Nursing CariesNCT05665868
Study on Integrated Nursing Strategy for Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors After Targeted Therapy
A study testing integrated care mode and conventional care mode in people with Nursing Caries and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to construct a symptom management strategy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted therapy based on symptom management theory under the guidance of MRC framework. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Caries, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- What is being tested?
- integrated care mode and conventional care mode
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2022to 1 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor and receiving targeted therapy
- Over 18 years old, with normal communication ability
- Will use smart phones, or the family members who will use smart phones will live in the meeting
- Informed consent and voluntary participation in this study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with psychiatric history or congenital mental retardation
- The patient or his/her cohabiting family members cannot complete the health status self test, health status assessment and questionnaire under the prompts of the platform.
- Criteria for case termination:
- Those who voluntarily put forward termination during the study period and are unwilling to accept follow-up or refuse to fill in the questionnaire
- Death
- Lost subjects
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000
Li Chen, Bachelor, (+86)13770336619, chenligulou@163.com
About this study
Official title: The Construction and Empirical Study of Symptom Management and Integrated Care Strategy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients With Targeted Therapy Based on MRC Framework
The goal of this clinical trial is to construct a symptom management strategy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted therapy based on symptom management theory under the guidance of MRC framework. Embed the symptom management strategy into the information platform and conduct an empirical study on integrated care for GIST patients, and compare it with the traditional outpatient follow-up patients to explore the safety and effectiveness of the symptom management strategy and the application effect of the integrated care platform.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this clinical trial is to build an information platform for symptom management and integrated care strategy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted treatment patients: the system is composed of big data platform and care strategy platform. The big data platform can automatically extract patient data from HIS, Medcare and other patient diagnosis and treatment systems according to the pre-set patient inclusion criteria, form a health file of gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted treatment patients, and complete the enrollment. The system will intelligently promote the care strategies of the patients included in the big data platform, promote the two-way communication between doctors and patients, and realize the functions of timed symptom evaluation, symptom management, symptom management result feedback, etc. All patient health data can be customized output through the big data platform. The two platforms complement each other, promote patient self-management, improve the quality of medical follow-up service, reduce the workload of medical personnel, optimize the use of medical resources, and improve the quality of scientific research data. It is not necessary for patients to judge how to take intervention measures, but the system's management center decision-making module will evaluate the symptoms of patients, and then pop up corresponding measures, so that patients can more effectively cope with the discomfort of related symptoms caused by targeted treatment at home, and alleviate the impact on life.
- Conditions
- Nursing Caries, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- Being tested
- integrated care mode, conventional care mode
- Medical subject headings
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
integrated care modeDevice
The information system consists of big data platform and nursing strategy platform. The system includes medical work end, patient operation end and administrator management end. The big data platform can automatically extract patient data from HIS, Medcare and other patient diagnosis and treatment systems, complete registration and establish patient health files according to the preset patient registration standards. By comparing the data input on the patient side with the database set on the platform, the system decision-making module can generate personalized measures and plans for feedback to patients, and can generate patient information overview feedback to the nurse side. Complete intelligent push of symptom management decision model
conventional care modeDevice
① The health education manual for patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors will be issued. The patients who need targeted treatment will be identified and followed up in the routine outpatient department (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, and once a year thereafter); ② Telephone follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and once a year thereafter); ③ Patients independently complete disease symptom monitoring, lifestyle adjustment, and other disease self-management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group based on integrated care mode | Experimental | ① Obtain the health records of patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors in the big data platform; ② Patients upload health data, disease symptoms, complete questionnaires, health consultation and other functions; ③ The platform can regularly send audit reminders, automatically analyze the data uploaded and saved by patients, automatically and intelligently intervene when abnormal results occur, and remind medical staff to intervene manually; ④ Researchers can view the recent health status of patients through the terminal, and members of corresponding disciplines can give targeted health guidance according to the existing health problems of patients; Remind patients with complex conditions to have outpatient reexamination; ⑤ Push disease related knowledge every week for patients to learn independently. Receives: Device: integrated care mode |
| Control group based on conventional care mode | Active comparator | ① The health education manual for patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors will be issued. The patients who need targeted treatment will be identified and followed up in the routine outpatient department (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, and once a year thereafter); ② Telephone follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and once a year thereafter); ③ Patients independently complete disease symptom monitoring, lifestyle adjustment, and other disease self-management. Receives: Device: conventional care mode |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Measured: One month after intervention
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Measured: Three month after intervention
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Measured: Six month after intervention
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Measured: One month after intervention
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Measured: Three month after intervention
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Measured: Six month after intervention
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Measured: One month after intervention
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Measured: Three month after intervention
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Measured: Six month after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Apr 2022
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nursing CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Li Chen, Bachelor, Study chair, The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05665868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022-LCYJ-MS-30
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Construction and Empirical Study of Symptom Management and Integrated Care Strategy for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients With Targeted Therapy Based on MRC Framework
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05665868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2022-LCYJ-MS-30
- Conditions
- Nursing Caries, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to construct a symptom management strategy for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted therapy based on symptom management theory under the guidance of MRC framework. Embed the symptom management strategy into the information platform and conduct an empirical study on integrated care for GIST patients, and compare it with the traditional outpatient follow-up patients to explore the safety and effectiveness of the symptom management strategy and the application effect of the integrated care platform.
Detailed description
The purpose of this clinical trial is to build an information platform for symptom management and integrated care strategy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted treatment patients: the system is composed of big data platform and care strategy platform. The big data platform can automatically extract patient data from HIS, Medcare and other patient diagnosis and treatment systems according to the pre-set patient inclusion criteria, form a health file of gastrointestinal stromal tumor targeted treatment patients, and complete the enrollment. The system will intelligently promote the care strategies of the patients included in the big data platform, promote the two-way communication between doctors and patients, and realize the functions of timed symptom evaluation, symptom management, symptom management result feedback, etc. All patient health data can be customized output through the big data platform. The two platforms complement each other, promote patient self-management, improve the quality of medical follow-up service, reduce the workload of medical personnel, optimize the use of medical resources, and improve the quality of scientific research data. It is not necessary for patients to judge how to take intervention measures, but the system's management center decision-making module will evaluate the symptoms of patients, and then pop up corresponding measures, so that patients can more effectively cope with the discomfort of related symptoms caused by targeted treatment at home, and alleviate the impact on life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group based on integrated care mode | Experimental | Device: integrated care mode① Obtain the health records of patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors in the big data platform; ② Patients upload health data, disease symptoms, complete questionnaires, health consultation and other functions; ③ The platform can regularly send audit reminders, automatically analyze the data uploaded and saved by patients, automatically and intelligently intervene when abnormal results occur, and remind medical staff to intervene manually; ④ Researchers can view the recent health status of patients through the terminal, and members of corresponding disciplines can give targeted health guidance according to the existing health problems of patients; Remind patients with complex conditions to have outpatient reexamination; ⑤ Push disease related knowledge every week for patients to learn independently. |
| Control group based on conventional care mode | Active comparator | Device: conventional care mode① The health education manual for patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors will be issued. The patients who need targeted treatment will be identified and followed up in the routine outpatient department (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, and once a year thereafter); ② Telephone follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and once a year thereafter); ③ Patients independently complete disease symptom monitoring, lifestyle adjustment, and other disease self-management. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor and receiving targeted therapy
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with psychiatric history or congenital mental retardation
- Those who voluntarily put forward termination during the study period and are unwilling to accept follow-up or refuse to fill in the questionnaire
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| integrated care modeThe information system consists of big data platform and nursing strategy platform. The system includes medical work end, patient operation end and administrator management end. The big data platform can automatically extract patient data from HIS, Medcare and other patient diagnosis and treatment systems, complete registration and establish patient health files according to the preset patient registration standards. By comparing the data input on the patient side with the database set on the platform, the system decision-making module can generate personalized measures and plans for feedback to patients, and can generate patient information overview feedback to the nurse side. Complete intelligent push of symptom management decision model | Device | Experimental group based on integrated care mode |
| conventional care mode① The health education manual for patients receiving targeted treatment of gastric stromal tumors will be issued. The patients who need targeted treatment will be identified and followed up in the routine outpatient department (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery, and once a year thereafter); ② Telephone follow-up (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and once a year thereafter); ③ Patients independently complete disease symptom monitoring, lifestyle adjustment, and other disease self-management. | Device | Control group based on conventional care mode |
Primary outcome
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Time frame: One month after intervention
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Time frame: Three month after intervention
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system
Time frame: Six month after intervention
Evaluate the quality of life of patients. The scale consists of 27 items: 7 items of physiological status (coded GP1-GP7), 7 items of social/family status (GS1-GS7), 6 items of emotional status (GE1-GE6) and 7 items of functional status (GF1-GF7). Each item adopts a 5-level scoring method. From "not at all" to "very", the score is 0-4, respectively. Among them, GP1-GP7, GE1, and GE3-GE6 are reverse items.
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: One month after intervention
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: Three month after intervention
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Quality of life score of patients assessed by the specific module of gastric cancer of Anderson Symptom Assessment Scale
Time frame: Six month after intervention
It is widely applicable to cancer patients of different types and treatments. The scale consists of two parts, which measure the severity of 13 core cancer symptoms and "symptom interference", that is, the interference of symptoms to patients and the specific module of gastrointestinal cancer. The severity of 13 core symptoms was evaluated for cancer symptoms, including pain, fatigue, nausea, restless sleep, distress, shortness of breath, amnesia, anorexia, drowsiness, dry mouth, sadness, vomiting and numbness, of which 2 items evaluated sleep problems; Symptom interference assessment The interference degree of the above 13 core symptoms to the six daily life items of general activities, work, emotion, walking, interpersonal relationship and fun of life. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 points, 0-4 points are mild, 5-6 points are moderate, and ≥ 7 points are severe.
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
Time frame: One month after intervention
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
Time frame: Three month after intervention
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Anxiety tendency of patients in the past week assessed by self rating anxiety scale
Time frame: Six month after intervention
It can accurately evaluate the anxiety tendency of patients in the past week. The evaluation method is convenient and highly operable. The evaluation time is short and the content is easy to understand. Cronbach's of SAS α The coefficient is 0.824, including 20 items, with a total score of 100 points. In the entry, "1 minute" means no or very little time, "2 minutes" means a small part of time, and "3 minutes" means a considerable amount of time; "4 points" means most or all of the time, in which items 5, 9, 13, 17 and 19 are scored reversely. The integral part of the original score multiplied by 1.25 is the final standard score. The higher the total score, the more obvious the anxiety symptoms of the patient. The score of normal emotion is below 50, the score of mild anxiety is between 50-59, the score of moderate anxiety is between 60-69, and the score of more than 70 is severe anxiety.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nursing Caries
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Oral Hygiene Assistance Training Program
Elderly, Periodontal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Escape Room Game About Medical Device in Nurses
Nursing Caries, Pressure Injuries
Recruiting
Extending Dental Care to Nursing Home Residents to Reduce Mouth Infections and Incidence of Pneumonia and Improve Diabetic Glucose Control
Periodontitis, Gingivitis
Not yet recruiting
Flipped Learning Model on the Stoma Care
Stoma Colostomy, Nursing Caries
Not yet recruiting
Flipped Learning Model on Nursing Students' Thorax and Heart Examination
Nursing Students, Nursing Caries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Li Chen, Bachelor study chair
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing integrated care mode and conventional care mode in people with Nursing Caries and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, run by The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Li Chen, Bachelor ((+86)13770336619, chenligulou@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Scoring of quality of life using the cancer treatment function evaluation system (time frame: One month after intervention). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2022.