Urinary Bladder, OveractiveNCT05668715
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Antimuscarinic Naive and Refractory Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
A study testing Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
In this study is the first prospective trial that compares the efficacy of TTNS in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women with idiopathic OAB. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of TTNS on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to OAB in antimuscarinic naive and refractory… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- What is being tested?
- Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 30 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women 18 years and older with clinically idiopathic OAB
- Having the ability to give written informed consent
- Ability to understand procedures
Who cannot join
- Presence of active vaginal or urinary tract infection or malignancy
- Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study
- History of neurogenic bladder, peripheral or central neurological pathology
- Presence of Grade 2 and higher pelvic organ prolapse (POP) according to the International Continence Society (ICS)
- Having undergone urogynecological surgery in the last 3 months
- Women with stress urinary incontinence
Show all 11Show fewer
- History of PTNS and/or TTNS for OAB in the past 6 months
- Presence of a pacemaker or implanted defibrillator
- Presence of anatomical or post-traumatic malformations / skin disorders of the tibial nerve region of the inner ankle that do not allow the application of electrodes
- PTK strength less than 3/5 (rated as modified Oxford scale, min: 0-max: 5)
- Ultrasonographic evidence of a postvoid residual urine volume greater than 100 ml
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Pamukkale University
Denizli
Necmettin Yıldız, +09 533 414 73 99, necmi74tr@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Antimuscarinic Naive and Refractory Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
In this study is the first prospective trial that compares the efficacy of TTNS in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women with idiopathic OAB. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of TTNS on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to OAB in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women. The results of this study would make it easier to understand the place of TTNS among the treatment options in women with idiopathic OAB.
Read the detailed description
This study was planned as a prospective clinical trial. The trial was carried out in the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, in between January 2023 and June 2023. The local ethics committee approved the study. All women were informed about the purpose and contents of the study and all women signed written consent to participate in the study.
As previously published by Sonmez et al , BT+IVES succeeded to reduce mean incontinence episodes from 4.40±3.43 to 0.70±0.57 after treatment in the active comparator group while mean incontinence episodes was reduced from 4.15±1.67 to 2.68±1.66 after treatment in the control group (BT). Considering a 50% or greater improvement in incontinence episodes in the referred study, the optimum sample size should be 18 cases in each arm with a level of significance of 95% (α=5%), a power of 95% (ß=0.05) . Taking into account possible withdrawals which was assumed to be about 10% of the number of patients, a total of 40 women (20 women for each group) were calculated for this study. Sample size calculation was performed by the physician using G*Power 3.1 Statistical Power Analysis for Microsoft Windows and Mac. Statistics.
To investigators recruited women with complaints of OAB who were referred to the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit and other related outpatient clinics. Women over the age of 18 with the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic OAB, and who could able to give written informed consent and understand the procedures were included in this study. The criteria for exclusion were as follows. Women who had stress urinary incontinence; a history of PTNS and/or TTNS for OAB within 6 months; urogynecological surgery within 3 months; current vulvovaginitis or urinary tract infections or malignancy; pregnancy; cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator; anatomic or posttraumatic malformations/skin disorders of tibial nerve region on inner ankle that can not allow to apply the electrodes; the strength of PFM less than 3/5 (graded as modified Oxford scale, min:0-max:5); the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) (stage 2 or more); neurogenic bladder; the peripheral or central neurologic pathology; ultrasonographic evidence of post-void residual urine volume more than 100 ml were excluded.
Women with idiopathic OAB were recruited for eligibility and of them who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included for this study. Antimuscarinic naive women were included in Group 1 (n:20), and women resistant to anti-muscarinic agents were included in Group 2 (n:20). Both groups received BT plus TTNS.
Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N) None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group.
Group 1: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R) Women with idiopathic OAB refractory to anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) when 2 or more were administered for at least 6 weeks each and failure was due to lack of efficacy with or without side effects were included in this group.
Bladder Training (BT) All women were informed about BT that consisted of four stages and lasted for 30 minutes. Then, it was given as a written brochure to be implemented as a home program. At the first stage, the women were familiarized with the location of the PFM and the pelvic anatomy and pathophysiology. After that information session, squeezing the PFM was shown in practice at least once to use in the urgency suppression strategies via digital palpation technique. The second stage including urgency suppression strategies was aimed to delay urination, inhibit detrusor contraction, and prevent urgency by squeezing the PFM several times on a row, breathing deeply, giving their attention to another job for a while, and self-motivating. In the third stage, a timed voiding program was started. It was carried out in 2 steps: a timed voiding and increasing the time between urination considering the voiding diary. At the last stage, the women were encouraged to continue BT.
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) Two self-adhesive surface electrodes were positioned according to the protocol used by Booth et al and Shreiner et al, with the negative electrode 2 cm behind the medial malleolus and positive electrode 10 cm proximal to it. Correct positioning was determined by noting a hallux reaction (plantar flexion of great toe or fanning of all toes). The stimulation protocol was delivered at fixed of 20 Hz and pulse width of 200 ms in continous mode in accordance with PTNS stimulation protocol. The intensity level of the stimulation current (range 0-50 mA) was determined once correct positioning was established, according to the comfort level of the subject. TTNS sessions were performed two times in a week, for 6 weeks. Every session lasted 30 minutes. The intervention comprised a 12 session treatment program of TTNS.
TTNS sessions were performed by an experienced urogynecological rehabilitation nurse in all groups. During the treatment, all women were advised to continue the medical treatment which was not related to incontinence. Participants were asked to fill in a one-day bladder diary biweekly to continue the timed voiding program, which is part of BT in two groups. Compliance with the BT was achieved with the daily checklist during 6 weeks and the bladder diaries of women were checked biweekly to rearrange the timed voiding program. Women who did not fill more than 20% of the daily checklist and who missed any therapy sessions for two groups were excluded from the study.
Evaluation Parameters The primary outcome measure was accepted as the improvement in incontinence episodes (positive response rate), according to literature . To determine positive response rate, reduction in incontinence episodes was collected from the 3-day bladder diary. Women with ≥a 50% reduction in incontinence episodes were considered positive responders. Furthermore, the severity of incontinence, PFM strength, symptom severity, frequency of voiding, nocturia, number of pads as well as QoL were secondary outcome measures. The 24-hour pad test was carried out to evaluate the severity of incontinence. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8) was used to evaluate the symptom severity in patients with OAB in this study. The OAB-V8 consists of 8 questions in which the patients can be classified with respect to the symptom severity: none (0), very little (1), a little (2), quite a few (3), very (4), and too many (5). The total score ranges from 0-40. The frequencies of voiding, nocturia, and the number of pads used were collected from the 3-day bladder diary. The Quality of Life-Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ7) was used to assess specific QoL related to incontinence. In addition, cure-improvement rate and treatment satisfaction were evaluated. In a 24-hour pad test, amount of urine that was under 1.3 gr was considered as a cure. The improvement rate was assessed in terms of 50% and more reduction in wet weight compared to baseline measurements in the 24-hour pad test . Women evaluated the change in their urinary incontinence on a 5-point Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very unsatisfied). All the evaluation tests were performed by another physician who was blinded to the groups in the initial visit and at the end of the treatment (8th week), except for the positive response rate, cure/improvement rate, and the treatment satisfaction parameters which were evaluated only at the 8th week.
Statistics SPSS17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for the statistical analysis. In each group, measurable parameters were tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the evaluation of normal distribution. Because the distributions were not normal, non-parametric tests were used in the statistical evaluation. Mann-Whitney U-test and χ2 test were used for inter-group comparisons. Wilcoxon tests were used for intra-group comparison of parameters at different point of times. P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Being tested
- Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)Other
PTNS has some disadvantages such as it is a minimally invasive method applied by needle, and the need to go to the hospital for this. However, the number of studies on transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) (non-invasive and can be applied at home) tends to increase in recent years
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N) | Experimental | None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group. Receives: Other: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) |
| Group 2: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R) | Active comparator | Women with idiopathic OAB refractory to anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) when 2 or more were administered for at least 6 weeks each and failure was due to lack of efficacy with or without side effects were included in this group. Receives: Other: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
İmprovement in incontinence episodes
To determine positive response rate, reduction in incontinence episodes was collected from the 3-day bladder diary. Women with ≥a 50% reduction in incontinence episodes were considered positive responders
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Severity of incontinence
The 24-hour pad test and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8) was carried out to evaluate the severity of incontinence. The OAB-V8 consists of 8 questions in which the patients can be classified with respect to severity of incontinence: none (0), very little (1), a little (2), quite a few (3), very (4), and too many (5). The total score ranges from 0-40.
Measured: 6 months
The frequencies of voiding
TThe frequencies of voiding, used were collected from the 3-day bladder diary.
Measured: 6 months
Cure-improvement rate
In a 24-hour pad test, amount of urine that was under 1.3 gr was considered as a cure. The improvement rate was assessed in terms of 50% and more reduction in wet weight compared to baseline measurements in the 24-hour pad test.
Measured: 6 months
Change in their urinary incontinence
Women evaluated the change in their urinary incontinence on a 5-point Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very unsatisfied)
Measured: 6 months
Nocturia
Nocturia, used were collected from the 3-day bladder diary.
Measured: 6 months
The number of pads
The number of pads, used were collected from the 3-day bladder diary.
Measured: 6 months
The Quality of Life
The Quality of Life-Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ7) was used to assess specific QoL related to incontinence. The form consists of 7 questions. In the form, the patients had no complaints (0); less (1); middle (2); many (3); graded as. The total score ranges from 0 to 21. A lower score indicates less quality of life impact.
Measured: 6 months
Treatment satisfaction
A 5-point "treatment satisfaction scale" was used for treatment satisfaction. (1, not at all satisfied 5, very satisfied). A lower score indicates less treatment satisfaction.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2022
- Study start1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Bladder, OveractiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Pamukkale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Necmettin Yildiz, Pamukkale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05668715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- pamukkaleu.ftr.NYildiz.001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2022
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Scaldazza CV, Morosetti C, Giampieretti R, Lorenzetti R, Baroni M. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):121-126. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0719.
PubMed 28124534Kasman A, Stave C, Elliott CS. Combination therapy in overactive bladder-untapped research opportunities: A systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Nov;38(8):2083-2092. doi: 10.1002/nau.24158. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
PubMed 31483070Wang S, Lv J, Feng X, Lv T. Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation versus Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation in Treating Female Idiopathic Urgency Urinary Incontinence. J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1496-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.065. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PubMed 28153510La Rosa VL, Platania A, Ciebiera M, Garzon S, Jedra R, Ponta M, Buttice S. A comparison of sacral neuromodulation vs. transvaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder: the impact on quality of life, body image, sexual function, and emotional well-being. Prz Menopauzalny. 2019 Jun;18(2):89-93. doi: 10.5114/pm.2019.86834. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
PubMed 31485205Firinci S, Yildiz N, Alkan H, Aybek Z. Which combination is most effective in women with idiopathic overactive bladder, including bladder training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2498-2508. doi: 10.1002/nau.24522. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
PubMed 32960999Yildiz N, Alkan H, Sarsan A. Efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation added to bladder training in women with idiopathic overactive bladder: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1150-1159. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0161.
PubMed 34469668Yildiz N, Alkan H, Findikoglu G. Efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation with different treatment frequency in women with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder. Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):662-671. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0837.
PubMed 35363455Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, Bortolini M, Dumoulin C, Gomes M, McClurg D, Meijlink J, Shelly E, Trabuco E, Walker C, Wells A. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):191-213. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
PubMed 27921161Lee HE, Cho SY, Lee S, Kim M, Oh SJ. Short-term Effects of a Systematized Bladder Training Program for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Study. Int Neurourol J. 2013 Mar;17(1):11-7. doi: 10.5213/inj.2013.17.1.11. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
PubMed 23610706Berghmans B, van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Nieman F, de Bie R, van den Brandt P, Van Kerrebroeck P. Efficacy of physical therapeutic modalities in women with proven bladder overactivity. Eur Urol. 2002 Jun;41(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00178-1.
PubMed 12074773Wang AC, Wang YY, Chen MC. Single-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.047.
PubMed 14751349Berghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, De Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Bo K, van Kerrebroeck PE. Conservative treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. BJU Int. 2000 Feb;85(3):254-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00434.x.
PubMed 10671878Abdelbary AM, El-Dessoukey AA, Massoud AM, Moussa AS, Zayed AS, Elsheikh MG, Ghoneima W, Abdella R, Yousef M. Combined Vaginal Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation (PFS) and Local Vaginal Estrogen for Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Perimenopausal Females. Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Urology. 2015 Sep;86(3):482-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
PubMed 26135813Yamanishi T, Yasuda K, Sakakibara R, Hattori T, Suda S. Randomized, double-blind study of electrical stimulation for urinary incontinence due to detrusor overactivity. Urology. 2000 Mar;55(3):353-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00476-8.
PubMed 10699609O'Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH. Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. BJOG. 2004 Aug;111(8):859-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00211.x.
PubMed 15270937
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Antimuscarinic Naive and Refractory Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05668715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- pamukkaleu.ftr.NYildiz.001
- Conditions
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In this study is the first prospective trial that compares the efficacy of TTNS in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women with idiopathic OAB. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of TTNS on quality of life (QoL) and clinical parameters related to OAB in antimuscarinic naive and refractory women. The results of this study would make it easier to understand the place of TTNS among the treatment options in women with idiopathic OAB.
Detailed description
This study was planned as a prospective clinical trial. The trial was carried out in the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, in between January 2023 and June 2023. The local ethics committee approved the study. All women were informed about the purpose and contents of the study and all women signed written consent to participate in the study.
As previously published by Sonmez et al , BT+IVES succeeded to reduce mean incontinence episodes from 4.40±3.43 to 0.70±0.57 after treatment in the active comparator group while mean incontinence episodes was reduced from 4.15±1.67 to 2.68±1.66 after treatment in the control group (BT). Considering a 50% or greater improvement in incontinence episodes in the referred study, the optimum sample size should be 18 cases in each arm with a level of significance of 95% (α=5%), a power of 95% (ß=0.05) . Taking into account possible withdrawals which was assumed to be about 10% of the number of patients, a total of 40 women (20 women for each group) were calculated for this study. Sample size calculation was performed by the physician using G*Power 3.1 Statistical Power Analysis for Microsoft Windows and Mac. Statistics.
To investigators recruited women with complaints of OAB who were referred to the Urogynecological Rehabilitation Unit and other related outpatient clinics. Women over the age of 18 with the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic OAB, and who could able to give written informed consent and understand the procedures were included in this study. The criteria for exclusion were as follows. Women who had stress urinary incontinence; a history of PTNS and/or TTNS for OAB within 6 months; urogynecological surgery within 3 months; current vulvovaginitis or urinary tract infections or malignancy; pregnancy; cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator; anatomic or posttraumatic malformations/skin disorders of tibial nerve region on inner ankle that can not allow to apply the electrodes; the strength of PFM less than 3/5 (graded as modified Oxford scale, min:0-max:5); the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) (stage 2 or more); neurogenic bladder; the peripheral or central neurologic pathology; ultrasonographic evidence of post-void residual urine volume more than 100 ml were excluded.
Women with idiopathic OAB were recruited for eligibility and of them who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria were included for this study. Antimuscarinic naive women were included in Group 1 (n:20), and women resistant to anti-muscarinic agents were included in Group 2 (n:20). Both groups received BT plus TTNS.
Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N) None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group.
Group 1: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R) Women with idiopathic OAB refractory to anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) when 2 or more were administered for at least 6 weeks each and failure was due to lack of efficacy with or without side effects were included in this group.
Bladder Training (BT) All women were informed about BT that consisted of four stages and lasted for 30 minutes. Then, it was given as a written brochure to be implemented as a home program. At the first stage, the women were familiarized with the location of the PFM and the pelvic anatomy and pathophysiology. After that information session, squeezing the PFM was shown in practice at least once to use in the urgency suppression strategies via digital palpation technique. The second stage including urgency suppression strategies was aimed to delay urination, inhibit detrusor contraction, and prevent urgency by squeezing the PFM several times on a row, breathing deeply, giving their attention to another job for a while, and self-motivating. In the third stage, a timed voiding program was started. It was carried out in 2 steps: a timed voiding and increasing the time between urination considering the voiding diary. At the last stage, the women were encouraged to continue BT.
Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) Two self-adhesive surface electrodes were positioned according to the protocol used by Booth et al and Shreiner et al, with the negative electrode 2 cm behind the medial malleolus and positive electrode 10 cm proximal to it. Correct positioning was determined by noting a hallux reaction (plantar flexion of great toe or fanning of all toes). The stimulation protocol was delivered at fixed of 20 Hz and pulse width of 200 ms in continous mode in accordance with PTNS stimulation protocol. The intensity level of the stimulation current (range 0-50 mA) was determined once correct positioning was established, according to the comfort level of the subject. TTNS sessions were performed two times in a week, for 6 weeks. Every session lasted 30 minutes. The intervention comprised a 12 session treatment program of TTNS.
TTNS sessions were performed by an experienced urogynecological rehabilitation nurse in all groups. During the treatment, all women were advised to continue the medical treatment which was not related to incontinence. Participants were asked to fill in a one-day bladder diary biweekly to continue the timed voiding program, which is part of BT in two groups. Compliance with the BT was achieved with the daily checklist during 6 weeks and the bladder diaries of women were checked biweekly to rearrange the timed voiding program. Women who did not fill more than 20% of the daily checklist and who missed any therapy sessions for two groups were excluded from the study.
Evaluation Parameters The primary outcome measure was accepted as the improvement in incontinence episodes (positive response rate), according to literature . To determine positive response rate, reduction in incontinence episodes was collected from the 3-day bladder diary. Women with ≥a 50% reduction in incontinence episodes were considered positive responders. Furthermore, the severity of incontinence, PFM strength, symptom severity, frequency of voiding, nocturia, number of pads as well as QoL were secondary outcome measures. The 24-hour pad test was carried out to evaluate the severity of incontinence. Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-V8) was used to evaluate the symptom severity in patients with OAB in this study. The OAB-V8 consists of 8 questions in which the patients can be classified with respect to the symptom severity: none (0), very little (1), a little (2), quite a few (3), very (4), and too many (5). The total score ranges from 0-40. The frequencies of voiding, nocturia, and the number of pads used were collected from the 3-day bladder diary. The Quality of Life-Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ7) was used to assess specific QoL related to incontinence. In addition, cure-improvement rate and treatment satisfaction were evaluated. In a 24-hour pad test, amount of urine that was under 1.3 gr was considered as a cure. The improvement rate was assessed in terms of 50% and more reduction in wet weight compared to baseline measurements in the 24-hour pad test . Women evaluated the change in their urinary incontinence on a 5-point Likert scale (5, very satisfied; 1, very unsatisfied). All the evaluation tests were performed by another physician who was blinded to the groups in the initial visit and at the end of the treatment (8th week), except for the positive response rate, cure/improvement rate, and the treatment satisfaction parameters which were evaluated only at the 8th week.
Statistics SPSS17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) was used for the statistical analysis. In each group, measurable parameters were tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the evaluation of normal distribution. Because the distributions were not normal, non-parametric tests were used in the statistical evaluation. Mann-Whitney U-test and χ2 test were used for inter-group comparisons. Wilcoxon tests were used for intra-group comparison of parameters at different point of times. P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N) | Experimental | Other: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)None of the women had previously taken anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) in this group. |
| Group 2: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R) | Active comparator | Other: Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)Women with idiopathic OAB refractory to anti-muscarinic agents and oral ß3 adrenoreceptor agonist (mirabegron) when 2 or more were administered for at least 6 weeks each and failure was due to lack of efficacy with or without side effects were included in this group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Women 18 years and older with clinically idiopathic OAB
- Having the ability to give written informed consent
- Ability to understand procedures
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Presence of active vaginal or urinary tract infection or malignancy
- Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during the study
- History of neurogenic bladder, peripheral or central neurological pathology
- Presence of Grade 2 and higher pelvic organ prolapse (POP) according to the International Continence Society (ICS)
- Having undergone urogynecological surgery in the last 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS)PTNS has some disadvantages such as it is a minimally invasive method applied by needle, and the need to go to the hospital for this. However, the number of studies on transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) (non-invasive and can be applied at home) tends to increase in recent years | Other | Group 1: Antimuscarinic Naive (AM-N), Group 2: Antimuscarinic Refractory (AM-R) |
Primary outcome
İmprovement in incontinence episodes
Time frame: 6 months
To determine positive response rate, reduction in incontinence episodes was collected from the 3-day bladder diary. Women with ≥a 50% reduction in incontinence episodes were considered positive responders
8 secondary outcomes
Severity of incontinence
Time frame: 6 months
The frequencies of voiding
Time frame: 6 months
Cure-improvement rate
Time frame: 6 months
Change in their urinary incontinence
Time frame: 6 months
Nocturia
Time frame: 6 months
The number of pads
Time frame: 6 months
The Quality of Life
Time frame: 6 months
Treatment satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28124534Scaldazza CV, Morosetti C, Giampieretti R, Lorenzetti R, Baroni M. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus electrical stimulation with pelvic floor muscle training for overactive bladder syndrome in women: results of a randomized controlled study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):121-126. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0719.
- Background: PubMed 31483070Kasman A, Stave C, Elliott CS. Combination therapy in overactive bladder-untapped research opportunities: A systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Nov;38(8):2083-2092. doi: 10.1002/nau.24158. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 28153510Wang S, Lv J, Feng X, Lv T. Efficacy of Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation versus Transvaginal Electrical Stimulation in Treating Female Idiopathic Urgency Urinary Incontinence. J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1496-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.065. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 31485205La Rosa VL, Platania A, Ciebiera M, Garzon S, Jedra R, Ponta M, Buttice S. A comparison of sacral neuromodulation vs. transvaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder: the impact on quality of life, body image, sexual function, and emotional well-being. Prz Menopauzalny. 2019 Jun;18(2):89-93. doi: 10.5114/pm.2019.86834. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 32960999Firinci S, Yildiz N, Alkan H, Aybek Z. Which combination is most effective in women with idiopathic overactive bladder, including bladder training, biofeedback, and electrical stimulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2498-2508. doi: 10.1002/nau.24522. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
- Background: PubMed 34469668Yildiz N, Alkan H, Sarsan A. Efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation added to bladder training in women with idiopathic overactive bladder: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Nov-Dec;47(6):1150-1159. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0161.
- Background: PubMed 35363455Yildiz N, Alkan H, Findikoglu G. Efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation with different treatment frequency in women with refractory idiopathic overactive bladder. Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):662-671. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0837.
- Background: PubMed 27921161Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, Bortolini M, Dumoulin C, Gomes M, McClurg D, Meijlink J, Shelly E, Trabuco E, Walker C, Wells A. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological management of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):191-213. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3123-4. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 23610706Lee HE, Cho SY, Lee S, Kim M, Oh SJ. Short-term Effects of a Systematized Bladder Training Program for Idiopathic Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Study. Int Neurourol J. 2013 Mar;17(1):11-7. doi: 10.5213/inj.2013.17.1.11. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 12074773Berghmans B, van Waalwijk van Doorn E, Nieman F, de Bie R, van den Brandt P, Van Kerrebroeck P. Efficacy of physical therapeutic modalities in women with proven bladder overactivity. Eur Urol. 2002 Jun;41(6):581-7. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00178-1.
- Background: PubMed 14751349Wang AC, Wang YY, Chen MC. Single-blind, randomized trial of pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback-assisted pelvic floor muscle training, and electrical stimulation in the management of overactive bladder. Urology. 2004 Jan;63(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.08.047.
- Background: PubMed 10671878Berghmans LC, Hendriks HJ, De Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES, Bo K, van Kerrebroeck PE. Conservative treatment of urge urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. BJU Int. 2000 Feb;85(3):254-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00434.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
RecruitingObservational study
Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Mirabegron Response in Women With Overactive Bladder
Overactive Bladder (OAB)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) in people with Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
İmprovement in incontinence episodes (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05668715, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2022.