Sudden Cardiac DeathPROFID EHRANCT05665608
Prevention Of Sudden Cardiac Death After Myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator Implantation
A study testing Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) in people with Sudden Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 86 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
Patients who have survived a myocardial infarction (MI) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. A severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a rough overall measure of impaired heart function after MI was shown to indicate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sudden Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,595 participants
- Where
- 86 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Nov 2023to 30 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years.
- Naïve to implantation of any pacemaker or defibrillator
- Documented history of MI either as ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or as non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) at least 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Symptomatic heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III.
- On OMT for at least 3 months prior to enrolment.
- LVEF ≤ 35% (at transthoracic echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] at least 3 months after MI).
- Signed informed consent.
- Inclusion criterion I3 defines myocardial infarction according to the 2018 ESC/ACC/AHA/WHF Fourth Universal Definition of myocardial infarction
Who cannot join
- Class I or IIa indication for implantation of an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD and ventricular tachycardia.
- Ventricular tachycardia induced in an electrophysiologic study.
- Unexplained syncope when ventricular arrhythmia is suspected as the cause of syncope.
- Class I or IIa indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
- Foreseable violation of instruction for use (IFU) of the ICD device selected for implantation (valid for control group patients, only).
- Acute coronary syndrome or coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting performed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Cardiac valve surgery or percutaneous cardiac valvular intervention performed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment.
- On the waiting list for heart transplantation.
- Class I or IIa indication for implantation of an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD and ventricular tachy-cardia has to be assessed according to the 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ven-tricular arrhythmias and the prevention of SCD.
- Any known disease that limits life expectancy to less than 1 year.
- Participation in another randomised clinical trial if study-specific treatment is still active at enrolment into PROFID EHRA.
- Previous participation in PROFID EHRA.
- Parallel participation in sub-studies connected to this trial is permitted as well as in purely observational studies without any pre-defined intervention.
Trial locations and contacts
86 sites in 13 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
86 sites in 13 countries
Germany37 sites, 35 recruiting
- Withdrawn
St. Marien-Krankenhaus - Klinikum Westmünsterland
Ahaus, 48683
- Recruiting
Helios Klinikum Aue
Aue, 08280
- Recruiting
Kerckhoff-Klinik Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, 61231
- Recruiting
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Universitätsklinik der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545
- Recruiting
Segeberger Kliniken Gmbh
Bad Segeberg, 23795
- Recruiting
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CCM)
Berlin, 10117
- Recruiting
Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg
Berlin, 10365
- Recruiting
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CBF)
Berlin, 12203
- Recruiting
BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin
Berlin, 12683
- Recruiting
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CVK)
Berlin, 13353
- Withdrawn
Vivantes Humboldt Klinikum
Berlin, 13509
- Recruiting
Klinikum Bielefeld
Bielefeld, 33604
- Recruiting
REGIOMED Klinikum Coburg
Coburg, 96450
- Recruiting
Carl-Thiem-Klinikum
Cottbus, 03048
- Recruiting
Städtisches Klinikum Dresden
Dresden, 01067
- Recruiting
Technische Universität Dresden - Herzzentrum Dresden
Dresden, 01307
- Recruiting
Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Essen
Essen, 45138
- Recruiting
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen - Universitätsmedizin Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
- Recruiting
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald
Greifswald, 17475
- Recruiting
Klinikum Gütersloh
Gütersloh, 33332
- Recruiting
Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg
Hamburg, 20099
- Recruiting
Asklepios Klinikum Harburg
Hamburg, 21075
- Recruiting
Albertinen Herz- und Gefäßzentrum
Hamburg, 22457
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Jena
Jena, 07747
- Recruiting
Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH
Kaiserslautern, 67655
- Recruiting
Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe
Karlsruhe, 76133
- Recruiting
B.Braun Ambulantes Herzzentrum Kassel
Kassel, 34121
- Recruiting
Asklepios Kliniken Langen
Langen, 63225
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103
- Recruiting
Klinikum St. Georg
Leipzig, 04129
- Recruiting
Herzzentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04289
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck, 23538
- Recruiting
Johannes Wesling Klinikum
Minden, 32429
- Recruiting
Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Klinikum)
München, 81377
- Recruiting
FEK - Friedrich-Ebert-Krankenhaus Neumünster
Neumünster, 24534
- Recruiting
Klinik Rothenburg ANregiomed
Rothenburg upon Tauber, 91541
- Recruiting
Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal
Wuppertal, 42117
France10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, 80054
- Recruiting
Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche-CHU BREST
Brest, 29609
- Recruiting
CHU Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
- Recruiting
University Hospital Grenoble-Alpes
Grenoble, 38700
- Recruiting
Européen Georges Pompidou Hospital Paris
Paris, 75015
- Recruiting
Hôpital Bichat Claude Bernard
Paris, 75018
- Recruiting
Chu de Rennes
Rennes, 35000
- Recruiting
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Saint-Denis, 93200
- Recruiting
University Hospital Rangueil Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059
- Recruiting
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
Austria9 sites, 9 recruiting
- Recruiting
Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch
Feldkirch, 6800
- Recruiting
LKH Universitätsklinikum Graz
Graz, 8036
- Recruiting
Tirol Kliniken - Universitätsklinik Innsbruck
Innsbruck, 6020
- Recruiting
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
Klagenfurt, 9020
- Recruiting
Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH Elisabethinen
Linz, 4020
- Recruiting
Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg - Universitätsklinikum der PMU
Salzburg, 5020
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten
Sankt Pölten, 3100
- Recruiting
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH
Wels, 4600
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Wiener Neustadt
Wiener Neustadt, 2700
United Kingdom6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Calderdale Royal Hospital
Halifax, HX3 0PW
- Recruiting
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust - St James's University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
- Recruiting
Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital Margate
Margate, CT9 4AN
- Recruiting
George Eliot Hospital
Nuneaton, CV10 7DJ
- Recruiting
Salisbury District Hospital
Salisbury, SP2 8BJ
- Recruiting
University Hospital of North Tees
Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 8PE
Netherlands5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, 1105
- Recruiting
Stichting Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623
- Recruiting
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7512 KZ
- Recruiting
Universitair Medisch Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700
- Recruiting
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, 6229
Belgium4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
OLV Ziekenhuis Campus Aalst
Aalst, 9300
- Recruiting
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Campus Sint-Jan
Bruges, 8000
- Recruiting
Centre hospitaliser régional (CHR) de la Citadelle
Liège, 4000
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire CHU UCL Namur - Site Godinne
Yvoir, 5530
Czechia4 sites, 3 recruiting
- Terminated
Fakultní Nemocnice Olomouc
Olomouc, 779 00
- Recruiting
Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
Prague, 128 08
- Recruiting
Institut Klinické a Experimentální Medicíny
Prague, 140 21
- Recruiting
Masaryk Hospital
Ústí nad Labem, 400 11
Spain4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante, 03010
- Recruiting
Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
- Recruiting
La Paz University Hospital
Madrid, 28046
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
Murcia, 30120
Poland3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kliniczny Szpital Wojewódzki Nr 2 im.Św.Jadwigi Królowej w Rzeszowie
Rzeszów, 35-301
- Recruiting
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
Warsaw, 04-141
- Recruiting
Śląskie Centrum Chorób Serca w Zabrzu
Zabrze, 41-800
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aarhus University Hospital I
Aarhus, 8200
Martinique1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Le Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique
Fort-de-France Cedex, 97261
About this study
Patients who have survived a myocardial infarction (MI) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. A severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a rough overall measure of impaired heart function after MI was shown to indicate a higher risk for SCD. Based on this observation, two landmark randomised trials, MADIT II and SCD-HeFT, were conducted between end of the 1990s and early 2000s. These trials compared the survival of patients with severely reduced LVEF who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with the survival of patients being on medical therapy alone. They reported a significantly better survival of patients in the defibrillator arm and led to international guideline recommendations for routine implantation of defibrillators in survivors of MI with severely impaired LVEF as a means for primary prevention of SCD. Since then, the management of these patients has changed dramatically with the advent of a series of novel drug classes that reduce not only mortality but specifically SCD leading to a substantial decrease of the sudden death rates as well as of the rates of appropriate defibrillator therapies implanted for primary prevention of SCD. At the same time, the complication rates associated with the defibrilllator therapy remain significant without obvious decrease. Thus, the risk-benefit of routine defibrillator implantation for primary prevention of SCD in patients with severely reduced LVEF has substantially changed since the conduction of the landmark trials that established this therapy. Due to the inherent risks and considerable costs of the defibrillator, a novel randomised adequately powered assessment of the potential benefit or harm of the defibrillator in survivors of MI with reduced LVEF under contemporary optimal medical treatment (OMT) appears imperative.
OBJECTIVE:
To demonstrate that in post-MI patients with symptomatic heart failure who receive OMT for this condition, and with reduced LVEF ≤ 35%, OMT without ICD implantation (index group) is not inferior to OMT with ICD implantation (control group) with respect to all-cause mortality.
- Conditions
- Sudden Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)
- Keywords
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, Sudden Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction
- Medical subject headings
- Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)Device
A transvenous ICD consists of an electronic medical device and electrode leads. Besides the possibility to shock during arrhythmias the ICD can potentially terminate ventricular tachycardias by rapid pacing for short periods (small bursts of pacing).
The subcutaneous defibrillator is an established and valid alternative to the transvenous ICD for the prevention of SCD, but in patients without an indication for bradycardia support, cardiac resynchronisation or antitachycardia pacing.
The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) system with substernal lead placement is a novel nontransvenous alternative to current available transvenous and subcutaneous ICDs.
Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)Drug
Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by the following guidelines:
- 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes
- 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Optimal Medical Therapy with ICD device therapy | Active comparator | Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by ESC Guidelines for treatment of patients with heart failure / chronic coronary syndromes and will receive an ICD device Receives: Device: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD); Drug: Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) |
| Optimal Medical Therapy without ICD device therapy | Experimental | Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by ESC Guidelines for treatment of patients with heart failure / chronic coronary syndromes and will not receive an ICD device Receives: Drug: Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time from randomisation to the occurrence of all-cause death.
Randomization to end of study
Measured: event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Secondary outcomes (5)
Time from randomisation to death from cardiovascular causes
Time from randomisation to death from cardiovascular causes
Measured: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Time from randomisation to sudden cardiac death
Time from randomisation to sudden cardiac death
Measured: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Time from randomisation to first hospital readmissions for cardiovascular causes after date of randomisation
Time from randomisation to first hospital readmissions for cardiovascular causes after date of randomisation
Measured: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Average length of stay in hospital during the study period
Average length of stay in hospital during the study period
Measured: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) trajectories over time
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) trajectories over time
Measured: At baseline and 12-month intervals thereafter
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Dec 2022
- Study start16 Nov 2023
- Primary completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sudden Cardiac DeathStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Charite University, Berlin, GermanyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- An investigator-driven, prospective, parallel-group, randomised, open, blinded outcome assessment (PROBE), multi-centre, non-inferiority trial without investigational medical products (Proof of Strategy Trial)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,595 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniela Fischer, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Investigators
- Gerhard Hindricks, Prof, Principal investigator, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care MedicineNikolaos Dagres, MD, Principal investigator, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05665608
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LHS-2019-0209
- Acronym
- PROFID EHRA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Qian Y, Roque CR, Woods B, Iglesias Urrutia CP, Gc VS, Gur Arie M, Fischer D, Dagres N, Hindricks G, Manca A. Economic evaluation protocol for the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation: the PROFID EHRA trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jan 8;16(1):e097495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097495.
PubMed 41506764Dagres N, Gale CP, Nadarajah R, Boveda S, Merino JL, Nielsen JC, Kirchhof P, Kutyifa V, Taborsky M, Thiele H, Tijssen JGP, Verma A, De Potter T, Braunschweig F, Merkely B, Sommer P, Vernooy K, Suleiman M, Purerfellner H, Hindricks G; PROFID EHRA trial investigators. PRevention of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial infarction by defibrillator implantation: Design and rationale of the PROFID EHRA randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2026 Jan;291:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.071. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
PubMed 40774643
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention Of Sudden Cardiac Death After Myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator Implantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05665608
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROFID EHRA / LHS-2019-0209
- Conditions
- Sudden Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, Sudden Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,595 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, GermanyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients who have survived a myocardial infarction (MI) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) caused by ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. A severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a rough overall measure of impaired heart function after MI was shown to indicate a higher risk for SCD. Based on this observation, two landmark randomised trials, MADIT II and SCD-HeFT, were conducted between end of the 1990s and early 2000s. These trials compared the survival of patients with severely reduced LVEF who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with the survival of patients being on medical therapy alone. They reported a significantly better survival of patients in the defibrillator arm and led to international guideline recommendations for routine implantation of defibrillators in survivors of MI with severely impaired LVEF as a means for primary prevention of SCD. Since then, the management of these patients has changed dramatically with the advent of a series of novel drug classes that reduce not only mortality but specifically SCD leading to a substantial decrease of the sudden death rates as well as of the rates of appropriate defibrillator therapies implanted for primary prevention of SCD. At the same time, the complication rates associated with the defibrilllator therapy remain significant without obvious decrease. Thus, the risk-benefit of routine defibrillator implantation for primary prevention of SCD in patients with severely reduced LVEF has substantially changed since the conduction of the landmark trials that established this therapy. Due to the inherent risks and considerable costs of the defibrillator, a novel randomised adequately powered assessment of the potential benefit or harm of the defibrillator in survivors of MI with reduced LVEF under contemporary optimal medical treatment (OMT) appears imperative.
OBJECTIVE:
To demonstrate that in post-MI patients with symptomatic heart failure who receive OMT for this condition, and with reduced LVEF ≤ 35%, OMT without ICD implantation (index group) is not inferior to OMT with ICD implantation (control group) with respect to all-cause mortality.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- An investigator-driven, prospective, parallel-group, randomised, open, blinded outcome assessment (PROBE), multi-centre, non-inferiority trial without investigational medical products (Proof of Strategy Trial)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Optimal Medical Therapy with ICD device therapy | Active comparator | Device: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), Drug: Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by ESC Guidelines for treatment of patients with heart failure / chronic coronary syndromes and will receive an ICD device |
| Optimal Medical Therapy without ICD device therapy | Experimental | Drug: Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by ESC Guidelines for treatment of patients with heart failure / chronic coronary syndromes and will not receive an ICD device |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age ≥18 years.
- Naïve to implantation of any pacemaker or defibrillator
- Documented history of MI either as ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or as non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) at least 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Symptomatic heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III.
- On OMT for at least 3 months prior to enrolment.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Class I or IIa indication for implantation of an ICD for secondary prevention of SCD and ventricular tachycardia.
- Ventricular tachycardia induced in an electrophysiologic study.
- Unexplained syncope when ventricular arrhythmia is suspected as the cause of syncope.
- Class I or IIa indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
- Foreseable violation of instruction for use (IFU) of the ICD device selected for implantation (valid for control group patients, only).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)A transvenous ICD consists of an electronic medical device and electrode leads. Besides the possibility to shock during arrhythmias the ICD can potentially terminate ventricular tachycardias by rapid pacing for short periods (small bursts of pacing). The subcutaneous defibrillator is an established and valid alternative to the transvenous ICD for the prevention of SCD, but in patients without an indication for bradycardia support, cardiac resynchronisation or antitachycardia pacing. The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) system with substernal lead placement is a novel nontransvenous alternative to current available transvenous and subcutaneous ICDs. | Device | Optimal Medical Therapy with ICD device therapy |
| Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT)Patients will be treated according to Optimal Medical Therapy defined by the following guidelines: 1. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes 2. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure | Drug | Optimal Medical Therapy with ICD device therapy, Optimal Medical Therapy without ICD device therapy |
Primary outcome
Time from randomisation to the occurrence of all-cause death.
Time frame: event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Randomization to end of study
5 secondary outcomes
Time from randomisation to death from cardiovascular causes
Time frame: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Time from randomisation to sudden cardiac death
Time frame: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Time from randomisation to first hospital readmissions for cardiovascular causes after date of randomisation
Time frame: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Average length of stay in hospital during the study period
Time frame: Randomization to end of study (event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) trajectories over time
Time frame: At baseline and 12-month intervals thereafter
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41506764Qian Y, Roque CR, Woods B, Iglesias Urrutia CP, Gc VS, Gur Arie M, Fischer D, Dagres N, Hindricks G, Manca A. Economic evaluation protocol for the PRevention Of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial Infarction by Defibrillator implantation: the PROFID EHRA trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Jan 8;16(1):e097495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097495.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40774643Dagres N, Gale CP, Nadarajah R, Boveda S, Merino JL, Nielsen JC, Kirchhof P, Kutyifa V, Taborsky M, Thiele H, Tijssen JGP, Verma A, De Potter T, Braunschweig F, Merkely B, Sommer P, Vernooy K, Suleiman M, Purerfellner H, Hindricks G; PROFID EHRA trial investigators. PRevention of sudden cardiac death aFter myocardial infarction by defibrillator implantation: Design and rationale of the PROFID EHRA randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J. 2026 Jan;291:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.071. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Sudden Cardiac Death
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Seizures
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Study of Cardiac Arrhythmias During Treatment With BTK Inhibitors or Venetoclax
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Waldenstr(SqrRoot)(Delta)m s Macroglobulinemia
Recruiting
ODSSEY-SCD_Identification Of Markers to preDict the rISk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Moderated LVEF in ischEmic cardiomyopathY
Myocardial Infarction (MI), Sudden Cardiac Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Gerhard Hindricks, Prof principal investigator
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine
Nikolaos Dagres, MD principal investigator
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine
86 sites in 13 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) in people with Sudden Cardiac Death and Myocardial Infarction, run by Charite University, Berlin, Germany at 86 sites in 13 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 86 sites in Germany, France, Austria, United Kingdom, Netherlands and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gerhard Hindricks, Prof (+49 30 450 513211, Gerhard.Hindricks@dhzc-charite.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time from randomisation to the occurrence of all-cause death. (time frame: event-driven, expected about 15 months after last patient in). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05665608, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2026.