in whom MRI or TMS might result in increased risk of side effects or complications. Common contraindications include metallic hardware in the body, cardiac pacemaker, patients with an implanted medication pumps or an intracardiac line, or prescription of medications known to lower seizure threshold. These account for the majority of the exclusion criteria listed below:
  • Intracranial pathology from a known genetic disorder (e.g., NF1, tuberous sclerosis) or from acquired neurologic disease (e.g. stroke, tumor), cerebral palsy, history of severe head injury, or significant dysmorphology
  • History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures
  • History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy
  • Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder
  • Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.)
  • Contraindicated metal implants in the head, brain or spinal cord (excluding dental implants, braces or fillings)
  • Non-removable makeup or piercings
  • Pacemaker
  • Implanted medication pump
  • Vagal nerve stimulator
  • Deep brain stimulator
  • TENS unit (unless removed completely for the study)
  • Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
  • Signs of increased intracranial pressure
  • Intracranial lesion (including incidental finding on MRI)
  • History of head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness
  • Substance abuse or dependence within past six months (i.e., DSM-5 substance use disorder criteria)
  • Chronic treatment with prescription medications that decrease cortical seizure threshold, not including psychostimulant medication if deemed to be medically safe as part of the medical review process.
  • Active psychosis or mania
  • Current suicidal intent
  • Current pregnancy
  • Significant visual, hearing or speech impairment
  • Current wards of the state

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Brian Kavanaugh, PsyD ABPP contact

14014321359

Brian_Kavanaugh@Brown.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • E. P. Bradley Hospital

    East Providence, Rhode Island, 02915

    Brian Kavanaugh, PsyD, 401 432 1359, Brian_Kavanaugh@Brown.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Working memory (WM) deficits are a transdiagnostic feature of adolescent psychopathology that substantially contribute to poor clinical and functional outcomes. This proposal will utilize a multimodal neuroscientific approach to investigate whether non-invasive brain stimulation can modulate the neural mechanisms underlying adolescent WM deficits. Directly in line with NIMH priorities, the researchers will identify the contributing roles of prefrontal and parietal regions in WM processes, as well as identify optimal targets and parameters for novel brain-based treatments in adolescent psychopathology. This study is funded by the NIMH-K23

Read the detailed description

Project Summary/Abstract Deficits in working memory (WM) comprise a core, transdiagnostic feature of childhood and adolescent psychopathology. WM is one of the strongest predictors of clinical and functional outcomes, yet there remains a dearth of treatments available for WM deficits. WM was historically conceptualized as solely localized to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, while modern technology has established the broader role of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC). There is evidence to suggest that PPC receives direct input from PFC, although other evidence suggests the PPC encodes incoming stimuli and feeds forward to the PFC for the initiation of control functions. I have previously found that frontoparietal theta/gamma oscillations, particularly theta-gamma coupling, is a neural mechanism underlying WM processes. Novel approaches to non-invasive brain stimulation, such as intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can now modulate these distinct oscillatory dynamics and subsequently examine possible causal or temporal relationships. This award would build on my preliminary findings and transition my career from a clinician to an independent researcher. The objective of this Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (K23) is to provide the necessary training for me to obtain my career goal of utilizing a multimodal neuroscientific approach to measure and modulate the neural dynamics underlying neurocognitive deficits in childhood and adolescent psychopathology. In line with NIMH priorities, the training plan proposed will build upon my clinical neuropsychology and clinical research foundation to provide comprehensive training and mentorship in two core areas: 1) Neuromodulation and 2) Computational Neuroscience. In a 2x2 factorial double-blind design, the researchers will randomize a sample of 40 adolescents (12-18 years) with WM deficits to iTBS at the left DLPFC or inferior parietal lobule (IPL). Participants will complete an active iTBS session and a sham iTBS session. The primary outcome will be theta-gamma coupling during WM demands, as measured via electroencephalography during a spatial WM task immediately before and after iTBS. Aim 1 will examine the effect of iTBS to the PPC on the encoding stage of WM, while Aim 2 will examine the effect of iTBS to the PFC on the maintenance stage of WM. Aim 3 will utilize computational neural modeling to identify the neocortical circuitry underlying oscillatory modulation. My central hypothesis is that the PFC and PPC regions have complimentary roles in executing WM processes. Further, iTBS can modulate theta-gamma coupling in these regions to improve behavioral performance. The researchers will establish a framework for modulating oscillatory dynamics in child psychiatry and set the stage for my first R01 on WM-related frontoparietal oscillatory dynamics and optimal treatment parameters for adolescent WM deficits. This will provide the foundation required to dedicate my career to measuring and modulating oscillatory abnormalities in child psychiatry.

Conditions
Working Memory
Being tested
Active Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation, Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active Intermittent Theta Burst StimulationDevice

    Standard iTBS protocol with active coil

  • Sham Intermittent Theta Burst StimulationDevice

    Standard iTBS protocol with active coil

Study groups in NCT05662280
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active intermittent Theta Burst StimulationExperimentalIn a 2x2 factorial double-blind design, researchers will randomize a sample of adolescents with WM deficits to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or inferior parietal lobule (IPL), based on each participant's structural brain MRI. Participants in both arms will complete an active iTBS session and a sham iTBS session. The primary outcome will be theta-gamma coupling during WM demands, as measured via electroencephalography (EEG) during a Sternberg spatial WM task (SWMT) immediately before and after iTBS.
Receives: Device: Active Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
Sham intermittent Theta Burst StimulationExperimentalIn a 2x2 factorial double-blind design, researchers will randomize a sample of adolescents with WM deficits to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or inferior parietal lobule (IPL), based on each participant's structural brain MRI. Participants in both arms will complete an active iTBS session and a sham iTBS session. The primary outcome will be theta-gamma coupling during WM demands, as measured via electroencephalography (EEG) during a Sternberg spatial WM task (SWMT) immediately before and after iTBS.
Receives: Device: Sham Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Theta-Gamma Coupling After Sham iTBS

    EEG recording will be obtained while the participant completes the Sternberg Spatial Working Memory Test (SWMT). The coupling between theta phase and gamma amplitude will be extracted from the EEG during encoding and maintaining demands. The change between pre and post a single iTBS session will be calculated.

    Measured: Theta-gamma coupling will be obtained immediately before (i.e., pre-iTBS) and after iTBS (i.e., post-iTBS). There will be approximately 5 minutes between the pre and post EEG recordings. The change between pre-iTBS and post-iTBS is the outcome variable.

  2. Change in Theta-Gamma Coupling after Active iTBS

    EEG recording will be obtained while the participant completes the Sternberg Spatial Working Memory Test (SWMT). The coupling between theta phase and gamma amplitude will be extracted from the EEG during encoding and maintaining demands. The change between pre and post a single iTBS session will be calculated.

    Measured: Theta-gamma coupling will be obtained immediately before (i.e., pre-iTBS) and after iTBS (i.e., post-iTBS). There will be approximately 5 minutes between the pre and post EEG recordings. The change between pre-iTBS and post-iTBS is the outcome variable.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2022
  2. Study start1 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05662280
Sponsor's protocol ID
BradleyHK23
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
15 Dec 2022
Last updated
1 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Kavanaugh BC, Vigne MM, Legere C, Borden Z, Lynott E, Cheong D, Warren A, Acuff WL, Tirrell E, Festa EK, Jones SR, Jones RN, Spirito A, Carpenter LL. Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates working memory-related theta-gamma coupling in adolescents with ADHD. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2026 Jul 15:2026.07.13.26357958. doi: 10.64898/2026.07.13.26357958.

    PubMed 42528575

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in people with Working Memory, run by Bradley Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 30 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Brian Kavanaugh, PsyD ABPP (14014321359, Brian_Kavanaugh@Brown.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Theta-Gamma Coupling After Sham iTBS (time frame: Theta-gamma coupling will be obtained immediately before (i.e., pre-iTBS) and after iTBS (i.e., post-iTBS). There will be approximately 5 minutes between the pre and post EEG recordings. The change between pre-iTBS and post-iTBS is the outcome variable.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05662280, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in